Contents 1 Arts 1.1 Lolita (Leah LaBelle song) 1.2 The Haunting of Amphipolis 1.3 Fred Rogers 1.4 The Cloisters 1.5 Kal Ho Naa Ho 1.6 Wild Side Story 1.7 WizG 1.8 Kid Rock 1.9 Devil Without a Cause 1.10 Species (film) 1.11 Nadodi Mannan 1.11.1 Comments from Yashthepunisher 1.11.2 Comments from Kailash 1.12 Occult Classic 1.12.1 Comments from dnllnd 1.13 Alfred Hitchcock 1.14 The Room (film) 1.15 Beatriz Romilly 1.15.1 Comments from dnllnd 2 Everyday life 2.1 Moorgate tube crash 2.1.1 Comments from Tim riley 2.2 Chinese home run 2.3 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. 2.4 Pavel Bure 2.5 Oxenfree 3 Engineering and technology 3.1 IDempiere 3.2 Essential Phone 4 General 4.1 University of Oxford 4.1.1 Non-reviewer comment 4.2 Indian Administrative Service 4.2.1 Peer Review by Peer Review Bot 4.3 Mount Carmel East 4.4 Twin Towers 2 4.5 Forest Fair Village 5 Geography and places 5.1 Level Mountain 5.2 Hong Kong 6 History 6.1 Arab Agricultural Revolution 6.2 Battle of Cape Gloucester 6.3 Kate Sheppard 6.4 Deportation of the Crimean Tatars 7 Natural sciences and mathematics 7.1 Messier 87 7.1.1 Comments by Cas Liber 7.2 Sleep paralysis 7.3 Kallmann syndrome 7.3.1 Comments by Ubedjunejo 7.4 1867 Manhattan, Kansas earthquake 7.5 Nihonium 8 Language and literature 9 Philosophy and religion 9.1 2017–18 Bergen County eruv controversy 9.2 Faith in Buddhism 9.3 Presbyterian Church in the United States of America 9.4 Mohammad Hamid Ansari 9.4.1 Comments by CookieMonster755 10 Social sciences and society 10.1 Territorial disputes of Japan 10.2 Unita Blackwell 10.3 Ammar Campa-Najjar 10.4 Indian hospital 10.5 Lèse majesté in Thailand 10.6 Nibiru cataclysm 10.6.1 Feedback from LovelyGirl7 10.7 Phillips Exeter Academy Library 10.7.1 Comments from Rhinopias 11 Lists 11.1 List of Turkish football champions 11.2 Kollegah discography 11.3 Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Song of the Year 12 WikiProject peer-reviews The peer review list on this page is automatically generated: please follow the steps on the instructions page to add or remove a review.


