Contents 1 Derivation 2 Role 3 Adherence 4 Enforcement 5 ­Content 6 Not part of the encyclopedia 7 Life cycle 7.1 Proposals 7.1.1 Good practice for proposals 7.2 Demotion 7.3 Content changes 7.3.1 Substantive changes 7.4 Conflicts between advice pages 8 Naming 9 See also 10 Notes 11 Further reading

Derivation Further information: Wikipedia:Administration § Human and legal administration Wikipedia is operated by the not-for-profit Wikimedia Foundation, which reserves certain legal rights - see the Wikimedia Foundation's Policies page for a list of its policies. See also Role of Jimmy Wales. Nevertheless, normally Wikipedia is a self-governing project run by its community. Its policies and guidelines are intended to reflect the consensus of the community.

Role Further information: Wikipedia:The difference between policies, guidelines and essays Shortcuts WP:POLICIES WP:GUIDES Policies have wide acceptance among editors and describe standards that all users should normally follow. All policy pages are in Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines and Category:Wikipedia policies. For summaries of key policies, see also List of policies. Guidelines are sets of best practices that are supported by consensus. Editors should attempt to follow guidelines, though they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Guideline pages can be found in Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines and Category:Wikipedia guidelines. For summaries of key guidelines, see also List of guidelines. Essays are the opinion or advice of an editor or group of editors for which widespread consensus has not been established. They do not speak for the entire community and may be created and written without approval. Essays that the author does not want others to edit, or that are found to contradict widespread consensus, belong in the user namespace. (For more information, see Wikipedia:Essays.) Other administration pages in the Wikipedia: namespace include: process pages, which facilitate application of the policies and guidelines (e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion), WikiProject pages, including essays they have written to give advice to other editors about their areas of interest, how-to or help pages (also found in the Help namespace), which provide mainly technical information, information pages, which generally provide factual information, supplements to guidelines and policies, which explain advice in greater detail, community discussion pages and noticeboards for communication between editors, and historical pages, which are outdated.[1] These other pages are not policies or guidelines, although they may contain valuable advice or information.

Adherence Use common sense when interpreting and applying policies and guidelines; there will be occasional exceptions to these rules. Conversely, those who violate the spirit of a rule may be reprimanded even if no rule has technically been broken. Whether a policy or guideline is an accurate description of best practice is determined by the community through consensus. On discussion pages and in edit summaries, shortcuts are often used to refer to policies and guidelines. For example, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:LIVE. Similar shortcuts are sometimes also used for other types of project page. A shortcut does not necessarily imply that the page linked to has policy or guideline status. Additionally, remember that the shortcut is not the policy; the plain-English definition of the page's title or shortcut may be importantly different from the linked page.

Enforcement Further information: Wikipedia:Enforcement policies, Wikipedia:Active sanctions, and Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement Shortcuts WP:Enforcement WP:ENFORCEMENT Enforcement on Wikipedia is similar to other social interactions. If an editor violates the community standards described in policies and guidelines, other editors can persuade the person to adhere to acceptable norms of conduct, over time resorting to more forceful means, such as administrator and steward actions. In the case of gross violations of community norms, they are likely to resort to more forceful means fairly rapidly. Going against the principles set out on these pages, particularly policy pages, is unlikely to prove acceptable, although it may be possible to convince fellow editors that an exception ought to be made. This means that individual editors (including you) enforce and apply policies and guidelines. In cases where it is clear that a user is acting against policy (or against a guideline in a way that conflicts with policy), especially if they are doing so intentionally and persistently, that user may be temporarily or indefinitely blocked from editing by an administrator. In cases where the general dispute resolution procedure has been ineffective, the Arbitration Committee has the power to deal with highly disruptive or sensitive situations.

