Contents 1 Your account 1.1 Purpose of editing 1.2 Reputation and user accounts 1.3 User anonymity and privacy 1.4 Ceasing editing 2 Working together 2.1 How things get done 2.2 Collaboration and honesty 2.3 Thoughtful helpful approach to other editors 2.4 Expertise and real-world credentials 2.5 Disputes and disagreements 2.6 Inconsiderate and forbidden conduct 2.7 Off-wiki issues 3 Structure of Wikipedia 3.1 Social structure 3.2 Policies and norms 3.3 Ownership, use, and censorship of material 4 Main policies, guidelines and essays 5 See also 6 Further reading (external links)


Your account[edit] Purpose of editing[edit] Main pages: Wikipedia:Wikipedia in brief and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not Our community exists for one purpose: writing a free, neutral, well-sourced encyclopedia. Anyone who shares this goal is invited to join. However, editing is a privilege, not a right. It may be revoked by blocking, banning or otherwise restricting people who damage or disrupt Wikipedia. Rules to remember: Wikipedia editing exists for users who together with others want to help write a neutral encyclopedia. Wikipedia pages are only available for project-related use while inappropriate content will be removed. Wikipedia is not for indiscriminate or ephemeral topics. (Coverage is quite selective) Wikipedia is not for promotion or advocacy of any kind, and links placed on Wikipedia pages do not affect search engine rankings. Reputation and user accounts[edit] Over time, editors may acquire an informal reputation based on their edits and the views of their peers. Past behavior, recorded in each editor's contribution history, may be a factor in community discussions related to sought positions of trust or potential sanctions. If you have gained a poor reputation in some matter, remedy it by demonstrating change or by no longer editing in the problematic area. Do not attempt to engage in the same behavior or topic area under a new name. The community scrutinizes the behavior of individuals, not just accounts. Rules to remember: Users are discouraged from using multiple accounts (reasonable uses include editing from insecure locations, avoidance of real-world controversy from family and colleagues, and separation of edits by bots or in a Foundation role). Users may not use multiple accounts or IPs to deceive, undermine consensus processes, evade blocks or sanctions, game the system, or prevent scrutiny within a discussion of their past relevant editing and conduct. Users are encouraged to publicly link any legitimate accounts to their main account, for transparency. User anonymity and privacy[edit] Anyone may edit under a nickname or without registering an account as an IP address. Editors who contribute anonymously or using an account may not be identified by others or have non-public information posted on-wiki unless they have previously posted it or otherwise consented on Wikipedia or a sister project. Any such breach of privacy may be completely removed ("oversighted") so that not even administrators can retrieve them. The privacy of article subjects is the subject of a separate policy and is given a very high priority. Rules to remember: Anonymous editing is embraced and welcomed. Breaches of user privacy (including "outing" and other non-public information) are strictly forbidden without the clear consent of the affected user/s. Experienced users will try to help if privacy is breached, but this may not always be practical. Sensitive problems such as privacy breaches, harassment, or handling or disclosure of multiple accounts, may usually be directed by email to the functionaries team or for maximal privacy, to the Arbitration committee. Ceasing editing[edit] To cease editing, a user simply stops editing. Accounts and edits cannot deleted, however, for reasons related to copyright, licensing requirements (attribution), and public record of the proceedings of the community. Specific discussions of a sensitive nature may be courtesy blanked but remain in the history record. Some pages, particularly in a user's own userspace, can often be deleted if no other user was a significant contributor. The community has provisions for a clean start and for "vanishing", but both are subject to strict conditions, the violation of which may lead to the sanctioning of the user. Rules to remember: Anyone can cease or resume editing at any time. With few exceptions, actions on Wikipedia of past and present users remain as part of the community's records after they leave. Policies exist covering clean start and vanishing, but they have strict limitations and are conditional on proper use. Sanctions may apply for misuse or violation of these.