Arts[edit] Lolita (Leah LaBelle song)[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions for this article. I would like to put it through the FAC process sometime in the future as a way to honor the singer following the recent news of her death. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Updated infobox as per Template:Infobox song#Parameters (easier than listing here). It appears the same, but makes it easier for future additions, changes, etc. Many newer pop songs include the video link in the infobox, but it is not required. If wanted, the Vevo link in the External links section may be replaced with the |misc= field using Template:External music video. —Ojorojo (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you for the updates! I will definitely think about putting the music video in the infobox. It really does not make the big of a difference to me if the link for the music video is at the end of the article or at the infobox, but I will make sure to put some thought into it. Aoba47 (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC) The Haunting of Amphipolis[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to take it to GA-status at some point in the future. My main problem with the article is that I'm unable to find any high-quality/reliable reviews to add in the "Reception" section. Additionally, if there are any further articles, interviews etc. that could help expand the "Production" & "Broadcast and release" sections, that would be very helpful as well. PanagiotisZois (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Fred Rogers[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because Fred Rogers's work on television was notable and important for millions of Americans, and I was hoping to get his page to Good Article status. Thanks, The lorax (talk) 02:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC) The Cloisters Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 18 February 2018, 10:43 UTC Last edit: 24 February 2018, 01:16 UTC Kal Ho Naa Ho[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to take it to FA. Constructive comments are most welcome. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Wild Side Story[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because of the reasons given at Talk:Wild Side Story#Creator requests action and at the kind suggestion of a neutral editor there. Thanks, SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC) WizG[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because it needs to be patrolled/reviewed to appear on search engines. Yep, it's my first article and I'm pretty excited to see it on Google :P Thanks, Hunter Kid Rock[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to lnow how close it is to being featured. Thanks, TheRealBoognish (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Devil Without a Cause[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know how close it is to being featured. Thanks, TheRealBoognish (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC) It looks well cited, but still ugly. There are many one-liners that don't qualify as actual paragraphs. The songs don't need individual enter buttons pressed after you talk about them - depending on how much content you have, you could put two or three of them in a paragraph. In fact, it happens pretty much everywhere in the article; it's the biggest problem. Integrate these into paragraphs - they fit fine. Kid Rock's biography has a lot of the same problem - well cited, poorly formatted. All your references need formatted consistently - the Biography.com reference (is that reliable?) is missing accessdate at least, and ideally should have an author and date posted as well - but it's alright if it isn't available. I would also recommend being much more specific about the albums success and promotion - were there any tours that helped promote this? Any incidents that occurred during those times? And 2002 isn't a fifteen year anniversary celebration, I believe that's a 2012 typo. The credits overlink everyone, once is enough. That's all for now. I'd recommend heading to GA before FA, but your choice. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 21:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Species (film)[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because, as it stands, it's fairly substantive and I personal am a fan of this movie (my guilty pleasure, I must say). Since it has already been promoted to GA, I would now like to bring it first to the A-class and then FA. To do so, I need help from the experts (horror buffs and non-horror buffs alike) to provide me notes in order to attain comprehensiveness criteria, ranging from Themes to Reception. I have access to audio commentaries for this movie so I might be able to do something with the artice; meanwhile, this PR is open for anybody who is interested in helping me. Thanks, Slightlymad 08:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Academic sources I'm repeating what was said on my talk page here in case you didn't get my reply. In looking for academic sources, Species didn't have a whole lot of material written about it to begin with, especially when compared to a film like Alien. But I did locate 3 dissertations, one of them being a doctoral thesis. These usually take up to a year to write and are typically hundreds of pages long. They are arguably the best academic sources a person could hope for. This particular one was for a doctorate in Philosophy. Here's one passage: SIL's own desire to reproduce is conflated with the clerk's obviously pregnant body in a brief but significant point-of-view shot from SIL, focusing on the woman's belly, which then immediately cuts to a reaction shot of SIL's face. A brief look of silent understanding passes between the two women and the viewer is asked to identify/conflate the two women through their own looks of mutual recognition. This mirroring and resulting recognition is not a case of Lacanian misrecognition and loss. Rather, this look serves, in the Bakhtinian sense, as a form of mutual authoring, a dialogical intersection of the frontiers between selves.[1]:163 Dr. Bjornsson's doctoral thesis, which covered the movie Species as part of a broader look at the topic of American narratives concerning outsider goups like women and immigrants, is just under 70 pages long and starts on page 154 (pdf reader page 158). Bjornsson, Nina Gudrun (1999). "Terminal Visibility in the Reproductive Zone: Species and the California-Mexico Connection" (PDF). Aliens Within: Immigrants, the Feminine, and American National Narrative (Ph.D. thesis). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. pp. 154–223. Document No.9927491 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.  Gutierrez, Osiel (2001). "Species". The Horrifying Transformation of the Female Monster (Master's thesis). San Jose, CA: San Jose State University. pp. 63–66, 105–109. Document No.1403970 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.  James, Cara Lyn (August 1996). Hideous Progeny: 'Frankenstein' and the Female Monster in Science Fiction (Master's thesis). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University. pp. 17–20. Document No.MM15914 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.  Spintendo ᔦᔭ 04:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC) References ^ Bjornsson, Nina Gudrun (1999). "Terminal Visibility in the Reproductive Zone: Species and the California-Mexico Connection" (PDF). Aliens Within: Immigrants, the Feminine, and American National Narrative (Ph.D. thesis). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. pp. 154–223. Document No.9927491 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.  Thanks Spintendo, but I read your reply already. Slightlymad 04:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Nadodi Mannan[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to take it to FA. In doing so it would be my second solo attempt at it. Constructive comments are most welcome. Thanks,  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Comments from Yashthepunisher[edit] "..action adventure film, co-produced and directed by M. G. Ramachandran." Try loosing few names of the cast from the opening para in lead. Future king? "..after he is abducted". It can be written as 'after getting abducted'. Comma missing at some instances in the third para of lead. I think the re-release bit suits in the legacy section. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC) I have hopefully resolved your comments, Yashthepunisher. Do let me know if there is anything pending. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Comments from Kailash[edit] I may have various comments, but I'd like to see the article add more info from this MGR biography, of which I got quite a few pages. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC) This is as you say, a piece of gem, Kailash29792. I'll get around to it on the 11th January if that's alright as I'll be quite busy due to family matters for a few days.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Kailash29792, I've added info from Kannan's books. Do have a look at it now.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC) I'll give a good readthrough today, and post comments tomorrow. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC) Alright, here are some comments for a start: The writer field shouldn't have the dialogue writer listed. A good explanation behind this is given here. Mention the film being MGR's directorial debut in the lead. The infobox sources the film's release date, which is already sourced under "Release". Since the infobox is part of the lead section, you may want to comply with WP:LEADCITE. You must mention how the film was a turning point in his later political career. Don't you think there is some inconsistency here? Principal photography took place from 1956 to 1958 over a period of 156 days Because a year has only 365 days. Please re-read the source and edit. Balakrishnan composed the songs - introduce him by his full name. Please try expanding the critical reception section. The "cancelled sequel" section is too small, so you could merge it with legacy. Page 107 of MGR: A Life mentions Dina Thanthi calling the film "Komali Mannan". See where that can fit here. More to follow soon... --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC) Kailash29792, Kantha mentions it like this: "Nadodi Mannan (The Vagabond King) was MGR’s grand project of 1956-57, and it was released on August 22, 1958." This indicates that principal photography occurred from 1956 to 1957. This line "Usually 40-50 days of shooting are adequate for a movie. But, for ‘Nadodi Mannan’, it took 156 days" indicates that a period of 156 days (possibly with intervals/break from shooting) was taken to make the film.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC) I'll expand the "critical reception" section soon. The rest of your comments have been resolved.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Occult Classic[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because Occult Classic is the largest page i've created and I want to know how to improve it. Thanks, Micro (Talk) 06:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Comments from dnllnd[edit] Hey! Congratulations on creating your first longer form page. Here are a few general comments about the structure and style of the page: The citations in the lead can be dialed back since there isn't anything present that's likely to be challenged. MOS:LEADCITE is a good reference for drafting a page intro. Thoughtful and contextually driven quotations are a good addition to any article, but the number and extent of those included in the Background and composition section veer into quote farm territory. Paraphrasing what you've included into shorter digestible sentences will pull the page inline with the spirit of an encyclopedia and make it easier for people to scan. MOS:QUOTE includes suggestions about how and when to use quotations. In this case, it makes sense to include commentary about the album's development, but they would have a greater impact if used more judiciously. Reception and release section: Make sure to include links to relevant Wikipedia pages to help explain who people and sites you reference are - not all readers are going to be familiar with the genre of music and related figures. For example, what is EDM.com? Who is Michael Sundius? What is Dancing Astronaut? If there aren't relevant pages to link to, include a brief note explaining who or what the are. Alt Classic subheading: Italicize heading. Generally the page would benefit from having more of a narrative flow. Right now much of the information is included as standalone nuggets rather than points that naturally follow each other. Cutting back on the use of quotes might help on this front. You may also want to consider comparing and contrasting reaction to the album as a way of weaving things together. It may also be useful to find a few pages that are more developed for other albums you like that can be used as guides. Consider centralizing references you've used multiple times by naming them so that it's readily obvious to readers how many references come from each source. It can be done using the Cite menu in either the RefToolbar or the Visual Editor.--Dnllnd (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Alfred Hitchcock Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 11 December 2017, 18:35 UTC Last edit: 16 January 2018, 20:38 UTC The Room (film)[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because the article recently passed GA review and I hope to get this article to FAC status. It has been getting increasingly more views this last year because of The Disaster Artist film coming out in December and I think it is a bizarrely interesting topic. Thanks, Jeanjung212 (talk) 15:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC) I archived all references using archive box but there are still some issues that might bother reviewers: Avoid references and quotes in the lead per the manual of style. Focus on generalizatons in the lead as it is meant to introduce readers to the article rather than pinpoint certain facts. Avoid small paragraphs. The video game appears to be fanmade so I suggest removing it unless it is notable. Same with music. "In popular culture" might be the trickiest section. While there are many people who know of the Nostalgia Critic, general readers might not care about the reviews, among others. Unless any of these mentions are notable I might advise you to remove them. That's all I see. If you have free time could you check my peer review? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Beatriz Romilly[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because whilst I have listed the subject's career and a brief overview, I feel it might require some further input from editors more experienced in writing articles about actors. Thanks, Osarius - Want a chat? 11:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC) First, the strong points. The article's well structured and "well-cited", in the sense of having a decent number of citations. The absence of a photo is a pity. But the key problem's already been identified in the tag - there are nowhere near enough reliable secondary sources used to indicate that Ms Romilly warrants an article. To elaborate: Source 1 is her own, self-published cv; Sources 2 and 3 are commercial, promotional, casting websites; I really don't think these meet the criteria for reliable secondary sources. Source 5 is the Globe advertisement for the show and does nothing but list Ms Romilly as a cast member; Which leaves Source 4, the Guardian review. This describes Ms Romilly's performance as "feisty" and "peppery". It's exactly what you need, but it is the only cite, amongst about 57, that, I would suggest, meets the criteria for reliability and notability. In a nutshell, there's not nearly enough to justify an article on the grounds of notability. If you can find more like Source 4, then throw them in. But a quick Google search suggests that will be a struggle. In which case, I just don't think the article is warranted. Can I ask why you think that it is? KJP1 (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Comments from dnllnd[edit] I agree with @KJP1:. The page lacks reliable secondary sources, relying too heavily on Romilly's CV and third-party aggregate sites. The page would benefit from better sources and, if possible, more biographical information. Possible areas of interest that would align with biographies of living persons guidelines might be family history, upbringing or training. I did a quick Google search and didn't hit on anything promising, but I wonder if there may be more substantive coverage in Spanish media that could be used in keeping with WP:NOENG?--Dnllnd (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