­Content Policy and guideline pages should: Be clear. Avoid esoteric or quasi-legal terms and dumbed-down language. Be plain, direct, unambiguous, and specific. Avoid platitudes and generalities. Do not be afraid to tell editors directly that they must or should do something. Be as concise as possible—but no more concise. Verbosity is not a reliable defense against misinterpretation. Omit needless words. Direct, concise writing may be more clear than rambling examples. Footnotes and links to other pages may be used for further clarification. Emphasize the spirit of the rule. Expect editors to use common sense. If the spirit of the rule is clear, say no more. Maintain scope and avoid redundancy. Clearly identify the purpose and scope early in the page, as many readers will just look at the beginning. Content should be within the scope of its policy. When the scope of one advice page overlaps with the scope of another, minimize redundancy. When one policy refers to another policy, it should do so briefly, clearly and explicitly. Avoid overlinking. Links to policies, guidelines, essays, and articles should be used only when clarification or context is needed. Links to other advice pages may inadvertently or intentionally defer authority to them. Make it clear when links defer, and when they do not. Not contradict each other. The community's view cannot simultaneously be "A" and "not A". When apparent discrepancies arise between pages, editors at all the affected pages should discuss how they can most accurately represent the community's current position, and correct all of the pages to reflect the community's view. This discussion should be on one talk page, with invitations to that page at the talk pages of the various affected pages; otherwise the corrections may still contradict each other.

Not part of the encyclopedia Shortcut WP:NOTPART Wikipedia has many policies and guidelines about encyclopedic content. These standards require verifiability, neutrality, respect for living people, and more. The policies, guidelines, and process pages themselves are not part of the encyclopedia proper. Consequently, they do not generally need to conform to the same content standards. It is therefore not necessary to provide reliable sources to verify Wikipedia's administrative pages, or to phrase Wikipedia procedures or principles in a neutral manner, or to cite an outside authority in determining Wikipedia's editorial practices. Instead, the content of these pages is controlled by community-wide consensus, and the style should emphasize clarity, directness, and usefulness to other editors.[2] These pages do, however, need to comply with Wikipedia's legal and behavioral policies, as well as policies applicable to non-content pages. For example, editors may not violate copyrights anywhere on Wikipedia, and edit warring is prohibited everywhere, not merely in encyclopedia articles.

