Contents 1 Achieving consensus 1.1 Through editing 1.2 Through discussion 1.3 Consensus-building 1.3.1 In talk pages 1.3.2 By soliciting outside opinions 1.3.3 Administrative or community intervention 1.3.4 Pitfalls and errors 2 Determining consensus 2.1 Levels of consensus 2.2 No consensus 3 Consensus can change 4 Decisions not subject to consensus of editors 5 See also


Achieving consensus Policy shortcut WP:CONACHIEVE Editors usually reach consensus as a natural process. After one changes a page, others who read it can choose whether or not to further edit. When editors do not reach agreement by editing, discussion on the associated talk pages continues the process toward consensus. A consensus decision takes into account all of the proper concerns raised. Ideally, it arrives with an absence of objections, but often we must settle for as wide an agreement as can be reached. When there is no wide agreement, consensus-building involves adapting the proposal to bring in dissenters without losing those who accepted the initial proposal. Through editing Policy shortcut WP:EDITCONSENSUS A simplified diagram of how consensus is reached. When an edit is made, other editors may either accept it, change it, or revert it. Seek a compromise means "attempt to find a generally acceptable solution", either through continued editing or through discussion. Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy and Wikipedia:Be bold Consensus is a normal and usually implicit and invisible process across Wikipedia. Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus. Should that edit later be revised by another editor without dispute, it can be assumed that a new consensus has been reached. In this way, the encyclopedia is gradually added to and improved over time. All edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious) – either by clear edit summaries indicating the reason why the change was made, or by discussion on the associated talk page. Substantive, informative edit summaries indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Edit summaries are especially important when reverting another editor's good faith work. Repeated reversions are contrary to Wikipedia policy under Edit warring, except for specific policy-based material (such as WP:BLP exceptions) and for reversions of vandalism. Except in cases affected by content policies or guidelines, most disputes over content may be resolved through minor changes rather than taking an all-or-nothing position. Often, a simple rewording will satisfy all editors' concerns. Whether changes come through editing or through discussion, the encyclopedia is best improved through collaboration and consensus, not through combat and capitulation. Be bold, but not rash. In most cases, the first thing to try is an edit to the page, and sometimes making such an edit will resolve a dispute. Use clear edit summaries that explain the purpose of the edit. If the edit is reverted, try making a compromise edit that addresses the other editors' concerns. Edit summaries are useful, but do not try to discuss disputes across multiple edit summaries; that is generally viewed as edit warring and may incur sanctions. If an edit is reverted and further edits seem likely to meet the same fate, create a new section on the associated talk page to discuss the issue. Through discussion Further information: Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle When agreement cannot be reached through editing alone, the consensus-forming process becomes more explicit: editors open a section on the associated talk page and try to work out the dispute through discussion. Here editors try to persuade others, using reasons based in policy, sources, and common sense; they can also suggest alternative solutions or compromises that may satisfy all concerns. The result might be an agreement that does not satisfy anyone completely, but that all recognize as a reasonable solution. Consensus is an ongoing process on Wikipedia; it is often better to accept a less-than-perfect compromise – with the understanding that the page is gradually improving – than to try to fight to implement a particular preferred version immediately. The quality of articles with combative editors is, as a rule, far lower than that of articles where editors take a longer view. When editors have a particularly difficult time reaching a consensus, several processes are available for consensus-building (third opinions, requests for comment), and even more extreme processes that will take authoritative steps to end the dispute (administrator intervention, formal mediation, and arbitration). Keep in mind, however, that administrators are primarily concerned with policy and editor behavior and will not decide content issues authoritatively. They may block editors for behaviors that interfere with the consensus process (such as edit-warring, abuse of multiple accounts, or a lack of civility). They may also make decisions about whether edits are or are not allowable under policy, but will not usually go beyond such actions. Consensus-building Further information: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Editors who maintain a neutral, detached, and civil attitude can usually reach consensus on an article through the process described above. They may still occasionally find themselves at an impasse, either because they cannot find rational grounds