Everyday life[edit] Moorgate tube crash[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review The Moorgate tube crash was a horrific crash on the London Underground in which 43 people died and 74 were injured. The train, at the height of rush hour, failed to stop at the platform, and continued at full speed into a dead-end tunnel, where it piled into a solid wall. The front three cars of the train were concertinaed into the size of two. It took 13 hours to free the casualties and a further four days to extract the last body. No technical problems were found, and driver-error was the conclusion of the subsequent investigation; no explanation has been established for the driver's action. This article has been through a complete re-write recently and any and all comments are welcome. – SchroCat (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Comments from Tim riley[edit] This has been tough reading and must have been truly painful to write. Only a few comments: Crash The last sentences of the second paragraph have a lot of "days" in them. If you rejig "external examinations were being held in the school on that day which meant a day's holiday for the pupils" on the lines of "the pupils had a day's holiday as the school was in use for external examinations", and drop the last two words of the last sentence it will do the trick. Rescue At the end of the first para I slightly quarrel with "St Barts" – in my experience the hospital is either called "St Bartholomew's" or abbreviated to just "Barts" with no "St". I see the WP article concurs. Investigation and inquiry "She added 'there are so many unknown factors here that it isn't difficult to be precise and definite..." Surely she said it is difficult, not isn't? "On 19 March a memorial service was held St Paul's Cathedral" – needs either an “in” or an at; I wasn’t sure which you’d prefer so have not added one. In the concluding block quote, just checking that "no sufficient evidence" is right rather than "not sufficient evidence" Memorials The text says Finsbury Square; the caption says Finsbury Circus. The text is correct. Sources At that time HMSO’s publications division (for which I worked in the 1970s) was based in London, and you may safely add that as the location in the citation. That's all I can find. A fine article. Thank you for making it so. Tim riley talk 18:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Many thanks Tim. All changes made per your suggestions. Cheers – SchroCat (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Chinese home run[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I've done a lot of work on it and I want to get it to GA. I think it's there, but I'd like to see what other people have to say. Thanks, Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Tottenham Hotspur F.C.[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review to get the artcle to GA status. Thanks, Govvy (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Pavel Bure[edit] Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review It was reviewed years ago, and sent to FAC, which it didn't pass. I recently cleaned up the article, removing over 2000 excess words, and then having it sent through WP:COPYEDITORS, with the hopes of sending to FAC in the near future. But before then I'd like one more review if possible. Thanks, Kaiser matias (talk) 09:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Oxenfree Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 5 December 2017, 22:16 UTC Last edit: 20 January 2018, 13:05 UTC


Engineering and technology[edit] IDempiere[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to help it finally get to Good Article status, To do so, I need help from the experts to provide me notes in order to attain comprehensiveness criteria, this review is open for anybody who is interested in helping. Thanks, Palmpilot (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Essential Phone[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want advice before nominating for a GA. Thanks, Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


General[edit] University of Oxford[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I think it's potentially a candidate for WP:FA status. A peer review is a step towards it becoming WP:FAC. Thanks, ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 20:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Non-reviewer comment[edit] @Bellezzasolo: I am glad you are trying to bring this article to FA and I think that it is definitely an important subject that really ought to be brought up to FA, but I happened to notice that the article seems to be sorely lacking in citations. There are whole paragraphs that are completely uncited. In order to become an FA, every single statement in the entire article needs to be cited to a reliable source (and really this should have been the case with GA also, but apparently that was not a standard eleven years ago when this article became a "Good Article.") I will say that the level of helpful media content in the article is certainly worthy of an FA, though. Hopefully this advice has helped a little bit. I really do not know very much about the University of Oxford; I am an American who has never left the country, so I cannot really help you much on the accuracy or completeness of the article. Good luck with the article and congratulations on getting into the University of Oxford! (This is coming from someone who has applied to the University of Chicago, which has a 7.9% acceptance rate, a rate which I imagine is probably similar to the University of Oxford's; I still have not yet received notification that I have been rejected, as I inevitably will be.) --Katolophyromai (talk) 02:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Indian Administrative Service[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review Article is a WP:GA nominee, any and all critique is welcome. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 06:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Peer Review by Peer Review Bot[edit] Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?] The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[?] Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings. Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long – consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?] This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?] There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. it has been might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Mount Carmel East Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 27 January 2018, 00:18 UTC Last edit: 12 February 2018, 09:21 UTC Twin Towers 2[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for Good article consideration. It isn't quite Good article satisfactory yet, but I would like some editors inputs on the matter. Thanks! Thanks, CookieMonster755✉ 20:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC) @CookieMonster755: I guess you will have better luck getting a copyedit first at WP:GOCE/REQ. Peer review doesn't seem to be very active. Anyway, you may want to consider splitting the lead up into separate paragraphs. Additionally, you may want to get rid of the "Planning" header. For a GA quality article, the lead should make it obvious that this proposal was never built. epicgenius (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you @Epicgenius:, I will make those changes soon. CookieMonster755✉ 16:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC) ​For the Get rid of the Planning header part, I meant, bringing up all the subsections with 3 equals signs to main sections with 2 equals signs. epicgenius (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Forest Fair Village[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get it to GA-class at least. A newspaper archive subscription revealed a treasure trove of information on this heavily troubled mall. I find the subject particularly interesting, and wanted to make further improvements to the article. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


Geography and places[edit] Level Mountain Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 31 December 2017, 21:12 UTC Last edit: 6 February 2018, 02:46 UTC Hong Kong[edit] Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because most parts of the article have been exhaustively rewritten and rechecked over the past month and I'm looking to have it re-listed as FA. Thanks, Horserice (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Since this has gone so long without anyone picking up, and because it's an article about a major global city, and because I worked on the Dubai peer review, and because I've been there, I will print it out and do this. Give me a couple of days ... Daniel Case (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Much appreciated! Cheers, Horserice (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


History[edit] Arab Agricultural Revolution[edit] Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because since it has attained GA status there has been a discussion about its title and focus. We have reached consensus that the article is about the historical events, not just the famous 1974 paper by Watson. I have accordingly extended the article to focus more on the historical events, less on Watson's paper and the subsequent academic arguments. The original GA reviewer has suggested PR "primarily to ascertain that the prose is clear to a person without previous knowledge of this topic." Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Battle of Cape Gloucester Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 3 February 2018, 01:22 UTC Last edit: 23 February 2018, 11:42 UTC Kate Sheppard Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 2 February 2018, 18:22 UTC Last edit: 12 February 2018, 22:04 UTC Deportation of the Crimean Tatars[edit] Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to upgrade it to at least a "good article", maybe even a "featured article". The last time, nobody bothered to do a review, so I am submitting it again. And I'm going to keep submitting it, again and again and again, until someone has the courtesy to review it. Please, help me out, I would be very grateful. Thanks, Seiya (talk) 09:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Meh, bag WP:PR. I'm taking Bengal Famine of 1943 to WP:GA, where they may or may not give the best advice, but at least they will do something.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 12:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Seiya: Personally, At the current state of the article, I'd just go ahead and GA nominate it. If you really want, I'll do a review, but I'd recommending GA nominating, then PR nominating, as generally those tend to get more response. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