Working together[edit] How things get done[edit] Wikipedia's principal means of "getting things done" is self-motivated collaborative activity. As a volunteer each individual chooses to edit, improve, and help others wherever they wish. As a community member each individual is obliged to work in a reasonable and honest way with others, to seek wider input and advice as needed, to be open to others' views, to avoid disruptive or obstructive behavior and other major policy breaches, and to engage in discussions only in ways that help the project. This is especially important when users disagree — an unavoidable situation in any community. Given the size of the community even uncommon tasks often have multiple volunteers active and able to help. Rules to remember: Wikipedia is radically open. You are invited to find what you enjoy and whatever catches your attention — and improve it! Users are expected to maintain a courteous collegial approach, to consult openly if needed (when unsure or during a problem), to avoid deliberate disruption, and to use editing access only in ways that help the project. Be bold — try things that look right, but be sensitive, courteous, and if others object, discuss before continuing. As a volunteer community sometimes things you may feel are needed aren't done yet. There's one sure cure for this....! Collaboration and honesty[edit] Main page: Wikipedia:Consensus Most discussions are ultimately settled by "consensus" - after exposure to public debate a number of independent uninvolved users have contributed and given reasons why a particular matter is or is not appropriate. Users wishing to edit should work within this model. Attempts to subvert or bias discussions or to influence them improperly, for example by canvassing, sock-puppetry (abuse of multiple accounts) or "gaming", are taken extremely seriously and can lead to a block or ban on a first occasion. Rules to remember: The freedom to edit brings responsibility. Changes should be thought through and those likely to be (or found to be) contentious should lead to discussion and ultimately resolved by consensus. When users disagree, both should treat each other respectfully and focus on the project issue. Dishonest editing, "gaming the system", and disruptive/obstructive behavior, are never acceptable and will routinely result in sanctions. Every page has a talk (or discussion) page linked to it, where editors can present suggestions and possible issues, and discussion takes place on editorial concerns. Thoughtful helpful approach to other editors[edit] A large number of users donate time, knowledge, skills, and effort to help the project and other users. Users should act towards other users in a generally helpful manner even if disagreeing with their views or tone. This often means listening and trying to find common ground, avoiding inflaming disputes or polarizing discussions, and working from unselfish project principles. A generally calm, productive, collegial style is looked for. Handling difficult users is covered below. Newcomers, who may not know the site's norms, should be supported and helped rather than "bitten". Users who appear to be making efforts to edit positively but whose actions are disruptive will usually be warned before any further action. However users editing in a very improper or disruptive manner (vandalism, pure self-promotion, attacks, etc.) may find themselves treated more strictly or rapidly sanctioned. Users who do not feel inclined to help others are expected at the least not to make others' positive activities harder or less rewarding by engaging in difficult conduct or poor and ungraceful social manners. Especially, users joining a dispute should do so with a view to helping those involved find ways to resolve it, and should not act in ways that "make it worse". Rules to remember: As a volunteer community, mutual support and collegiality is important. Newcomers apparently trying to edit in good faith should be supported, not "bitten". Users choosing to involve themselves in an on-wiki situation should do so for project benefit and to calm and help those already in dispute. Users joining a heated discussion should make efforts to not make it worse, inflame, or polarize. "Gaming" social norms to "get at" others or unfairly discourage users from genuine involvement is strictly forbidden. Expertise and real-world credentials[edit] Wikipedia documents topics as they are seen through reliable sources such as academic papers, and reputable books and news media. The work of editors is to summarize and balance those sources and reflect them neutrally and fairly, rather than to present novel ideas of their own. Editorial writing skills and an ability to explain and collaborate well are often more important than subject-matter expertise. Wikipedians are not themselves reliable sources, no matter who they are. Experts who edit bring great knowledge to Wikipedia and to the world. However it is important to recognize that experts, no less than anyone else, may have their own views and biases, and must also summarize topics neutrally and at a suitable level for the topic. While credentials are respected, they do not carry weight in discussions, and appeals to credentials often carry little weight. Wikipedia contains users of all kinds, and some academics find it preferable to allude to their credentials but edit under a pseudonym, to separate Wikipedia editing from their academic life. Rules to remember: Experts are welcomed and valued. They often bring great improvements to the content of topics they are expert in. As Wikipedia's main task is editorial and not research, credentials usually rank behind the general ability to write well on a topic, edit appropriately, and collaborate well with others. If a query arises over some issue in an article, users (of any standing) will be asked to provide evidence of points from credible sources, not by relying on their own authority. Disputes and disagreements[edit] Main page: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Personality and topic approaches vary between users. A range of dispute resolution methods exist for users who find themselves in disagreement. Users are expected to seek dialog and, if that fails, seek uninvolved help from the rest of the community (it's