Contents 1 Faster display 1.1 Set user preferences 1.2 Skip slow parts of articles 2 Side-by-side editing or diff 2.1 Use an external editor beside edit-window 2.2 Double-copy the edit-window 2.3 Even proofread alongside an edit-window 2.4 Potential impact for side-by-side edit 3 Complex text substitutions 4 Avoiding accidental save of edit 5 Showing double-brace markup 6 Far future 7 See also

Faster display[edit] Set user preferences[edit] Enable section editing – The top section of an article (&section=0) can be edited separately for much faster update of the intro text (right-click top option "My preferences", click tab "Editing" and click "Enable section editing" option). Hide edit-toolbar – Turning off the edit-toolbar can make a short edit-page appear 2x-4x faster (right-click top option "My preferences", click tab "Editing" and unclick "Show edit-toolbar" option). NOTE: Some article intro-sections do not contain all the top images, so sometimes, editing a whole article could be faster for adjusting the image placement. Skip slow parts of articles[edit] After clicking "Show preview", all cumbersome tables or navboxes must be reformatted during the preview, but can be skipped by adding comments or #ifeq. Consider commenting-out those massive, gigantic bottom navboxes that typically double (or triple) the S-L-O-W-N-E-S-S of article previews: just put "<!--" and "-->" around the bottom navbox-template codings. (Even with high-speed Internet, large navboxes take a long time to load.) Consider conditional skip of text, using MediaWiki #ifeq-statements: using the markup language, surround omitted sections with "{{#if: skip |skip part 1|" and ending with "}}". Only "skip part 1" will show. Although HTML comments cannot be nested, the #ifeq-statements can be nested, as long as the spanned text does not upset the use of vertical-bar "|" or "}}" text. Consider copying troublesome sections of an article into a test-page for repeated changes & previews: edit as a user-space page (User:XXX/TestZZ) and copy/paste some text there for repeated changing/previewing. Perhaps have an "edit-TestZZ" window all the time. NOTE: For broader testing, the copied part of an article often spans 2 or 3 sections, rather than having just 1 section for editing. Be sure to copy enough sections for an accurate preview.