Natural sciences and mathematics[edit] Messier 87[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because, it has been a good article for over seven years and has been improved all along. To my mind it is good enough to be nominated for Feature Article Status. But before that, I would like to request feedback from others if it is really as good as I think or if it needs further improvements before being nominated as such. Thanks ubedjunejo (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Comments by Cas Liber[edit] Looking now - does look in okay shape at first glance....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC) This sentence, "M87 continued to be called an extragalactic nebula for many years thereafter, but by 1956 it had been identified as an E0-type galaxy" - could do with some expansion - e.g. who called it an E0 galaxy and on what evidence did they do so? Hi, thanks for your comments. As for first one, regarding designation as nebula/galaxy, I have found a couple papers from 1950s. Earlier of them (published in 1954) mentions M87 as nebula, while the latter (published in 1956) calls it an elliptical galaxy, but the authors do not mention the grounds for calling it a galaxy, which means its status as galaxy was established prior to that. The latter is given as reference to the statement you have mentioned. It is not clear exactly when and how it began being labelled as galaxy rather nebula. But it should be somewhere in between 1954 and 1956. I will keep looking for it. Thanks. ubedjunejo (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Does it have any satellite galaxies? If not, mention there are none. ✓ Done Cas Liber! It does have satellites and I have mentioned them in the article with references. You may have a look. Please share if you have any other ideas. Thanks--ubedjunejo (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Sleep paralysis[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because… This article depends on a very small number of references that are almost all primary sources. The section on Pathophysiology is highly technical and highly speculative. Thanks, Neurorel (talk) 01:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Kallmann syndrome[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because… I have been the main editor for this article, it is a subject close to me as I am a patient with the condition. I would like an experienced editor to look at the article to see how it reads to somebody new to the condition. I would like to raise the standard of the article as high as possible and would welcome any suggestions for improvement. I have followed the rules for medical related articles the best I can and have tried to use current review articles whenever possible. Since Kallmann syndrome is a rare condition the number of review articles available are limited. Thanks, Neilsmith38 (talk) 08:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Comments by Ubedjunejo[edit] Thank you for your input. This source says "When associated with anosmia or hyposmia, CHH is termed Kallmann syndrome...". In my opinion, material describing this in the lead should be in the first paragraph. Something like this: Kallmann syndrome (KS) is a genetic disorder that prevents a person from starting or fully completing puberty. It is a form of a group of conditions termed hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Kallmann syndrome has an additional symptom of a total lack of sense of smell or a reduced sense of sense of smell which distinguishes it from other forms of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Altered. The statement The condition is more commonly diagnosed in males than in females should precede mention of Finnish study. Otherwise it is redundant. Altered. If possible, a secondary source, possibly in English, can be given for discovery of link between anosmia and hypogonadism by Spanish doctor, as it will be easier to verify. Will try to find a English reference for this. Fixed, I think. Table of responsible genes is quite complicated and technical. As a non-specialist in the field, I couldn't understand much. I'm not sure if it should be included. I am considering whether to have a separate article just for "Genetics of GnRH deficiency" to list the table and cut this down to a few more readable sentences. The article needs significant copy editing effort. I have added a tag on the article. I have not noticed many spelling mistakes on the article. Most of the article has been developed over the years with editing from different people. Do you have examples ? I have done some fixes in the lead section. You can have a look in history. Similar instances can be found in other sections. Thanks --ubedjunejo (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Section on history of the condition needs to be moved up. It should be first section, just after the lead. I am following the suggested layout in the Manual of Style for Medicine related articles. The "History" section is supposed to be near the end of the article unless the disorder is now only of historical interest, when it is then moved higher up. You are right. Sorry, my mistake. Regards. ubedjunejo (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you. Neilsmith38 (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 1867 Manhattan, Kansas earthquake Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 20 January 2018, 21:41 UTC Last edit: 9 February 2018, 16:28 UTC Nihonium Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch review This review is too large to display in full. Please go to the review directly if you want to contribute. Date added: 20 January 2018, 03:28 UTC Last edit: 28 January 2018, 15:19 UTC


Language and literature[edit]


Philosophy and religion[edit] 2017–18 Bergen County eruv controversy[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because… I plan to take it to FAC in due course and would be grateful for feedback. Thanks, Wehwalt (talk) 02:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Faith in Buddhism[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to submit it as a Featured Article. I would like to have some feedback before I submit. This is the first time I will submit an article for FA. Thanks, Farang Rak Tham (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Presbyterian Church in the United States of America[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I would like for this article to one day reach Featured Article status. While I have nominated good articles before, I have never nominated an article for FA status and would like input on what sort of improvements I would need to make to get this article ready. Basically, I'm looking for any advice on issues with prose, sourcing, article layout, illustrations, coverage (is it detailed enough?) and anything else that might keep this article from moving forward. Thanks, Ltwin (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Mohammad Hamid Ansari[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to promote it to GA. I am facing some difficulties in expanding the article primarily because lack of sufficient information for GA standards. This is because, Mr. Ansari was a diplomat and there is hardly any coverage of him. Also though he became the vice president of India, since it is merely a ceremonial post, not much is to add about. So I need some suggestions to improve this article. Thanks, RRD (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Comments by CookieMonster755[edit] I will be making some comments soon. However, on a first note, the lead needs improvement. There are only two paragraphs in the lead. Generally, it should be four and should be a summary of the article. I will mention more specifics when I have time. On another note, consistency in capitalization and grammar should be established. Indian Politician, the word politician should be lower cased, as well as vice in Vice president. Thanks. CookieMonster755✉ 20:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