Life cycle Shortcut WP:PGLIFE Many of the most well-established policies and guidelines have developed from principles which have been accepted as fundamental since Wikipedia's inception. Others developed as solutions to common problems and disruptive editing. Policy and guideline pages are seldom established without precedent,[3] and always require strong community support. Policies and guidelines may be established through new proposals, promotion of existing essays or guidelines, and reorganization of existing policies and guidelines through splitting and merging. Essays and information pages may be established by writing them and adding {{essay}}, {{Information page}}, {{Wikipedia how-to}},or similar template to the page. Current policy and guideline proposals can be found in Category:Wikipedia proposals, and failed proposals can be found in Category:Wikipedia failed proposals. All editors are welcome to comment on these proposals. Proposals Shortcut WP:PROPOSAL Further information: Wikipedia:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance See also: WP:POLL § Policy and guidelines, and WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY Proposals for new guidelines and policies require discussion and a high level of consensus from the entire community for promotion to guideline or policy. Adding the {{policy}} template to a page without the required consensus does not mean that the page is policy, even if the page summarizes or copies policy. Most commonly, a new policy or guideline documents existing practices, rather than proposing a change to what experienced editors already choose to do. Good practice for proposals The first step is to write the best initial proposal that you can. Authors can request early-stage feedback at Wikipedia's village pump for idea incubation and from any relevant WikiProjects. Amendments to a proposal can be discussed on its talk page. It is crucial to improve a proposal in response to feedback received from outside editors. Consensus is built through a process of listening to and discussing the proposal with many other editors. Once you think that the initial proposal is well-written, and the issues involved have been sufficiently discussed among early participants to create a proposal that has a solid chance of success with the broader community, start an RfC for your policy or guideline proposal in a new section on the talk page, and include the {{rfc|policy}} tag along with a brief, time-stamped explanation of the proposal. After that, you can provide, if you want, a detailed explanation of what the page does and why you think it should be a policy or guideline. The {{proposed}} template should be placed at the top of the proposed page; this tag will get the proposal properly categorized. The RfC should typically be announced at the policy and/or proposals village pumps, and you should notify other potentially interested groups. If your proposal affects a specific content area, then related WikiProjects can be found at the WikiProject directory. If your proposal relates to an existing policy or guideline, then leave a note on the talk page of the related policy or guideline. Try to identify the subcategory of guideline or policy (see {{subcat guideline}}). Proposals involving contentious subjects or wide-ranging effects should normally be listed on Wikipedia:Centralized discussion for the duration of the RfC. Rarely, a particularly important proposal may be advertised via a watchlist notice; sitenotices (which are displayed to all readers, not just to active editors) are not used for proposals. RfCs for policy and guideline proposals are normally left open for at least one week, and sometimes as long as a couple of months. To avoid later complaints about insufficient notice, it may be helpful to provide a complete list of the groups or pages that you used to advertise the proposal on the talk page. Be careful to not canvass with non-neutral wording or too-targeted notification when doing this advertising. Editors should respond to proposals in a way that helps identify and build consensus. Explain your thoughts, ask questions, and raise concerns; all views are welcome. Many editors begin their response with bold-font 'vote' of support or opposition to make evaluation easier. Editors should sign their responses. Ending a discussion requires careful evaluation of the responses to determine the consensus. This does not require the intervention of an administrator, but may be done by any sufficiently experienced independent editor (an impartial editor not involved in the discussion) who is familiar with all of the policies and guidelines that relate to the proposal. The following points are important in evaluating consensus: Consensus for guidelines and policies should be reasonably strong, though unanimity is not required. There must be exposure to the community beyond just the authors of the proposal. Consider the strength of the proposed page: Have major concerns raised during the community discussion been addressed? Does the proposal contradict any existing guidelines or policies? Can the new proposed guideline or policy be merged into an existing one? Is the proposed guideline or policy, or some part of it, redundant with an existing guideline or policy? A proposal's status is not determined by counting votes. Polling is not a substitute for discussion, nor is a poll's numerical outcome tantamount to consensus. If consensus for broad community support has not developed after a reasonable time period, the proposal is considered failed. If consensus is neutral or unclear on the issue and unlikely to improve, the proposal has likewise failed. Discussion may be closed as one of: Promote, No consensus, or Failed. Please leave a short note about the conclusion that you came to. Update