Contents 1 The meaning of "gaming the system" 2 Examples 2.1 Gaming the use of policies and guidelines 2.2 Gaming the consensus-building process 2.3 Gaming of sanctions for disruptive behavior 3 Spurious legalisms 4 Various levels of intent 5 Abuse of process 6 See also


The meaning of "gaming the system"[edit] The card player on the left is gaming the system of card-playing in bad faith, because he has two cards hidden behind his back. An editor gaming the system is seeking to use policy in bad faith, by finding within its wording some apparent justification for disruptive actions and stances that policy is clearly not at all intended to support. In doing this, the gamester separates policies and guidelines from their rightful place as a means of documenting community consensus, and attempts to use them selectively for a personal agenda. An editor is disruptive if they are using a few words of policy to claim support for a viewpoint which clearly contradicts those policies, to attack a genuinely policy-based stance by willfully misapplying Wikipedia policies, or to derail Wikipedia processes. Gaming the system may include: Wikilawyering, pettifogging, and otherwise using the letter of policy to violate the broader principles of the policy. Filibustering the consensus-building process by reverting another editor for minor errors, or sticking to a viewpoint that the community has clearly rejected. Attempting to twist Wikipedia sanctions or processes to harass other editors. In each case, willfulness or knowing is important. Misuse of policy, guidelines or practice is not gaming if it is based upon a genuine mistake. But it may well be, if it is deliberate, where the editor continues to game policy even when it is clear there is no way they can reasonably claim to be unaware. Actions that game the system may also overlap with other policies: Misusing Wikipedia processes to put another editor in an invidious position, prove a point, or muddy the water in a dispute, can also be a form of gaming. However it is more often categorized as using Wikipedia to prove a point or abuse of process. Using policies and guidelines to build (or push) a patently false case that some editor is editing in bad faith, with the "evidence" for this itself being an obviously unreasonable bad-faith interpretation of that person's action. This is more often categorized as a breach of the guideline to assume good faith, and in particular, repeated unjustified "warnings" may also be viewed as a breach of civility. If gaming is also knowingly used as a basis to impugn another editor or to mischaracterize them as bad-faith editors, then this may also violate the policy of no personal attacks. Disruption of any kind merits being warned (or blocked) by an administrator. Violating the principles of Wikipedia's behavior guidelines may prejudice the decision of administrators or the Arbitration Committee.


