Contents 1 Background 1.1 Cession, retrocession, legal status, and self-determination of Taiwan 1.1.1 Legal status dispute under international law 2 Historical overview 2.1 1895–1945 – Japanese rule 2.1.1 Treaty of Shimonoseki 2.1.2 Potsdam Declaration and surrender of Japan 2.2 1945–Today – Post World War II status 2.2.1 1945 – End of World War II 2.2.2 1947 – February 28 Incident 2.2.3 1950–1953 – Korean War and US intervention 2.2.4 1951 – Treaty of Peace with Japan (San Francisco) 2.2.5 1952 ROC-Japan Peace Treaty 3 Question of sovereignty over Taiwan 3.1 Position of the People's Republic of China (PRC) 3.2 Position of the Republic of China (ROC) 3.3 Position of other countries and international organizations 4 Legal arguments 4.1 Arguments for the Republic of China and People's Republic of China sovereignty claims 4.2 Arguments for Taiwanese self sovereignty claims and its legal status 4.3 Arguments for United States sovereignty claims 5 Controversies 6 Governing authority 7 Possible military solutions and intervention 7.1 PRC's condition on military intervention 7.2 Balance of power 7.3 Third Taiwan Strait Crisis 8 Developments since 2004 and future prospects 8.1 Judicial 8.2 Political 8.3 Public opinion 8.4 Changing Taiwan's status to abide the ROC constitution 9 Note on terminology 9.1 Political status vs. Taiwan issue or Mainland issue 9.2 De facto vs. de jure and whether ROC ceased to exist 10 See also 11 References 12 Further reading 13 External links

Background[edit] Main article: History of Taiwan Taiwan (excluding Penghu) was first populated by Austronesian people and was colonized by the Dutch, who had arrived in 1623. The Kingdom of Tungning, lasting from 1661 to 1683, was the first Han Chinese government to rule on Taiwan. From 1683, the Qing dynasty ruled Taiwan and the Pescadores as Taiwan Prefecture and in 1875 divided the island into two prefectures. In 1885 the island was made into a separate Chinese province to speed up development in this region. In the aftermath of the First Sino-Japanese War, Taiwan and Penghu were ceded by the Qing dynasty to Japan in 1895. At the end of World War II, Japanese troops in Taiwan surrendered to the Republic of China, which was acting as the representative of the Allied Powers,[3] putting Taiwan under a Chinese government again after 50 years of Japanese rule. The ROC then claimed sovereignty on the basis of the Qing dynasty's administration, Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration, and Japanese Instrument of Surrender, but this became contested by pro-independence groups in subsequent years due to different perceptions of the said documents' legality. Upon losing the Chinese civil war in 1949, the ROC government retreated to Taipei and kept control over a few islands along the coast of mainland China and in the South China Sea. The People's Republic of China (PRC) was established in mainland China on 1 October 1949, claiming to be the successor to the ROC.[4] Quemoy, Matsu and Wuqiu on the coast of Fukien, Taiping and Pratas in the South China Sea, are part of the ROC's present territory, but were not ceded to Japan. Some arguments supporting the independence of Taiwan do not apply to these islands.[5] Cession, retrocession, legal status, and self-determination of Taiwan[edit] According to the Treaty of Shimonoseki Taiwan was part of Japan at the establishment of the ROC in 1912. The PRC (founded 1 October 1949) argues that the Treaty of Shimonoseki was never valid, saying it was one of several unequal treaties forced upon the Qing. China, during the Qing dynasty, ceded the island of Taiwan, including Penghu, to Japan "in perpetuity" at the end of the First Sino-Japanese War in 1895 by signing the Treaty of Shimonoseki. In the Cairo Conference of 1943, the allied powers agreed to have Japan restore "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese", specifically listing "Formosa" and Penghu, to the Republic of China after the defeat of Japan. According to the viewpoints of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China, this agreement was given legal force by the Instrument of Surrender of Japan in 1945. The PRC's UN Ambassador, Wang Yingfan (Chinese 王英凡), has stated multiple times in the UN general committee: "Taiwan is an inseparable part of China's territory since antiquity" and "both the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Declaration have reaffirmed in unequivocal terms China's sovereignty over Taiwan as a matter of international law". The PRC rejects arguments involving the lack of a specific treaty (San Francisco Peace Treaty) transferring Taiwan's sovereignty to China by noting that neither the PRC nor the ROC was a signatory to any such treaty, making the treaties irrelevant with regard to Chinese claims. The ROC argues that the Treaty of Taipei implicitly transferred sovereignty of Taiwan to it, however the US State Department disagreed with such an interpretation in its 1971 Starr Memorandum.