the proposal to reflect the consensus. Remove the {{Proposed}} template and replace it with another appropriate template, such as {{Subcat guideline}}, {{Policy}}, {{Supplement}}, {{Essay}}, or {{Failed}}. See Wikipedia namespace templates for a listing of banners. If a proposal fails, the failed tag should not usually be removed. It is typically more productive to rewrite a failed proposal from scratch to address problems, or seek consensus to integrate uncontroversial aspects of it into existing pages, than to re-nominate a proposal. Demotion Shortcut WP:HISTORICAL See also: WP:PRJDEL and WP:HISPAGES An accepted policy or guideline may become obsolete because of changes in editorial practice or community standards, may become redundant because of improvements to other pages, or may represent unwarranted instruction creep. In such situations editors may propose that a policy be demoted to a guideline, or that a policy or guideline be demoted to a supplement, informational page, essay or historical page. In certain cases, a policy or guideline may be superseded, in which case the old page is marked and retained for historical interest. The process for demotion is similar to promotion. A talk page discussion is typically started, the {{Under discussion|status|Discussion Title}} template is added to the top of the project page, and community input is solicited. After a reasonable amount of time for comments, an independent editor should close the discussion and evaluate the consensus. The {{Disputed tag}} template is typically used instead of {{Under discussion}} for claims that a page was recently assigned guideline or policy status without proper or sufficient consensus being established. Essays, information pages, and other informal pages that are only supported by a small minority of the community are typically moved to the primary author's userspace. These discussions typically happen on the page's talk page, sometimes with an RfC, but they have at times also been conducted at Miscellany for deletion (despite the MFD guidelines explicitly discouraging this practice). Other pages are retained for historical reference and are marked as such. Content changes Shortcut WP:PGCHANGE Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy § Edits to policies and guidelines See also: Wikipedia:Policy writing is hard Policies and guidelines can be edited like any other Wikipedia page. It is not strictly necessary to discuss changes or to obtain written documentation of a consensus in advance. However, because policies and guidelines are sensitive and complex, users should take care over any edits, to be sure they are faithfully reflecting the community's view and to be sure that they are not accidentally introducing new sources of error or confusion. Because Wikipedia practice exists in the community through consensus, editing a policy/guideline/essay page does not in itself imply an immediate change to accepted practice. It is, naturally, bad practice to recommend a rejected practice on a policy or guideline page. To update best practices, you may change the practice directly (you are permitted to deviate from practice for the purposes of such change) and/or set about building widespread consensus for your change or implementation through discussion. When such a change is accepted, you can then edit the page to reflect the new situation. Substantive changes Shortcuts WP:TALKFIRST WP:PGBOLD Further information: Wikipedia:Be bold § Wikipedia namespace Talk first. Talk page discussion typically precedes substantive changes to policy. Changes may be made if there are no objections, or if discussion shows that there is consensus for the change. Minor edits to improve formatting, grammar, and clarity may be made at any time. If the result of discussions is unclear, then it should be evaluated by an administrator or other independent editor, as in the proposal process. Major changes should also be publicized to the community in general; announcements similar to the proposal process may be appropriate. If wider input on a proposed change is desired, it may be useful to mark the section with the tag {{Under discussion|section|talk=Discussion Title}}. (If the proposal relates to a single statement, use {{Under discussion-inline|Discussion Title}} immediately after it.) Or be bold. The older but still valid method is to boldly edit the page. Bold editors of policy and guideline pages are strongly encouraged to follow WP:1RR or WP:0RR standards. Although most editors find advance discussion, especially at well-developed pages, very helpful, directly editing these pages is permitted by Wikipedia's policies. Consequently, you should not remove any change solely on the grounds that there was no formal discussion indicating consensus for the change before it was made. Instead, you should give a substantive reason for challenging it and, if one hasn't already been started, open a discussion to identify the community's current views. Editing a policy to support your own argument in an active discussion may be seen as gaming the system, especially if you do not disclose your involvement in the argument when making the edits. Conflicts between advice pages Shortcut WP:POLCON If policy and/or guideline pages directly conflict, one or more pages need to be revised to resolve the conflict so that all of the conflicting pages accurately reflect the community's actual practices and best advice. As a temporary measure during that resolution process, if a guideline appears to conflict with a policy, editors may assume that the policy takes precedence. More commonly, advice pages do not directly conflict, but provide multiple options. For example, WP:Identifying reliable sources says that newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific situation at hand.