to settle a dispute or because one or both sides of the discussion become emotionally or ideologically invested in winning an argument. What follows are suggestions for resolving intractable disputes, along with descriptions of several formal and informal processes that may help. In talk pages See also: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines Policy shortcut WP:TALKDONTREVERT In determining consensus, consider the quality of the arguments, the history of how they came about, the objections of those who disagree, and existing policies and guidelines. The quality of an argument is more important than whether it represents a minority or a majority view. The arguments "I just don't like it" and "I just like it" usually carry no weight whatsoever. Limit article talk page discussions to discussion of sources, article focus, and policy. If an edit is challenged, or is likely to be challenged, editors should use talk pages to explain why an addition, change, or removal improves the article, and hence the encyclopedia. Consensus can be assumed if no editors object to a change. Editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material, or who stonewall discussions, may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions. Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated. The goal of a consensus-building discussion is to resolve disputes in a way that reflects Wikipedia's goals and policies while angering as few contributors as possible. Contributors with good social skills and good negotiation skills are more likely to be successful than those who are less than civil to others. By soliciting outside opinions When talk page discussions fail – generally because two editors (or two groups of editors) simply cannot see eye to eye on an issue – Wikipedia has several established processes to attract outside editors to offer opinions. This is often useful to break simple, good-faith deadlocks, because uninvolved editors can bring in fresh perspectives, and can help involved editors see middle ground that they cannot see for themselves. The main resources for this are as follows: Third opinion (3O) A neutral third party will give non-binding advice on the dispute. Reserved for cases where exactly two editors are in dispute. Noticeboards Most policy and guideline pages, and many wikiprojects, have noticeboards for interested editors. Posting neutrally worded notice of the dispute on applicable noticeboards will make the dispute more visible to other editors who may have worthwhile opinions. Dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN) For disputes involving more than two parties, moderators help the parties come to consensus by suggesting analysis, critiques, compromises, or mediation, but generally limited to simple disputes which can quickly be resolved. Formal mediation For disputes involving many parties or complicated issues or which otherwise need more time for resolution than is allowed at DRN, the Mediation Committee (MedCom) is staffed by members with proven mediation ability. Requests for comment (RfC) Placement of a formal neutrally worded notice on the article talk page inviting others to participate which is transcluded onto RfC noticeboards. Village pump Neutrally worded notification of a dispute here also may bring in additional editors who may help. Many of these discussions will involve polls of one sort or another; but as consensus is determined by the quality of arguments (not by a simple counted majority), polls should be regarded as structured discussions rather than voting. Responses indicating individual explanations of positions using Wikipedia policies and guidelines are given the highest weight. Administrative or community intervention Policy shortcut WP:CONADMIN In some cases, disputes are personal or ideological rather than mere disagreements about content, and these may require the intervention of administrators or the community as a whole. Sysops will not rule on content, but may intervene to enforce policy (such as WP:Biographies of living persons) or to impose sanctions on editors who are disrupting the consensus process. Sometimes merely asking for an administrator's attention on a talk page will suffice; as a rule, sysops have large numbers of pages watchlisted, and there is a likelihood that someone will see it and respond. However, there are established resources for working with intransigent editors, as follows: Noticeboards As noted previously, policy pages generally have noticeboards, and many administrators watch them. Administrators' noticeboard of incidents and general Administrators' noticeboard These are noticeboards for administrators. They are high-volume noticeboards and should be used sparingly. Use AN for issues that need eyes but may not need immediate action; use ANI for more pressing issues. Do not use either except at need. Requests for arbitration The final step for intractable disputes. The Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) may rule on almost any behaviorial or policy-interpretation aspect of a dispute, and has broad powers in its decisions. ArbCom does not settle content disputes or change policy. Pitfalls and errors The following are common mistakes made by editors when trying to build consensus: Off-wiki discussions. Discussions on other websites, web forums, IRC, by e-mail, or otherwise off the project are generally