Social sciences and society[edit] Territorial disputes of Japan[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review This used to be Japan's territorial claims, but I've moved it and completely overhauled it to become a sort of summary/overview article for, well, the major territorial disputes that Japan is currently involved in. There are a couple things I'd like to be reviewed: Factual accuracy: I'm not particularly familiar with the disputes, especially Okinotorishima and the Liancourt Rocks dispute. I based the summaries on our articles and sources linked from those articles, so this shouldn't be an issue, but I hope I didn't accidentally misread something and/or introduce any errors in my paraphrasing. Neutrality: in the interest of full disclosure, I'm Taiwanese-American, which may or may not accord some bias in my writing. I think I've done a pretty good job, but it would be nice for someone with less potential for bias can review and see if everything seems to be neutral enough. This is the main reason why I didn't request anything at WP:JAPAN. Accordance with ARBCOM procedures: again, shouldn't be an issue, but discretionary sanctions from several cases are active on the topic area, and I want to make sure that I've done everything right. I added {{ds/talk notice}} on the talk page, but I'm not sure if {{ds/editnotice}} can or should be added, in accordance with the newly revised awareness requirements. Additional information: is there anything else that can be added? Historical disputes and claims, perhaps? Who knows, sky's the limit. Thanks, ansh666 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Unita Blackwell[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see what (if anything) needs to be done to get through FAC. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Ammar Campa-Najjar[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because this is a new article I wrote about an American politician. I am not an expert on his life, and have written the article based on newspaper articles and other online sources. It could use expansion, further documentation from reliable sources, and possibly formatting changes, photographs, links to and from other Wikipedia articles, and etc. Thanks, B P G PhD (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Indian hospital[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because it's a timely topic, with a new lawsuit, lots of news coverage, several books being published, and much reference to similar topics in Canadian history and Indigenous relations, notably the Canadian Indian residential schools article and the Sixties Scoop. I'm looking for feedback, suggestions for expansion, and help getting it assessed and rated under a number of relevant WikiProjects. Thanks, Allanaaaaaaa (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Lèse majesté in Thailand[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I think it is a potential good article. I would like to receive general suggestions and suggestions per GA criteria. Thanks, Horus (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Nibiru cataclysm[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because it has more than doubled in size since it became a good article and I'm pondering if it's ready for FA consideration. Thanks, Serendipodous 22:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Feedback from LovelyGirl7[edit] Hi @Serendipodous: I think this article looks great. It’s just that I would add a few sentences (at least 1-3 sentences) in the “Cultural influence”. I do think after that, it’s ready for FA. —LovelyGirl7 talk 02:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Phillips Exeter Academy Library[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review to prep it for FA nomination. Thanks, alphalfalfa(talk) 02:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC) Comments from Rhinopias[edit] Hi, alphalfalfa! I've read through the article and here are some suggestions: Lead I rewrote the first paragraph here, feel free to change if desired. I don't think mentioning its size prior to its relationship with the academy makes sense, and I wanted the statement about it being the largest secondary school library before its capacity. Seems like a good representation of the article! History and services Two sentences which end paragraphs don't have footnotes so their sourcing isn't clear – if adding footnotes would be redundant you could list where the info is from in hidden comments following the sentences Paragraphs can be combined so they're more substantial – I see how they're organized based on the topic, but they could be grouped by date ranges (e.g. 1800s – 1950, new library beginnings – 2006, maybe the latest stuff with most recent statistics on its own if it's substantial enough) Image caption: the architectural points aren't discussed in the body of this section less emphasis on shushing library patrons – could use a reword to replace "shushing" Replace the use of Today, see MOS:DATED I see that In 1995, the library was officially named the Class of 1945 Library, honoring … is from a source, but I don't understand the significance of that; if it's just a bureaucratic thing and no one refers to the library by that name I'd remove the "officially named" part I'm not sure if the library's "services" are really discussed in this section, so it could be called just History (unless it's expanded, of course!) Choosing Louis Kahn as architect The section title could be more succinctly "Selecting an architect", otherwise please add "the" to the current chosen to design the new library for Phillips Exeter Academy – to clarify after listing others Don't think the second quote from Kahn describing books is necessary, but the first I think gives some context Architecture The library's heating and cooling needs are supplied by the nearby dining hall – so there is no HVAC infrastructure in the library? Don't really understand what this means Also, that sentence doesn't need to be on its own line File:Phillips-Exeter-Academy-Library-Exterior-Exeter-New-Hampshire-Apr-2014-b.jpg could be cropped to focus on the building more if the quality is good enough (which it seems to be), so the reader may be able to refer to the image from the text without opening up the image In paragraph two of #Exterior, the last sentence of the quote (The Library at Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, New Hampshire (1967–1972) is a classic example) isn't necessary as that can be summarized Could add "(a form of limestone)" or similar after travertine I think the paragraphs of #Interior could also be combined a bit – the last three are good Architectural interpretations I'd move this section under the prior one and just call it "Interpretation", or maybe "Critical reception"/"Critical response" as it seems to be critical in nature (especially the second paragraph)? Can you grab a ref from First Unitarian Church of Rochester to source the last sentence of the first paragraph, or is it already in a ref somewhere in the article? Is the use of issue at the beginning of the second paragraph meant to be negative? Or is it just a notable topic to discuss? Other #Recognition: I think this section could be in prose format rather than a list; one of the three could be expanded a little so the paragraph is more than three quick sentences #External links: can these two bullets be shortened? (e.g. cut "is an excellent resource", maybe "see Figure 6 for …") I fixed up a few of the article's links. I recommend doing some preventative archiving. Is the shortening of the name to Exeter Library an official thing that the library or academy itself uses? I'm not sure if it's an issue if not, but when the name needs to be reiterated you may just want to use the full name and use "the library" when possible I found myself enjoying the quotes, but I think it's bordering on too many. It's not a copyright violation of online sources, but I can't say about offline ones. Perhaps you should evaluate which ones you feel are the most necessary throughout the article and paraphrase the others, mostly in #Architecture and #Architectural interpretations. Very interesting article. I can't believe this school has such a nice library! Feel free to ping me when you respond to my comments. If you have time and wouldn't mind leaving comments on my open PR I'd really appreciate it! (And it's coincidentally another Twenty-five Year Award winner!) Rhinopias (talk) 00:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


Lists[edit] List of Turkish football champions[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want it to be a featured list. Thanks, Akocsg (talk) 19:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Kollegah discography[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I wanted to get help. My goal is to get this article promoted to a Featured list. Thanks, Lee (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Song of the Year[edit] Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want it to be a featured list. Thanks, Brankestein (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)


WikiProject peer-reviews[edit] WikiProject Military history: Battle of Cape Gloucester v t e Wikipedia community For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard. About Wikipedia Welcome! Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous Awards Reward board Contests Contents and grading Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation Creation Help Vital articles Today's articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Portals Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors WikiProjects and collaborations Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category Maintenance tasks Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues Administrators and noticeboards Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement Content dispute resolution Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Mediation Other noticeboards and assistance Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Online Ambassadors Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Paid editors Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse Deletion discussions Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue Elections and votings Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones Directories and summaries Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Template messages Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup Book Media Category Templates Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review&oldid=761951478" Categories: Wikipedia backlogPages checked by Checklinks weeklyWikipedia peer reviewWikipedia editorial validationHidden categories: Wikipedia move-protected project pagesNon-talk pages with subpages that are automatically signed