Naming The page names of policies and guidelines usually do not include the words "policy" or "guideline", unless required to distinguish the page from another.

See also Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines, – a listing of policy and guideline proposals advertised through Wikipedia:Requests for comment Wikipedia:Centralized discussion – a centralized list of ongoing policy discussions Wikipedia:Perennial proposals – proposals that come up very often Wikipedia:Product, process, policy – the place of policies in Wikipedia Help:Introduction to policies and guidelines – an introduction to the major policies and guidelines for very new users Wikipedia:Principles – an index of essays about the community's principles and values Wikipedia:Content forking/Internal § Policy forks – on avoiding conflict between different policy/guideline pages

Notes ^ Many historical essays can still be found within Meta's essay category. The Wikimedia Foundation's Meta-wiki was envisioned as the original place for editors to comment on and discuss Wikipedia, although the "Wikipedia" project space has since taken over most of that role. ^ There is no prohibition against including appropriate external references to support and explain our policies or guidelines, but such sources are not authoritative with respect to Wikipedia, and should only be used to reinforce consensus. ^ Office declarations may establish unprecedented policies to avoid copyright, legal, or technical problems, though such declarations are rare.

Further reading Book: Key Wikipedia Policies & Guidelines Mission statement - The Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia values - The six values of the Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia founding principles - Principles generally supported by all of the Wikimedia communities v t e Wikipedia key policies and guidelines Five pillars What Wikipedia is not Ignore all rules Content Verifiability No original research Neutral point of view What Wikipedia is not Biographies of living persons Image use Wikipedia is not a dictionary Article titles Notability Autobiography Citing sources Identifying reliable sources medicine Do not include copies of primary sources Plagiarism Don't create hoaxes Fringe theories Patent nonsense External links Conduct Civility Consensus Editing policy Harassment Vandalism Ignore all rules No personal attacks Ownership of content Edit warring Dispute resolution Sock puppetry No legal threats Child protection Paid-contribution disclosure Assume good faith Conflict of interest Disruptive editing Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Etiquette Gaming the system Please do not bite the newcomers Courtesy vanishing Responding to threats of harm Deletion Deletion policy Proposed deletion Criteria for speedy deletion Attack page Oversight Proposed deletion of BLP Proposed deletion (books) Revision deletion Enforcement Administrators Banning Blocking Page protection Editing Article size Be bold Disambiguation Hatnotes Set index articles Subpages User pages Talk page guidelines Signatures Broad-concept article Project namespace WikiProjects Style Manual of Style Contents Accessibility Understandability Dates and numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Classification Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Template namespace WMF List of policies Friendly space policy Licensing and copyright Privacy policy Values FAQ List of all policies and guidelines List of policies List of guidelines Lists of attempts in creating fundamental principles v t e Wikipedia accounts and governance Unregistered (IP) users Why create an account? Create an account Request an account IPs are human too IP addresses are not people IP hopper Registered users New account Logging in Reset passwords Username policy Changing username Usernames for administrator attention Unified login or SUL Alternate account Account security Password strength requirements User account security Personal security practices Two-factor authentication Simple 2FA 2FA for AWB Committed identity On privacy, confidentiality and discretion Compromised accounts Blocks, global locks, bans, sanctions Blocking policy FAQ Admins guide Tools Autoblock Appealing a block Guide to appealing blocks UTRS Unblock Ticket Request System Blocking IP addresses Range blocks IPv6 Open proxies Global locks Banning policy ArbCom appeals Sanctions Personal sanctions General sanctions Discretionary sanctions and Log Essay Long-term abuse Standard offer Related to accounts Sock puppetry Single-purpose account Sleeper account Vandalism-only account Wikibreak Enforcer Retiring Courtesy vanishing Clean start Quiet return User groups and global user groups Requests for permissions Admin instructions Admin guide Account creator PERM Autopatrolled PERM AutoWikiBrowser PERM Confirmed PERM Extended confirmed PERM Edit filter helper File mover PERM Mass message sender PERM New page reviewer PERM Page mover PERM Pending changes reviewer PERM Rollback PERM Template editor PERM IP-block-exempt Requests Courses access Requests Bot accounts Requests Global rights policy OTRS Volunteer Response Team Advanced user groups Administrators RfA Bureaucrats RfB Edit filter manager Requests CheckUser and Oversight Requests Founder Committees and related Arbitration Committee Mediation Committee Bot approvals group Functionaries Clerks Governance Administration FAQ Formal organization Editorial oversight and control Quality control Wikimedia Foundation Board Founder's seat Meta-Wiki Leadership opportunities WikiProjects Elections Policies and guidelines Unbundling administrators' powers Petitions Noticeboards Consensus Dispute resolution Reforms Retrieved from "" Categories: Wikipedia policiesWikipedia policies and guidelinesWikipedia administrationWikipedia procedural policiesHidden categories: Wikipedia semi-protected project pagesWikipedia move-protected project pages

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadView sourceView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects Wikimedia CommonsMediaWikiMeta-WikiWikispeciesWikibooksWikidataWikinewsWikiquoteWikisourceWikiversityWikivoyageWiktionary Languages Afrikaansالعربيةঅসমীয়াАварAzərbaycancaتۆرکجهবাংলাBahasa BanjarБашҡортсаБеларускаяБеларуская (тарашкевіца)‎भोजपुरीБългарскиBosanskiBrezhonegCatalàČeštinaCymraegDanskDeutschDiné bizaadΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoEuskaraفارسیFrançaisGaeilgeGalegoگیلکی한국어Հայերենहिन्दीHornjoserbsceHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaInterlinguaÍslenskaItalianoעבריתKalaallisutಕನ್ನಡქართულიҚазақшаKurdîКыргызчаLëtzebuergeschMagyarमैथिलीМакедонскиമലയാളംمصرىمازِرونیBahasa MelayuNederlandsNedersaksiesनेपाली日本語NapulitanoНохчийнNorskNorsk nynorskOʻzbekcha/ўзбекчаPolskiPortuguêsRomânăRomaniРусскийScotsShqipSicilianuසිංහලSimple EnglishسنڌيSlovenčinaSlovenščinaکوردیСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиBasa SundaSuomiSvenskaதமிழ்Татарча/tatarçaไทยТоҷикӣTürkçeУдмуртУкраїнськаاردوTiếng Việtייִדיש粵語中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 17 December 2017, at 08:42. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.320","walltime":"0.406","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1800,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":132446,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":3567,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":8,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":20,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":0,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":1398,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 279.680 1 -total"," 19.48% 54.478 9 Template:Navbox"," 12.66% 35.412 9 Template:Shortcut"," 12.11% 33.875 1 Template:Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines"," 11.54% 32.289 1 Template:Short"," 10.36% 28.967 1 Template:Pp-semi-vandalism"," 8.67% 24.249 1 Template:Procedural_policy"," 8.56% 23.934 5 Template:See"," 7.61% 21.271 1 Template:Ombox"," 7.06% 19.745 1 Template:Policy_list"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.129","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":3649773,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1299","timestamp":"20180323160731","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":89,"wgHostname":"mw1248"});});