Examples[edit] Shortcut WP:GAMETYPE There are several types of gaming the system. The essence of gaming is the willful and knowing misuse of policies or processes. The following is an (incomplete) list of examples. Actions that are similar to the below, where there is no evidence of intent to act improperly, are usually not considered gaming. Gaming the use of policies and guidelines[edit] Bad-faith wikilawyering – arguing the word of policy to defeat the principles of policy. Example: Posting a neutral notice that does not violate the policy on canvassing, while using a different set of notifications to lure a partisan audience to view that neutral notice. Playing policies against each other. Example: Saying that you refuse to remove content that violates the policy on verifiability, because that content is protected by the policy that "Wikipedia is not censored". Selectively "cherry-picking" wording from a policy (or cherry-picking one policy to apply but willfully ignoring others) to support a view which does not in fact match policy. Example: Adding content that is restricted under the policy on what Wikipedia is not, while cherry-picking the words that "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia" to evade those restrictions. Spuriously and knowingly claiming protection, justification, or support under the words of a policy, for a viewpoint or stance which actually contradicts policy. Example: Saying that content meets the policy on verifiability because it is cited to a source, when in fact the source is not reliable, or the content twists the source's point of view. (See WP:Neutral point of view § Due and undue weight.) Attempting to force an untoward interpretation of policy, or impose one's own novel view of "standards to apply" rather than those of the community. Example: Presenting a Wikipedia essay that was written by a single editor as though it were a consensus policy. Gaming the consensus-building process[edit] Shortcuts WP:STONEWALL WP:ONEHANDGIVES WP:FILIBUSTER Stonewalling or filibustering – repeatedly pushing a viewpoint with which the consensus of the community clearly does not agree, effectively preventing a policy-based resolution. Example: An editor refuses to accept a change unless some condition is complied with, but it is not a condition that has any basis in Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Example: Editors reach a consensus, except one (or a tagteam) insisting that the change sought violates some policy or other principle, in a way they cannot clearly demonstrate. See also the policy WP:Disruptive editing, especially on "refusal to get the point", and the essays WP:What is consensus? § Not unanimity, WP:Status quo stonewalling, WP:BRD misuse § Filibusterers Bad-faith negotiating – Luring other editors into a compromise by making a concession, only to withhold that concession after the other side has compromised. Example: An editor negotiates a consensus to remove well-verified material from one article, because it is already covered in a second article. Afterward, the editor deletes the material from the second article. Example: Editors reach a consensus. The author of the final agreed text is supposed to post it, but never does. Weeks later, a second editor tires of waiting and posts a modified version, which the first editor immediately reverts. Example: An editor withholds agreement to a change unless additional, more satisfactory sources are provided, but declares all the new sourcing to be unsatisfactory despite the citation work clearly fulfilling the core content policies. Removing a large addition for a minor error. If the error is minor, then fix it (or at least tag it for clean-up). Perfection is not required, and Wikipedia is built through incremental improvement. Example: An editor adds a paragraph of verifiable information, but it is removed entirely because of a typographical error that could easily be fixed. Example: An editor performs page-wide, uncontroversial copy editing and code cleanup, but another editor thinks some ostensibly minor changes subtly altered the meaning of two sentences, and so reverts several hours of work instead of just the two disputed changes. Gaming of sanctions for disruptive behavior[edit] Shortcut WP:SANCTIONGAME Mischaracterizing other editors' actions in order to make them seem unreasonable, improper, or deserving of sanction. Example: Refusing to provide a proper citation to an editor looking to verify your claim, and accusing the editor of being disruptive for making repeated requests. Citations should be accurate so that other editors may verify them. "Walking back" a personal attack to make it seem less hostile than it was, rather than apologizing. Example: An editor responds to a disagreement by saying, "You're obviously wrong, wrong, wrong. Did you even pass grade 10 history?" Later, they defend this statement as a good-faith question about the other editor's education. "Borderlining" – habitually treading the edge of policy breach or engaging in low-grade policy breach, in order to make it hard to actually prove misconduct. Example: An editor never violates the three-revert rule, but takes several months to repeatedly push the same edits over the objections of multiple editors. Retribution: Deliberately reverting an editor's edits in one article in retaliation for a dispute in another. Example: Editor A reverts an edit made by Editor B because it did not adhere to a neutral point of view and they did not provide a reliable source. Editor B starts a discussion on the talk page in which Editor A participates, but the discussion fails to generate consensus. Later on, Editor B reverts a well-sourced, neutral addition that Editor A made, saying that it did not comply with the Manual of Style. Playing victim: Violating a rule and at the same time claiming others in violation of the same or a closely related rule. Also known as hypocrisy. Example: Editor A posts uncivil comments while at the same time accusing Editor B of uncivil behavior, demanding sanctions and citing policies that Editor A clearly violates.


Spurious legalisms[edit] Since Wikipedia is not a court of law, many legal procedures or terms have no bearing on Wikipedia. Typically, wikilawyering raises procedural or evidentiary points in a manner analogous to that used in formal legal proceedings, often using ill-founded legal reasoning. Occasionally wikilawyering may raise legitimate questions, including fairness, but often it serves to evade an issue or obstruct the crafting of a workable solution. For example, it is often impossible to definitely establish the actual user behind a set of sockpuppets, and it is not a defense that none of the sockpuppets which emerge were named in the request for arbitration.


Various levels of intent[edit] Use of the term "gaming the system" should be done with caution, as it can be interpreted as an accusation of bad-faith editing. Although users might engage in the practices described above, that activity should not be considered proof of malicious intent. The actual level of intent should also be considered separately, as to whether the action was pre-meditated, or spur-of-the-moment, or merely copying an older tactic that seemed effective for other editors in the past. The term gaming the system is not meant to vilify those involved, with the word "gaming" also referring to playful activity in the manner of a game of sport. The goal is to focus on Wikipedia activities as a serious effort to improve articles, not an arena for playing games and sparring with opponents as a form of amusement. Judging intent might include discussions with others, rather than escalate the situation as an issue for direct confrontation. The situation might warrant special mediation (see WP:Mediation) or perhaps even, in extreme cases, formal arbitration see WP:Arbitration). The risks of continued involvement should be carefully considered, especially if the intent seems overly severe, or obsessive–compulsive behavior. However clear such an intent might subjectively seem, one should not cast aspersions about the mentalities or motivations of other editors. Wikipedia has a variety of WP:Noticeboards for dealing with problematic editing behavior, patterns of which tend to speak for themselves when properly diffed with evidence.