Side-by-side editing or diff[edit] The Wikipedia article-edit window is not designed for side-by-side editing, due to the formatted preview-article usually being on the top-half of the page, while the edit-buffer is typically far below (near the page bottom). By the time various text-issues are noticed, the user often forgets where those occurred within the edit-buffer, far below. However, when using 2 browser windows for side-by-side editing, the text (or image) is noticed in one window and located/changed in the other window, thereby allowing numerous precise changes to be made 2x to 10x times (or more) faster, without forgetting the tedious details. The 2nd window could show an edit-preview, a diff, or history-tab list. Compare the lower productivity of 1 browser window, versus using 2 windows, and note how much faster all details are caught. Use an external editor beside edit-window[edit] See also: List of text editors A good method to allow side-by-side editing is to copy the browser edit-window into a text-editor (such as Notepad in Windows or TextEdit in Mac OS X), then change text in the external editor but copy/paste & preview the results in the browser edit-window buffer. However, this can be dangerous, as it's possible to forget which buffer has the recent changes. The nearby editor can allow powerful editing, such as search-and-replace, or perhaps some spell-checker functions. There are many free text editors available which support syntax highlighting. NOTE: To avoid losing changes, perhaps always edit in the external editor, but paste into the browser window to preview. The final save would be made in the browser window, but perhaps only after a final careful edit-preview. Remember: a careful preview could save perhaps an hour of (later) finding & re-editing a half-changed article. Recall the adage: "A stitch in time saves nine". Double-copy the edit-window[edit] A quick method to allow side-by-side editing is to copy the browser edit-window, then change text in one window but copy/paste & preview the results in the 2nd window. However, this can be dangerous, as it's possible to forget which of the 2 windows has the most recent changes. NOTE: To avoid losing changes, perhaps always edit in the left-hand window (for example), but paste into the right-hand window to preview. The final save could be made in the left-hand window, perhaps after a final (one-time) preview of the left. A safer technique is to edit in a sandbox and save actual changes to the real article after they are finalized. By saving the sandbox frequently, you can minimize the chances of losing your work if your browser or system crashes, without any need for concern about whether the changes are final yet. Even proofread alongside an edit-window[edit] The increased speed of side-by-side editing can even be extended to a mere "proofreading" phase. When initially viewing an article, there might be a "wait-and-see attitude" as to whether there are enough trouble spots to warrant editing the article. Instead, consider first reading an article (with no intent to change it), but first click to "edit" in a new window, and then while reading (for the first time) make "possible edits" in the edit-window, while reading the formatted article page in the 1st window. Click "edit" open in new window (before first reading an article). Often, within 10 minutes, numerous improvements could be made that might have taken another 20 minutes to re-locate and remember, if the edit-window had not been instantly available when first reading the page. It might seem like a trivial issue, but compare the results a few times to realize how much time is burned to re-locate and remember such changes. However, beware the temptation to become a "copy-edit fanatic" when it is usually more important to add new text or new source footnotes to most articles. Potential impact for side-by-side edit[edit] The potential increase in productivity, using side-by-side as a new way of arranging edits, is almost a magical breakthrough in the ability to easily improve hundreds of scattered details. It is even more powerful than a WYSIWYG editor, for 4 reasons: (1) it allows users to even see/edit the underlying tables or infobox markup-language, before becoming distracted by a wholly reformatted page; (2) the editing can continue while the preview-page is being formatted/displayed in the 2nd window; (3) results do not demand verification; and (4) the diff-listing can remind users about all edits. Specifically: WYSIWYG editors have the drawback that they insist on live, instant transformations, which can seriously distract attention from rapidly focusing on myriad other details, when such ongoing reformatting occurs. In effect, side-by-side editing allows both levels of attention: either change a few details & reformat to see results, or step-by-step change almost all details (top-to-bottom), uninterrupted, and then wait for the massive reformatting afterward. Again, WYSIWYG-editing could be very distracting if adding a small change distorted the output and shocked attention away from numerous other small details. Because the edit-preview is processed in a 2nd window, the user is able to continue more editing in the 1st window, while choosing to ignore the in-progress formatting of the display-page, if too distracting at the moment. It is an utter myth that all changes must be verified (instantly or not). When making 57 changes to a page, it can be better to hope for 54 (of 57) successes, and move onto other articles, rather than to carefully babysit each change and lose time for the next article. Total "perfection" is not necessary in this level of writing, where articles are later hacked by anyone. During the side-by-side edit, a user can focus on changing the underlying markup language, so when it comes time to run a diff-listing (button "Show changes"), the user is able to review each change (as before/after) and compare the text in the familiar markup style. New typos can appear as unexpected keystrokes in the diff-listing. Quick editing is not just about fast edit/response feedback, but also about avoiding or limiting either distractions, or forced verification steps, as well. Being quicker, long-term, could depend on spotting edit-problems by using diff-listings in the 2nd window, while further editing continues in the 1st window.

Complex text substitutions[edit] Even a simple text-editor, such as Microsoft Notepad, can be used to handle some complex changes, by using multiple text string-substitutions. For example, 2 edit-commands could be used to add quotation marks around wikilinks: Use Notepad edit-replace to change all opening ' [[' (to become: "[[ ). Use Notepad edit-replace to change all closing ']] ' (to become: ]]" ). For any wikilinks which already had quotation marks, then replace all double-quote patterns ("") with a single quotation mark. For several years, there has been a free text-editor, called "NoteTab", which allows using highly complex regular expressions to find, replace or swap multiple text-patterns on each line of a page. The free version of NoteTab is a simplified version of the commercial-product version, and allows many sophisticated features, without having to buy the full-feature version. NoteTab can also be used to count words or particular phrases within a page.