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages AlemannischÆngliscالعربيةБашҡортсаБеларускаяБеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎CatalàDanskDeutschΕλληνικάEspañolFrançaisFrysk한국어ՀայերենItalianoעבריתLatviešuMagyarМакедонскиBahasa MelayuNederlands日本語PolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийSeelterskSuomiSvenskaТатарча/tatarçaTürkçeУкраїнськаייִדיש粵語Zeêuws中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 25 January 2017, at 20:01. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.692","walltime":"0.970","ppvisitednodes":{"value":8098,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":577024,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":26998,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":11,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":55,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 630.729 1 -total"," 31.85% 200.863 1 User:AnomieBOT/C/Arts_peer_reviews"," 31.23% 196.957 15 Template:CF/Arts_peer_reviews"," 28.70% 181.042 52 Template:Al"," 25.55% 161.180 43 Template:PR/heading"," 24.12% 152.160 104 Template:Toolbar"," 11.67% 73.626 1 Wikipedia:Peer_review/Species_(film)/archive1"," 9.39% 59.241 1 User:AnomieBOT/C/General_peer_reviews"," 8.97% 56.576 5 Template:CF/General_peer_reviews"," 8.35% 52.660 1 User:AnomieBOT/C/Social_sciences_and_society_peer_reviews"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.179","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":5299576,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1329","timestamp":"20180224011835","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":97,"wgHostname":"mw1251"});});


Wikipedia:Peer_review - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Peer_review More Links