discouraged, and are not taken into account when determining consensus "on-wiki". In some cases, such off-wiki communication may generate suspicion and mistrust. Most Wikipedia-related discussions should be held on Wikipedia where they can be viewed by all participants. Canvassing, sock puppetry, and meat puppetry. Any effort to gather participants to a community discussion that has the effect of biasing that discussion is unacceptable. While it is fine – even encouraged – to invite people into a discussion to obtain new insights and arguments, it is not acceptable to invite only people favorable to a particular point of view, or to invite people in a way that will prejudice their opinions on the matter. Using an alternative persona ("sock puppet", or "sock") to influence consensus is absolutely forbidden. Neutral, informative messages to Wikipedia noticeboards, wikiprojects, or editors are permitted; but actions that could reasonably be interpreted as an attempt to "stuff the ballot box" or otherwise compromise the consensus-building process are considered disruptive editing. Tendentious editing. The continuous, aggressive pursuit of an editorial goal is considered disruptive, and should be avoided. Editors should listen, respond, and cooperate to build a better article. Editors who refuse to allow any consensus except the one they insist on, and who filibuster indefinitely to attain that goal, risk damaging the consensus process. Shortcuts WP:FORUMSHOP WP:ADMINSHOP WP:OTHERPARENT Forum shopping, admin shopping, and spin-doctoring. Raising essentially the same issue on multiple noticeboards and talk pages, or to multiple administrators, or any of these repetitively, is unhelpful to finding and achieving consensus. It does not help develop consensus to try different forums in the hope of finding one where you get the answer you want. (This is also known as "asking the other parent".) Queries placed on noticeboards and talk pages should be phrased as neutrally as possible, in order to get uninvolved and neutral additional opinions. Where multiple issues do exist, then the raising of the individual issues on the correct pages may be reasonable, but in that case it is normally best to give links to show where else you have raised the question.


Determining consensus See also: Wikipedia:Closing discussions Consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy. Levels of consensus Policy shortcuts WP:CONLEVEL WP:CONLIMITED WP:LOCALCONSENSUS Consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale. For instance, unless they can convince the broader community that such action is right, participants in a wikiproject cannot decide that some generally accepted policy or guideline does not apply to articles within its scope. Wikiproject advice pages, how-to and information pages, and template documentation pages have not formally been approved by the community through the policy and guideline proposal process, thus have no more status than an essay. Wikipedia has a standard of participation and consensus for changes to policies and guidelines. Their stability and consistency are important to the community. Accordingly, editors often propose substantive changes on the talk page first to permit discussion before implementing the change. Bold changes are rarely welcome on policy pages. Improvements to policy are best made slowly and conservatively, with active efforts to seek out input and agreement from others. See also: ArbCom statement of principles on levels of consensus. No consensus Policy shortcuts WP:NOCON WP:NOCONSENSUS Discussions sometimes result in no consensus to take or not take an action. What happens next depends on the context: In deletion discussions, a lack of consensus normally results in the article, page, image, or other content being kept. In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit. However, for contentious matters related to living people, a lack of consensus often results in the removal of the contentious matter, regardless of whether the proposal was to add, modify or remove it. When actions by administrators are contested and the discussion results in no consensus either for the action or for reverting the action, the action is normally reverted. In disputes over external links, disputed links are removed unless and until there is a consensus to include them. In article title discussions (WP:TITLECHANGES), the policy gives a default action for a no-consensus result: "If it has never been stable, or it has been unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title used by the first major contributor after the article ceased to be a stub."


Consensus can change Policy shortcuts WP:CCC WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE Editors may propose a change to current consensus, especially to raise previously unconsidered arguments or circumstances. On the other hand, proposing to change a recent consensus can be disruptive. Editors may propose a consensus change by discussion or editing. That said, in most cases, an editor who knows a proposed change will modify a matter resolved by past discussion should propose that change by discussion. Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus") which provide little guidance to the proposing editor (or, if you do use such terse explanations, it is helpful to also include a link to the discussion where the consensus was formed).