Avoiding accidental save of edit[edit] Wikipedia has a user-preferences setting to warn about a blank edit-summary line, and then request confirmation before saving. However, when nearing completion of changing a page, a user is tempted to start composing the edit-summary text, which thus opens the door of accidental SAVE of a partial edit, with a permanent partial summary line. Instead of accidents, compose the edit-summary line as the last line of the page, using HTML comment tags "<!--" and "-->" to hide that line. For example: (...text of article above here...) <!-- 31 changes: +2 sources; fixed 9 spellings; 8 convert ft/m; moved 6 images +commas --> Putting that comment line at the end of the page allows seeing (& revising) the whole edit-summary text, without risk of accidental SAVE (stopped by the edit-summary field still blank). When ready, copy that bottom line as the edit-summary, and if you forget to remove that bottom line, it is only a hidden comment, so it can wait until you (or another user) deletes that comment when making further changes to that page, after a few hours or days. Few things make editing worse than saving a partial edit, where other users see the half-baked change, and either complain or re-change the page, causing "edit-conflict" when you try to finish the incomplete edit which was accidentally saved. In general, try to SAVE an entire edit to a specific article only once, or wait another 20 minutes, because other editors will be alerted and might embark on their own changes to the awakened article.

Showing double-brace markup[edit] Although articles rarely contain the double-brace markers "{{" and "}}" those braces are common in wiki-template documentation pages. To avoid activating templates (except inside tables), the double-brace markers can be encoded by adding 1 HTML character-number code: the left double-brace "{{" is "{&#123;", with bar "|" as &#124; the right double-brace "}}" is "&#125;}". When editing text inside of tables, then double-numbers or nowiki tags should be used (because tables look for a single left-brace "{"). The double-number characters are simply "&#123;&#123;" (for "{{") and "&#125;&#125;" (for "}}").

Far future[edit] Perhaps in the near future, a Wikipedia edit-window will have some type of side-by-side display, allowing a scrolling area for formatted output. However, due to the complexity of simulating a formatted page in a scrolling region, it will probably be many years before such side-by-side editing can be implemented in a single browser page. It is being implemented for translations currently though.

See also[edit] WP:Contributing to Wikipedia WP:Advanced footnote formatting WP:Advanced template coding WP:Advanced table formatting WP:Advanced text formatting v t e Essays on building Wikipedia Philosophy Articles must be written Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Cohesion Concede lost arguments Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism Here to build an encyclopedia Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is a community Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Construction 100K featured articles A navbox on every page Advanced article editing Advanced table formatting Advanced template coding Advanced text formatting Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test An unfinished house is a real problem Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Bare URLs Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Cherrypicking Citation overkill Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability The deadline is now Dictionaries as sources Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Give an article a chance How to run an edit-a-thon Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace Inaccuracy Law sources Link rot Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a WikiProject Nothing is in stone Permastub Potential, not just current state Printability Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Temporary versions of articles There is a deadline Walled garden What an article should not include Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Writing HER Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles Deletion Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion Content removal Delete the junk Does deletion help? Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Follow the leader How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Immunity Identifying blatent advertising Identifying test edits Liar Liar Pants on Fire Nothing Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion Why was the page I created deleted? Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole About essays Avoid writing redundant essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Finding an essay Quote your own essay Value of essays Related subjects About policies and guidelines Guidelines Policies Wikipedia is a volunteer service Essay directory Retrieved from "" Categories: Wikipedia essaysWikipedia essays about article formattingWikipedia how-to essaysWikipedia essays about editing

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces Project pageTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage information Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 11 February 2018, at 06:01. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.136","walltime":"0.188","ppvisitednodes":{"value":397,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":59373,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":72,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":11,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":1,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 127.959 1 -total"," 62.41% 79.865 1 Template:Essay"," 42.18% 53.969 1 Template:Ombox"," 15.27% 19.539 1 Template:Contributing_to_Wikipedia"," 13.51% 17.291 1 Template:Sidebar"," 12.06% 15.437 1 Template:Shortcut"," 12.02% 15.381 1 Template:Essays_on_building_Wikipedia"," 9.35% 11.960 1 Template:Navbox"," 8.26% 10.575 1 Template:See_also"," 3.21% 4.111 7 Template:Startflatlist"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.047","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":1624461,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1261","timestamp":"20180216090528","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":76,"wgHostname":"mw1322"});});