easier to resolve a problem if other editors have clearly acted to a high standard). If needed seek more formal dispute resolution but always keep acting to a high standard. Disruptive activities and editing in lieu of calm resolution are not appropriate. Even if one user in a dispute appears behaving unreasonably, others in the dispute are expected to try to resolve it calmly, then seek progressively more formal help. Posts made in a dispute should focus on discerning what is right and best for the project. They should reflect Wikipedia norms and policies rather than personal agendas, advocacy or battleground mindsets, and responses should focus on addressing any Wikipedia issues and not just be reactive. Rules to remember: The primary approach to disputes is calmly to seek dispute resolution, not to "fight". Users unable to resolve a disagreement or who are being attacked, should first try to resolve the dispute. Users who cannot resolve a dispute should ask for uninvolved help rather than fighting. Points made in a dispute are expected to focus on the project's benefits, the merits of the views stated, and community norms, not on personalities and emotional escalation. Users seeing a dispute should intervene only in order to help calm it down, and (by peer pressure and good advice) to help the disputants find an appropriate amicable solution. Private or sensitive information related to a Wikipedia dispute (real world identities and issues, off-wiki logs, improper activity off-site, harassment, etc.) should not usually be posted on the wiki. They may be passed to the Arbitration Committee or the functionaries team by email instead. Inconsiderate and forbidden conduct[edit] Main pages: Wikipedia:Conduct policies, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and Wikipedia:Harassment Wikipedia has a number of strict norms on inappropriate conduct to other users. These cover behaviors ranging from ordinary impoliteness and sarcasm, through to styles of speech likely to provoke "heat" rather than "light" ("fighting words"), and also cover more reprehensible forms of conduct such as harassment, personal attacks, and "outing". Low grade and sporadic abrasive conduct ("incivility") should be avoided, but if it happens is best ignored rather than rising to the bait. Users should focus on the Wikipedia issue and set aside personal issues. More serious issues or persistent problems should be raised, first with the user and then if needed, switching to dispute resolution. Conduct that disrupts content writing is also strictly forbidden. This includes disruptive, deceptive, vandalistic, and tendentious editing. The latter covers all forms of behavior where the user prevents good quality editing from taking place or persists in causing productive discussion to be derailed. These do not affect removal of inappropriate material on good policy-based grounds. However an established disagreement between editors over possibly poor quality edits should usually be met by discussion and attempt to agree what is best for the project following usual project norms, rather than edit warring or battleground behavior. Wikipedia's sanctions and blocking regimes for this kind of conduct initially seem quite mild and tolerant, however repeatedly disruptive users will find that it becomes strongly enforced in the end. Rules to remember: Conduct that causes disruption of the project's goals, whether involving interpersonal behaviors or article editing behaviors, is unacceptable. Low grade comments are best ignored. More serious or persistently disruptive behavior may require community input. When a user is apparently engaging in antisocial or unproductive conduct and dialog fails, dispute resolution should be followed, rather than personally directed responses. More serious conduct is likely to result in warnings or blocks, even for a first incident. Legal threats are incompatible with editing. A user who appears to threaten legal action will be blocked and asked not to edit until the matter is resolved or the threat withdrawn. Sanctions, including blocks, are not "punitive"; they are intended to protect the project and prevent or reduce the risk of future disruption. They provide a strong hint where "the line" is on certain behaviors. They can be appealed on good cause. Further issues generally result in longer blocks or bans. Blocked users should not try to evade the block or use a new account. Off-wiki issues[edit] Editors may have (and identify as having) any beliefs, opinions, preferences or lifestyles, even if offensive to other people. Nobody is excluded from Wikipedia because of any of these, or because of gender, sexual orientation, race, nationality, real-world behavior, or other such criteria. The sole current exception is zero tolerance on pedophilia and related advocacy which will result in a ban from the project whether or not they affect editing. Editors with strong views on a matter or who are closely involved with the topic must not let their personal convictions or background improperly affect their editing of articles. Users are expected and obligated to edit neutrally and based upon discussion and consensus of evidence only. Ideally it should not be possible, when looking at an editor's contributions to an article, to determine their personal views (if any) about the subject itself. People who are unable to edit in this manner should limit themselves to the talk page or avoid the topic entirely, if they wish to edit, because Wikipedia is not for promotion and soapboxing and is not a battleground. E-mails and other off-site communications are usually not allowed to be posted on Wikipedia except by consent of all who are being quoted or referenced. Off-wiki attempts to improperly manipulate Wikipedia discussions are forbidden. Rules to remember: Personal views must not overtake encyclopedia-centered discussion. Beliefs and agendas not relevant to Wikipedia itself should be left at the door. Users who cannot do this should avoid the topic or limit themselves to uncontroversial edits and the talk page. Posting off-wiki private communications on the wiki without permission by all involved is forbidden as it breaches copyright. Attempts to improperly influence Wikipedia content (whether undertaken on- or off-site) are forbidden.


