Contents 1 Before starting the process 2 About the conduct of another user 3 Request comment on articles, policies, or other non-user issues 3.1 Categories 3.2 Example 3.3 Statement should be neutral and brief 3.4 Placing an RfC in a page other than a talk page 3.5 Publicizing an RfC 4 Suggestions for responding 5 Ending RfCs 6 Notes 7 See also


Before starting the process[edit] Before using the RfC process to get opinions from outside editors, it's often faster and more effective to thoroughly discuss the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. Editors are normally expected to make a reasonable attempt at working out their disputes before seeking help from others. If you are able to come to a consensus or have your questions answered through discussion with other editors, then there is no need to start an RfC. If a local discussion does not answer your question or resolve the problem, then some other forums for resolution include: If the article is complex or technical, it may be worthwhile to ask for help at the relevant WikiProject. If an article content question is just between two editors, you can simply and quickly ask for a third opinion on the Third opinion page. If more than two editors are involved or the issue is complex, dispute resolution is available through the Dispute resolution noticeboard or Formal mediation. If you want general help in improving an article, such as achieving Featured status, then list it at Peer review. For a more complete description of dispute resolution options, see the Dispute resolution policy and the list of noticeboards. If you are not sure if an RfC is necessary, or about how best to frame it, ask on the talk page of this project.


About the conduct of another user[edit] To report an offensive or confusing user name in violation of Wikipedia username policy, see subpage User names. To report spam, page blanking, and other blatant vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism. The use of requests for comment on user conduct has been discontinued. In severe cases of misconduct, you may try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If the dispute cannot be resolved there, then arbitration may be warranted as a last resort.


Request comment on articles, policies, or other non-user issues[edit] Edit the talk page of the article or project page that you are interested in. Create a new section at the bottom of the talk page. It is a very good idea to let the section heading begin with "RfC" or "Request for comment", for example "RfC on beak length" or "Request for comments on past or present tense for television series". Choose a category and insert an RfC template at the top of the new talk page section. The categories and RfC templates are listed below; the category must be given in lower case. Example: {{rfc|econ}} See details below on the meanings of some of the categories. If no category seems to fit, pick the one that seems closest. If the RfC is relevant to two categories, include them both. For example: {{rfc|econ|bio}} Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue in the talk page section, immediately below the RfC template. Do not begin the statement with a wikilink, as this may cause formatting errors. Sign the statement with either ~~~~ (name and date) or ~~~~~ (just the date). Failing to provide a date will cause Legobot to remove your discussion from the pages that notify interested editors of RFCs. Publish the talk page. Now you're done. Legobot will take care of the rest, including posting the RfC in the proper RfC lists. It may take Legobot up to a day to list the RfC, so be patient. Categories[edit] Issues by topic area Article topics Biographies (watch) {{rfc|bio}} Economy, trade, and companies (watch) {{rfc|econ}} History and geography (watch) {{rfc|hist}} Language and linguistics (watch) {{rfc|lang}} Maths, science, and technology (watch) {{rfc|sci}} Media, the arts, and architecture (watch) {{rfc|media}} Politics, government, and law (watch) {{rfc|pol}} Religion and philosophy (watch) {{rfc|reli}} Society, sports, and culture (watch) {{rfc|soc}} Project-wide topics Wikipedia style and naming (watch) {{rfc|style}} Wikipedia policies and guidelines (watch) {{rfc|policy}} WikiProjects and collaborations (watch) {{rfc|proj}} Wikipedia technical issues and templates (watch) {{rfc|tech}} Wikipedia proposals (watch) {{rfc|prop}} Unsorted Unsorted RFCs (watch) {{rfc}} The list of RfC categories is in the adjacent table. The "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" category is for discussing changes to the policies and guidelines themselves, not for discussing how to apply them to a specific case. The same applies to "style", "WikiProject", and