Wikipedia:Advanced_article_editing - Photos and All Basic Informations

Wikipedia:Advanced_article_editing More Links

Wikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:ConsensusWikipedia:ShortcutWikipedia:Contributing To WikipediaWikipedia:Help DeskWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:Editing PolicyWikipedia:Core Content PoliciesWikipedia:EtiquetteWikipedia:Dispute ResolutionWikipedia:Simplified RulesetWikipedia:Simplified Manual Of StyleHelp:Getting StartedWikipedia:AboutWikipedia:AdministrationWikipedia:Contributing To WikipediaWikipedia:TutorialWikipedia:A Primer For NewcomersWikipedia:Plain And SimpleWikipedia:The Wikipedia AdventureHelp:Introduction To Editing (VE)/1Help:Contents/DirectoryWikipedia:Why Create An Account?Help:EditingWikipedia:Your First ArticleWikipedia:Article WizardHelp:Using Talk PagesWikipedia:BOLD, Revert, Discuss CycleHelp:Referencing For BeginnersWikipedia:Moving A PageWikipedia:Guide To DeletionWikipedia:Creation And Usage Of Media FilesHelp:ListHelp:Table/Introduction To TablesHelp:TemplateWikipedia:Copying Text From Other SourcesWikipedia:StyletipsHelp:Wiki MarkupWikipedia:Essays In A Nutshell/Article WritingWikipedia:Article DevelopmentWikipedia:Basic CopyeditingWikipedia:Manual Of Style/LayoutWikipedia:Avoiding Common MistakesWikipedia:Writing Better ArticlesWikipedia:The Perfect ArticleWikipedia:Writing About WomenWikipedia:Department DirectoryWikipedia:Community PortalWikipedia:DashboardWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:MaintenanceWikipedia:WikiProject Council/DirectoryWikipedia:Editor's Index To WikipediaWikipedia:DirectoryWikipedia:FAQ/IndexHelp:DirectoryWikipedia:ToolsWikipedia:RequestsWikipedia:TeahouseWikipedia:Help DeskTemplate:Contributing To WikipediaTemplate Talk:Contributing To WikipediaHigh-speed InternetMediaWikiComparisonProductivityList Of Text EditorsNotepadTextEditSyntax HighlightingAdageWikipedia:SANDBOXWYSIWYGNotepad (software)String SubstitutionQuotation MarkWikipedia:WikilinkNoteTabRegular ExpressionsWikipedia:TemplateWikipedia:Contributing To WikipediaWikipedia:Advanced Footnote FormattingWikipedia:Advanced Template CodingWikipedia:Advanced Table FormattingWikipedia:Advanced Text FormattingTemplate:Essays On Building WikipediaTemplate Talk:Essays On Building WikipediaWikipedia:EssaysWikipedia:Articles Must Be WrittenWikipedia:Vague IntroductionsWikipedia:Be A Reliable SourceWikipedia:Coherence And CohesionWikipedia:ConcessionWikipedia:Eight Simple Rules For Editing Our EncyclopediaWikipedia:ExplanationismWikipedia:Here To Build An EncyclopediaWikipedia:Not Editing Because Of Wikipedia RestrictionWikipedia:ParadoxesWikipedia:Close ParaphrasingWikipedia:POV And OR From Editors, Sources, And FieldsWikipedia:Product, Process, PolicyWikipedia:PurposeWikipedia:Reasonability RuleWikipedia:The Role Of Policies In Collaborative AnarchyWikipedia:The Rules Are PrinciplesWikipedia:Ten Simple Rules For Editing WikipediaWikipedia:Tendentious EditingWikipedia:TrifectaWikipedia:Wikipedia In BriefWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A CommunityWikipedia:Wikipedia Is An EncyclopediaWikipedia:100,000 Feature-quality ArticlesWikipedia:A Navbox On Every PageWikipedia:Advanced Table FormattingWikipedia:Advanced Template CodingHelp:Advanced Text FormattingWikipedia:Alternatives To The "Expand" TemplateWikipedia:Amnesia TestWikipedia:An Unfinished House Is A Real ProblemWikipedia:Autosizing ImagesWikipedia:Avoid Mission StatementsWikipedia:Bare URLsWikipedia:Be Neutral In FormWikipedia:Beef Up That First