Structure of Wikipedia[edit] Social structure[edit] All editors in good standing are precisely equal in a discussion about content and ordinary project matters. While some individual's views may be noted more than others, this is inevitably due to individual choices and experience; it is not a reflection of any kind of formal "status". Even long-standing editors and administrators have no extra say — they participate in all discussions on equal terms (no higher or lower) than others. Because Wikipedia is reputation based, very new users, "single purpose" users or apparent canvassed users evidencing an agenda, users who have not yet set up an account, and apparently disruptive or improperly behaving users, may be given less "weight" in some discussions. Even so, if such users do make good cogent points based upon good sense and community policies and norms, these will usually carry identical weight in a discussion. The (very) few exceptions tend to be related to management of tools, disputes and privacy, and other matters requiring trust. The relevant rights are granted due to reputation and following careful discussion, usually by the community as a whole. Examples of advanced tools and related rights Rollbackers, trusted to use the "one button" rollback tool to undo vandalism; Reviewers, trusted to operate pending changes - pages where edits will be held back until confirmed to be free of vandalism; Administrators, experienced editors trusted to show good judgment, give good general advice, make summary decisions about inappropriate user conduct and dispute handling, and to use tools such as deletion, page protection, and blocking properly; Bureaucrats, trusted to judge consensus in discussions over administrator promotion; Checkusers and Oversighters, very highly trusted users allowed to access non-public material in line with the privacy policy; Arbitrators (the Arbitration Committee) responsible for final decisions on the most serious disputes, and for supervision of Checkusers and Oversighters; Stewards, who add or remove many advanced rights from users in line with due process. Further information: Wikipedia:User access levels Rules to remember: With the exception of very new users, possibly disruptive users, and (in some debates) non logged-in users, all editors are considered to have equal rights and standing in all discussions. All users with elevated rights will have gained them through scrutiny and a formal decision process. None of these roles gives any kind of "special privilege" in any ordinary content or project discussion, beyond the set limits of their role. Policies and norms[edit] Main pages: Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and Help:Introduction to policies and guidelines Community policies, guidelines, and norms are effectively rules or common expectations established by the community through either common practice or discussion and agreement. From time to time they are reconsidered and amended. There are many of them, and they tend to grow in an "organic" and somewhat anarchic manner. Not all policies and norms are agreed upon or have the same level of "buy-in" (or general acceptance), but those that gain consensus to be designated policies or guidelines are usually considered to be widely supported and will often be strongly enforced. Policies and guidelines reflect (and are written descriptions of) communal views. They may become close to mandatory when they reflect a norm that the community has shown it agrees and accepts, and may be set aside in rare cases where the community feels it is appropriate to do so. They may change whenever a change is proposed and the community shows the change is agreed and accepted. Policy wordings are in ongoing development so the on-wiki wording may not always or fully reflect community norms at any given time. While anyone may post a suggested norm or a proposed change, it takes considerable experience to learn the kinds of norms likely to gain widespread agreement. Wikipedia also has a few policies that describe how other policies should be used. The best known is "Ignore All Rules", a policy that states written policies exist to benefit the project; in exceptional circumstances there may be a need to place the core principles of the project above its written policies, if there is a conflict between the two. Rules to remember: The written policies and guidelines provide guidance to the community's widely agreed norms. They are periodically updated by users to better reflect the view of the community, fix issues, or when a change is agreed upon. Anyone can propose or change a policy or guideline. Because policies and guidelines have very wide agreement users should not make major changes to them without a good understanding of the community's likely view on the matter. Users generally discuss issues based upon their understanding of community norms as well as policies. Ownership, use, and censorship of material[edit] Main pages: Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles Wikipedia's content is licensed under GFDL and CC-by-SA, both well known irrevocable free licenses that make all submitted content permanently and entirely free to reuse or change. With the exception of Wikipedia's own logos and those of its sister sites, anyone may copy, modify and reuse any material on any page of Wikipedia, for any purpose including personal or commercial reuse, subject to minimal conditions (of which the main one is a backlink and attribution). For this reason the community takes copyright of submitted material very seriously. Nobody can tell how material will be reused, therefore material may not be added to any page nor any image or media uploaded, that cannot be uploaded, stored, reused and distributed under these licenses and relevant laws. This includes copyright text such as emails and chat logs as well as websites, books and other media (unless permission is granted or fair use applies). Two other social norms affect content: Wikipedia's encyclopedic content is not censored - the main encyclopedia's content is governed by encyclopedic value rather than social acceptability. In addition, edits on Wikipedia remain perpetually in the public record unless they happen to fall within (fairly strict) deletion criteria. Editors do not own articles. All articles are communally owned with edits being contributed to the encyclopedia at the point of editing. Even the creator of a new article does not have the right to control its editing or content, or any control over its deletion or keeping outside usual community processes. Rules to remember: Wikipedia content is free. Copyright is taken very seriously, especially in terms of text added to articles and discussions or images and media uploaded. Wikipedia's encyclopedic content is not censored. Articles reflect encyclopedic merit (judged by the community at large) rather than national, cultural, or individual beliefs. With rare exceptions, all edits once made are publicly available forever. Individual users (even article creators) do not own articles or control what happens to them. The community does.