Wikipedia:PGCHANGE - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:PGCHANGE More Links

This Page Is Semi-protected Due To VandalismWikipedia:ShortcutCategory:Wikipedia Procedural PoliciesWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:PrinciplesWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:Core Content PoliciesWikipedia:Content PoliciesWikipedia:Article TitlesWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not A DictionaryWikipedia:Conduct PoliciesWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:Clean StartWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:HarassmentWikipedia:No Legal ThreatsWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Non-discrimination PolicyWikipedia:Ownership Of ContentWikipedia:Username PolicyWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsTemplate:Policy ListTemplate Talk:Policy ListWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:What "Ignore All Rules" MeansWikipedia:AdministrationWikimedia FoundationWikipedia:Role Of Jimmy WalesWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:The Difference Between Policies, Guidelines And EssaysWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia PoliciesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:Articles For DeletionWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:WikiProject Advice PagesWikipedia:How To PagesWikipedia:Help NamespaceWikipedia:Information PagesWikipedia:Supplemental PagesCategory:Wikipedia DiscussionCategory:Wikipedia NoticeboardsWikipedia:What "Ignore All Rules" MeansWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:NORWikipedia:NPOVWikipedia:LIVEMap–territory RelationWikipedia:Enforcement PoliciesWikipedia:Active SanctionsWikipedia:Arbitration EnforcementWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:CONDUCTWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:StewardsWikipedia:IARWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:ContentWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:ShortcutTemplate:EssayTemplate:Information PageTemplate:Wikipedia How-toWikipedia:Template Messages/Wikipedia NamespaceCategory:Wikipedia ProposalsCategory:Wikipedia Failed ProposalsWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:How To Contribute To Wikipedia GuidanceWikipedia:Polling Is Not A Substitute For DiscussionWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Local ConsensusTemplate:PolicyWikipedia:Village Pump (idea Lab)Template:RfcTemplate:ProposedWikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryTemplate:Subcat GuidelineWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Watchlist NoticesWikipedia:CANVASSINGWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Polling Is Not A Substitute For DiscussionTemplate:ProposedTemplate:Subcat GuidelineTemplate:PolicyTemplate:SupplementTemplate:EssayTemplate:FailedWikipedia:Template Messages/Wikipedia NamespaceWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:PRJDELWikipedia:HISPAGESWikipedia:Avoid Instruction CreepTemplate:SupplementTemplate:Information PageTemplate:EssayTemplate:HistoricalTemplate:SupersededTemplate:Under DiscussionTemplate:Disputed TagTemplate:Under DiscussionWikipedia:Miscellany For DeletionWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:Policy Writing Is HardWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:What "Ignore All Rules" MeansWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Be BoldTemplate:Under DiscussionTemplate:Under Discussion-inlineWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Gaming The SystemWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (medicine)Wikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Requests For Comment/Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Perennial ProposalsWikipedia:Product, Process, PolicyHelp:Introduction To Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:PrinciplesWikipedia:Content Forking/InternalWikipedia:Office ActionsBook:Key Wikipedia Policies & GuidelinesTemplate:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesTemplate Talk:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not A DictionaryWikipedia:Article TitlesWikipedia:NotabilityWikipedia:AutobiographyWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (medicine)Wikipedia:Do Not Include The Full Text Of Lengthy Primary SourcesWikipedia:PlagiarismWikipedia:Do Not Create HoaxesWikipedia:Fringe TheoriesWikipedia:Patent NonsenseWikipedia:External LinksWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:HarassmentWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Ownership Of ContentWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:No Legal ThreatsWikipedia:Child ProtectionWikipedia:Paid-contribution DisclosureWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Conflict Of InterestWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:Gaming The SystemWikipedia:Please Do Not Bite The NewcomersWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Responding To Threats Of HarmWikipedia:Deletion PolicyWikipedia:Proposed DeletionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Attack PageWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Revision DeletionWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:Banning PolicyWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:Protection PolicyWikipedia:Article SizeWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:DisambiguationWikipedia:HatnoteWikipedia:Set Index ArticlesWikipedia:SubpagesWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:SignaturesWikipedia:Broad-concept ArticleWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/AccessibilityWikipedia:Make Technical Articles UnderstandableWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Dates And NumbersWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ImagesWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LayoutWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LinkingWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ListsWikipedia:Categories, Lists, And Navigation TemplatesWikipedia:CategorizationWikipedia:Template NamespaceWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:PrinciplesTemplate:Wikipedia AccountsTemplate Talk:Wikipedia AccountsUser (computing)GovernanceWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Why Create An Account?Special:CreateAccountWikipedia:Request An AccountWikipedia:IPs Are Human TooWikipedia:IP Addresses Are Not PeopleWikipedia:IP HopperWikipedia:New AccountHelp:Logging InHelp:Reset PasswordWikipedia:Username PolicyWikipedia:Changing UsernameWikipedia:Usernames For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Unified LoginWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Password Strength RequirementsWikipedia:User Account SecurityWikipedia:Personal Security PracticesHelp:Two-factor AuthenticationWikipedia:Simple 2FAWikipedia:Using AWB With 2FATemplate:Committed IdentityWikipedia:On Privacy, Confidentiality And DiscretionWikipedia:Compromised AccountsWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:FAQ/BlocksWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/BlockingWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/Blocking/ToolsWikipedia:AutoblockWikipedia:Appealing A BlockWikipedia:Guide To Appealing BlocksWikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request SystemWikipedia:Blocking IP AddressesWikipedia:Open ProxiesWikipedia:Banning PolicyWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban AppealsWikipedia:SanctionsWikipedia:Editing RestrictionsWikipedia:General SanctionsWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary SanctionsWikipedia:Arbitration Enforcement LogWikipedia:Sanctions (essay)Wikipedia:Long-term AbuseWikipedia:Standard OfferWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Single-purpose AccountWikipedia:Sleeper AccountWikipedia:Vandalism-only AccountWikipedia:WikibreakWikipedia:WikiProject User Scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak EnforcerWikipedia:RetiringWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Clean StartUser:Worm That Turned/Quiet ReturnWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For PermissionsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Administrator InstructionsWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/Granting And Revoking User RightsWikipedia:Account CreatorWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Account CreatorWikipedia:AutopatrolledWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/AutopatrolledWikipedia:AutoWikiBrowserWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/AutoWikiBrowserWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/ConfirmedWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Extended ConfirmedWikipedia:Edit Filter HelperWikipedia:File MoverWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/File MoverWikipedia:Mass Message SendersWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Mass Message SenderWikipedia:New Pages Patrol/ReviewersWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/New Page ReviewerWikipedia:Page MoverWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Page MoverWikipedia:Reviewing Pending ChangesWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Pending Changes ReviewerWikipedia:RollbackWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/RollbackWikipedia:Template EditorWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Template EditorWikipedia:IP Block ExemptionWikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request SystemWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Education NoticeboardWikipedia:Bot PolicyWikipedia:Bots/Requests For ApprovalWikipedia:Global Rights PolicyWikipedia:Volunteer Response TeamWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:BureaucratsWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Edit FilterWikipedia:Edit Filter NoticeboardWikipedia:CheckUserWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser And OversightWikipedia:Role Of Jimmy WalesWikipedia:CommitteesWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:Mediation CommitteeWikipedia:Bot Approvals GroupWikipedia:FunctionariesWikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/SPI/ClerksWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:FAQ/AdministrationWikipedia:Formal OrganizationWikipedia:Editorial Oversight And ControlWikipedia:Quality ControlWikipedia:Wikimedia FoundationWikipedia:Board Of TrusteesWikipedia:Founder's SeatWikipedia:MetaWikipedia:Leadership OpportunitiesWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:ElectionsWikipedia:Unbundling Administrators' PowersWikipedia:List Of PetitionsWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:ReformsHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia PoliciesCategory:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia AdministrationCategory:Wikipedia Procedural PoliciesCategory:Wikipedia Semi-protected Project PagesCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]This Page Is Protected. You Can View Its Source [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link