Information on the process[edit] What may be nominated for deletion here: Pages in these namespaces: Book:, Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText:, Education Program:, Topic:, Gadget:, Gadget definition:, and the various Talk: namespaces Userboxes (regardless of namespace) Files in the File namespace that have a local description pages but no local file (if there is a local file, Wikipedia:Files for discussion is the right venue) Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XfD venue. Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy. Before nominating a page for deletion[edit] Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines: Deleting pages in your own userspace If you want to have your own personal userpage deleted, there is no need to list it here; simply tag it with {{db-userreq}}. If you wish your user talk page (or user talk page archives) to be deleted, this is the correct location to request that. Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding {{subst:Uw-userpage}} ~~~~  to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using {{db-userreq}}. Take care not to bite newcomers - sometimes using the {{subst:welcome}} or {{subst:welcomeg}} template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first. Problematic userspace material is often addressed by the User pages guidelines including in some cases removal by any user or tagging to clarify the content or to prevent external search engine indexing. (Examples include copies of old, deleted, or disputed material, problematic drafts, promotional material, offensive material, inappropriate links, 'spoofing' of the MediaWiki interface, disruptive HTML, invitations or advocacy of disruption, certain kinds of images and image galleries, etc) If your concern relates to these areas consider these approaches as well, or instead of, deletion. User pages about Wikipedia-related matters by established users usually do not qualify for deletion. Articles that were recently deleted at AfD and then moved to userspace are generally not deleted unless they have lingered in userspace for an extended period of time without improvement to address the concerns that resulted in their deletion at AfD, or their content otherwise violates a global content policy such as our policies on Biographies of living persons that applies to any namespace. Policies, guidelines and process pages Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the policy as {{historical}} or redirecting it somewhere. Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors. WikiProjects and their subpages It is generally preferable that inactive WikiProjects not be deleted, but instead be marked as {{WikiProject status|inactive}}, redirected to a relevant WikiProject, or changed to a task force of a parent WikiProject, unless the WikiProject was incompletely created or is entirely undesirable. WikiProjects that were never very active and which do not have substantial historical discussions (meaning multiple discussions over an extended period of time) on the project talk page should not be tagged as {{historical}}; reserve this tag for historically active projects that have, over time, been replaced by other processes or that contain substantial discussion (as defined above) of the organization of a significant area of Wikipedia. Before deletion of an inactive project with a founder or other formerly active members who are active elsewhere on Wikipedia, consider userfication. Notify the main WikiProject talk page when nominating any WikiProject subpage, in addition to standard notification of the page creator. Alternatives to deletion Normal editing that doesn't require the use of any administrator tools, such as merging the page into another page or renaming it, can often resolve problems. Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move. Alternatives to MfD Speedy deletion If the page clearly satisfies a "general" or "user" speedy deletion criterion, tag it with the appropriate template. Be sure to read the entire criterion, as some do not apply in the user space. Proposed deletion is an option for non-controversial deletions of books (in both User: and Book: namespaces). Please familiarize yourself with the following policies[edit] Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on how to list anything for deletion Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – whose guidelines on discussion format and shorthands also apply here Wikipedia:Project namespace – our guidelines on "Wikipedia" namespace pages Wikipedia:User page – our guidelines on user pages and user subpages Wikipedia:Userboxes – our guideline on userboxes How to list pages for deletion[edit] Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions: Click to view instructions on listing pages for deletion To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted) Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process. I. Edit PageName: Enter the following text at the top of the page you are listing for deletion: {{mfd}} for a second or subsequent nomination use {{mfdx|2nd|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}}} If the nomination is for a userbox, please put <noinclude></noinclude> tags around the {{mfd}}, as to not mess up the formating for the userbox. or {{mfd|GroupName}} if nominating several similar related pages in an umbrella nomination. Choose a suitable name as GroupName and use it on each page. or {{subst:md1-inline|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}}} if you are nominating a userbox in userspace or similarly transcluded page. Please include in the edit summary the phrase Added MfD nomination at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]] replace PageName with the name of the page that is up for deletion. Please don't mark your edit summary as a minor edit. Check the "Watch this page" box if you would like to follow the page in your watchlist. This may help you to notice if your MfD tag is removed by someone. Save the page II. Create its MfD subpage. The resulting MfD box at the top of the page should contain the link "this page's entry" Click that link to open the page's deletion discussion page. Insert this text: {{subst:mfd2| pg={{subst:#titleparts:{{subst:PAGENAME}}||2}}| text=Reason why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ replacing Reason... with your reasons why the page should be deleted and sign the page. Do not substitute the pagename, as this will occur automatically. Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate. Please use an edit summary such as Creating deletion discussion page for [[PageName]] replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion. Save the page. III. Add a line to MfD. Follow   this edit link   and add a line to the top of the list: {{subst:mfd3| pg=PageName}} Put the page's name in place of "PageName". Include the discussion page's name in your edit summary like Added [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]] replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion. Save the page. If nominating a page that has been nominated before, use the page's name in place of "PageName" and add {{priorxfd|PageName}} in the nominated page deletion discussion area to link to the previous discussions and then save the page using an edit summary such as Added [[Template:priorxfd]] to link to prior discussions. If nominating a page from someone else's userspace, notify them on their main talk page. For other pages, while not required, it is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the miscellany that you are nominating. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the page and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter or Wikipedia Page History Statistics. For your convenience, you may add {{subst:MFDWarning|PageName}} ~~~~ to their talk page in the "edit source" section, replacing PageName with the pagename. Please use an edit summary such as Notice of deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]] replacing PageName with the name of the nomination page you are proposing for deletion. If the user has not edited in a while, consider sending the user an email to notify them about the MfD if the MfD concerns their user pages. If you are nominating a Portal, please make a note of your nomination here and consider using the portal guidelines in your nomination. If you are nominating a WikiProject, please post a notice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, in addition to the project's talk page and the talk pages of the founder and active members. Administrator instructions[edit] Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.

Contents 1 Information on the process 1.1 Before nominating a page for deletion 1.2 Please familiarize yourself with the following policies 1.3 How to list pages for deletion 1.4 Administrator instructions 2 Current discussions 2.1 February 24, 2018 2.2 February 23, 2018 2.2.1 Draft:Batzaya Choijiljav 2.2.2 Draft:Dragons And Stuff 2.2.3 User:PK2/Template:Infobox broadcast 2.2.4 User:PK2/Template:Infobox Broadcast 2.2.5 Draft:Cheapest hosting plans in india 2.2.6 Draft:Julian Adrat 2.2.7 Draft:Big Ghost 2.2.8 2.2.9 Draft:Nudah 2.2.10 Draft:Megan Rain 2.2.11 Draft:Shahab Khan 2.3 February 22, 2018 2.3.1 Draft:王府半岛酒店 2.3.2 User:Dramatic24/sandbox 2.3.3 Draft:Dollar Digits Calling App 2.3.4 User:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof is a term for vampire vestures. 2.3.5 User:Monazami/sandbox/Monazami 2.3.6 User:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical Writing 2.3.7 User:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther Kane 2.3.8 User:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr. 2.3.9 Draft:List of books considered the worst 2.3.10 Draft:Children of the Caribbean Foundation 2.3.11 User:Linton.zeng/sandbox 2.3.12 User talk:Bindi Arts 2.3.13 Draft:Abhijit Naskar 2.4 February 21, 2018 2.4.1 User:2829VC/C.U.R.E. 2.4.2 User:HelicopterLlama/sandbox 2.4.3 Wikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America Destubathon 2.4.4 User:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21 2.4.5 Draft:Pewdiepie's Chair 2.4.6 Draft:نسرين الحمدانى 2.4.7 Draft:Kamogelo T-reX Letshwithi 2.4.8 User:Horsdt71/sandbox 2.4.9 Draft:Anna McHale 2.4.10 Draft:FAM71E1 2.4.11 Draft:Thomas Polk Park 2.4.12 Draft:Republic of Florida (group) 2.4.13 User:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy equation 2.5 February 20, 2018 2.5.1 Draft:Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide 2.5.2 User:Sweetsuresh777/sandbox 2.5.3 User:NapasornCho/sandbox 2.5.4 User:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Infantry Regiments 2.6 February 19, 2018 2.6.1 User:Dave Harton 2.6.2 User:Back files 2.6.3 Draft:Ushti Baba 2.6.4 Draft:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Secondary focus 2.6.5 Draft:Ringed topos 2.7 February 18, 2018 2.7.1 Draft:Walter Noetico 2.7.2 Draft:David Parsons 2.7.3 User:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David Parsons 2.8 February 17, 2018 2.8.1 Draft:Blake Mawson 2.8.2 User:David B Miguel 2.8.3 2.8.4 Draft:List of maritime science fiction works 2.8.5 Draft:Main theorem of elimination theory 2.8.6 Draft:Cyclic algebra 2.8.7 Draft:Hearts Pirates 2.8.8 Draft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami Thakur 2.9 February 16, 2018 2.9.1 Draft:Guadalix Democratic Republic 2.9.2 Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/elevated 3 Old business 3.1 February 16, 2018 3.1.1 Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment 3.1.2 Draft:Bredon cohomology 3.1.3 Draft:Ring with the approximation property 3.1.4 Draft:Discrepancy (algebraic geometry) 3.1.5 Draft:IDubbbzTV 3.1.6 User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH! 3.1.7 Draft:Adria Rae 3.1.8 Draft:Cat Pausé 3.1.9 Draft:Bobby2pistols 3.1.10 User:007paritosh/sandbox 3.1.11 Draft:4imprint plc 3.2 February 13, 2018 3.2.1 Draft:Distributional calculus 3.3 February 10, 2018 3.3.1 User:Valoem/List of auteurs 4 Closed discussions

Current discussions[edit] Pages currently being considered for deletion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section. February 24, 2018[edit] February 23, 2018[edit] Draft:Batzaya Choijiljav[edit] Draft:Batzaya Choijiljav (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Appearent autobio of a non-notable person. I believe this has been deleted before for the title was already on my watchlist. Suggest the user pursue alternative outlets to promote themselves. Legacypac (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, not notable and nothing to suggest they are going to become notable. Article in its current state is entirely unsourced. (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Dragons And Stuff[edit] Draft:Dragons And Stuff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This draft was resubmitted with the addition of non-reliable sources, and with a note that the fans will be editing the article after it is accepted. It doesn't appear that the article is likely to be submitted in a neutral form. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete purely promotional. I removed a long list of facebook and youtube channel links Legacypac (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PK2/Template:Infobox broadcast The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. Redirects are nominated/discussed at WP:RFD. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:PK2/Template:Infobox broadcast[edit] User:PK2/Template:Infobox broadcast (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Userspace #redirect (with no incoming links) to a template.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  17:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PK2/Template:Infobox Broadcast The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. Redirects are nominated/discussed at WP:RFD. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:PK2/Template:Infobox Broadcast[edit] User:PK2/Template:Infobox Broadcast (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Userspace #redirect (with no incoming links) to a template.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  17:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Draft:Cheapest hosting plans in india[edit] Draft:Cheapest hosting plans in india (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:NOTHOWTO/WP:NOTWEBHOST/WP:OR//WP:PROMO etc. There is no way this can grow into a encyclopedic article. Kleuske (talk) 08:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Quite. Per nom. >SerialNumber54129...speculates 09:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Inherently promotional topic, even if the creator's intentions were pure as gold. If I had seen a speedy nom on this, I would have deleted it. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete we need a hopeless Draft CSD based on NOT. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Julian Adrat[edit] Draft:Julian Adrat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Non-notable unsourced Legacypac (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Big Ghost[edit] Draft:Big Ghost (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined 5 times so far, up for AfC review again. Nothing about this "bio" suggests it will ever become an article. Legacypac (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[edit] (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined 5 times and postponed from deletion several times. Either we should delete it or mainspace it so it can be run through NPP Legacypac (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Nudah[edit] Draft:Nudah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unsourced nonsense about a 19 year old. Maybe BLP violations Legacypac (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Totally inane. Has elements of attack page and BLP violations. jni (delete)...just not interested 18:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Megan Rain The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per criterion G7 by Fastily. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Megan Rain[edit] Draft:Megan Rain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined and according the reviewer "Subject was deleted at AfD and the title has been salted against recreation. New facts since AfD still don't establish notability." so we should remove this page sooner than later. Legacypac (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC) DeleteChabota Kanguya (talk) 06:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Draft:Shahab Khan[edit] Draft:Shahab Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This draft has been declined three times and is not likely to be an article. This draft was created by blocked sockpuppeteers and sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete along with any other versions. Just spam about yet another non-notable indian actor. Legacypac (talk) 04:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC) February 22, 2018[edit] Draft:王府半岛酒店[edit] Draft:王府半岛酒店 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page is on a non-historic, non-architecturally notable Beijing hotel, written mostly in Chinese. There are hundreds of similar hotels in Beijing so there is no reason to retain this advertising. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:Dramatic24/sandbox[edit] User:Dramatic24/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Contested U5 Cabayi (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Approaching 3 years since the last edit and it appears to be promotional in nature given the links. ALH (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Dollar Digits Calling App[edit] Draft:Dollar Digits Calling App (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page has been declined for notability and advertising a few times (see page history, not just what shows up on page now. It was moved to mainspace amd tagged for notability there, and then kicked back to Draft. Given the number of different editors that have expressed the unsuitability of this page about a new app, it warrents a deletion discussion. Legacypac (talk) 08:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Not seeing any sort of coverage of this outside of those "sources" that are mostly promotional in nature. If the decision is to keep this, it needs a major revamp. ALH (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof is a term for vampire vestures.[edit] User:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof is a term for vampire vestures. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Admin failed to delete blank AfC submission so we need to debate this Legacypac (talk) 07:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:Monazami/sandbox/Monazami[edit] User:Monazami/sandbox/Monazami (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Admin failed to delete blank AfC submission so here we are to debate it Legacypac (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical Writing[edit] User:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical Writing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Improperly declined CSD. Legacypac (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - Properly declined, because the CSD criteria for drafts are stupid. But maybe there is invisible magical writing in it. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC) It met the criteria at the time of the decline but an admin has changed the criteria forcing us to MfD these. Discuss at WP:CSD Legacypac (talk) 04:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Properly declined, but it is unfortunate that G2 is so stupidly limited. jni (delete)...just not interested 19:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther Kane[edit] User:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther Kane (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Improperly declined Test page submitted to AfC Legacypac (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - Properly declined, because the criteria are stupid. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr.[edit] User:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Improperly declined Test page Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - CSD properly declined, because the criteria are stupid. Delete anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:List of books considered the worst[edit] Draft:List of books considered the worst (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Just a bad idea. Someone's worst book is someone else's gem. Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Per WP:LSC a list article require a selection criteria which is unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources. An example is List of best-selling books. There is no objective "considered the worst" criteria other than a list already selected by a particular source with whatever beliefs and biases apply to that source. Johnuniq (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Comment quite a few similarly themed pages exist in Template:Worst works. though a lot of the pages there do have issues, they've existed in mainspace for a fair amount of time without being deleted for being possibly a bad idea thus far at least. do tend to agree w johnuniq's specific reasoning though ~Helicopter Llama~ 18:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as Helicopter notes, it could be possible to have an valid article on this topic sourced to critical reviews and tertiary summaries of those reviews. But since this draft is sourced only to user-generated content, it would not be useful in creating that valid article. VQuakr (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC) please, my father was helicopter. me llamo llama ~Helicopter Llama~ 04:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Children of the Caribbean Foundation[edit] Draft:Children of the Caribbean Foundation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined as advertising by AfC reviewer. G11 Advertising CSD declined by an admin. So let's discuss and decide if this is Advertising or a valid page. Legacypac (talk) 05:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:Linton.zeng/sandbox[edit] User:Linton.zeng/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Test edit submitted to AFC. The only edits by this account have been this test and vandalism. G2 may apply, on my reading, but has been declined. G2 does not apply in user space, unless submitted to AFC; but this was submitted to AFC. In any case, we don't need it. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Robert, I missed the undiscussed addition of "unless submitted to WP:AfC" earlier this month. This has now been reverted by someone else. The intent of G2 has always been that you can perform tests in your userspace without it getting speedy deleted. ~ GB fan 11:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete the content is "dkjkdnccmznxkscj ncnm antipoise" that the admin is forcing us to discuss this is nuts. That said, its a sandbox, which is never really deleted, so just blanking the whole page would have been fine. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete G1 should contain similar language to G2 to allow the former criterion to be applied to AfC submissions. VQuakr (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Keep - there is no reason to delete a sandbox because they were testing something. Remove the AFC template from the test if that is the problem. ~ GB fan 11:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Testing or vandalism? Cause sending this to AfC is not right. Legacypac (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Replace page content with {{user sandbox}} This is what I do when encounter these. jni (delete)...just not interested 19:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User talk:Bindi Arts[edit] User talk:Bindi Arts (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) I don't know what this is – most of seems to have been copied from Bharti Kher – but it gives the impression of a WP:fakearticle in user talk space. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Abhijit Naskar[edit] Draft:Abhijit Naskar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Hopeless self serving bio with way too many refs Legacypac (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. Promotion. The first three references incidate the subject is a journalist, his reports, and one doesn’t even include his name. The rest should be written off as WP:Reference bombing. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. hopeless promotional, and no underlyng notability DGG ( talk ) 07:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC) February 21, 2018[edit] User:2829VC/C.U.R.E.[edit] User:2829VC/C.U.R.E. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) User has not edited since 2015. The statements about this not being published at the top run counter to the fact it is published within Wikipedia userspace. Legacypac (talk) 20:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Blank. {{Userpage blanked}}. Pages like this are not worth reviewing, just blank. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:HelicopterLlama/sandbox[edit] User:HelicopterLlama/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Jeezus I have no idea what the heck is going on here, but I'm pretty sure it falls afoul of some part of WP:NOT. Probably also contains a lot of WP:COPYVIO. There's an AfD tag in there somewhere, which is what I came to get rid of, but I can't even find it. ansh666 18:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC) i have removed the afd template tag which was causing troubles, ~Helicopter Llama~ 18:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as full of problems. Legacypac (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America Destubathon[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America Destubathon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page does not currently serve a purpose; see talk page discussion --Another Believer (Talk) 17:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete what a mess. Legacypac (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC) What a mess?? It was and still is a planned contest. I thought it was a good idea to try to improve a few thousand US and Canadian articles in one contest. Don't you want that?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Then recreate when editors are interested in starting a campaign. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Or, perhaps convert the page to a user subpage, since you wish to save the content? I just don't see the need to have this in the main space. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC) I don't mind moving it into my user space.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. It was claimed to be a North American initiative but only started out as just Canada and US. Mexico was added as an afterthought while Caribbeans was totally forgotten. So I agree with the sentiment that it's a mess. OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Keep - the intent is good even if the parameters need some fine tuning. We don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Any competition that aims to destub stubs is good. Regarding scope, it is relatively straightforward to use List of sovereign states and dependent territories in North America as a guide (presuming it is correct, I don't know as it is not an area I am too familiar with.) Scope is easy to sort out without nuking it. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Comment: If User:Dr. Blofeld is fine with converting this page into a user sub page, can an admin close this discussion and move the page? No need to have more editors spend time here, right? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Comment Dr. Blofeld has retired from Wikipedia. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Keep Throw a banner up top marking the page as inactive and leave it alone until someone wants to move it forward, at which time they can remove the banner and modify the page however they want. The only problem with the page's existence is the possibility of people landing there and thinking it might be active now. Once you fix that, I see no benefit in deleting something that might eventually be useful, and can be modified as desired either tomorrow or in five years. I'm fairly confident Dr. Blofeld will unretire, so moving to his userspace wouldn't be a horrible outcome, but I just don't see the point, and it's far less useful if someone besides Dr. Blofeld wants to organize it. Just find/create an appropriate "currently inactive" banner and leave it alone. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Keep, per Floquenbeam, and mark inactive. Why are we discussing this, for Chrissake? What harm is this page doing besides being inactive and appearing active? Vanamonde (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Comment/Question: @Floquenbeam and Vanamonde93: For the record, here is the version of the page nominated for deletion (not the current version, which was updated by Dr. Blofeld). If this discussion results in a keep vote, does that mean we can't move the page to User:Dr. Blofeld/The North America Destubathon, even though they said we could? --Another Believer (Talk) 23:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC) My thinking is that if something is coming up from scratch, then userfying it until it is at a form approaching being ready to go is good. Right now, my take on this is whether there is a choice between making it all north america or splitting into subsections. There have been Asia and Africa ones...though it would be a stretch to see the US as underrepresented if the main point is addressing systemic bias. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21[edit] User:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Abandoned draft in Indonesian about a now dead website distributing pirated films. Sam Sailor 10:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete clearly notable and deserves extensive coverage in English Wikipedia. Just look at the line up of editors wishing to delete Peter Wang (cadet) as we struggle to remove non-notable content about people and websites that no one but their promotor cares about learning about. Legacypac (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Pewdiepie's Chair[edit] Draft:Pewdiepie's Chair (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Hopeless draft. We should discourage these. Legacypac (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Could warrant a mention in the main article but doesn't seem notable enough for a full stand-alone article. ALH (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - I could make some comment about sitting in the chair, but on the Internet, no one understands sarcasm. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:نسرين الحمدانى[edit] Draft:نسرين الحمدانى (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Repeated submission of placeholder content under a non-English title. Legacypac (talk) 05:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Kamogelo T-reX Letshwithi[edit] Draft:Kamogelo T-reX Letshwithi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) No chance of meeting WP:N. We need a CSD for these Legacypac (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Obvious delete. Why we don't have some form of A7 for drafts that have been submitted for review is beyond me. Draft space is a mess with stuff like this. (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC) User:Horsdt71/sandbox[edit] User:Horsdt71/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Stupidity that will never be an article. We need a CSD for hopeless drafts. Legacypac (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anna McHale The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per criterion G10 by SoWhy. Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Anna McHale[edit] Draft:Anna McHale (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Either complete nonsense, an attempt at fiction, or an attack on the people named. We need a CSD for hopeless drafts. Legacypac (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete utter nonsense. ALH (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC) {{db|horseshit}} Reyk YO! 09:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Draft:FAM71E1[edit] Draft:FAM71E1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Duplicate of FAM71E1. No need for this draft, which does not have the references of the accepted article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete not needed Legacypac (talk) 03:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Thomas Polk Park[edit] Draft:Thomas Polk Park (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Tagged Promising draft. Delete G13 or move to mainspace? Legacypac (talk) 03:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Copied from talkpage: I was interested in publishing this page, but new to the community wasn't quite sure how to?Lornagraphic (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Withdraw and I'll send it to AfC. Legacypac (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Republic of Florida (group)[edit] Draft:Republic of Florida (group) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) The article was created in the wake of the Parklands shooting due to the media reports on the purported affiliation of the suspect with the group. Please see Talk:Douglas_High_School_shooting#Claims_by_Republic_of_Florida. This was shown to be a hoax / publicity seeking, and the media quickly retracted their statements on the matter. The group itself is not otherwise notable and reported comprises 5 people. For a recap, please see "How white nationalists fooled the media about Florida shooter", Politico. I had previously moved the article into draft, after discussing with the article creator. The article has been recently moved into main space by another editor. However, this seems the case of WP:TOOSOON / borderline WP:HOAX. I moved the article into draft again and am starting this MfD for community input. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete and thanks for the excellent explanation. Legacypac (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Delete . K.e.coffman is wise. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC) User:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy equation[edit] User:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy equation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Invented by the user and of no value to the project. Legacypac (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC) February 20, 2018[edit] Draft:Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide[edit] Draft:Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) "Promising draft" up for G13 deletion. Has sources and is quite lengthy. Legacypac (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Delete I just noticed that it is the same as what was deleted here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC) User:Sweetsuresh777/sandbox[edit] User:Sweetsuresh777/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This autobiography of a non-notable person is being resubmitted with minor changes, but will never be an encyclopedic article. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. CV. No indication of notability. I think it is CSD#G11 eligible. Probably U5 too, although I’m not sure what to make of his DraftSpace article on a politician. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC) User:NapasornCho/sandbox[edit] User:NapasornCho/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Duplicate of Draft:Kalae. What do we want to do with these two drafts? The topic is probably worthy of coverage, but this draft is far from ready for article space, and the original author hasn't edited in well over a year. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Delete the sandbox. I'll fix the Draft. All the info is there it just needs cleanup. Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Support Legacypac’s plan. Redirect the sandbox to the draft would have been a good “do nothing” solution, but if Legacypac fixes and checks to avoid losing information, the deletion of the lesser fork is better. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC) User:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Infantry Regiments[edit] User:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Infantry Regiments (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC) This article was deleted via AfD but moved to userspace. Now various editors are maintaining it because it has so many images. Either we need the article in mainspace or we should actually delete it and cut down on the maintenance. Userspace is not for the indefinite hosting of deleted pages with no effort to address the reasons for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Large enough that I would prefer to relist at least once to see if anyone has any thoughts. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Blank. Not bad enough for this to need deletion, blanking will solve the noted problem. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC) February 19, 2018[edit] Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dave Harton (2nd nomination) The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per criteria G4 and U5 by Anthony Bradbury. Steel1943 (talk) 18:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC) User:Dave Harton[edit] User:Dave Harton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UP#COPIES, WP:HOARD, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:FAKEARTICLE. Recreation of article content that was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Chase (UK game show) episodes. See also: Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#Chaser records Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#Episode results. Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#A place for the missing details AldezD Content was speedily deleted 1 January 2018 (see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dave Harton), then recreated by user 14 February 2018. AldezD (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, per the result of the last nomination. ALH (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. User:Back files[edit] User:Back files (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) User:Wikilists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Redundant to the draft namespace. Any subpages should either be deleted as stale or moved into draftspace or the userspace of a real user. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC) (edited 02:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)) Delete all. This is a misuse of userspace. We don't need a shadow encyclopedia of topics not suitable for mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Note: Currently, the only subpages are: User:Back files/Jews in the history of business, created by Wikidemon and last touched in 2008, which underwent AfD in 2008 before being draftified; User:Wikilists/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever, created by the indefinitely blocked AKR619 (talk · contribs) and last touched in 2009; and User:Wikilists/List of songs with numbers in the title, which has been edited recently by Buf7579 but was created by HappyDog. Also pinging Sam who seems the progenitor of this workaround. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Delete An interesting work around from back in the day before the draft namespace existed, and if nobody wanted to claim ownership within their own userspace. At any rate, times have changed, and had the first two been placed in draftspace, they'd be G13 eligible. The numbers list is not an encyclopedic list. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC) I had already notified Sam on his talk page, so pinging him wasn't technically necessary. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC) No opinion — as creator of a subpage that was probably a copy of a now-deleted article, I have no objection. The subpage is mildly interesting, but the community has decided it is not appropriate content for the encyclopedia so the subpage's existence does not support keeping the parent page. - Wikidemon (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Keep I had forgotten about these pages in the years since I created this. A little background. Back in the early days of Wikipedia things were much more flexible as we figured things out and guidelines were being developed. There were many interesting and popular pages that were unsourced, but full of interesting crowd sourced information that didn't quite fit anywhere. An example is User:Wikilists/List of songs with numbers in the title. While this is unsourced, it seemed that the information in it was obvious, not really requiring a source because the guidelines said that only information "likely to be challenged" needed sourcing. The only way to challenge an entry to such a list was to show that no such song actually existed, and doing so was not controversial. People enjoyed contributing to these pages and I believe, back then, they helped get people involved in editing Wikipedia. Then there was a big move to delete all such lists, a move that was very successful. It seemed to me at the time that there could be a way to accommodate crowd-sourced lists, and I hoped that a new namespace or even a new project (Wikilists) could be created to accommodate them. In the meantime, I created these user pages and rescued a few pages from oblivion. The idea did not get traction, so I abandoned it. I still think there is value to crowd-sourced lists that don't fit into the conservative encyclopedic model. Rather than delete all of these page, could they just be moved to my user space? I'll do the work moving them... -- SamuelWantman 22:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC) I could see an argument that User:Wikilists/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever could have some merit if improved a la List of films considered the worst, and thus could be userified, but I really think User:Back files/Jews in the history of business in particular has to go, for all the reasons in the AfD. Even assuming the best intentions, it's trouble. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Keep and move to draft space (or to Sam's user space or to my own userspace) for expansion into an article. As I said at the original afd, preferably "turn into an actual discussion of the topic, not just a list. I am certainly aware of the possibility of ethnic prejudice for articles of this type, but proper NPOV handling can deal with it. There was a prejudice against trying to write on the topics of "Jews in [whatever]" years ago, when the apparent bias of some of the editors involved made them vulnerable. But we should have by now learned to handle topics of this sort . That an article would be "trouble" is no reason for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 02:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC) And then do what with the main User:Back files and User:Wikilists pages? {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Ushti Baba[edit] Draft:Ushti Baba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Twice declined at AfC by different users as a non-notable band. Twice nominated G13 as abandoned by different users but twice the tags have been removed. This page has had since 2015 to demonstrate notability but the topic does not pass WP:NMUSIC and it's time to delete the page. Legacypac (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Delete No indication of notability Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Secondary focus[edit] Draft:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Secondary focus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Split off over a year ago. Seems like a fork to me. Is this still needed? Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Ringed topos[edit] Draft:Ringed topos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Math draft up for G13. No work done in over three years. Effort to Redirect it 6 months back was. reversed as "vandalism". If abandoned or no longer required, it should be deleted. If of some use for merge, it should be redirected again until an editor is actively working on it. Legacypac (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep: This is a notable topic. It is a subtopic of topos but just as we have ringed space in addition to topological space, the topic seems to deserve a standalone-article treatment. -- Taku (talk) 07:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep The section about sheaves of E n {\displaystyle E_{n}} -rings is awkwardly incomplete, but if it were either cut completely or filled out more, we'd have a respectable stub here. XOR'easter (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC) If the other editors want to comment out that section (which is not essential), move the draft to the mainspace and then add that section back when it becomes more complete, I can be on board with that. -- Taku (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC) I'll withdraw in favor of a proper move to mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC) February 18, 2018[edit] Draft:Walter Noetico[edit] Draft:Walter Noetico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page has been declined multiple times but it has extensive inline and additional referencing. The artist has been covered extensively in publications for the movements he created. I think the page needs more review before we delete. User:DGG expressed interest in this too so pinging. Legacypac (talk) 17:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Keep , cleanup, and move to mainspace. I consider him probably though not unquestionably notable. The current version is my partial cleanup. I Intended to continue, but I have about 500 AfCs on my list to follow up. I think I should have moved it to mainspace instead, because articles are very much more likely to be improved there than at AfC. This is an example of one key problem with our AfC process: too few people willing to seriously help an AfC get improved. DGG ( talk ) 20:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Withdraw I support a move to mainspace where the page will be exposed to a lot more editors. Legacypac (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:David Parsons[edit] Draft:David Parsons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Duplicate of Draft:David R. Parsons and another sandbox version, all created by a connected contributor. Draft:David R. Parsons is the 'least badly formatted' of them, so let it stay and get rid of the other two. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Delete duplicate. I redirected the sandbox to the best version so it is effectively gone. Legacypac (talk) 02:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC) User:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David Parsons[edit] User:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David Parsons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Duplicate of Draft:David Parsons and of Draft:David R. Parsons. All three drafts are created by a connected contributor. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:David R. Parsons is the least badly formatted of these drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC) I redircted the sandbox at the better Draft version. This can be closed by someone with the right script. Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC) February 17, 2018[edit] Draft:Blake Mawson[edit] Draft:Blake Mawson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This autobiography isn't going to pass notability and be neutral as long as the author is the person who is submitting it. If a volunteer editor thinks that the subject is notable, then we can keep this draft to let them work on it. Otherwise, we don't need it. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete not needed. Legacypac (talk) 02:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC) User:David B Miguel[edit] User:David B Miguel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Also covers User: Under the name of David B Miguel this includes photo and parts of text from David B. Samadi, which may be a BLP violation even though in userspace : Noyster (talk), 11:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Both as a problem. Legacypac (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[edit] (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) apparent self-description by a student, with no potential for an article. We unfortunately have no speedy criterion, but WP cannot be used as Facebook or a personal web sute, DGG ( talk ) 10:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete U5 or A7 but in draft-space. Yet another "top achiever" in school, who cannot figure out what kind of content encyclopedias have. jni (delete)...just not interested 11:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:List of maritime science fiction works[edit] Draft:List of maritime science fiction works (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) It has been found that this is not a genre in multiple discussions. There is a huge hill for this page to ever be accepted into mainspace. See the talkpage please. Legacypac (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep It's a small subgenre, but no less valid for that. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep, a good page and subgenre waiting for recognition, the concept is spot-on and I'm surprised that, as a draft nonetheless, it would even be considered for deletion. The External links and other data on the page indicate that it is already a genre or sub-genre, so there doesn't seems a problem there, and I really can't figure out why editors would want to keep the page out of visible space. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC) I refer everyone to the talkpage and these links to relevent discussions Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maritime_science_fiction, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of maritime science fiction media, Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_May_24#Draft:Maritime_science_fiction, Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_1#Category:Maritime_science_fiction. The core problem is this is a setting, and not effort. a category of works discussed in RS. Given all the input previously and that this draft has become stale it's time to end this Legacypac (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC) The only discussion and decision that you list above which concerns the draft page resulted in keeping the draft page. So by "it's time to end this" may I suggest that agreement has already been made to keep the draft if it is being worked on. I am one of the minor editors who have added a few work titles, and I should flesh them out a bit with descriptors, and I personally see the value of the page (probably under a different title, 'Underwater science fiction' seems more accurate as a descriptor, and the External links focus on it as a name). There have been sources added, I believe, since the major discussions you list above. I'd expect this incomplete draft, which does need working on, will at some point graduate to visible space. Until then, maybe editors can assist in adding to or otherwise editing the draft. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. suggesteddeletion reason does not seem to be applicable, as it is being worked on. Whether it will ultimately be acceptable can better be decided as a mainspace afd. DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Main theorem of elimination theory[edit] Draft:Main theorem of elimination theory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Up for G13. No work on this since Aug 2014 except to reverse an attempt to redirect it. Redirects help interested users find the draft from the related page "what links here" and remove the incompete effort from reader view, being mirrored etc. Legacypac (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep: This is an important theorem in mathematics. In Wikipedia, we prefer to have a standalone article for each important theorem (whence the draft article). I cannot find any exception in this case. — Taku (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC) @TakuyaMurata: I see it's your draft, if you are planning to continue working on it, sourcing it and moving it to mainspace, I don't have any objections. But articles usually don't use language like "We need to show that" - the current state of the draft looks more like personal notes - are you planning to create an article out of this? Seraphim System (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Yes, I intend to work on it (if not today); I also have a good track record of completing the drafts (as the majority of the drafts started by me are now in the mainspace). About royal we: many math articles in the mainspace use “we”, especially in the proofs; the employment of this writing style *does not mean* the draft is a personal note. If asked, I’m more than willing to add contexts and references (I started with the proof, since that’s the gist of the article). — Taku (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC) @Seraphim System: : Although there is such a thing as overuse of figures of speech involving the word "we", it must be recognized that standard figures of speech are not to be taken literally. Look at this manual page: The author's we found in scientific writing: We are thus led also to a definition of "time" in physics (Albert Einstein); Throughout this proof we assume that the function ƒ is uniformly continuous. Often rephrasing using the passive voice is preferable:[q] Throughout this proof it is assumed that the function ƒ is uniformly continuous. I used to find math articles labeled as looking like a "personal reflection or essay" and I was baffled by that tag since I couldn't find anything in the article that looked that way to me. It turned out someone was going around applying that tag to every article that used the word "we" without regard to whether it was meant literally. Its use in such sentences as "Throughout this proof we assume that the function ƒ is uniformly continuous." is standard throughout the English-speaking world and usually learned in secondary school. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC) This is true in other types of academic writing as well, "we" is often used - but MOS:WE is very clear that the tone is non-encyclopedic. If there is a consensus amongst math editors that it is ok in math articles, then I don't think templating every math article for a rewrite is going to be helpful, but I generally agree with the guideline that the passive voice would be preferable for consistency with the style of Wikipedia articles throughout the encyclopedia, but this is largely a style preference and it would have be discussed by editors working on the articles. Seraphim System (talk) 11:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Keep Since the editor is still active and states that he intends to turn it into an article, I don't see any problem with keeping it. For future reference, making a few edits to it every six months is enough to save it from G13 I think, it's mostly for articles that have been abandoned by inactive accounts.Seraphim System (talk) 09:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep I'm not seeing the problem here. Paul August ☎ 20:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Cyclic algebra[edit] Draft:Cyclic algebra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Math page of notes up for G13 again. No substantive work done since 2014. Delete or restore the redirect until someone is willing to work on this. Legacypac (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per Legacypac - it hasn't been worked on since 2014, so unless someone states an intention to resume work on this in the future, I think it is fair to delete at this point.Seraphim System (talk) 08:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Keep: Well, this is a notable topic. Also, as far as I can tell, the topic is not covered in the mainspace. What is needed to find a good reference (there is a ref that I don’t like) — Taku (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Even a poor reference would be better than no reference in this case, I think (and adding it to the draft would make the draft less stale). XOR'easter (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC) That’s true; so I have added one. The coverage in the ref is only cursory so we need some more substantial ref (Maybe Weil’s basic number theory has a good discussion; I will check.) — Taku (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Hmm, we have a section on "cyclic algebra" in Factor system. Should that be expanded before splitting off a new article? XOR'easter (talk) 22:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Ok. Yes the definition appears there but I don't think the article is the best place for the discussions of say structure results of cyclic algebra on its own right; (see also [1] for additional possible references and contexts). The present draft, as quite drafty as it is, doesn't already fits neatly into factor system. -- Taku (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Besides the factor system article itself looks a bit problematic; it focuses too much on auxiliary topics like crossed product algebra, which also deserves its own article. I myself missed the factor article since it is not a natural place to find the discussion of a cyclic algebra (notice, in the stackexchange thread, factor system never comes up); this is the issue ultimately need to be fixed by having an article on cyclic algebra. -- Taku (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Scratch what I said about the ref: I found a good ref (one mentioned in the stackexchange thread). -- Taku (talk) 00:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep The "example" section is obviously incomplete, so it's not ready for main space yet, but it doesn't look far from being a decent stub. XOR'easter (talk) 04:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Move to main space — I cut out the "example" section, and what remains is a respectable stub. XOR'easter (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC) If this had been created in the main space, in its current state, it would be a perfectly acceptable stub. It has two sources. So we should just move it to the main space now and let others work on it when they want. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Move to main space as is. Paul August ☎ 00:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Hearts Pirates[edit] Draft:Hearts Pirates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) It's a recruiting page for a game. Doug Weller talk 07:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. Good ol' "attempt to communicate with someone" CSD criteria comes to mind, but this is in draft-space so lets delete it here in MFD. jni (delete)...just not interested 11:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. Probably qualifies for speedy under G11. VQuakr (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami Thakur[edit] Draft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami Thakur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Page deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrila Patitpavan Goswami Thakur but moved to Draft. It's been improved but not submitted to AfC. Now it is up for G13. The creator has abandoned it. Given the history... I'm uncomfortable G13ing it. Should it be returned to mainspace or reimpliment the AfD delete decision? Legacypac (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Because it was a mainspace page first, looking for more input. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - In the AFD, this was draftified to allow sourcing. It has not been sourced. The person may be notable, but there is no indication that this article will be completed. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Comment - Has anyone done a copyvio check? This is written in a style that is characteristic of Hindu hagiography and is likely to be copied from an official biography. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC) February 16, 2018[edit] Draft:Guadalix Democratic Republic[edit] Draft:Guadalix Democratic Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unsourced and no sources available. The chances of this becoming a legitimate article approach zero. Since the review template was removed, it's apparent that it's not going to be submitted. Delete per WP:NOTFREEWEBHOST/WP:MADEUP. Kleuske (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per it is made up by the page creator. Legacypac (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, clearly self-promotional and not a viable candidate for the Main namespace. --Kinu t/c 22:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Comment: this could probably deleted via WP:CSD#G11, since it's apparently self-promotional based on the name of the account that created it. I won't tag it as such since I have already !voted, and am fine with the discussion taking its course. --Kinu t/c 03:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/elevated[edit] Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/elevated (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Orphaned; appears to be abandoned. The BSicon catalogue is now on Commons, and this largely duplicates sections of those pages. Jc86035 (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Move to Commons, along with Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment. This should have been done along with all the other catalog pages. With reference to the "duplication" issue, it is often helpful to have all the icons in these broad sub-categories available in one place. Useddenim (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC) @Useddenim: I agree this would be useful in the short term, with the individual sections of the current catalogues being split up in the long term (replacing these two as well as the others). Jc86035 (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Old business[edit] Everything from here on down is old business; the 7-day review period that began 12:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC) ended today on 24 February 2018. Open discussions below this marker should be either closed or relisted above. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action. February 16, 2018[edit] Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment[edit] Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Orphaned; appears to be abandoned. The BSicon catalogue is now on Commons, and this largely duplicates sections of those pages. Jc86035 (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I assume a redirect would help with navigation to Commons? VQuakr (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Move to Commons, as noted with Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment. This should have been done along with all the other catalog pages. With reference to the "duplication" issue, it is often helpful to have all the icons in these broad sub-categories available in one place. Useddenim (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Bredon cohomology[edit] Draft:Bredon cohomology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Up for G13 again. Redirect reversed 6 months ago. No progress on draft since August 2014. Legacypac (talk) 08:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Merge to equivariant cohomology (and split off the section when it becomes large). —- Taku (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Move to mainspace as this is a notable topic – see the Encyclopedia of Mathematics, for example. A trout for the nominator as creating an MfD page adds to the time-wasting clutter, rather than reducing it. Andrew D. (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Trout not accepted User:Andrew Davidson MfD is the appropriate place to deal with this user's pages. Legacypac (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Keep - draft on a clearly notable non-duplicated topic (per Andrew D.) which is also clearly not ready for mainspace as it's only one incomplete sentence fragment. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Redirect as was done before. It saves the history but keeps the point that we don't allow the draft space to be used as a personal collection of math notes. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC) How does blanking the article with a redirect contribute to constructing the draft, though? The redirect just has to be overwritten in order to continue working on it. Seems pointlessly obstructive to me. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC) A redirect links the page to the related topic via "what links here" which helps interested users find it for possible expansion or merger. Secondly, redirects are not subject to G13 so they don't come up on maintenance lists every six months. Third the redirect preserves whatever value there is in the work without presenting an incomplete or unreferenced page to readers that may be mirrored to other sites. Legacypac (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I think it's reasonable to say the draft isn't going to be constructed at this point. Taku himself suggested a merge. I always prefer a merge from a redirect at XfDs, because it eliminates something that is policy-violating (i.e. the draft space is not a webhost for notes on math), while allowing the merger of any content that needs to be merged. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Well okay, I see what you're saying. Taku seems willing to help complete this to a mainspace-acceptable point, or if not we could probably kludge our way through merging it ourselves. There's not a lot of calculus in accounting but I'm less unfamiliar than most. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Ring with the approximation property[edit] Draft:Ring with the approximation property (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Up for G13 again today. Redirect reversed 6 months ago. No progress on draft since August 2014. Legacypac (talk) 08:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Move to the mainspace: this is already perfectly a fine stub in the mainspace. If the notability of the topic is in question (which I highly doubt), then it can be nominated for an AfD. — Taku (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Promote unless there's some more general article this could be appropriately merged into. Given that the author who I presume is a subject matter expert has not suggested one, I doubt there is. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I must mention that the notion is closely related to Artin's approximation theorem; I don't think the merger works since the theorem is only about a formal power series ring. (But I can be persuaded if someone editor can make a good argument.) — Taku (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Merge, Redirect, and Protect Merge what reasonable content into the parent article Noetherian ring, redirect the Draft page to parent, and protect it. Though to be perfectly honest there's no real content to add. I specifically vote against moving to mainspace, because this would not pass WP:V as there's not one cited fact that would allow this to survive. Promoting to mainspace only to have it be Speedied, PRODed, or AFDed is a perfect example of process for process sake. Hasteur (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC) I'm confident that it can survive an AfD (given my experience of writing many similar articles in the mainspace). Do you have a specific reason for the claim that the topic is not notable (so that it will likely fail to pass an AfD if nominated)? -- Taku (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC) I urgently advise you to strike above as it could be a violation of your topic ban. As to your "objection" please observe I didn't say notable. AFD is not just testing Notability. What I said (and you elected to overlook) is that because there's not one cited fact in this draft (just as there was no cited facts 6 months ago when I tried to redirect to a parent topic and you decided to object on burecratic reasons, again) there is little viability for it in mainspace. The New Page patrolers would have a field day with this if it were in main space as there's no way to know if it's made up word salad because there's no cited facts. NPPers could forcibly redirect the page elsewhere, they could propose uncontraversial deletion, they could also nominate the article for deletion on a very similar line of arguments that we're having right now. This belongs either as a scholarly work published outside of wikipedia or as a sub-topic of an already existing article. In short your stub isn't viable in mainspace so you should let the redirect happen and then you can splice over whatever content could work to a mainspace parent topic. Hasteur (talk) 03:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Simply ignoring off-topic stuff (e.g., topic ban), do you have any good piece of evidence supporting the claim that the draft will be deleted by an AfD if nominated? This draft does not look substantially different from other similar looking articles like Popescu’s theorem (which support my argument that it has a good chance of surviving an AfD). See also XOR'easter's commebt below. -- Taku (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Wow... Fillful ignorance there's not one cited fact in this draft. Your claim regarding Popescu's therom is a "Other stuff exists" argument, and in fact I would even argue that the Popescu article would be best served by merging and redirecting to Artin approximation theorem until such time that the theorem can stand on it's own. Thank you Taku for raising the example that so we can continue improving main space by cleaning up clearly deficient pages. Hasteur (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC) I ignored “not one cited fact” because this is off-topic; here we are discussing the topic’s viability as a standalone article; whether it duplicates the existing topic or it can pass the notability requirement. Also, since the question is the viability, it is perfectly reasonable and should be encouraged to look at the other stuff (since that would help ascertain whether it can pass an AfD or not.) —- Taku (talk) 19:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. It looks close to ready for main space. Sources exist; I haven't yet tried to find the best ones. XOR'easter (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC) OK, I've started trying to improve the state of the referencing (which, procedurally, means G13 is no longer applicable). XOR'easter (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Discrepancy (algebraic geometry)[edit] Draft:Discrepancy (algebraic geometry) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Up for G13 again. No work done since January 2015. Redirect reversed 6 months ago. Legacypac (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Keep: This seems to be a notable topic, at least to me. (I am adding more ref in min.) — Taku (talk) 08:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I note that canonical singularity already has some discussion of a special case of discrepancy (the notion of discrepancy is used to define canonical singularity. But that article itself is not the best place for the discussion of discrepancy per se.) — Taku (talk) 20:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Keep pending promotion - appears to be a notable topic worth a standalone article, even though it's likely to remain a stub. It is however not quite ready to promote, it has at least one "TO DO" section visible in the body. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:IDubbbzTV[edit] Draft:IDubbbzTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Title deleted 5 times from mainspace for lack of notability and declined 3 times so far at AfC. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Userfy. I want to keep editing and there are a couple of sources I have not used yet. The article was deleted before some sources were added to this draft. Thanks for nominating at MfD. Ꞷumbolo 08:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Sending to MfD is a good way to get further input beyond AfC declines. Legacypac (talk) 09:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I do not believe that this draft should be deleted as it is for an entity who is highly relevant. We just haven't been able to get many outside sources as most mainstream media outlets avoid discussion on this person due to his controversial nature. But he is very relevant in the YouTube community and deserves his own Wikipedia article. DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 16:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia does not rely on user generated content - like Youtube - to establish notability. Until he gets that mainstream attention, no page here. Legacypac (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC) He has gotten attention from a few sources outside of YouTube, but it's very rare and most paint him in a negative light which won't fly here as Wikipedia articles are to be a unbiased and neutral as possible. Also, CinemaSins has a wikipedia article despite the fact that he has gotten very little mainstream attention.DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Bad press, cited, is fine. I'll look into the linked page but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Legacypac (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC) fair enough DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Keep for now. A fair number of new GNews hits since the AfD suggests that the notability (ie independent coverage) of the underlying subject may have changed since October 2016. Since there are multiple editors expressing interest in improving it and the AfC submissions haven't been repetitive bludgeoning, let's give them a chance to work. VQuakr (talk) 07:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC) I agree. We should keep this so we can work on it more, find sources, and improve the article. DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC) User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH![edit] User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I stumbled on this useless page while searching for problematic pages. Maybe some kind of joke, but it does nothing to improve the encyclopedia. Legacypac (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC) maybe worth saving as a humourous essay? Seraphim System (talk) 07:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Keep doesn't seem to violate any aspect of WP:UPNOT. It is quite rude to troll user subpages and nominate them for deletion without a good reason; if you had concerns starting by talking to them on their talk page would have been preferable. VQuakr (talk) 07:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Nomination also does not address what has changed since the previous WP:SNOW keep. VQuakr (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. Stupid, but delightful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. Mostly harmless.--WaltCip (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. Within leeway for a productive Wikipedian. Is project related. I’m guessing it is intended to be sung to the music of, from Team America: World Police? A note to that effect could be added. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adria Rae The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Adria Rae[edit] Draft:Adria Rae (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This is a massive BLP violation. Also not notable. Legacypac (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Per nom. Don't think it meets WP:PORNBIO and that "early life" section definitely doesn't seem terribly biographical so to speak. ALH (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Good lord delete. VQuakr (talk) 07:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cat Pausé The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Cat Pausé[edit] Draft:Cat Pausé (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page has several issues, as detailed in the reviewer notes. The area of study is fairly unique and the name suggests some creative parents. Is this a hopeless cause or should this page be promoted ? Legacypac (talk) 07:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bobby2pistols The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:Bobby2pistols[edit] Draft:Bobby2pistols (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unsourced likely vandalism. Legacypac (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete not vandalism, but not a useful start at an article either. VQuakr (talk) 07:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:007paritosh/sandbox The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC) User:007paritosh/sandbox[edit] User:007paritosh/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined at AfC 5 times so far. Nominating here per the strikes proposal for a definitive decision. Legacypac (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Vermont | reply here 14:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Note: There is no "three strike rule" accepted by the community. There isn't even really a proposal. No formal RfC on this matter. The RfC that just closed, Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144#Three Strikes Rule for AfC submissions and reviews, did not really support this. Doing this as a "tester" case instead of actually seeing if the community accepts this is putting the horse before the cart. Not saying that the draft doesn't deserve deletion but please do not use a rationale that isn't supported by the community. --Majora (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The discussion closed with the suggestion that we try this manually. There was a lot of support. I feel strongly that drafts with a lot of declines deserve wider discussion for promotion or deletion. Legacypac (talk) 23:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I'm pretty sure that was just slakr's suggestion. Not an actual part of the consensus reading. Although clarification would be nice. The line that makes me think this is It might help to propose without the automatic/bot aspect. Slakr is saying that you should propose something else. Formally. Not use this rationale to start opening deletion discussion since the rationale doesn't yet have community acceptance. Again, I'm not saying that the draft should stay. In fact, I'm going to put myself formally down as a delete. Just please don't use this rationale until it actually has community acceptance. If I'm wrong with how I'm reading Slakr's close I apologize. --Majora (talk) 23:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC) slakr note — yeah; my close is more a suggestion for further discussion, not a prescription (the question was, after all, more about a bot listing these at MFD). That said, MfD is for whatever you reasonably think needs deleting that doesn't fall into the other xfds, and without it being codified, multiple declines—especially from more than one person—means multiple people already agree the content is likely deletion-worthy (else they'd just move it to mainspace for their "keep" vote), so opening an MfD can be one last check to make sure that those declining didn't simply make a mistake. --slakr\ talk / 03:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Weak Keep – Yes, this is a bad draft and doesn't appear to be making progress towards becoming acceptable. If it had been moved to draftspace, I'd probably be in favor of deletion. But it's a user sandbox and does not appear to particularly violate our policies about what may appear in a user sandbox. The multiple submissions and declines indicate a problem with the contributor, which deleting the draft would do little to address. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. esentially an advertisement, and should be deleted no matter where it is located . DGG ( talk ) 02:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:4imprint plc The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: no consensus . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Draft:4imprint plc[edit] Draft:4imprint plc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Declined at AfC 7 times. Nominating per the strikes proposal. The company is WP:LISTED and has substantial sales and history. Legacypac (talk) 01:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The declines are spread over several years, with attempts at improvement between the submissions. Since the underlying topic is plausible, keep. VQuakr (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. February 13, 2018[edit] Draft:Distributional calculus[edit] Draft:Distributional calculus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Page is up for G13 as stale. An editor indicated it was a "promising draft" and to use MfD. Instead of immediately seeking deletion I submitted the page to AfC for evaluation (I'm not qualified to tell if it is wonderful or nonsense) but that was removed by the creator. Can we get a decision on this Draft here? Legacypac (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Keep: I think this is an important topic not well-covered in the mainspace (whence the draft.) Although there is distribution (mathematics), there are more things that can be said that don’t fit into that mainspace article (e.g., examples; a lot more examples can be added to the draft.) Also, I removed the template because it is for an AfC draft. –– Taku (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, no reason to duplicate Distribution (mathematics) here. Unlike the present draft, that page defines what it is talking about. —Kusma (t·c) 21:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC) I admit the draft needs more work but for example, an example in the draft doesn’t appear in the mainspace article and we don’t want to populate the mainspace article with too many of those examples. Just as we have calculus besides limit (mathematics) and many others, the draft has a different scope than the "distribution" article; this make the draft not a fork even though there are some overlaps, which I think are allowed. — Taku (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Keep author says they still want it. I could be convinced to change my !vote if someone pointed out a consensus somewhere regarding this class of drafts by this specific author. VQuakr (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Off-topic. Stick to discussing the draft. There is a significant history of disruption around this specific user and his drafts. He is now topic banned from discussing deletion policy anywhere in site. Legacypac (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC) I record that this is part of the continuing stalking/harassment attack on me by Legacypac, despite the repeated warning. I hope it is clear that which party is trying to have an ordinary MfD discussion as opposed to disruption. — Taku (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Defer to WikiProject Mathematics - this subject is beyond my pay grade, but at a glance it appears that the distribution (mathematics) article is already quite large and seems to cover a wide range of subtopics; it could use to be split into more manageable articles on appropriate groups of these subtopics. It's well beyond my year-and-a-half of engineering school to suggest what those subgroupings ought to be, but distributional calculus seems like a start. Keep, in the meantime. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. While Taku has asserted that there is a difference between the topic here and the distribution (mathematics) article, that difference appears to be non-existent. Where the draft defines what it is about, it says "Distributional calculus can give a rigorous meaning to the formal equations such as: δ ( ξ ) = ∫ e 2 π i ⟨ x , ξ ⟩ d x . {\displaystyle \delta (\xi )=\int e^{2\pi i\langle x,\xi \rangle }\,dx.} " So the subject of the article is identical with the existing (far better) article distribution (mathematics). The selection of topics in the draft is also suggestive that there is no difference between this draft and the existing article. I don't think we should keep drafts around indefinitely, if the article that they are intended to replace is already light-years ahead of the draft in terms of development. That is simply likely to create more fractious content and needless merge discussions down the road. Useful content can be added to the existing article in the normal way. Sławomir Biały (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC) For clarification, the draft was not meant as a replacement; in my view, distribution (mathematics) is trying to do too much and having complementary articles would address that. (For example, there is the notion of a distribution in algebraic geometry as well) But having said that, I do agree the scope of the draft is probably problemic: that the difference is unclear and so the deletion may not be a bad idea. — Taku (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC) There seems to be not enough in this draft to distinguish it from the main topic of distribution (mathematics), and so this seems to be aimed at a needless fork of content. There could be a separate article on distributional calculus, but I don't know what that subject would be. Usually we make forks like this if the main article gets too long, and then we might decide what the topic of the fork should be. A draft with an ill-defined topic is just a recipe for a bad article/fork. Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Comment Observing that again we have the same arguments regarding Mathematics drafts created by a particular user. "Effort" was put in some time back to create content that is quite dense and requiring a degree in mathematics to be able to judge if it's even worth keeping. The author of the draft has been engaged on multiple occasions to see if they could finish their work on the many drafts for which no forward progress was made. Multiple overtures to WikiProject Mathematics have been made to see if the project can evaluate or improve the drafts to the point that the draft could be promoted to mainspace. The author, having been made well aware of how to spin off sections of a large article on multiple occasions, has elected instead to not resolve these issues but defend the right to keep these drafts until "some day" when they come back to work on them. Fundamentally this needs to either be kept in the author's own userspace and worked on at their pace or deleted and regular editing in mainspace done to correct the problem. I am not voting on this MFD because it has been observed that I may not be rational with respect to the author of this draft. Hasteur (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete As it stands, it's not clear from the text how this should be distinguished from distribution (mathematics). In this particular instance, I think adding to the main article and eventually splitting off if necessary is the better way to go. XOR'easter (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC) February 10, 2018[edit] User:Valoem/List of auteurs[edit] User:Valoem/List of auteurs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This page is the oldest page tagged as a userspace draft. It remains as a copy of a deleted article Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_auteurs and the arguments for deletion there still apply. Userspace is not an indefinate hosting space for deleted pages. User is active and notified of this discussion. Legacypac (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Given that Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valoem/List of auteurs closed as keep, and there seems to be no new argument for deletion, we should keep. But lets encourage Valoem to put some more work into making this acceptable, ie make it non-subjective. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC) That MfD was a year ago now. We give Drafts 6 months usually. I don't think the page can be made non-subjective, or at least no one has managed to do it in 13 years. Legacypac (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC) User has asked me to withdraw - I've requested they make their case here (creates a centralized location for next trip to MfD for the page) and said I'll consider it. Legacypac (talk) 17:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - stale as fuck, barely touched since being imported to userspace in 2014. Now redundant to List of film auteurs anyway so there's pretty much zero reason to keep it around. (disclosure: I took it to MfD last time, which actually closed as no consensus, not a straight-up keep). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Can someone point me to where it says we delete pages in userspace after 6 months? My impression is that only applies to draftspace and userspace pages that have gone through AfC. Otherwise obviously keep. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC) I could have been more clear. My comment was comparing how we deal with all Drafts and AfC submissions (ie WP:G13 after 6 months unimproved) in contrast to how this page is the single oldest (tagged) page in user space Category:Monthly_clean-up_category_(Userspace_drafts)_counter There is no specific deadline in userspace but at some point this is a WP:NOTAWEBHOST issue and runs against the idea we don't keep a shadow encyclopdia of pages deleted through deletion processes. So ya... keep for how long exactly? Legacypac (talk) 06:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC) The relevant guideline is on WP:User pages under WP:FAKEARTICLE: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content". Also, at the end of the third paragraph: "Pages that preserve material previously deleted, without an active attempt to address the reasons for deletion, if left live, may be deleted by tagging with {{db-g4}}. Less blatant cases are routinely deleted at WP:MfD." In this case, as the userfied content has been completely unimproved since 2014, there is clearly no active attempt to address the reasons for deletion and it should be deleted. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Update: Given Valoem has been active since this nomination and has not shown an interest in keeping it, I'm not interested to do so either. And given that this was a copy of a deleted article which was userfied but not really improved, it's not the sort of userspace draft I care to argue for on principle alone. Keep struck; abstaining. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as per WP:STALE and WP:FAKEARTICLE; WP:CFORK is relevant too since List of film auteurs exists. -Apocheir (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as per nom and redundant to List of film auteurs. No significant edits since 2014, no need to keep indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Keep, this is among the strongest cases for WP:PRESERVE, this list was made in a time when there was more interest in auteur directors. The historic editors which worked on the page are no longer active. Many of this directors have sources which state them as auteurs and is a vastly more complete list which needs to be sourced. At a minimum the history retained can be merged into List of film auteurs. Valoem talk contrib 15:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC) How about redirecting it at the mainspace page? History preserved, no more fake article issues, out of the maintenance lists. Legacypac (talk) 17:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC) How is this a fake article? But yes that would be fine merging history with the mainspace article. Valoem talk contrib 17:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC) WP:FAKEARTICLE pages that look like articles in userspace I'll request a history merge. Legacypac (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC) Keep. I cannot imagine deleting a page in userspace of an active and experienced editor because they have not yet gotten around to it. There are user space pages appropriate for deletion, but this is not once of them. DGG ( talk ) 02:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Close Historymerge completed and the draft therefore no longer exists Legacypac (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Closed discussions[edit] For archived Miscellany for deletion debates see the MfD Archives. v t e Wikipedia community For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard. About Wikipedia Welcome! Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous Awards Reward board Contests Contents and grading Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation Creation Help Vital articles Today's articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Portals Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors WikiProjects and collaborations Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category Maintenance tasks Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues Administrators and noticeboards Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement Content dispute resolution Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Mediation Other noticeboards and assistance Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Online Ambassadors Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Paid editors Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse Deletion discussions Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue Elections and votings Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones Directories and summaries Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Template messages Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup Book Media Category Templates Retrieved from "" Categories: Wikipedia deletionWikipedia discussionHidden categories: Noindexed pagesWikipedia move-protected project pagesNon-talk pages with subpages that are automatically signed

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages भोजपुरी Edit links This page was last edited on 24 February 2018, at 12:02. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.808","walltime":"1.232","ppvisitednodes":{"value":3683,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":438837,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":9172,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":9,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":1,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 635.199 1 -total"," 32.70% 207.707 73 Template:Pagelinks"," 28.12% 178.628 72 Template:Page-multi"," 22.10% 140.349 1 Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Front_matter"," 9.95% 63.225 3 Template:Ombox"," 4.72% 29.981 1 Template:Deletion_debates"," 4.15% 26.362 1 Template:Sidebar"," 3.37% 21.416 1 Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Back_files"," 2.48% 15.739 1 Template:Wikipedia_community"," 2.42% 15.381 1 Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:Main_theorem_of_elimination_theory"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.211","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":4167814,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1223","timestamp":"20180224120211","ttl":3600,"transientcontent":true}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":127,"wgHostname":"mw1251"});});

Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion More Links

Wikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Administrator InstructionsWikipedia:Articles For DeletionWikipedia:Templates For DeletionSkip To Table Of Contents.Wikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:User PageWikipedia:SubpageTemplate:Db-userreqWikipedia:AdministratorWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:XfD TodayWikipedia:Requests For UndeletionWikipedia:Deletion ReviewSpecial:Log/deleteCategory:Wikipedia Administrators Willing To Provide Copies Of Deleted ArticlesWikipedia:Articles For DeletionWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Log/2018 February 24Category:AfD DebatesWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Log/2018 February 17Wikipedia:Templates For DiscussionWikipedia:Templates For Discussion/Log/2018 February 24Category:Templates For DiscussionWikipedia:Templates For Discussion/Log/2018 February 17Wikipedia:Templates For Discussion/Holding CellWikipedia:Files For DiscussionWikipedia:Files For Discussion/2018 February 24Category:Wikipedia Files For DiscussionWikipedia:Files For Discussion/2018 February 17Wikipedia:Categories For DiscussionWikipedia:Categories For Discussion/Log/2018 February 24Category:Categories For DiscussionWikipedia:Categories For Discussion/Log/2018 February 17Wikipedia:Categories For Discussion/SpeedyWikipedia:Redirects For DiscussionWikipedia:Redirects For Discussion/Log/2018 February 24Category:Redirects For DiscussionWikipedia:Redirects For Discussion/Log/2018 February 17Wikipedia:Redirects For Discussion/LogWikipedia:Miscellany For DeletionCategory:Miscellaneous Pages For DeletionWikipedia:Miscellany For DeletionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionCategory:Candidates For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Proposed DeletionCategory:All Articles Proposed For DeletionWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Deletion PolicyWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Deletion Guidelines For AdministratorsTemplate:Deletion DebatesTemplate Talk:Deletion DebatesWikipedia:WikipediansWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:AdministratorWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:PolicyWikipedia:Deletion Guidelines For AdministratorsWikipedia:NAMESPACEWikipedia:UserboxWikipedia:Files For DiscussionWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Undeletion PolicyTemplate:Db-userreqWikipedia:SubstitutionTemplate:Uw-userpageTemplate:Db-userreqWikipedia:BITEWikipedia:SubstitutionTemplate:WelcomeWikipedia:SubstitutionTemplate:WelcomegWikipedia:UPWikipedia:UPWikipedia:AFDWikipedia:BLPWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:Speedy KeepTemplate:HistoricalWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:Inactive WikiProjectsTemplate:WikiProject StatusTemplate:HistoricalWikipedia:UFYWikipedia:MergeWikipedia:Requested MovesHelp:MoveTemplate:Db-g6Wikipedia:CSDWikipedia:BPRODWikipedia:BooksWikipedia:Deletion PolicyWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:User PageWikipedia:UserboxesWikipedia Talk:Miscellany For DeletionWikipedia:UMWikipedia:TransclusionHelp:Page HistoryHelp:Talk PageWikipedia:WikiProject Portals/MfDWikipedia:Portal GuidelinesWikipedia Talk:WikiProject CouncilWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Administrator InstructionsDraft:Batzaya ChoijiljavDraft:Batzaya ChoijiljavSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Batzaya ChoijiljavUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Kb.auUser Talk:Kb.auDraft:Dragons And StuffDraft:Dragons And StuffSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Dragons And StuffUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:RFDWikipedia:Non-admin ClosureUser:Steel1943User Talk:Steel1943User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastUser:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastUser:Tom.RedingUser Talk:Tom.RedingWikipedia:DGAFHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:RFDWikipedia:Non-admin ClosureUser:Steel1943User Talk:Steel1943User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastUser:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:PK2/Template:Infobox BroadcastUser:Tom.RedingUser Talk:Tom.RedingWikipedia:DGAFHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewDraft:Cheapest Hosting Plans In IndiaDraft:Cheapest Hosting Plans In IndiaSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Cheapest Hosting Plans In IndiaWikipedia:NOTHOWTOWikipedia:NOTWEBHOSTWikipedia:ORWikipedia:PROMOUser:KleuskeUser Talk:KleuskeUser:Serial Number 54129Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129User Talk:Serial Number 54129User:78.26User Talk:78.26Special:Contributions/78.26User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Julian AdratDraft:Julian AdratSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Julian AdratUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Big GhostDraft:Big GhostSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Big GhostUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:TopSpeed.comDraft:TopSpeed.comSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:TopSpeed.comUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:NudahDraft:NudahSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:NudahUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:JniSpecial:Log/delete/jniUser Talk:JniWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:Megan RainHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:CSDUser:FastilyUser:Steel1943User Talk:Steel1943Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Megan RainUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Icem4kUser Talk:Icem4kHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewDraft:Shahab KhanDraft:Shahab KhanSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Shahab KhanUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:王府半岛酒店Draft:王府半岛酒店Draft Talk:王府半岛酒店Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:王府半岛酒店User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Dramatic24/sandboxUser:Dramatic24/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Dramatic24/sandboxWikipedia:CSDUser:CabayiUser Talk:CabayiUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHDraft:Dollar Digits Calling AppDraft:Dollar Digits Calling AppSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Dollar Digits Calling AppUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHUser:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof Is A Term For Vampire Vestures.User:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof Is A Term For Vampire Vestures.Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Oelehnlehn Faithful/sandbox/Silverproof Is A Term For Vampire Vestures.User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Monazami/sandbox/MonazamiUser:Monazami/sandbox/MonazamiSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Monazami/sandbox/MonazamiUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical WritingUser:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical WritingSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:MagicalWriter/sandbox/Magical WritingUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonWikipedia:CSDUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:JniSpecial:Log/delete/jniUser Talk:JniUser:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther KaneUser:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther KaneSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Lukane123/sandbox/Luther KaneUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr.User:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr.Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Loaner Spinner/sandbox/Martarrious "Loaner" King, Sr.User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonDraft:List Of Books Considered The WorstDraft:List Of Books Considered The WorstSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:List Of Books Considered The WorstUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:LSCList Of Best-selling BooksUser:JohnuniqUser Talk:JohnuniqTemplate:Worst WorksUser:HelicopterLlamaUser Talk:HelicopterLlamaUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrUser:HelicopterLlamaUser Talk:HelicopterLlamaDraft:Children Of The Caribbean FoundationDraft:Children Of The Caribbean FoundationSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Children Of The Caribbean FoundationUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Linton.zeng/sandboxUser:Linton.zeng/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Linton.zeng/sandboxWikipedia:G2User:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonWikipedia:AfCUser Talk:GB FanUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrUser Talk:GB FanUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacTemplate:User SandboxUser:JniSpecial:Log/delete/jniUser Talk:JniUser Talk:Bindi ArtsUser Talk:Bindi ArtsBharti KherWikipedia:FakearticleUser:JustlettersandnumbersUser Talk:JustlettersandnumbersDraft:Abhijit NaskarDraft:Abhijit NaskarSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Abhijit NaskarUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Reference BombingUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:2829VC/C.U.R.E.User:2829VC/C.U.R.E.User Talk:2829VC/C.U.R.E.Special:WhatLinksHere/User:2829VC/C.U.R.E.User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacTemplate:Userpage BlankedUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeUser:HelicopterLlama/sandboxUser:HelicopterLlama/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:HelicopterLlama/sandboxWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:COPYVIOUser:Ansh666User Talk:Ansh666User:HelicopterLlamaUser Talk:HelicopterLlamaUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America DestubathonWikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America DestubathonWikipedia Talk:WikiProject North America/The North America DestubathonSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject North America/The North America DestubathonUser:Another BelieverUser Talk:Another BelieverUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Dr. BlofeldUser:Another BelieverUser Talk:Another BelieverUser:Another BelieverUser Talk:Another BelieverUser:Dr. BlofeldUser:OhanaUnitedUser Talk:OhanaUnitedList Of Sovereign States And Dependent Territories In North AmericaUser:CasliberUser Talk:CasliberSpecial:Contributions/CasliberUser:Dr. BlofeldUser:Another BelieverUser Talk:Another BelieverUser:Eddie891User Talk:Eddie891Special:Contributions/Eddie891User:FloquenbeamUser Talk:FloquenbeamUser:Vanamonde93User Talk:Vanamonde93User:FloquenbeamUser:Vanamonde93User:Another BelieverUser Talk:Another BelieverUser:CasliberUser Talk:CasliberSpecial:Contributions/CasliberUser:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21User:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Gedeadi93/TopMovies21User:Sam SailorUser Talk:Sam SailorPeter Wang (cadet)User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Pewdiepie's ChairDraft:Pewdiepie's ChairSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Pewdiepie's ChairUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHInternetWikipedia:SARCASMUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonDraft:نسرين الحمدانىDraft:نسرين الحمدانىSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:نسرين الحمدانىUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Kamogelo T-reX LetshwithiDraft:Kamogelo T-reX LetshwithiSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Kamogelo T-reX LetshwithiWikipedia:NUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Kb.auUser Talk:Kb.auUser:Horsdt71/sandboxUser:Horsdt71/sandboxUser Talk:Horsdt71/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Horsdt71/sandboxUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:Anna McHaleHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:CSDUser:SoWhyUser:Steel1943User Talk:Steel1943Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Anna McHaleUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHUser:ReykUser Talk:ReykHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewDraft:FAM71E1Draft:FAM71E1Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:FAM71E1FAM71E1User:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Thomas Polk ParkDraft:Thomas Polk ParkDraft Talk:Thomas Polk ParkSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Thomas Polk ParkUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Republic Of Florida (group)Draft:Republic Of Florida (group)Draft Talk:Republic Of Florida (group)Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Republic Of Florida (group)Talk:Douglas High School ShootingUser Talk:MichiganWoodShopWikipedia:TOOSOONWikipedia:HOAXUser:K.e.coffmanUser Talk:K.e.coffmanUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:K.e.coffmanUser:KudpungUser Talk:KudpungUser:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy EquationUser:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy EquationSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:R.prasanna2892/Prasanna Venkatesh's Crazy EquationUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Social Media And Dark Traits, Depression, And SuicideDraft:Social Media And Dark Traits, Depression, And SuicideSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Social Media And Dark Traits, Depression, And SuicideUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Social Media And Dark Traits, Depression, And SuicideUser:Calliopejen1User Talk:Calliopejen1User:Sweetsuresh777/sandboxUser:Sweetsuresh777/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Sweetsuresh777/sandboxWikipedia:AUTOBIOUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeUser:NapasornCho/sandboxUser:NapasornCho/sandboxSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:NapasornCho/sandboxDraft:KalaeUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeUser:Hammon27/Coats Of Arms Of U.S. Infantry RegimentsUser:Hammon27/Coats Of Arms Of U.S. Infantry RegimentsSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Hammon27/Coats Of Arms Of U.S. Infantry RegimentsUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Deletion ProcessUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:Dave Harton (2nd Nomination)Help:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:CSDWikipedia:CSDUser:Anthony BradburyUser:Steel1943User Talk:Steel1943User Talk:Dave HartonSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Dave HartonWikipedia:UPWikipedia:HOARDWikipedia:NOTWEBHOSTWikipedia:FAKEARTICLEWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/List Of The Chase (UK Game Show) EpisodesTalk:The Chase (UK Game Show)/Archive 1Talk:The Chase (UK Game Show)/Archive 1Talk:The Chase (UK Game Show)/Archive 1User:AldezDWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:Dave HartonUser:AldezDUser Talk:AldezDUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Back FilesUser:Back FilesUser Talk:Back FilesSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Back FilesUser:WikilistsUser Talk:WikilistsSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:WikilistsUser:PpperyUser Talk:PpperyUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Back Files/Jews In The History Of BusinessUser:WikidemonWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Jews In The History Of BusinessUser:Wikilists/Actors And Actresses Considered The Greatest EverUser:AKR619User Talk:AKR619Special:Contributions/AKR619User:Wikilists/List Of Songs With Numbers In The TitleUser:HappyDogUser:SamWikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)/Archive 30User:AmorymeltzerUser Talk:AmorymeltzerSpecial:Contributions/AmorymeltzerUser:AmorymeltzerUser Talk:AmorymeltzerSpecial:Contributions/AmorymeltzerUser:PpperyUser Talk:PpperyUser:WikidemonUser Talk:WikidemonUser:Wikilists/List Of Songs With Numbers In The TitleUser:SamUser Talk:SamUser:Wikilists/Actors And Actresses Considered The Greatest EverList Of Films Considered The WorstUser:Back Files/Jews In The History Of BusinessUser:AmorymeltzerUser Talk:AmorymeltzerSpecial:Contributions/AmorymeltzerUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:Back FilesUser:WikilistsUser:PpperyUser Talk:PpperyDraft:Ushti BabaDraft:Ushti BabaSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Ushti BabaWikipedia:NMUSICUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Calliopejen1User Talk:Calliopejen1Draft:WikiProject Missing Encyclopedic Articles/Secondary FocusDraft:WikiProject Missing Encyclopedic Articles/Secondary FocusSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:WikiProject Missing Encyclopedic Articles/Secondary FocusUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Ringed ToposDraft:Ringed ToposDraft Talk:Ringed ToposSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Ringed ToposUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacToposRinged SpaceTopological SpaceUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Walter NoeticoDraft:Walter NoeticoSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Walter NoeticoUser:DGGUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:David ParsonsDraft:David ParsonsSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:David ParsonsDraft:David R. ParsonsDraft:David R. ParsonsUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David ParsonsUser:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David ParsonsSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Jonathan Parsonswhoa/sandbox/David ParsonsDraft:David ParsonsDraft:David R. ParsonsUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonDraft:David R. ParsonsUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Blake MawsonDraft:Blake MawsonSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Blake MawsonWikipedia:AUTOBIOUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:David B MiguelUser:David B MiguelUser Talk:David B MiguelSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:David B MiguelUser: B. SamadiUser:NoysterUser Talk:NoysterUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDraft:Areeh.netDraft:Areeh.netSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Areeh.netUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:JniSpecial:Log/delete/jniUser Talk:JniDraft:List Of Maritime Science Fiction WorksDraft:List Of Maritime Science Fiction WorksDraft Talk:List Of Maritime Science Fiction WorksSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:List Of Maritime Science Fiction WorksUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Andy DingleyUser Talk:Andy DingleyUser:Randy KrynUser Talk:Randy KrynWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Maritime Science FictionWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/List Of Maritime Science Fiction MediaWikipedia:Deletion Review/Log/2017 May 24Wikipedia:Categories For Discussion/Log/2016 August 1User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Randy KrynUser Talk:Randy KrynUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGDraft:Main Theorem Of Elimination TheoryDraft:Main Theorem Of Elimination TheoryDraft Talk:Main Theorem Of Elimination TheorySpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Main Theorem Of Elimination TheoryUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:TakuyaMurataUser:Seraphim SystemUser Talk:Seraphim SystemRoyal WeUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:Seraphim SystemWikipedia:Manual Of StyleUser:Michael HardyUser Talk:Michael HardyMOS:WEUser:Seraphim SystemUser Talk:Seraphim SystemUser:Seraphim SystemUser Talk:Seraphim SystemUser:Paul AugustUser Talk:Paul AugustDraft:Cyclic AlgebraDraft:Cyclic AlgebraDraft Talk:Cyclic AlgebraSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Cyclic AlgebraUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:LegacypacUser:Seraphim SystemUser Talk:Seraphim SystemUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataFactor SystemUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataCrossed Product AlgebraUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:CBMUser Talk:CBMUser:Paul AugustUser Talk:Paul AugustDraft:Hearts PiratesDraft:Hearts PiratesSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Hearts PiratesUser:Doug WellerUser Talk:Doug WellerUser:JniSpecial:Log/delete/jniUser Talk:JniUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrDraft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami ThakurDraft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami ThakurDraft Talk:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami ThakurSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Shrila Patitpavan Goswami ThakurUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/Shrila Patitpavan Goswami ThakurUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Deletion ProcessUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonHagiographyUser:Robert McClenonUser Talk:Robert McClenonDraft:Guadalix Democratic RepublicDraft:Guadalix Democratic RepublicSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Guadalix Democratic RepublicWikipedia:NOTFREEWEBHOSTWikipedia:MADEUPUser:KleuskeUser Talk:KleuskeUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:KinuUser Talk:KinuSpecial:Contributions/KinuWikipedia:CSDUser:KinuUser Talk:KinuSpecial:Contributions/KinuWikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/elevatedWikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/elevatedSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/elevatedUser:Jc86035User Talk:Jc86035Wikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/embankmentUser:UseddenimUser Talk:UseddenimUser:UseddenimUser:Jc86035User Talk:Jc86035User:LegobotWikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/embankmentWikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/embankmentSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/embankmentUser:Jc86035User Talk:Jc86035User:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrWikipedia:Route Diagram Template/Catalog Of Pictograms/embankmentUser:UseddenimUser Talk:UseddenimDraft:Bredon CohomologyDraft:Bredon CohomologyDraft Talk:Bredon CohomologySpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Bredon CohomologyUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacEquivariant CohomologyUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:Andrew DavidsonUser Talk:Andrew DavidsonUser:Andrew DavidsonUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorUser:TonyBallioniUser Talk:TonyBallioniUser:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:TonyBallioniUser Talk:TonyBallioniUser:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorDraft:Ring With The Approximation PropertyDraft:Ring With The Approximation PropertyDraft Talk:Ring With The Approximation PropertySpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Ring With The Approximation PropertyUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorArtin's Approximation TheoremUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataNoetherian RingWikipedia:VWikipedia:BUROUser:HasteurUser Talk:HasteurUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataWikipedia:ORUser:HasteurUser Talk:HasteurPopescu’s TheoremUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataWikipedia:WAXArtin Approximation TheoremUser:HasteurUser Talk:HasteurUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterUser:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterDraft:Discrepancy (algebraic Geometry)Draft:Discrepancy (algebraic Geometry)Draft Talk:Discrepancy (algebraic Geometry)Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Discrepancy (algebraic Geometry)User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataCanonical SingularityUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorDraft:IDubbbzTVDraft:IDubbbzTVSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:IDubbbzTVUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:WumboloUser Talk:WumboloUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:DatGuyonYouTubeUser Talk:DatGuyonYouTubeUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacCinemaSinsUser:DatGuyonYouTubeUser Talk:DatGuyonYouTubeWikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTSUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:DatGuyonYouTubeUser Talk:DatGuyonYouTubeUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrUser:DatGuyonYouTubeUser Talk:DatGuyonYouTubeUser:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH!User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH!Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH!User:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:Seraphim SystemUser Talk:Seraphim SystemWikipedia:UPNOTUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:Mattbuck/Wikipedia - FUCK YEAH!User:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:WaltCipUser Talk:WaltCipTeam America: World PoliceUser:SmokeyJoeUser Talk:SmokeyJoeWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:Adria RaeHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Adria RaeUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:PORNBIOUser:ALHUser Talk:ALHUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:Cat PauséHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Cat PauséUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:Bobby2pistolsHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Bobby2pistolsUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:007paritosh/sandboxHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:007paritosh/sandboxUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:VermontUser Talk:VermontWikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)/Archive 144User:MajoraUser Talk:MajoraUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:SlakrUser:MajoraUser Talk:MajoraWikipedia:DELUser:SlakrUser Talk:SlakrUser:JmcgnhUser Talk:JmcgnhSpecial:Contributions/jmcgnhUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Draft:4imprint PlcHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosDraft:4imprint PlcDraft:4imprint PlcDraft Talk:4imprint PlcSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:4imprint PlcWikipedia:LISTEDUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Deletion ReviewDraft:Distributional CalculusDraft:Distributional CalculusDraft Talk:Distributional CalculusSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Distributional CalculusUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacDistribution (mathematics)User:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataDistribution (mathematics)User:KusmaUser Talk:KusmaSpecial:Contributions/KusmaCalculusLimit (mathematics)User:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataUser:VQuakrUser Talk:VQuakrUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:LegacypacUser:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataDistribution (mathematics)User:IvanvectorUser Talk:IvanvectorSpecial:Contributions/IvanvectorDistribution (mathematics)Distribution (mathematics)User:Sławomir BiałyUser Talk:Sławomir BiałyDistribution (mathematics)User:TakuyaMurataUser Talk:TakuyaMurataDistribution (mathematics)User:Sławomir BiałyUser Talk:Sławomir BiałyWikipedia:SPINOUTUser:HasteurUser Talk:HasteurDistribution (mathematics)User:XOR'easterUser Talk:XOR'easterSpecial:WhatLinksHere/User:Valoem/List Of AuteursWikipedia:Articles For Deletion/List Of AuteursUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/User:Valoem/List Of AuteursUser:Graeme BartlettUser Talk:Graeme BartlettUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacList Of Film AuteursUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:RhododendritesUser Talk:RhododendritesWikipedia:G13Category:Monthly Clean-up Category (Userspace Drafts) CounterWikipedia:NOTAWEBHOSTUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:FAKEARTICLEUser:Premeditated ChaosUser Talk:Premeditated ChaosUser:RhododendritesUser Talk:RhododendritesWikipedia:STALEWikipedia:FAKEARTICLEWikipedia:CFORKList Of Film AuteursUser:ApocheirUser Talk:ApocheirList Of Film AuteursUser:P199User Talk:P199List Of Film AuteursUser:ValoemUser Talk:ValoemSpecial:Contributions/ValoemUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:ValoemUser Talk:ValoemSpecial:Contributions/ValoemWikipedia:FAKEARTICLEUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacUser:DGGUser Talk:DGGUser:LegacypacUser Talk:LegacypacWikipedia:Miscellany For Deletion/Archived DebatesTemplate:Wikipedia CommunityTemplate Talk:Wikipedia CommunityWikipedia CommunityWikipedia:Community PortalWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:AboutWikipedia:Welcoming Committee/Welcome To WikipediaWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:NewsWikipedia:Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia:Goings-onWikipedia:Wikipedia In The MediaWikipedia:MeetupWikipedia:Mailing ListsWikipedia:WikipediansWikipedia:StatisticsWikipedia:MilestonesWikipedia:The Wikipedia LibraryWikipedia:Centralized DiscussionWikipedia:Village PumpWikipedia:Village Pump (idea Lab)Wikipedia:Village Pump (policy)Wikipedia:Village Pump (proposals)Wikipedia:Village Pump (technical)Wikipedia:Village Pump (miscellaneous)Wikipedia:AwardsWikipedia:Reward BoardWikipedia:ContestsPortal:ContentsWikipedia:WikiProject AssessmentWikipedia:Requested ArticlesWikipedia:Most-wanted ArticlesWikipedia:Requested Articles/ImagesWikipedia:Requested PicturesWikipedia:Articles For CreationWikipedia:Article CreationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles For Creation/Help DeskWikipedia:Vital ArticlesWikipedia:Today's Articles For ImprovementWikipedia:Peer ReviewWikipedia:Good Article NominationsWikipedia:Featured Article CandidatesWikipedia:Featured List CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Picture CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Portal CandidatesWikipedia:Featured Topic CandidatesWikipedia:TranslationWikipedia:Pages Needing Translation Into EnglishTalk:Main PageWikipedia:Main Page/ErrorsWikipedia:WikiProjectCategory:Wikipedia CollaborationsWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/GeographicalWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/History And SocietyWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/WikipediaWikipedia:PatrolsWikipedia:Recent Changes PatrolWikipedia:Counter-Vandalism UnitWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial TeamWikipedia:WikiProject AccessibilityCategory:Wikipedian OrganizationsWikipedia:MaintenanceWikipedia:Task CenterWikipedia:Community Portal/OpentaskWikipedia:BacklogCategory:Wikipedia BacklogCategory:Administrative BacklogWikipedia:Edit RequestsCategory:Wikipedia Edit RequestsWikipedia:Database ReportsTemplate:Category TrackerWikipedia:Dusty ArticlesSpecial:SpecialPagesSpecial:NewPagesFeedSpecial:RecentChangesWikipedia:List Of Controversial IssuesWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:Administrators' NoticeboardWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Edit WarringWikipedia:Administrator Intervention Against VandalismTemplate:Admin DashboardWikipedia:Requests For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Requests For ClosureWikipedia:Requests For Page ProtectionWikipedia:Requests For PermissionsWikipedia:Sockpuppet InvestigationsWikipedia:WikiProject On Open ProxiesWikipedia:Revision DeletionWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Requests For OversightWikipedia:Usernames For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Changing UsernameMediaWiki Talk:TitleblacklistWikipedia:OTRS NoticeboardWikipedia:Bureaucrats' NoticeboardWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/NoticeboardWikipedia:Arbitration/RequestsWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/EnforcementWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Editor Assistance/RequestsWikipedia:Requests For Comment/AllWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:Dispute Resolution NoticeboardWikipedia:Biographies Of Living Persons/NoticeboardWikipedia:Conflict Of Interest/NoticeboardWikipedia:External Links/NoticeboardWikipedia:Fringe Theories/NoticeboardWikipedia:Neutral Point Of View/NoticeboardWikipedia:No Original Research/NoticeboardWikipedia:Reliable Sources/NoticeboardWikipedia:Requests For MediationWikipedia:Regional Notice BoardsWikipedia:Request DirectoryCategory:Wikipedia Requests Related To HelpWikipedia:QuestionsWikipedia:TeahouseWikipedia:Help DeskWikipedia:Reference DeskWikipedia:Adopt-a-userSpecial:OnlineVolunteersWikipedia:Copyright AssistanceWikipedia:Contributor Copyright InvestigationsWikipedia:Copyright ProblemsWikipedia:Media Copyright QuestionsWikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid Editor HelpWikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource RequestWikipedia:Proposed MergersWikipedia:Requests For History MergeWikipedia:Requested MovesWikipedia:Requests For Page ImportationWikipedia Talk:WikiProject SpamMediaWiki Talk:Spam-blacklistMediaWiki Talk:Spam-whitelistWikipedia:Bots/NoticeboardWikipedia:Education NoticeboardWikipedia:New Pages Patrol/NoticeboardWikipedia:General SanctionsWikipedia:Editing RestrictionsWikipedia:Long-term AbuseWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Deletion Guidelines For AdministratorsWikipedia:XfD TodayWikipedia:Articles For DeletionWikipedia:Templates For DiscussionWikipedia:Files For DiscussionWikipedia:Categories For DiscussionWikipedia:Redirects For DiscussionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Proposed DeletionWikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Deletion ReviewWikipedia:Requests For UndeletionWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Make In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Article Rescue SquadronWikipedia:ElectionsWikipedia:VotingWikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:WikiProject DemocracyWikipedia:Voting Is Not EvilWikipedia:Times That 1000 Or More Wikipedians Supported SomethingWikipedia:Directories And IndexesWikipedia:Department DirectoryWikipedia:Edit Summary LegendWikipedia:Editor's Index To WikipediaWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:FAQ/IndexWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:Wikipedia AbbreviationsHelp:DirectoryWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Simplified Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:Shortcut DirectoryWikipedia:Template MessagesWikipedia:Citation TemplatesWikipedia:TipsWikipedia:Tip Of The DayWikipedia:ToolsWikipedia:WikiNodeHelp:CheatsheetBook:WikipediaCategory:WikipediansCategory:Wikipedia TemplatesHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia DeletionCategory:Wikipedia DiscussionCategory:Noindexed PagesCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesCategory:Non-talk Pages With Subpages That Are Automatically SignedDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link