Main policies, guidelines and essays[edit] Purpose of editing Five Pillars What Wikipedia is not Neutral point of view Editing policy The Wikipedia Community (on Meta) Reputation system and user accounts Sock-puppetry policy (multiple accounts/scrutiny) User anonymity and privacy Harassment, "outing", reposting of private material Oversight (removal of privacy breaches/defamation) Site privacy policy (on Meta) Off-wiki material and issues What Wikipedia is not Conflict of interest   Collaboration and honesty Consensus Sock puppetry Tendentious editing Thoughtful helpful approach Consensus Civility Gaming the system Policies and norms Policies and guidelines Disputes and disagreements Dispute resolution Wikiquette alerts No angry mastodons Wikipedia is not about winning Ownership, use, and censorship Copyrights Wikipedia is not censored Ownership of articles   Social structure Administrators Single-purpose accounts Antisocial conduct Interpersonal conduct: Civility No personal attacks Harassment Editing misconduct: Disruptive editing Sock puppetry Vandalism Tendentious editing Gaming the system Edit warring Disruption to prove a point Appropriate conduct: Consensus Bold-Revert-Discuss Dispute resolution  


See also[edit] Help desk Wikipedia:Administration Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia Wikipedia:Editorial oversight and control Wikipedia:Hazing Wikipedia:List of policies Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines (and the introductory help page on these) Wikipedia:Product, process, policy Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset Wikipedia:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not Wikipedia:Wikipedia in brief


Further reading (external links)[edit] Mission statement - The Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia values - The six values of the Wikimedia Foundation In a nutshell, what is Wikipedia? And what is the Wikimedia Foundation? - The Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia founding principles - Principles generally supported by all of the Wikimedia communities v t e Essays on building Wikipedia Philosophy Articles must be written Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Cohesion Concede lost arguments Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism Here to build an encyclopedia Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is a community Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Construction 100K featured articles A navbox on every page Advanced article editing Advanced table formatting Advanced template coding Advanced text formatting Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test An unfinished house is a real problem Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Bare URLs Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Cherrypicking Citation overkill Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability The deadline is now Dictionaries as sources Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Give an article a chance How to run an edit-a-thon Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace Inaccuracy Law sources Link rot Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a WikiProject Nothing is in stone Permastub Potential, not just current state Printability Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Temporary versions of articles There is a deadline Walled garden What an article should not include Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Writing HER Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles Deletion Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion Content removal Delete the junk Does deletion help? Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Follow the leader How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Immunity Identifying blatent advertising Identifying test edits Liar Liar Pants on Fire Nothing Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion Why was the page I created deleted? Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole About essays Avoid writing redundant essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Finding an essay Quote your own essay Value of essays Related subjects About policies and guidelines Guidelines Policies Wikipedia is a volunteer service Essay directory v t e  Basic information on Wikipedia Main Help directory menu FAQs Reference desk Help desk About Wikipedia Administration Purpose Who writes Wikipedia? Organization Censorship Introduction Why create an account? In brief General disclaimer What Wikipedia is not Readers' FAQ Parental advice Navigation Introduction Searching Viewing media Help Mobile access Other languages Researching with Wikipedia Citing Wikipedia Students help Readers' index Copyright Book creation Contributing to Wikipedia Main tutorial Tutorials and introductions The answer Dos and don'ts Learning the ropes Common mistakes Newcomer primer Plain and simple Your first article Wizard Young Wikipedians The Adventure Protocols and conventions Five pillars Introduction Simplified ruleset Simplified MoS Etiquette Expectations Oversight Principles Ignore all rules The rules