Decisions not subject to consensus of editors Certain policies and decisions made by the Wikimedia Foundation ("WMF"), its officers, and the Arbitration Committee of Wikipedia are outside the purview of editor consensus. Policy shortcut WP:CONEXCEPT The WMF has legal control over, and liability for, Wikipedia. Decisions, rulings, and acts of the WMF Board and its duly appointed designees take precedence over, and preempt, consensus. A consensus among editors that any such decision, ruling, or act violates Wikimedia Foundation policies may be communicated to the WMF in writing. Office actions are not permitted to be reversed by editors except by prior explicit office permission. The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee may issue binding decisions, within its scope and responsibilities, that override consensus. The committee has a noticeboard, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment, for requests that such decisions be amended, and may amend such decisions at any time. Some matters that may seem subject to the consensus of the community at the English-language Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) are, in fact, in a separate domain. In particular, the community of MediaWiki software developers, including both paid Wikimedia Foundation staff and volunteers, and the activities of Wikimedia Commons, are largely separate entities, as are the many non-English Wikipedias. These independent, co-equal communities operate however they deem necessary or appropriate, such as adding, removing, or changing software features (see meta:Limits to configuration changes), or accepting or rejecting images, even if their actions are not endorsed by editors here. This does not constitute an exhaustive list as much as a reminder that the decisions taken under this project apply only to the workings of the self-governing community of English Wikipedia.


See also This page is referenced in the Wikipedia Glossary. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. Information pages and Wikipedia essays concerning consensus: Wikipedia:Essay directory#Discussions and consensus Wikipedia:Closing discussions Wikipedia:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Wikipedia:Silence does not imply consent when drafting new policies Articles concerning consensus: Consensus decision-making False-consensus effect Truth by consensus v t e Wikipedia principles     Five pillars Statement of our principles Jimbo's statement Historic principles Simplified ruleset Synopsis of our conventions Wikimedia principles Common to all projects (in Meta-Wiki) Principles Other essays on Wikipedia's principles v t e Wikipedia key policies and guidelines Five pillars What Wikipedia is not Ignore all rules Content Verifiability No original research Neutral point of view What Wikipedia is not Biographies of living persons Image use Wikipedia is not a dictionary Article titles Notability Autobiography Citing sources Identifying reliable sources medicine Do not include copies of primary sources Plagiarism Don't create hoaxes Fringe theories Patent nonsense External links Conduct Civility Consensus Editing policy Harassment Vandalism Ignore all rules No personal attacks Ownership of content Edit warring Dispute resolution Sock puppetry No legal threats Child protection Paid-contribution disclosure Assume good faith Conflict of interest Disruptive editing Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Etiquette Gaming the system Please do not bite the newcomers Courtesy vanishing Deletion Deletion policy Proposed deletion Criteria for speedy deletion Attack page Oversight Proposed deletion of BLP Proposed deletion (books) Revision deletion Enforcement Administrators Banning Blocking Page protection Editing Article size Be bold Disambiguation Hatnotes Set index articles Subpages User pages Talk page guidelines Signatures Broad-concept article Project namespace WikiProjects Style Manual of Style Contents Accessibility Understandability Dates and numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Classification Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Template namespace WMF List of policies Friendly space policy Licensing and copyright Privacy policy Values FAQ List of all policies and guidelines List of policies List of guidelines Lists of attempts in creating fundamental principles v t e Wikipedia accounts and governance Unregistered (IP) users Why create an account? Create an account Request an account IPs are human too IP addresses are not people IP hopper Registered users New account Logging in Reset passwords Username policy Changing username Usernames for administrator attention Unified login or SUL Alternate account Account security Password strength requirements User account security Personal security practices Two-factor authentication Simple 2FA 2FA for AWB Committed identity On privacy, confidentiality and discretion Compromised accounts Blocks, global