Wikipedia:FAQ/OrganizationsWikipedia:Patrolled RevisionsWikipedia:Third-party SourcesWikipedia:Reviewing Pending ChangesWikipedia:New Pages PatrolWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Unanswered ReviewsWikipedia:Peer Review/guidelinesWikipedia Talk:Peer ReviewWikipedia:Peer Review/ToolsWikipedia:Peer Review/ArchiveWikipedia:ShortcutCategory:Wikipedia BacklogWikipedia:PRHelp:Starting A New PageWikipedia:Article DevelopmentWikipedia:How To Write A Great ArticleWikipedia:MOSWikipedia:Peer Review/CurrentWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Unanswered ReviewsWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Active ReviewsWikipedia:Peer Reviews By DateCategory:WikiProject Peer ReviewsWikipedia:Peer Review/ArchiveWikipedia:Peer Review/guidelinesWikipedia Talk:Peer ReviewWikipedia:Peer Review/ToolsWikipedia:Peer Review/Request Removal PolicyWikipedia:Peer Review/volunteersTemplate:Peer Review/SidebarWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Active ReviewsWikipedia:GANWikipedia:Featured Article CandidatesWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/AssessmentWikiProjectPeer ReviewWikipedia:TECHNICALWikipedia:PR/VWikipedia:PROJECTWikipedia:PRGWikipedia:PRLWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Active ReviewsWikipedia:Peer Reviews By DateWikipedia:Peer Review/guidelinesWikipedia:Peer Review/Lolita (Leah LaBelle Song)/archive1Lolita (Leah LaBelle Song)Talk:Lolita (Leah LaBelle Song)User:Aoba47User Talk:Aoba47Template:Infobox SongTemplate:External Music VideoUser:OjorojoUser Talk:OjorojoUser:Aoba47User Talk:Aoba47Wikipedia:Peer Review/The Haunting Of Amphipolis/archive1The Haunting Of AmphipolisTalk:The Haunting Of AmphipolisUser:PanagiotisZoisUser Talk:PanagiotisZoisWikipedia:Peer Review/Fred Rogers/archive1Fred RogersTalk:Fred RogersUser:The LoraxUser Talk:The LoraxWikipedia:Peer Review/The Cloisters/archive1The CloistersTalk:The CloistersWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/The Cloisters/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive1Kal Ho Naa HoTalk:Kal Ho Naa HoUser:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Wild Side Story/archive1Wild Side StoryTalk:Wild Side StoryTalk:Wild Side StoryUser:SergeWoodzingUser Talk:SergeWoodzingWikipedia:Peer Review/WizG/archive1WizGTalk:WizGWikipedia:Peer Review/Kid Rock/archive1Kid RockTalk:Kid RockUser:TheRealBoognishUser Talk:TheRealBoognishWikipedia:Peer Review/Devil Without A Cause/archive1Devil Without A CauseTalk:Devil Without A CauseUser:TheRealBoognishUser Talk:TheRealBoognishWikipedia:GAUser:DannyMusicEditorUser Talk:DannyMusicEditorWikipedia:Peer Review/Species (film)/archive1Species (film)Talk:Species (film)User:SlightlymadUser Talk:SlightlymadUniversity Of ArizonaSan Jose State UniversityDalhousie UniversityUser:SpintendoUser Talk:SpintendoUniversity Of ArizonaUser:SlightlymadUser Talk:SlightlymadWikipedia:Peer Review/Nadodi Mannan/archive1Nadodi MannanTalk:Nadodi MannanUser:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2User:YashthepunisherUser Talk:YashthepunisherUser:YashthepunisherUser:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2User:Kailash29792User Talk:Kailash29792User:Kailash29792User:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2User:Kailash29792User:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2User:Kailash29792User Talk:Kailash29792Template Talk:Infobox Film/Archive 29Wikipedia:LEADCITEUser:Kailash29792User Talk:Kailash29792User:Kailash29792User:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2User:Ssven2User Talk:Ssven2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Occult Classic/archive1Occult ClassicTalk:Occult ClassicUser:MicroPowerpointUser Talk:MicroPowerpointMOS:LEADCITEWikipedia:QUOTEFARMMOS:QUOTEWikipedia:REFNAMEWikipedia:RefToolbarWikipedia:VisualEditorUser:DnllndUser Talk:DnllndWikipedia:Peer Review/Alfred Hitchcock/archive1Alfred HitchcockTalk:Alfred HitchcockWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Alfred Hitchcock/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/The Room (film)/archive1The Room (film)Talk:The Room (film)User:Jeanjung212User Talk:Jeanjung212Wikipedia:Peer Review/Sasuke Uchiha/archive1User:Tintor2User Talk:Tintor2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Beatriz Romilly/archive1Beatriz RomillyTalk:Beatriz RomillyUser:OsariusUser Talk:OsariusUser:KJP1User Talk:KJP1User:KJP1Wikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:NOENGUser:DnllndUser Talk:DnllndWikipedia:Peer Review/Moorgate Tube Crash/archive1Moorgate Tube CrashTalk:Moorgate Tube CrashMoorgate Tube CrashLondon UndergroundUser:SchroCatUser Talk:SchroCatUser:Tim RileyUser Talk:Tim RileyUser:Tim RileyUser:SchroCatUser Talk:SchroCatWikipedia:Peer Review/Chinese Home Run/archive1Chinese Home RunTalk:Chinese Home RunUser:Daniel CaseUser Talk:Daniel CaseWikipedia:Peer Review/Tottenham Hotspur F.C./archive1Tottenham Hotspur F.C.Talk:Tottenham Hotspur F.C.User:GovvyUser Talk:GovvyWikipedia:Peer Review/Pavel Bure/archive2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Pavel Bure/archive1Pavel BureTalk:Pavel BureWikipedia:COPYEDITORSUser:Kaiser MatiasUser Talk:Kaiser MatiasWikipedia:Peer Review/Oxenfree/archive1OxenfreeTalk:OxenfreeWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Oxenfree/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/IDempiere/archive1IDempiereTalk:IDempiereUser:PalmpilotUser Talk:PalmpilotWikipedia:Peer Review/Essential Phone/archive1Essential PhoneTalk:Essential PhoneUser:Emir Of WikipediaUser Talk:Emir Of WikipediaWikipedia:Peer Review/University Of Oxford/archive1University Of OxfordTalk:University Of OxfordWikipedia:FAWikipedia:FACUser:BellezzasoloUser Talk:BellezzasoloUser:BellezzasoloWikipedia:RSUniversity Of ChicagoUser:KatolophyromaiUser Talk:KatolophyromaiWikipedia:Peer Review/Indian Administrative Service/archive1Indian Administrative ServiceTalk:Indian Administrative ServiceWikipedia:GAUser:SshibumXZUser Talk:SshibumXZSpecial:Contributions/SshibumXZWikipedia:LEADUser:AndyZ/GWikipedia:LEADUser:AndyZ/GWikipedia:Manual Of Style (headings)Wikipedia:WIAFAWikipedia:Summary StyleUser:AndyZ/GWikipedia:SSUnited StatesHistory Of The United StatesUser:AndyZ/GWeasel WordWikipedia:AWTWikipedia:FOOTNOTEUser:AndyZ/GWikipedia:WIAFAUser:Tony1/How To Satisfy Criterion 1aUser:AndyZ/GUser:AndyZ/SuggestionsWikipedia:Peer Review/Mount Carmel East/archive1Mount Carmel EastTalk:Mount Carmel EastWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Mount Carmel East/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Twin Towers 2/archive1Twin Towers 2Talk:Twin Towers 2User:CookieMonster755User Talk:CookieMonster755User:CookieMonster755Wikipedia:GOCE/REQUser:EpicgeniusUser Talk:EpicgeniusUser:EpicgeniusUser:CookieMonster755User Talk:CookieMonster755User:CookieMonster755User:EpicgeniusUser Talk:EpicgeniusWikipedia:Peer Review/Forest Fair Village/archive1Forest Fair VillageTalk:Forest Fair VillageUser Talk:TenPoundHammerWikipedia:Peer Review/Level Mountain/archive1Level MountainTalk:Level MountainWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Level Mountain/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Hong Kong/archive3Wikipedia:Peer Review/Hong Kong/archive2Hong KongTalk:Hong KongUser:HorsericeUser Talk:HorsericeGlobal CityDubaiWikimaniaUser:Daniel CaseUser Talk:Daniel CaseUser:HorsericeUser Talk:HorsericeWikipedia:Peer Review/Arab Agricultural Revolution/archive2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Arab Agricultural Revolution/archive1Arab Agricultural RevolutionTalk:Arab Agricultural RevolutionUser:Chiswick ChapUser Talk:Chiswick ChapWikipedia:Peer Review/Battle Of Cape Gloucester/archive1Battle Of Cape GloucesterTalk:Battle Of Cape GloucesterWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Battle Of Cape Gloucester/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Kate Sheppard/archive1Kate SheppardTalk:Kate SheppardWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Kate Sheppard/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Deportation Of The Crimean Tatars/archive2Wikipedia:Peer Review/Deportation Of The Crimean Tatars/archive1Deportation Of The Crimean TatarsTalk:Deportation Of The Crimean TatarsUser:SeiyaUser Talk:SeiyaWikipedia:PRBengal Famine Of 1943Wikipedia:GAUser:LingzhiUser Talk:LingzhiUser:SeiyaUser:Eddie891User Talk:Eddie891Special:Contributions/Eddie891Wikipedia:Peer Review/Messier 87/archive1Messier 87Talk:Messier 87User:Ubed JunejoUser Talk:Ubed JunejoUser:CasliberUser Talk:CasliberSpecial:Contributions/CasliberUser:Ubed JunejoUser Talk:Ubed JunejoUser:CasliberUser:Ubed JunejoUser Talk:Ubed JunejoWikipedia:Peer Review/Sleep Paralysis/archive1Sleep ParalysisTalk:Sleep ParalysisUser Talk:NeurorelWikipedia:Peer Review/Kallmann Syndrome/archive1Kallmann SyndromeTalk:Kallmann SyndromeUser:Neilsmith38User Talk:Neilsmith38User:Ubed JunejoUser Talk:Ubed JunejoUser:Ubed JunejoUser Talk:Ubed JunejoUser:Neilsmith38User Talk:Neilsmith38Wikipedia:Peer Review/1867 Manhattan, Kansas Earthquake/archive11867 Manhattan, Kansas EarthquakeTalk:1867 Manhattan, Kansas EarthquakeWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/1867 Manhattan, Kansas Earthquake/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/Nihonium/archive1NihoniumTalk:NihoniumWikipedia:PRWikipedia:Peer