the other non-article categories. The "Language and linguistics" category is for requests related to a Wikipedia article (or part of one) about language and linguistics, not for requests concerning the language on a page. If you want comments on how an article should be worded, categorize your request according to the topic of the article. Example[edit] Below is an example of how a new RfC appears while you are editing the talk page. You can copy and paste this example, but be sure to change the wording to reflect your particular topic (for example, the "hist" category may need to be changed). A signature ("~~~~") or at least a date ("~~~~~") is required. After you have inserted text similar to this into the talk page, you must publish the page. == RfC about the photo in the history section == {{rfc|hist}} Should the "History" section contain a photograph of the ship? ~~~~ Consider creating a subsection, after your signature, called (for example) "survey," where people can support or oppose with a one-liner, and a second called "threaded discussion," where people can discuss the issues in depth. This will make the RfC easier to close. It might look like this: == RfC about the photo in the history section == {{rfc|hist}} Should the "History" section contain a photograph of the ship? ~~~~ ===Survey=== * * ===Threaded discussion=== * * Other styles can be seen at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example formatting. Statement should be neutral and brief[edit] See also: WP:Writing requests for comment Y Good questions: Should the picture in the lead be changed? Is this website a good source for information about this product's invention? N Bad questions: What do other editors think about the discussions on this page? We should talk about this some more. Keep the RfC statement short and simple. Statements are often phrased as questions, for example: "Should this article say in the lead that John Smith was a contender for the Pulitzer Prize?" Legobot will copy your statement (from the end of the {{RFC}} template through the first date stamp) to the list of active RfCs. A long statement will make the list harder to read. For technical reasons, statements may not contain tables or complex formatting, although these may be added after the initial statement (i.e., after the first date stamp). The statement should be self-contained, and should not assume that the section title is available (because the statement, but not the section title, will be copied to the RfC list pages). If you have lots to say on the issue, give and sign a brief statement in the initial description and publish the page, then edit the page again and place additional comments below your first statement and date stamp. If you feel that you cannot describe the issue neutrally, you may either ask someone else to write the question or summary, or simply do your best and leave a note asking others to improve it. It may be helpful to discuss your planned RfC question on the talk page before starting the RfC, to see whether other editors have ideas for making it clearer or more concise. Placing an RfC in a page other than a talk page[edit] Normally, RfCs are located in talk pages. But in some situations, an RfC may be placed on a subpage of this page or a subpage of a policy page (for example Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012 or Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Categorization of persons). Publicizing an RfC[edit] After you create an RfC, it will be noticed by editors that watch the talk page, by editors that watch the RfC lists, and by some editors subscribed to the Feedback Request Service (FRS), who will be automatically notified by Legobot. However, there may not be enough editors to get sufficient input. To get more input, you may publicize the RfC by posting a notice at one or more of the following locations: One of the Village Pump forums, such as those for policy issues, proposals, or miscellaneous Noticeboards such as point-of-view noticeboard, reliable source noticeboard, or original research noticeboard Talk pages of relevant WikiProjects Talk pages of closely related articles or policies When posting a notice at those locations, provide a link to the RfC, and a brief statement, but do not argue the RfC. Take care to adhere to the canvassing guideline, which prohibits notifying a chosen group of editors who may be biased. When creating a new Wikipedia policy or suggesting major modifications to a policy, follow the instructions at WP:PROPOSAL. Centralized discussion may be used for policy-related RfCs but is not for publicizing any content disputes in articles. Further guidance is available at WP:Publicising discussions.