locks, bans, sanctions Blocking policy FAQ Admins guide Tools Autoblock Appealing a block Guide to appealing blocks UTRS Unblock Ticket Request System Blocking IP addresses Range blocks IPv6 Open proxies Global locks Banning policy ArbCom appeals Sanctions Personal sanctions General sanctions Discretionary sanctions and Log Essay Long-term abuse Standard offer Related to accounts Sock puppetry Single-purpose account Sleeper account Vandalism-only account Wikibreak Enforcer Retiring Courtesy vanishing Clean start Quiet return User groups and global user groups Requests for permissions Admin instructions Admin guide Account creator PERM Autopatrolled PERM AutoWikiBrowser PERM Confirmed PERM Extended confirmed PERM Edit filter helper File mover PERM Mass message sender PERM New page reviewer PERM Page mover PERM Pending changes reviewer PERM Rollback PERM Template editor PERM IP-block-exempt Requests Courses access Requests Bot accounts Requests Global rights policy OTRS Volunteer Response Team Advanced user groups Administrators RfA Bureaucrats RfB Edit filter manager Requests CheckUser and Oversight Requests Founder Committees and related Arbitration Committee Mediation Committee Bot approvals group Functionaries Clerks Governance Administration FAQ Formal organization Editorial oversight and control Quality control Wikimedia Foundation Board Founder's seat Meta-Wiki Leadership opportunities WikiProjects Elections Policies and guidelines Unbundling administrators' powers Petitions Noticeboards Consensus Dispute resolution Reforms Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Consensus&oldid=823420514" Categories: Wikipedia policiesWikipedia glossary itemsWikipedia conduct policiesWikipedia consensusHidden categories: Wikipedia move-protected project pagesWikipedia semi-protected project pages


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadView sourceView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata item Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects WikiversityWikivoyage Languages العربيةঅসমীয়াAzərbaycancaتۆرکجهবাংলাБеларускаяБългарскиBosanskiBrezhonegCatalàČeštinaCymraegDanskDeutschΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoفارسیFrançaisGalego한국어ՀայերենHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaInterlinguaItalianoქართულიҚазақшаLietuviųMagyarМакедонскиമലയാളംMaltiBahasa MelayuNederlands日本語NorskOʻzbekcha/ўзбекчаPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийСаха тылаසිංහලSimple EnglishسنڌيSlovenčinaSlovenščinaکوردیСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSuomiSvenskaதமிழ்Татарча/tatarçaతెలుగుТоҷикӣTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوVènetoTiếng Việtייִדיש粵語中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 1 February 2018, at 03:37. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.280","walltime":"0.385","ppvisitednodes":{"value":2862,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":140971,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":3799,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":9,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":20,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 278.193 1 -total"," 21.75% 60.520 8 Template:Policy_shortcut"," 18.55% 51.603 10 Template:Navbox"," 15.22% 42.341 1 Template:Policy"," 14.20% 39.512 1 Template:Ombox"," 13.83% 38.465 8 Template:Bulleted_list"," 12.49% 34.753 1 Template:Pp-protected"," 8.58% 23.875 1 Template:Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines"," 8.08% 22.465 2 Template:Shortcut"," 7.85% 21.844 1 Template:Wikipedia_principles"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.109","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":3584291,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1331","timestamp":"20180218172531","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":64,"wgHostname":"mw1325"});});


Wikipedia:Consensus - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Consensus More Links

This Page Is Semi-protected.Wikipedia:Conflict Of InterestHelp:Edit ConflictWikipedia:WikiConWikipedia:WikiProject ContainersWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:What "Ignore All Rules" MeansWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:Clean StartWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:HarassmentWikipedia:Non-discrimination PolicyWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Ownership Of ContentWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Username PolicyWikipedia:VandalismTemplate:Conduct Policy ListTemplate Talk:Conduct Policy ListWikipedia:GoalsWikipedia:Polling Is Not A Substitute For DiscussionWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutEnlargeHelp:RevertingWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:Silence And ConsensusWikipedia:Edit SummaryWikipedia:RevertingWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:BLPWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:BOLD, Revert, Discuss CycleWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:MediationWikipedia:ArbitrationWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Competence Is RequiredWikipedia:NegotiationWikipedia:Third OpinionWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:Dispute Resolution NoticeboardWikipedia:MediationWikipedia:Mediation CommitteeWikipedia:Requests For CommentWikipedia:TransclusionWikipedia:Village PumpWikipedia:Polling Is Not A Substitute For DiscussionWikipedia:!VOTEWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/IncidentsWikipedia:Administrators' NoticeboardWikipedia:Requests For ArbitrationWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionInternet Relay ChatWikipedia:CanvassingWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:CanvassingWikipedia:CanvassingWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:Tendentious EditingWikipedia:Disruptive EditingFilibusterWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Closing DiscussionsWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:POLICYWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:Template DocumentationWikipedia:PROPOSALWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/InfoboxesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:DeletionWikipedia:ContentiousWikipedia:BLPWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:External LinksWikipedia:Article TitlesWikipedia:TITLECHANGESWikipedia:StubWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutArbitration CommitteeWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Office ActionsWikipedia:Arbitration/PolicyWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/AmendmentWikipedia:GlossaryWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:Closing DiscussionsWikipedia:How To Contribute To Wikipedia GuidanceWikipedia:Silence Does Not Imply Consent When Drafting New PoliciesConsensus Decision-makingFalse-consensus EffectTruth By ConsensusTemplate:Wikipedia PrinciplesTemplate Talk:Wikipedia PrinciplesWikipedia:PrinciplesWikipedia:Five PillarsUser:Jimbo Wales/Statement Of PrinciplesWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:PrinciplesTemplate:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesTemplate Talk:Wikipedia Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Five PillarsWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:Neutral Point Of ViewWikipedia:What Wikipedia Is NotWikipedia:Biographies Of Living PersonsWikipedia:Image Use PolicyWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not A DictionaryWikipedia:Article TitlesWikipedia:NotabilityWikipedia:AutobiographyWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable SourcesWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (medicine)Wikipedia:Do Not Include The Full Text Of Lengthy Primary SourcesWikipedia:PlagiarismWikipedia:Do Not Create HoaxesWikipedia:Fringe TheoriesWikipedia:Patent NonsenseWikipedia:External LinksWikipedia:CivilityWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:HarassmentWikipedia:VandalismWikipedia:Ignore All RulesWikipedia:No Personal AttacksWikipedia:Ownership Of ContentWikipedia:Edit WarringWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:No Legal ThreatsWikipedia:Child ProtectionWikipedia:Paid-contribution DisclosureWikipedia:Assume Good FaithWikipedia:Conflict Of InterestWikipedia:Disruptive EditingWikipedia:Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A PointWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:Gaming The SystemWikipedia:Please Do Not Bite The NewcomersWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Deletion PolicyWikipedia:Proposed DeletionWikipedia:Criteria For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Attack PageWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Proposed Deletion Of Biographies Of Living PeopleWikipedia:Proposed Deletion (books)Wikipedia:Revision DeletionWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:Banning PolicyWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:Protection PolicyWikipedia:Article SizeWikipedia:Be BoldWikipedia:DisambiguationWikipedia:HatnoteWikipedia:Set Index ArticlesWikipedia:SubpagesWikipedia:User PagesWikipedia:Talk Page GuidelinesWikipedia:SignaturesWikipedia:Broad-concept ArticleWikipedia:Project NamespaceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/GuideWikipedia:Manual Of StyleWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ContentsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/AccessibilityWikipedia:Make Technical Articles UnderstandableWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Dates And NumbersWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ImagesWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LayoutWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Lead SectionWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LinkingWikipedia:Manual Of Style/ListsWikipedia:Categories, Lists, And Navigation TemplatesWikipedia:CategorizationWikipedia:Template