are principles Core content policies Policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines Vandalism Appealing blocks Getting assistance Requests for help Request editor assistance Disputes resolution requests IRC live chat Tutorial Village pump Contact us Wikipedia community Community portal Dashboard Noticeboards Departments Maintenance Task Center Essays Meetups WikiProjects Sourcing and referencing Finding sources Combining sources Referencing Introduction Citations Citation Style 1 Citation templates Footnotes Page numbers Cite errors Information Editing Toolbar Conflict VisualEditor User guide Category Diffs Email confirmation Infoboxes Linking Link color Manual of Style Introduction Simplified Namespaces Page name URLs User contribution pages Using talk pages Introduction Archiving Image and media files Images Media files How-to Guide to page deletion Image deletion Logging in Merging pages Page renaming Requests Redirecting Reset passwords Reverting Uploading images Introduction Wiki markup Wiki markup Cheatsheet Barcharts Calculations Columns HTML Lists Magic words For beginners Music symbols Sections Sounds Special Characters Tables Introduction Templates Documentation Messages Tools Transclusion Visual file markup Tutorial Directories Abbreviations Contents Edit summaries Essays Glossary Index The Missing Manual Shortcuts Tips Tip of the day Wikis Teahouse (interactive help for new editors) Ask for help on your talk page (a volunteer will visit you there) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Expectations_and_norms_of_the_Wikipedia_community&oldid=818767533" Categories: Wikipedia information pagesWikipedia basic information


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage information Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 5 January 2018, at 13:29. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.172","walltime":"0.222","ppvisitednodes":{"value":826,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":96842,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":10497,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":9,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":2,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 124.023 1 -total"," 50.47% 62.598 1 Template:Infopage"," 41.28% 51.197 1 Template:Ombox"," 13.30% 16.495 6 Template:Main"," 12.41% 15.392 2 Template:Navbox"," 10.48% 12.994 1 Template:Shortcut"," 9.70% 12.032 1 Template:Hidden"," 9.28% 11.504 1 Template:Essays_on_building_Wikipedia"," 7.85% 9.735 1 Template:Basic_information"," 5.09% 6.317 1 Template:Namespace_detect"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.048","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":2124108,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1327","timestamp":"20180218173445","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":65,"wgHostname":"mw1255"});});


Wikipedia:Expectations_and_norms_of_the_Wikipedia_community - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Expectations_and_norms_of_the_Wikipedia_community More Links

Wikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:HEREWikipedia:LOPWikipedia:LOPWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:Wikipedia In BriefWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:COMMUNITYFree Culture MovementWikipedia:NPOVWikipedia:VEncyclopediaWikipedia:BLOCKWikipedia:BANWikipedia:Arbitration/Active SanctionsWikipedia:IINFOWikipedia:PromotionReputationHelp:User ContributionsWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:GAMEWikipedia:IPs Are Human TooIP AddressWikipedia:SIGHTWikipedia:BLPWikipedia:FUNCWikipedia:ACWikipedia:BLANKINGWikipedia:CLEANSTARTWikipedia:Right To VanishWikipedia:CLEANSTARTWikipedia:RTVEdit Section: Collaboration And HonestyWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:CANVASSWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:GAMEWikipedia:EPWikipedia:BITEWikipedia:AGFEdit Section: Expertise And Real-world CredentialsWikipedia:Reliable SourcesAppeal To AuthorityEdit Section: Disputes And DisagreementsWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:DRWikipedia:DISRUPTWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:ACWikipedia:FUNCWikipedia:Conduct PoliciesWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:HarassmentFighting WordsWikipedia:DRWikipedia:DISRUPTWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:VANDALWikipedia:TEWikipedia:EWWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:DRWikipedia:CIVILWikipedia:Appealing BlocksWikipedia:Child ProtectionWikipedia:COIWikipedia:NPOVWikipedia:TPWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:NOTEdit Section: Structure Of WikipediaWikipedia:SPAWikipedia:ROLLBACKWikipedia:RVWWikipedia:PCWikipedia:ADMINWikipedia:CRATWikipedia:CHECKWikipedia:SIGHTWikipedia:ACWikipedia:STEWARDWikipedia:User Access LevelsEdit Section: Policies And NormsWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesHelp:Introduction To Policies And GuidelinesBuy-inWikipedia:IAREdit Section: Ownership, Use, And Censorship Of MaterialWikipedia:CopyrightWikipedia:Ownership Of ArticlesWikipedia:CopyrightsWikipedia:GFDLWikipedia:CC-BY-SACopyleftWikipedia:REUSEFair UseWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:Deletion CriteriaWikipedia:OWNFree ContentWikipedia:5PWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:NPOVWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:HARASSWikipedia:SIGHTWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:COIWikipedia:CONSENSUSWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:TEWikipedia:CONSENSUSWikipedia:CIVILWikipedia:GAMEWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:DRWikipedia:WQAWikipedia:No Angry MastodonsWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not About WinningWikipedia:CopyrightsWikipedia:NOTWikipedia:OWNWikipedia:ADMINWikipedia:SPAWikipedia:CIVILWikipedia:NPAWikipedia:HARASSWikipedia:DISRUPTWikipedia:SOCKWikipedia:VANDALWikipedia:TEWikipedia:GAMEWikipedia:EWWikipedia:POINTWikipedia:CONSENSUSWikipedia:BRDWikipedia:DRWikipedia:Help DeskWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid On Discussion PagesWikipedia:Contributing To WikipediaWikipedia:Editorial Oversight And ControlWikipedia:HazingWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesHelp:Introduction To Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Product, Process, PolicyWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:The Role Of Policies In Collaborative AnarchyWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Wikipedia In BriefWikimedia FoundationTemplate:Essays On Building WikipediaTemplate Talk:Essays On Building WikipediaWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:Articles Must Be WrittenWikipedia:Vague IntroductionsWikipedia:Be A Reliable SourceWikipedia:Coherence And CohesionWikipedia:ConcessionWikipedia:Eight Simple Rules For Editing Our EncyclopediaWikipedia:ExplanationismWikipedia:Here To Build An EncyclopediaWikipedia:Not Editing Because Of Wikipedia RestrictionWikipedia:ParadoxesWikipedia:Close ParaphrasingWikipedia:POV And OR From Editors, Sources, And FieldsWikipedia:Product, Process, PolicyWikipedia:PurposeWikipedia:Reasonability RuleWikipedia:The Role Of Policies In Collaborative AnarchyWikipedia:The Rules Are PrinciplesWikipedia:Ten Simple Rules For Editing WikipediaWikipedia:Tendentious EditingWikipedia:TrifectaWikipedia:Wikipedia In BriefWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A CommunityWikipedia:Wikipedia Is An EncyclopediaWikipedia:100,000 Feature-quality ArticlesWikipedia:A Navbox On Every PageWikipedia:Advanced Article EditingWikipedia:Advanced Table FormattingWikipedia:Advanced Template CodingHelp:Advanced Text FormattingWikipedia:Alternatives To The "Expand" TemplateWikipedia:Amnesia TestWikipedia:An Unfinished House Is A Real ProblemWikipedia:Autosizing ImagesWikipedia:Avoid Mission StatementsWikipedia:Bare URLsWikipedia:Be Neutral In FormWikipedia:Beef Up That First RevisionWikipedia:CherrypickingWikipedia:Citation OverkillWikipedia:Concept CloudWikipedia:Creating Controversial ContentWikipedia:Criticisms Of Society May Be Consistent With NPOV And ReliabilityWikipedia:The Deadline Is NowWikipedia:Dictionaries As SourcesWikipedia:Don't Demolish The House While It's Still Being BuiltWikipedia:Avoid Parkinson's Bicycle Shed EffectWikipedia:Don't Hope The House Will Build ItselfWikipedia:Don't PanicWikipedia:Editing On Mobile DevicesWikipedia:Editors Are Not MindreadersWikipedia:Encourage The NewcomersWikipedia:EndorsementsWikipedia:Featured Articles May Have ProblemsWikipedia:Give An Article A ChanceWikipedia:How To Run An Edit-a-thonWikipedia:Inaccuracies In Wikipedia NamespaceWikipedia:InaccuracyWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (law)Wikipedia:Link RotWikipedia:Minors And Persons Judged IncompetentWikipedia:"Murder Of" ArticlesWikipedia:Not Every Story/event/disaster Needs A BiographyWikipedia:Not Everything Needs A NavboxWikipedia:Not Everything Needs A WikiProjectWikipedia:Nothing Is In StoneWikipedia:PermastubWikipedia:Potential, Not Just Current StateWikipedia:PrintabilityWikipedia:For Publicists Publicizing A Client's WorkWikipedia:Put A Little Effort Into ItWikipedia:Restoring Part Of A Reverted EditWikipedia:Robotic EditingWikipedia:Sham ConsensusWikipedia:Temporary Versions Of ArticlesWikipedia:There Is A DeadlineWikipedia:Walled GardenWikipedia:What An Article Should Not IncludeWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A Work In ProgressWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not Being Written In An Organized FashionWikipedia:The World Will Not End TomorrowWikipedia:Essays In A Nutshell/Article WritingWikipedia:HERWikipedia:Write The Article FirstWikipedia:Writing About WomenWikipedia:Writing Better ArticlesWikipedia:Essays In A Nutshell/DeletionWikipedia:Adjectives In Your RecommendationsWikipedia:Articles For Deletion Is Not A War ZoneWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion ReviewsWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Image Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Make In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Avoid Repeated ArgumentsWikipedia:Before Commenting In A Deletion DiscussionWikipedia:Content RemovalWikipedia:Delete The JunkWikipedia:Does Deletion