Suggestions for responding[edit] All editors (including IP users) are welcome to respond to any RfC. Responses may be submitted in a variety of formats. Some RfCs are structured as a series of distinct responses, one per editor. Others result in a threaded (indented) conversation involving multiple editors. Yet others offer one or more alternative proposals that are separately endorsed or opposed by editors using a polling process. Other RfCs combine polling with threaded discussions. See the example section above for a suggested format. Edits to content under RfC discussion may be particularly controversial. Avoid making edits that others may view as unhelpful. Editing after others have raised objections may be viewed as disruptive editing or edit warring. Be patient; make your improvements in accord with consensus after the RFC is resolved. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; all articles must follow the Neutral point of view, Verifiability, and No original research policies. Try not to be confrontational. Be friendly and civil, and assume good faith of other editors' actions. If you feel an RfC is improperly worded, ask the originator to improve the wording, or add an alternative unbiased statement immediately below the RfC question template. Do not close the RfC just because you think the wording is biased. An RfC tag generally remains on the page until removed by Legobot or the originator. A discussion can be closed only when the criteria at Ending RfCs are met. Mediate where possible—identify common ground, and attempt to draw editors together rather than push them apart. If necessary, educate users by referring to the appropriate Wikipedia policies or style page.


Ending RfCs[edit] See also: WP:Advice on closing discussions Shortcut WP:RFCEND As an RfC is a discussion with accompanying solicitation of comment, ending an RfC consists of ending that solicitation. That means removing it from the RfC lists. This is distinct from the discussion ending, which just means people stop discussing, and closing the discussion, which means someone lists conclusions and discourages further discussion. There are several ways in which RfCs end: The question may be withdrawn by the poster (e.g., if the community's response became obvious very quickly). In this situation, the editor who started the RfC should normally be the person who removes the {{rfc}} template. The RfC participants can agree to end it at any time, and one of them can remove the {{rfc}} template. The dispute may be moved to another dispute resolution forum, such as mediation.[1] The {{rfc}} tag can be removed and a formal closing summary of the discussion can be posted by any uninvolved editor. The discussion stops, and no one cares to restore the {{rfc}} tag after the bot removes it. When an RfC is used to resolve a dispute, the resolution is determined the same way as for any other discussion: the participants in the discussion determine what they have agreed on and try to implement their agreement. Like other discussions, RfCs sometimes end without an agreement or clear resolution. Please remove {{rfc}} template when the dispute has been resolved, or when discussion has ended. Anyone who wants an uninvolved editor to write a closing summary of the discussion (ideally with a determination of consensus) can formally request closure by posting at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure. If the matter under discussion is not contentious and the consensus is obvious to the participants, then formal closure is neither necessary nor advisable. Written closing statements are not required. Editors are expected to be able to evaluate and agree upon the results of most RfCs without outside assistance. An RfC should last until enough comment has been received that consensus is reached, or until it is apparent it won't be. Legobot assumes an RfC has been forgotten and automatically ends it 30 days after it begins, to avoid a buildup of stale discussions cluttering the lists and wasting commenters' time. But editors should not wait for that; if one of the reasons listed above applies, someone should end it manually, as soon as it is clear the discussion has run its course. And if additional commenters are still desirable after 30 days, someone should delay Legobot's automatic closing. Legobot's determination of age is based on the first timestamp following the {{rfc}} template. To end an RfC, remove the RfC tag, {{rfc}}, from the talk page. Legobot will remove the discussion from the central lists on its next run. (When Legobot automatically ends an RfC because of its age, it removes the {{rfc}} tag). If you are also closing the discussion, you should do this in the same edit. To prevent Legobot's automatic ending and extend the RfC up to another 30 days, insert a current timestamp after the RfC statement, but before its original timestamp. To restart an RfC after Legobot has automatically removed the rfc template, reinsert the {{rfc}} tag and insert a current timestamp after the RfC statement, but before its original timestamp. To alert readers that an RfC has ended, you may optionally enclose the talk page section in a box using a template pair such as {{closed rfc top}}/{{closed rfc bottom}} or {{archive top}}/{{archive bottom}}. This is not required, and may be done with or without a closing statement about the discussions results. This example shows one way to do this: == RfC about the photo in the History section == {{closed rfc top|result= Consensus was reached to keep the photo. ~~~~ }} .... here is the entire RfC discussion... {{closed rfc bottom}}


Notes[edit] ^ For this to succeed, however, the {{rfc}} template must be removed and the discussion ended first, since most dispute resolution forums and processes will not accept a case while a RfC is pending.


See also[edit] This page is referenced in the Wikipedia Glossary. For ongoing discussions and current requests, see Wikipedia:Dashboard. Wikipedia:Decisions not subject to consensus of editors Archives of user conduct disputes Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Requests for comment, a list of all subpages of this page Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All, a listing of all current RFCs Wikipedia:Feedback request service, sign up to receive requests on your user talk page to participate in RFCs Wikipedia:Requests, all other request departments Wikipedia:Expert help Archives v t e Requests for comment (All) Articles Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc) Non-articles Wikipedia style and naming (style) Wikipedia policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Wikipedia technical issues and templates (tech) Wikipedia proposals (prop) Unsorted Instructions To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category. For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment&oldid=824383974" Categories: Wikipedia glossary itemsWikipedia requests for commentHidden categories: Wikipedia move-protected project pages


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects Wikimedia CommonsMediaWikiMeta-WikiWikispeciesWikibooksWikidataWikiquoteWikisourceWikiversityWikivoyage Languages বাংলাБеларускаяБеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎BosanskiČeštinaEsperantoفارسیFøroysktFrançais한국어ՀայերենHrvatskiItalianoעבריתქართულიMagyarNederlands日本語NordfriiskPatoisPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийसंस्कृतम्ScotsSlovenčinaСрпски / srpskiSuomiSvenskaTagalogТатарча/tatarçaУкраїнськаVènetoTiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 7 February 2018, at 00:50. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.212","walltime":"0.322","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1877,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":58298,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":3668,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":15,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":4,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 210.383 1 -total"," 15.47% 32.547 1 Template:Centralized_discussion"," 13.67% 28.750 1 Template:Archive_banner"," 13.46% 28.314 1 Template:Centralized_discussion/core"," 11.05% 23.253 1 Template:Mbox"," 11.01% 23.171 2 Template:Shortcut"," 9.48% 19.938 1 Template:Dispute-resolution"," 9.38% 19.724 1 Template:Wikipedia_RFC_topics"," 9.25% 19.465 1 Template:RfA_watchlist_notice"," 8.50% 17.891 1 Template:Helpbox"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.046","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":1798817,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1243","timestamp":"20180219031031","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":81,"wgHostname":"mw1258"});});


Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment More Links

Wikipedia:SPIWikipedia:AFC/RWikipedia:RFCAUTOWikipedia:AN/RFCWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Dispute Resolution RequestsWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:NegotiationWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:Responding To A Failure To DiscussWikipedia:Editor AssistanceWikipedia:Dispute Resolution NoticeboardWikipedia:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard/requestWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:Mediation CommitteeWikipedia:Requests For MediationWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:Arbitration/RequestsTemplate:Dispute-resolutionTemplate Talk:Dispute-resolutionWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)Wikipedia:Village Pump (idea Lab)Wikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia Talk:Notability (organizations And Companies)Wikipedia Talk:AdministratorsWikipedia Talk:Banning PolicyTalk:Sarah Jane BrownWikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:DashboardTemplate:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Centralized Discussion/ArchiveWikipedia Talk:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:THIRDWikipedia:ANIWikipedia:RS/NWikipedia:NPOV/NWikipedia:DR/NWikipedia:ARBCOMWikipedia:Requests For Comment/AllWikipedia:RFC/AWikipedia:Centralized Discussion/ArchiveWikipedia:Resolving DisputesWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of WikiProjectsWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:DRNWikipedia:MEDCOMPortal:Featured ContentWikipedia:Peer ReviewWikipedia:DRWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia Talk:Requests For CommentWikipedia:UsernameWikipedia:Requests For Comment/User NamesWikipedia:SpamWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Requests For Comment/User ConductWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:ArbitrationWikipedia:Talk PageTemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcWikilinkUser:LegobotWikipedia:Requests For Comment/BiographiesTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Economy, Trade, And CompaniesTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/History And GeographyTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Language And LinguisticsTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Maths, Science, And TechnologyTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Media, The Arts, And ArchitectureTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Politics, Government, And LawTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Religion And PhilosophyTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Society, Sports, And CultureTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Style And NamingTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/WikiProjects And CollaborationsTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Technical Issues And TemplatesTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia ProposalsTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Requests For Comment/UnsortedTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Example FormattingWikipedia:Writing Requests For CommentTemplate:RFCWikipedia:Pending Changes/Request For Comment 2012Wikipedia:Requests For Comment/Categorization Of PersonsWikipedia:WATCHLISTWikipedia:FRSWikipedia:Village PumpWikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)Wikipedia:Village Pump (miscellaneous)Wikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:POVNWikipedia:RSNWikipedia:ORNWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:CANVASSWikipedia:PROPOSALWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:CENTNOTWikipedia:Publicising DiscussionsWikipedia:THREADWikipedia:POLLWikipedia:DEWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:MediationWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Advice On Closing DiscussionsWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Closing DiscussionsWikipedia:SNOWTemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionTemplate:RfcWikipedia:CLOSETemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Requests For ClosureTemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcTemplate:RfcTemplate:Closed Rfc TopTemplate:Closed Rfc BottomTemplate:Archive TopTemplate:Archive BottomTemplate:RfcWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:CONEXCEPTWikipedia:Requests For Comment/User Conduct/ArchiveSpecial:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:Requests For Comment/AllWikipedia:Feedback Request ServiceWikipedia:RequestsWikipedia:Expert HelpHelp:Archiving A Talk PageTemplate:RFC List FooterTemplate Talk:RFC List FooterWikipedia:Requests For Comment/AllWikipedia:Requests For Comment/BiographiesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Economy, Trade, And CompaniesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/History And GeographyWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Language And LinguisticsWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Maths, Science, And TechnologyWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Media, The Arts, And ArchitectureWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Politics, Government, And LawWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Religion And PhilosophyWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Society, Sports, And CultureWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Style And NamingWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/WikiProjects And CollaborationsWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Technical Issues And TemplatesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia ProposalsWikipedia:Requests For Comment/UnsortedWikipedia:Talk PageTemplate:RfcWikipedia Talk:Requests For CommentUser:LegobotHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia Glossary ItemsCategory:Wikipedia Requests For CommentCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link