NamespaceWikipedia:List Of Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:PrinciplesTemplate:Wikipedia AccountsTemplate Talk:Wikipedia AccountsUser (computing)GovernanceWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Why Create An Account?Special:CreateAccountWikipedia:Request An AccountWikipedia:IPs Are Human TooWikipedia:IP Addresses Are Not PeopleWikipedia:IP HopperWikipedia:New AccountHelp:Logging InHelp:Reset PasswordWikipedia:Username PolicyWikipedia:Changing UsernameWikipedia:Usernames For Administrator AttentionWikipedia:Unified LoginWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Password Strength RequirementsWikipedia:User Account SecurityWikipedia:Personal Security PracticesHelp:Two-factor AuthenticationWikipedia:Simple 2FAWikipedia:Using AWB With 2FATemplate:Committed IdentityWikipedia:On Privacy, Confidentiality And DiscretionWikipedia:Compromised AccountsWikipedia:Blocking PolicyWikipedia:FAQ/BlocksWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/BlockingWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/Blocking/ToolsWikipedia:AutoblockWikipedia:Appealing A BlockWikipedia:Guide To Appealing BlocksWikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request SystemWikipedia:Blocking IP AddressesWikipedia:Open ProxiesWikipedia:Banning PolicyWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban AppealsWikipedia:SanctionsWikipedia:Editing RestrictionsWikipedia:General SanctionsWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary SanctionsWikipedia:Arbitration Enforcement LogWikipedia:Sanctions (essay)Wikipedia:Long-term AbuseWikipedia:Standard OfferWikipedia:Sock PuppetryWikipedia:Single-purpose AccountWikipedia:Sleeper AccountWikipedia:Vandalism-only AccountWikipedia:WikibreakWikipedia:WikiProject User Scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak EnforcerWikipedia:RetiringWikipedia:Courtesy VanishingWikipedia:Clean StartUser:Worm That Turned/Quiet ReturnWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For PermissionsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Administrator InstructionsWikipedia:Administrators' Guide/Granting And Revoking User RightsWikipedia:Account CreatorWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Account CreatorWikipedia:AutopatrolledWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/AutopatrolledWikipedia:AutoWikiBrowserWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/AutoWikiBrowserWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/ConfirmedWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Extended ConfirmedWikipedia:Edit Filter HelperWikipedia:File MoverWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/File MoverWikipedia:Mass Message SendersWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Mass Message SenderWikipedia:New Pages Patrol/ReviewersWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/New Page ReviewerWikipedia:Page MoverWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Page MoverWikipedia:Reviewing Pending ChangesWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Pending Changes ReviewerWikipedia:RollbackWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/RollbackWikipedia:Template EditorWikipedia:Requests For Permissions/Template EditorWikipedia:IP Block ExemptionWikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request SystemWikipedia:User Access LevelsWikipedia:Education NoticeboardWikipedia:Bot PolicyWikipedia:Bots/Requests For ApprovalWikipedia:Global Rights PolicyWikipedia:Volunteer Response TeamWikipedia:AdministratorsWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:BureaucratsWikipedia:Requests For AdminshipWikipedia:Edit FilterWikipedia:Edit Filter NoticeboardWikipedia:CheckUserWikipedia:OversightWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser And OversightWikipedia:Role Of Jimmy WalesWikipedia:CommitteesWikipedia:Arbitration CommitteeWikipedia:Mediation CommitteeWikipedia:Bot Approvals GroupWikipedia:FunctionariesWikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/SPI/ClerksWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:FAQ/AdministrationWikipedia:Formal OrganizationWikipedia:Editorial Oversight And ControlWikipedia:Quality ControlWikipedia:Wikimedia FoundationWikipedia:Board Of TrusteesWikipedia:Founder's SeatWikipedia:MetaWikipedia:Leadership OpportunitiesWikipedia:WikiProjectWikipedia:ElectionsWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Unbundling Administrators' PowersWikipedia:List Of PetitionsWikipedia:NoticeboardsWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:ReformsHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia PoliciesCategory:Wikipedia Glossary ItemsCategory:Wikipedia Conduct PoliciesCategory:Wikipedia ConsensusCategory:Wikipedia Move-protected Project PagesCategory:Wikipedia Semi-protected Project PagesDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]This Page Is Protected. You Can View Its Source [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link