Contents 1 FAQ 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Assessing articles 1.3 Common concerns 2 Quality scale 3 See also


FAQ[edit] Purpose[edit] What is the purpose of article assessments?  The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Are these ratings official?  Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. Assessing articles[edit] Who can assess articles? In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, assessing an article as "A-Class" generally requires the agreement of at least two editors, and the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as good articles or featured articles, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes. How do I assess an article? Consult the quality scale below; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the class parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use |class=B in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they are currently designated as such. Does this have anything to do with the Wikipedia:Article Feedback Tool, which used to appear at the end of many articles? No, that was a completely separate system. Common concerns[edit] Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). See Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#Article_tagging for more information. What if I don't agree with a rating? Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best rating. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. Wikipedia:Peer review is the process designed to provide detailed comments.


Quality scale[edit] Further information: Wikipedia:Assessment scale WikiProject article quality grading scheme v t e Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example  FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is— well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of— a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Water fluoridation (as of August 2014)  A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)  GA  The article has attained good article status by passing an official review. More detailed criteria The article meets the good article criteria: A good article is— Well written: the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. YouTube (as of August 2014)  B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article meets the six B-Class criteria: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Apple Inc. (as of October 2017)  C  The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Bishop (chess) (as of August 2014)  Start  An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as BLP. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted. Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Interval vector (as of February 2014)  Stub  A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Crescent Falls (as of February 2013)  FL  The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of National Basketball Association season assists leaders (as of April 2014)  List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of January 2013)


See also[edit] A few WikiProjects have similar FAQs that address issues more specific to their particular assessment programs: The Beatles Greece Medicine Military history Opera Queen Scouting Links for WikiProject members looking to implement assessments: The WikiProject Council Guide to article assessments Wikipedia 1.0 Subject index (produced by a bot) How to use the bot Templates User:N8wilson/AQFetcher, a script that stylizes links according to the assessed quality of the target article. v t e  WikiProject Council  WikiProject guides WikiProject Council Talk Guidelines/Intro WikiProjects Task forces Technical notes Assessment FAQ Work via WikiProjects  Directories and summaries Directory Proposals Signpost Shortcuts Popular pages Database reports New WikiProjects Changes Watchers  Culture and the arts Arts Music Performing Plastic Visual Broadcasting Crafts and hobbies Entertainment Games and toys Food and drink Internet culture Language and literature Biography Linguistics Media Philosophy and religion Sports  Geographical Bodies of water Cities Countries Africa Americas Asia Europe Oceania Landforms Maps Parks, conservation areas and historical sites  History and society History and society Business and economics Education Military and warfare Politics and government Transportation  Science, technology and engineering Science Biology Chemistry Economics Geosciences Information science Mathematics Medicine Meteorology Physics Space Technology Time  Wikipedia assistance and tasks Contents systems Maintenance Files Article improvement and grading Classroom projects WikiProjects Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Assessment_FAQ&oldid=823643909" Categories: WikiProject CouncilWikipedia 1.0 assessments


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects Wikivoyage Languages भोजपुरीहिन्दीItalianoLatinaNederlandsPolskiРусскийไทยУкраїнська中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 2 February 2018, at 14:34. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.184","walltime":"0.244","ppvisitednodes":{"value":2554,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":161149,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":30997,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":11,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":1,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 153.796 1 -total"," 45.12% 69.388 1 Template:Grading_scheme"," 35.60% 54.759 21 Template:Grading_scheme/row"," 20.61% 31.700 1 Template:Redirect"," 14.27% 21.942 1 Template:Shortcut"," 13.57% 20.863 9 Template:Class"," 12.77% 19.647 1 Template:WikiProject_Footer"," 11.13% 17.111 1 Template:Navbox"," 5.83% 8.961 2 Template:Box-shadow_border"," 4.97% 7.641 1 Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.034","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":1515655,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1263","timestamp":"20180220192134","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":66,"wgHostname":"mw1272"});});


Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Assessment_FAQ - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Assessment_FAQ More Links