RevisionWikipedia:CherrypickingWikipedia:Citation OverkillWikipedia:Concept CloudWikipedia:Creating Controversial ContentWikipedia:Criticisms Of Society May Be Consistent With NPOV And ReliabilityWikipedia:The Deadline Is NowWikipedia:Dictionaries As SourcesWikipedia:Don't Demolish The House While It's Still Being BuiltWikipedia:Avoid Parkinson's Bicycle Shed EffectWikipedia:Don't Hope The House Will Build ItselfWikipedia:Don't PanicWikipedia:Editing On Mobile DevicesWikipedia:Editors Are Not MindreadersWikipedia:Encourage The NewcomersWikipedia:EndorsementsWikipedia:Featured Articles May Have ProblemsWikipedia:Give An Article A ChanceWikipedia:How To Run An Edit-a-thonWikipedia:Inaccuracies In Wikipedia NamespaceWikipedia:InaccuracyWikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources (law)Wikipedia:Link RotWikipedia:Minors And Persons Judged IncompetentWikipedia:"Murder Of" ArticlesWikipedia:Not Every Story/event/disaster Needs A BiographyWikipedia:Not Everything Needs A NavboxWikipedia:Not Everything Needs A WikiProjectWikipedia:Nothing Is In StoneWikipedia:PermastubWikipedia:Potential, Not Just Current StateWikipedia:PrintabilityWikipedia:For Publicists Publicizing A Client's WorkWikipedia:Put A Little Effort Into ItWikipedia:Restoring Part Of A Reverted EditWikipedia:Robotic EditingWikipedia:Sham ConsensusWikipedia:Temporary Versions Of ArticlesWikipedia:There Is A DeadlineWikipedia:Walled GardenWikipedia:What An Article Should Not IncludeWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A Work In ProgressWikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not Being Written In An Organized FashionWikipedia:The World Will Not End TomorrowWikipedia:Essays In A Nutshell/Article WritingWikipedia:HERWikipedia:Write The Article FirstWikipedia:Writing About WomenWikipedia:Writing Better ArticlesWikipedia:Essays In A Nutshell/DeletionWikipedia:Adjectives In Your RecommendationsWikipedia:Articles For Deletion Is Not A War ZoneWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Deletion ReviewsWikipedia:Arguments To Avoid In Image Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Arguments To Make In Deletion DiscussionsWikipedia:Avoid Repeated ArgumentsWikipedia:Before Commenting In A Deletion DiscussionWikipedia:Content RemovalWikipedia:Delete The JunkWikipedia:Does Deletion Help?Wikipedia:Don't Overuse Shortcuts To Policy And Guidelines To Win Your ArgumentWikipedia:Follow The LeaderWikipedia:How To Save An Article Proposed For DeletionWikipedia:I Just Don't Like ItWikipedia:ImmunityWikipedia:Identifying Blatant AdvertisingWikipedia:Identifying Test EditsWikipedia:Liar Liar Pants On FireWikipedia:NothingWikipedia:Overzealous DeletionWikipedia:Relisting Can Be AbusiveWikipedia:What To Do If Your Article Gets Tagged For Speedy DeletionWikipedia:Why Was The Page I Created Deleted?Wikipedia:Wikipedia Is Not Whac-A-MoleWikipedia:Avoid Writing Redundant EssaysWikipedia:The Difference Between Policies, Guidelines And EssaysWikipedia:Don't Cite Essays Or Proposals As If They Were PolicyWikipedia:Essay DirectoryWikipedia:Quote Your Own EssayWikipedia:The Value Of EssaysWikipedia:Policies And GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of GuidelinesWikipedia:List Of PoliciesWikipedia:Wikipedia Is A Volunteer ServiceWikipedia:Essay DirectoryHelp:CategoryCategory:Wikipedia EssaysCategory:Wikipedia Essays About Article FormattingCategory:Wikipedia How-to EssaysCategory:Wikipedia Essays About EditingDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Project Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link