Abuse of process[edit] Abuse of process is related to gaming. It involves knowingly trying to use the communally agreed and sanctioned processes described by some policies, to advance a purpose for which they are clearly not intended. Abuse of process is disruptive, and depending on circumstances may be also described as gaming the system, personal attack, or disruption to make a point. Communally agreed processes are intended to be used in good faith.


See also[edit] Gaming the system He who comes into equity must come with clean hands Unclean hands Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (guideline) Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (guideline) Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose (essay) Wikipedia:Griefing (essay) Wikipedia:Maldoror's Conjecture (essay) Wikipedia:Not here to build an encyclopedia (information by consensus) Wikipedia:Policy shopping (essay) Wikipedia:POV railroad (essay) Wikipedia:Tag team (essay) Wikipedia:Too long; didn't read (essay) WP:FORUMSHOP (policy on seeking out a supportive forum) v t e Wikipedia key policies and guidelines Five pillars What Wikipedia is not Ignore all rules Content Verifiability No original research Neutral point of view What Wikipedia is not Biographies of living persons Image use Wikipedia is not a dictionary Article titles Notability Autobiography Citing sources Identifying reliable sources medicine Do not include copies of primary sources Plagiarism Don't create hoaxes Fringe theories Patent nonsense External links Conduct Civility Consensus Editing policy Harassment Vandalism Ignore all rules No personal attacks Ownership of content Edit warring Dispute resolution Sock puppetry No legal threats Child protection Paid-contribution disclosure Assume good faith Conflict of interest Disruptive editing Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Etiquette Gaming the system Please do not bite the newcomers Courtesy vanishing Deletion Deletion policy Proposed deletion Criteria for speedy deletion Attack page Oversight Proposed deletion of BLP Proposed deletion (books) Revision deletion Enforcement Administrators Banning Blocking Page protection Editing Article size Be bold Disambiguation Hatnotes Set index articles Subpages User pages Talk page guidelines Signatures Broad-concept article Project namespace WikiProjects Style Manual of Style Contents Accessibility Understandability Dates and numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Classification Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Template namespace WMF List of policies Friendly space policy Licensing and copyright Privacy policy Values FAQ List of all policies and guidelines List of policies List of guidelines Lists of attempts in creating fundamental principles Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Gaming_the_system&oldid=823313527" Categories: Wikipedia behavioral guidelinesHidden categories: Wikipedia move-protected project pages


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages العربيةتۆرکجهবাংলাفارسیFrançaisGalego한국어HrvatskiമലയാളംBahasa MelayuNederlands日本語PortuguêsРусскийکوردیTürkçeУкраїнськаTiếng Việt中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 31 January 2018, at 14:25. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.192","walltime":"0.283","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1441,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":112162,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":9208,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":13,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":8,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 198.337 1 -total"," 25.45% 50.469 1 Template:Subcat_guideline"," 24.25% 48.095 1 Template:Ombox"," 16.30% 32.332 8 Template:Navbox"," 11.90% 23.601 3 Template:Shortcut"," 11.63% 23.067 1 Template:Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines"," 11.53% 22.871 3 Template:Sidebar"," 11.29% 22.385 1 Template:Guideline_list"," 9.74% 19.326 1 Template:Helpbox"," 8.40% 16.668 1 Template:Pp-move-indef"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.072","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":2754144,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1271","timestamp":"20180213205132","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":58,"wgHostname":"mw1251"});});


Wikipedia:Gaming_the_system - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Gaming_the_system More Links