Wikipedia:WikiProject CouncilWikipedia:ASSESSMENTWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:1.0Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class CriteriaWikipedia:Good ArticlesWikipedia:Featured ArticlesWikipedia:Article Feedback ToolWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:Peer ReviewWikipedia:Assessment ScaleTemplate:Grading SchemeTemplate Talk:Grading SchemeFeatured ArticleCategory:FA-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Featured ArticlesWikipedia:Featured Article CriteriaWikipedia:Featured ArticlesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:When To CiteWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionHelp:SectionWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:ImagesWikipedia:Manual Of Style/CaptionsWikipedia:FAQ/CopyrightWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:Non-free ContentWikipedia:Non-free Content CriteriaWikipedia:File Copyright Tags/Non-freeWikipedia:Summary StyleA-Class ArticleCategory:A-Class ArticlesWikipedia:WikiProject Assessment/A-Class CriteriaWikipedia:Article DevelopmentWikipedia:Featured Article CandidatesWikipedia:WikiProject Military History/Assessment/A-Class ReviewWikipedia:Peer ReviewCategory:GA-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Good ArticlesWikipedia:Good Article CriteriaWikipedia:Good ArticlesWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LayoutWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Words To WatchWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Writing About FictionWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Embedded ListsWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:FNNRWikipedia:Inline CitationWikipedia:RSWikipedia:Likely To Be ChallengedWikipedia:Scientific Citation GuidelinesWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:CopyrightsWikipedia:PlagiarismWikipedia:Out Of ScopeWikipedia:Article SizeWikipedia:Summary StyleWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:Edit WarWikipedia:ImagesWikipedia:File Copyright TagsWikipedia:FAQ/CopyrightWikipedia:Non-free Use Rationale GuidelineWikipedia:Non-free ContentMOS:IMAGERELEVANCEWikipedia:CAPTIONWikipedia:Featured ArticlesB-Class ArticleCategory:B-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Good Article CriteriaWikipedia:WikiProject Assessment/B-Class CriteriaWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Inline CitationWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Likely To Be ChallengedHelp:FootnotesWikipedia:Citation TemplatesTemplate:Cite WebWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class CriteriaWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionWikipedia:Featured Article CriteriaWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/InfoboxesWikipedia:Make Technical Articles UnderstandableWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:Technical Terms And DefinitionsWikipedia:Manual Of StyleCategory:Wikipedia Style GuidelinesC-Class ArticleCategory:C-Class ArticlesWikipedia:CleanupWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Writing About FictionWikipedia:CleanupStart-Class ArticleCategory:Start-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:Speedy Deletion CriteriaWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesStub-Class ArticleCategory:Stub-Class ArticlesFeatured ListCategory:FL-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Featured ListsWikipedia:Featured List CriteriaWikipedia:Lead SectionWikipedia:SALWikipedia:Content ForkingHelp:SectionHelp:SortingWikipedia:Manual Of StyleHelp:TableWikipedia:ColoursWikipedia:ImagesWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:CaptionsWikipedia:Non-free ContentWikipedia:Non-free Content CriteriaWikipedia:Image Copyright Tags/Non-free ContentWikipedia:Edit WarCategory:List-Class ArticlesWikipedia:Stand-alone ListsWikipedia:TBAWikipedia:WikiProject Greece/AssessmentWikipedia:MEDAWikipedia:MHAWikipedia:WikiProject Opera/AssessmentWikipedia:WikiProject Queen/AssessmentWikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/AssessmentWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProjectWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/IndexWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using The BotCategory:Wikipedia Release Version TemplatesUser:N8wilson/AQFetcherTemplate:WikiProject FooterTemplate Talk:WikiProject FooterWikipedia:WikiProject CouncilWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:WikiProject CouncilWikipedia Talk:WikiProject CouncilWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProjectWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/Task ForcesWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/Technical NotesWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Work Via WikiProjectsWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:WikiProject Council/ProposalsWikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/WikiProject ReportWikipedia:List Of Shortcuts/Project ShortcutsWikipedia:Lists Of Popular Pages By WikiProjectWikipedia:Database ReportsWikipedia:Database Reports/New WikiProjectsWikipedia:Database Reports/WikiProjects By ChangesWikipedia:Database Reports/WikiProject WatchersWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/GamesWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Language And LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Language And LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Language And LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Philosophy And ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/SportsWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/OceaniaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikiProject CouncilHelp:CategoryCategory:WikiProject CouncilCategory:Wikipedia 1.0 AssessmentsDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link