Review/Nihonium/archive1Wikipedia:Peer Review/2017–18 Bergen County Eruv Controversy/archive12017–18 Bergen County Eruv ControversyTalk:2017–18 Bergen County Eruv ControversyUser:WehwaltUser Talk:WehwaltWikipedia:Peer Review/Faith In Buddhism/archive1Faith In BuddhismTalk:Faith In BuddhismUser:Farang Rak ThamUser Talk:Farang Rak ThamWikipedia:Peer Review/Presbyterian Church In The United States Of America/archive1Presbyterian Church In The United States Of AmericaTalk:Presbyterian Church In The United States Of AmericaUser:LtwinUser Talk:LtwinWikipedia:Peer Review/Mohammad Hamid Ansari/archive1Mohammad Hamid AnsariTalk:Mohammad Hamid AnsariUser:RoyroydebUser Talk:RoyroydebUser:CookieMonster755User Talk:CookieMonster755Wikipedia:Peer Review/Territorial Disputes Of Japan/archive1Territorial Disputes Of JapanTalk:Territorial Disputes Of JapanJapan's Territorial ClaimsOkinotorishimaLiancourt Rocks DisputeWikipedia:NPOVTaiwanese-AmericanWikipedia:JAPANWikipedia:AC/DSTemplate:Ds/talk NoticeTemplate:Ds/editnoticeUser:Ansh666User Talk:Ansh666Wikipedia:Peer Review/Unita Blackwell/archive1Unita BlackwellTalk:Unita BlackwellUser:CoffeeUser Talk:CoffeeSpecial:Contributions/CoffeeWikipedia:Peer Review/Ammar Campa-Najjar/archive1Ammar Campa-NajjarTalk:Ammar Campa-NajjarUser Talk:B P G PhDWikipedia:Peer Review/Indian Hospital/archive1Indian HospitalTalk:Indian HospitalCanadian Indian Residential SchoolsSixties ScoopUser:AllanaaaaaaaUser Talk:AllanaaaaaaaWikipedia:Peer Review/Lèse Majesté In Thailand/archive1Lèse Majesté In ThailandTalk:Lèse Majesté In ThailandUser Talk:HorusWikipedia:Peer Review/Nibiru Cataclysm/archive1Nibiru CataclysmTalk:Nibiru CataclysmUser:SerendipodousSpecial:Contributions/SerendipodousUser Talk:SerendipodousUser:SerendipodousUser:LovelyGirl7User Talk:LovelyGirl7Wikipedia:Peer Review/Phillips Exeter Academy Library/archive1Phillips Exeter Academy LibraryTalk:Phillips Exeter Academy LibraryUser:AlphalfalfaUser Talk:AlphalfalfaUser:AlphalfalfaSpecial:Diff/822372537MOS:DATEDFile:Phillips-Exeter-Academy-Library-Exterior-Exeter-New-Hampshire-Apr-2014-b.jpgFirst Unitarian Church Of RochesterWikipedia:DEADREFWikipedia:Peer Review/Monterey Bay Aquarium/archive1User:RhinopiasUser Talk:RhinopiasWikipedia:Peer Review/List Of Turkish Football Champions/archive1List Of Turkish Football ChampionsTalk:List Of Turkish Football ChampionsUser:AkocsgUser Talk:AkocsgWikipedia:Peer Review/Kollegah Discography/archive1Kollegah DiscographyTalk:Kollegah DiscographyUser:TRYHARDFLYUser Talk:TRYHARDFLYWikipedia:Peer Review/Billboard Latin Music Award For Hot Latin Song Of The Year/archive1Billboard Latin Music Award For Hot Latin Song Of The YearTalk:Billboard Latin Music Award For Hot Latin Song Of The YearUser:BrankesteinUser Talk:BrankesteinWikipedia:WikiProject Military History/ReviewWikipedia:Peer Review/Battle Of Cape Gloucester/archive1Template:Wikipedia CommunityTemplate Talk:Wikipedia CommunityWikipedia CommunityWikipedia:Community PortalWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:AboutWikipedia:Welcoming Committee/Welcome To WikipediaWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:NewsWikipedia:Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia:Goings-onWikipedia:Wikipedia In The MediaWikipedia:MeetupWikipedia:Mailing ListsWikipedia:WikipediansWikipedia:StatisticsWikipedia:MilestonesWikipedia:The Wikipedia LibraryWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Village PumpWikipedia:Village Pump (idea Lab)Wikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)Wikipedia:Village Pump (technical)Wikipedia:Village Pump (miscellaneous)Wikipedia:AwardsWikipedia:Reward BoardWikipedia:ContestsPortal:ContentsWikipedia:WikiProject AssessmentWikipedia:Requested ArticlesWikipedia:Most-wanted ArticlesWikipedia:Requested Articles/ImagesWikipedia:Requested PicturesWikipedia:Articles For CreationWikipedia:Article CreationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles For Creation/Help DeskWikipedia:Vital ArticlesWikipedia:Today's Articles For ImprovementWikipedia:Good Article NominationsWikipedia:Featured Article CandidatesWikipedia:Featured List CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Picture CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Portal CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Topic CandidatesWikipedia:TranslationWikipedia:Pages Needing Translation Into EnglishTalk:Main PageWikipedia:Main Page/ErrorsWikipedia:WikiProjectCategory:Wikipedia CollaborationsWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:PatrolsWikipedia:Recent Changes PatrolWikipedia:Counter-Vandalism UnitWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial TeamWikipedia:WikiProject AccessibilityCategory:Wikipedian OrganizationsWikipedia:MaintenanceWikipedia:Task CenterWikipedia:Community Portal/OpentaskWikipedia:BacklogCategory:Wikipedia BacklogCategory:Administrative BacklogWikipedia:Edit RequestsCategory:Wikipedia Edit RequestsWikipedia:Database ReportsTemplate:Category TrackerWikipedia:Dusty ArticlesSpecial:SpecialPagesSpecial:NewPagesFeedSpecial:RecentChangesWikipedia:List Of Controversial IssuesWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:Administrators' NoticeboardWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Edit WarringWikipedia:Administrator Intervention Against VandalismTemplate:Admin DashboardWikipedia:Requests For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Requests For ClosureWikipedia:Requests For Page ProtectionWikipedia:Requests For PermissionsWikipedia:Sockpuppet InvestigationsWikipedia:WikiProject On Open ProxiesWikipedia:Revision DeletionWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Requests For OversightWikipedia:Usernames For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Changing UsernameMediaWiki Talk:TitleblacklistWikipedia:OTRS NoticeboardWikipedia:Bureaucrats' NoticeboardWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/NoticeboardWikipedia:Arbitration/RequestsWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/EnforcementWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Editor Assistance/RequestsWikipedia:Requests For Comment/AllWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:Dispute Resolution NoticeboardWikipedia:Biographies Of Living Persons/NoticeboardWikipedia:Conflict Of Interest/NoticeboardWikipedia:External Links/NoticeboardWikipedia:Fringe Theories/NoticeboardWikipedia:Neutral Point Of View/NoticeboardWikipedia:No Original Research/NoticeboardWikipedia:Reliable Sources/NoticeboardWikipedia:Requests For MediationWikipedia:Regional Notice BoardsWikipedia:Request DirectoryCategory:Wikipedia Requests Related To HelpWikipedia:QuestionsWikipedia:TeahouseWikipedia:Help DeskWikipedia:Reference DeskWikipedia:Adopt-a-userSpecial:OnlineVolunteersWikipedia:Copyright AssistanceWikipedia:Contributor Copyright InvestigationsWikipedia:Copyright ProblemsWikipedia:Media Copyright QuestionsWikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid Editor HelpWikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource RequestWikipedia:Proposed MergersWikipedia:Requests For History MergeWikipedia:Requested MovesWikipedia:Requests For Page ImportationWikipedia Talk:WikiProject SpamMediaWiki Talk:Spam-blacklistMediaWiki Talk:Spam-whitelistWikipedia:Bots/NoticeboardWikipedia:Education NoticeboardWikipedia:New Pages Patrol/NoticeboardWikipedia:General SanctionsWikipedia:Editing RestrictionsWikipedia:Long-term AbuseWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Deletion Guidelines For AdministratorsWikipedia:XfD TodayWikipedia:Articles For DeletionWikipedia:Templates For DiscussionWikipedia:Files For DiscussionWikipedia:Categories For DiscussionWikipedia:Redirects For DiscussionWikipedia:Miscellany For DeletionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Proposed DeletionWikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Requests For UndeletionWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Make In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Article Rescue SquadronWikipedia:ElectionsWikipedia:VotingWikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:WikiProject DemocracyWikipedia:Voting Is Not EvilWikipedia:Times That 1000 Or More Wikipedians Supported SomethingWikipedia:Directories And IndexesWikipedia:Department DirectoryWikipedia:Edit Summary LegendWikipedia:Editor's Index To WikipediaWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:FAQ/IndexWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:Wikipedia AbbreviationsHelp:DirectoryWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Simplified Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:Shortcut DirectoryWikipedia:Template MessagesWikipedia:Citation TemplatesWikipedia:TipsWikipedia:Tip Of The DayWikipedia:ToolsWikipedia:WikiNodeHelp:CheatsheetBook:WikipediaCategory:WikipediansCategory:Wikipedia TemplatesHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia BacklogCategory:Pages Checked By Checklinks WeeklyCategory:Wikipedia Peer ReviewCategory:Wikipedia Editorial ValidationCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesCategory:Non-talk Pages With Subpages That Are Automatically SignedDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link