Wikipedia:VGWikipedia:GAMESWikipedia:BTGWikipedia:WGAMESWikipedia:WHACAMOLEWikipedia:MMORPGCategory:Wikipedia Behavioral GuidelinesWikipedia:What "Ignore All Rules" MeansWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia Talk:Gaming The SystemWikipedia:ShortcutCategory:Wikipedia GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesCategory:Wikipedia Behavioral GuidelinesWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Conflict Of InterestWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Please Do Not Bite The NewcomersWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia DiscussionWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:SignaturesCategory:Wikipedia Content GuidelinesWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (medicine)Wikipedia:Fringe TheoriesWikipedia:Non-free ContentWikipedia:Offensive MaterialWikipedia:Do Not Include The Full Text Of Lengthy Primary SourcesWikipedia:Do Not Create HoaxesWikipedia:Patent NonsenseWikipedia:External LinksWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia Editing GuidelinesWikipedia:Article SizeWikipedia:Be BoldHelp:Edit SummaryWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Make Technical Articles UnderstandableWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia CategorizationWikipedia:Categories, Lists, And Navigation TemplatesWikipedia:CategorizationWikipedia:DisambiguationWikipedia:SubpagesCategory:Wikipedia Style GuidelinesWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ListsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/TablesCategory:Wikipedia Deletion GuidelinesWikipedia:Deletion ProcessWikipedia:Speedy KeepWikipedia:Deletion Guidelines For AdministratorsWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesTemplate:Guideline ListTemplate Talk:Guideline ListGaming The SystemWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesBad FaithWikipedia:AimAbuse Of ProcessWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:NPOVLoopholeWikipedia:Administrator AbuseWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Blocking PolicyEnlargeWikipedia:POLICYBad FaithWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:WikilawyeringLetter And Spirit Of The LawFilibusterWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointAbuse Of ProcessWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:CIVILWikipedia:NPAWikipedia:BLOCKWikipedia:ADMINWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:LAWYERWikipedia:CanvassingWikipedia:VERIFIABILITYWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:VERIFIABILITYWikipedia:CITEWikipedia:RSWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:Wikipedia EssaysWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:ShortcutFilibusterWikipedia:POLICYWikipedia:TAGTEAMWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:IDIDNTHEARTHATWikipedia:What Is Consensus?Wikipedia:Status Quo StonewallingWikipedia:BRD MisuseWikipedia:RSWikipedia:CCPOLWikipedia:IMPERFECTWikipedia:VERIFIABLEWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:CITEWikipedia:VWikipedia:NPAWikipedia:3RRWikipedia:NOTWikilawyeringWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:AOBFWikipedia:MediationWikipedia:ArbitrationObsessive–compulsive DisorderWikipedia:Casting AspersionsWikipedia:NoticeboardsHelp:DiffAbuse Of ProcessWikipedia:DISRUPTWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointGaming The SystemMaxims Of EquityUnclean HandsWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:Don't Stuff Beans Up Your NoseWikipedia:GriefingWikipedia:Maldoror's ConjectureWikipedia:Not Here To Build An EncyclopediaWikipedia:Policy ShoppingWikipedia:POV RailroadWikipedia:Tag TeamWikipedia:Too Long; Didn't ReadWikipedia:FORUMSHOPTemplate:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesTemplate Talk:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not A DictionaryWikipedia:Article TitlesWikipedia:NotabilityWikipedia:AutobiographyWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (medicine)Wikipedia:Do Not Include The Full Text Of Lengthy Primary SourcesWikipedia:PlagiarismWikipedia:Do Not Create HoaxesWikipedia:Fringe TheoriesWikipedia:Patent NonsenseWikipedia:External LinksWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:HarassmentWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Ownership Of ContentWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:No Legal ThreatsWikipedia:Child ProtectionWikipedia:Paid-contribution DisclosureWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Conflict Of InterestWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:Please Do Not Bite The NewcomersWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Deletion PolicyWikipedia:Proposed DeletionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Attack PageWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Revision DeletionWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:Banning PolicyWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:Protection PolicyWikipedia:Article SizeWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:DisambiguationWikipedia:HatnoteWikipedia:Set Index ArticlesWikipedia:SubpagesWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:SignaturesWikipedia:Broad-concept ArticleWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/AccessibilityWikipedia:Make Technical Articles UnderstandableWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Dates And NumbersWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ImagesWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LayoutWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LinkingWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ListsWikipedia:Categories, Lists, And Navigation TemplatesWikipedia:CategorizationWikipedia:Template NamespaceWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:PrinciplesHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia Behavioral GuidelinesCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link