Help?Wikipedia:Don't Overuse Shortcuts To Policy And Guidelines To Win Your ArgumentWikipedia:Follow The LeaderWikipedia:How To Save An Article Proposed For DeletionWikipedia:I Just Don't Like ItWikipedia:ImmunityWikipedia:Identifying Blatant AdvertisingWikipedia:Identifying Test EditsWikipedia:Liar Liar Pants On FireWikipedia:NothingWikipedia:Overzealous DeletionWikipedia:Relisting Can Be AbusiveWikipedia:What To Do If Your Article Gets Tagged For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Why Was The Page I Created Deleted?Wikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not Whac-A-MoleWikipedia:Avoid Writing Redundant EssaysWikipedia:The Difference Between Policies, Guidelines And EssaysWikipedia:Don't Cite Essays Or Proposals As If They Were PolicyWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:Quote Your Own EssayWikipedia:The Value Of EssaysWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A Volunteer ServiceWikipedia:Essay DirectoryTemplate:Basic InformationTemplate Talk:Basic InformationCategory:Wikipedia Basic InformationWikipediaHelp:ContentsHelp:Contents/DirectoryHelp:MenuWikipedia:FAQ/IndexWikipedia:Reference DeskWikipedia:Help DeskWikipedia:AboutWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:PurposeWikipedia:Who Writes WikipediaWikipedia:Formal OrganizationHelp:CensorshipWikipedia:IntroductionWikipedia:Why Create An Account?Wikipedia:Wikipedia In BriefWikipedia:General DisclaimerWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:FAQ/ReadersWikipedia:Advice For ParentsHelp:NavigationHelp:Introduction To Navigating Wikipedia/1Help:SearchingHelp:Viewing MediaWikipedia:Media HelpHelp:Mobile AccessHelp:Other LanguagesWikipedia:Researching With WikipediaWikipedia:Citing WikipediaHelp:Student HelpWikipedia:Reader's Index To WikipediaHelp:CopyrightHelp:BooksWikipedia:Contributing To WikipediaWikipedia:TutorialHelp:Getting StartedWikipedia:The Answer To Life, The Universe, And EverythingWikipedia:Dos And Don'tsWikipedia:Learning The RopesWikipedia:Avoiding Common MistakesWikipedia:A Primer For NewcomersWikipedia:Plain And SimpleWikipedia:Your First ArticleWikipedia:Article WizardWikipedia:Guidance For Younger EditorsWikipedia:The Wikipedia AdventureWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Five PillarsHelp:Introduction To Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:Simplified Manual Of StyleWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:Editorial Oversight And ControlWikipedia:PrinciplesWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:The Rules Are PrinciplesWikipedia:Core Content PoliciesWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Guide To Appealing BlocksWikipedia:QuestionsWikipedia:RequestsWikipedia:Editor Assistance/RequestsWikipedia:Dispute Resolution RequestsWikipedia:IRCWikipedia:IRC/TutorialWikipedia:Village PumpWikipedia:Contact UsWikipedia CommunityWikipedia:Community PortalWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:Department DirectoryWikipedia:MaintenanceWikipedia:Task CenterWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:MeetupWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesHelp:Find SourcesWikipedia:Combining SourcesHelp:Referencing For BeginnersHelp:Introduction To Referencing/1Help:Citations Quick ReferenceHelp:Citation Style 1Wikipedia:Citation TemplatesHelp:FootnotesHelp:References And Page NumbersHelp:Cite ErrorsCategory:Wikipedia Information PagesHelp:EditingHelp:Edit ToolbarHelp:Edit ConflictWikipedia:VisualEditorWikipedia:VisualEditor/User GuideHelp:CategoryHelp:DiffHelp:Email ConfirmationHelp:InfoboxHelp:LinkHelp:Link ColorWikipedia:Manual Of StyleHelp:Introduction To The Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Simplified Manual Of StyleHelp:NamespacesHelp:Page NameHelp:URLHelp:User ContributionsHelp:Using Talk PagesHelp:Introduction To Talk PagesHelp:Archiving A Talk PageHelp:FilesWikipedia:ImagesWikipedia:Creation And Usage Of Media FilesCategory:Wikipedia How-toWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Guide To Image DeletionHelp:Logging InHelp:MergingHelp:How To Move A PageWikipedia:Requested MovesHelp:RedirectHelp:Reset PasswordHelp:RevertingWikipedia:Uploading ImagesHelp:Introduction To Uploading Images/1Wiki MarkupHelp:Wiki MarkupHelp:CheatsheetHelp:BarchartHelp:CalculationHelp:ColumnsHelp:HTML In WikitextHelp:ListHelp:Magic WordsHelp:Magic Words For BeginnersHelp:Musical SymbolsHelp:SectionHelp:Sound File MarkupHelp:Special CharactersHelp:TableHelp:Table/Introduction To TablesHelp:TemplateWikipedia:Template DocumentationWikipedia:Template MessagesWikipedia:ToolsWikipedia:TransclusionHelp:Visual File MarkupWikipedia:Picture TutorialWikipedia:DirectoryWikipedia:Wikipedia AbbreviationsPortal:ContentsWikipedia:Edit Summary LegendWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:Editor's Index To WikipediaHelp:Wikipedia: The Missing ManualWikipedia:List Of ShortcutsWikipedia:TipsWikipedia:Tip Of The DayWikipedia:WikiNodeWikipedia:TeahouseHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia Information PagesCategory:Wikipedia Basic InformationDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link