[6] In addition, the ROC's Foreign Minister Yeh stated that "no provision has been made either in the San Francisco Treaty of Peace as to the future of Taiwan and Penghu".[5] Legal status dispute under international law[edit] On the other hand, a number of supporters of Taiwan independence argue that Taiwan was only formally incorporated as a Chinese territory under the Qing dynasty in 1683, and as a province in 1885. Subsequently, because of the Shimonoseki Treaty of 1895, Taiwan had been de jure part of Japan when the ROC was established in 1912 and thus was not part of the Chinese republic. Also, because the Cairo Declaration was an unsigned press communiqué, the independence advocates argue that the legal effectiveness of the Declaration is highly questionable. Furthermore, they point out that the Instrument of Surrender of Japan was no more than an armistice, a "modus vivendi" in nature, which served as a temporary or provisional agreement that would be replaced with a peace treaty. Therefore, only a military occupation of Taiwan began on 25 October 1945, and both the Treaty of San Francisco and Treaty of Taipei hold legal supremacy over the surrender instrument. These treaties did not transfer the title of Taiwan from Japan to China. According to this argument, the sovereignty of Taiwan was undetermined when Japan renounced sovereignty of Taiwan in the Treaty of San Francisco (also known as San Francisco Peace Treaty, SFPT) in 1951. Although the interpretation of the peace treaties was used to challenge the legitimacy of the ROC on Taiwan before the 1990s, the ROC supporters argue that the introduction of popular elections in Taiwan has compromised this position. Except for Taiwan independence supporters, most Taiwanese support the popular sovereignty theory and no longer see much conflict between this theory of sovereignty and the ROC position. In this sense, the ROC government administering Taiwan is not the same ROC which accepted Japanese surrender because the ruling authorities were given popular mandate by different pools of constituencies: one is the mainland Chinese electorate, the other is the Taiwanese constituencies. In fact, former president Chen Shui-bian has been frequently emphasizing the popular sovereignty theory in his speeches. However, as of 2016, the conflict between these two theories still plays a role in internal Taiwanese politics. The popular sovereignty theory, which the Pan-Green Coalition emphasizes, suggests that Taiwan could make fundamental constitutional changes by means of a popular referendum. The ROC legal theory, which is supported by the Pan-Blue Coalition, suggests that any fundamental constitutional changes would require that the amendment procedure of the ROC constitution be followed. From 2008 to 2016, under the Ma Ying-jeou administration, Taiwan had an accommodating policy towards a One-China policy, with the Taipei Times quoting that Ma believes his administration was part of China.[7]

Historical overview[edit]  Penghu ↓Battle of Penghu ↓Treaty of Shimonoseki ↓Surrender of Japan   Ming, Tungning Qing Japan Republic of China  Taiwan ↓Siege of Zeelandia ↓Battle of Penghu ↓Treaty of Shimonoseki ↓Surrender of Japan   Dutch & Spanish     Tungning Qing Japan Republic of China │ 1625 │ 1650 │ 1675 │ 1700 │ 1725 │ 1750 │ 1775 │ 1800 │ 1825 │ 1850 │ 1875 │ 1900 │ 1925 │ 1950 │ 1975 │ 2000 1895–1945 – Japanese rule[edit] A ROC Map, printed in 1926, which showed Taiwan as part of Japan. Treaty of Shimonoseki[edit] After losing the First Sino-Japanese War, the Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan (including the Pescadores) to Imperial Japan via Articles 2b and 2c of the Treaty of Shimonoseki on 8 May 1895, in one of what the Chinese term as an unequal treaty. Kinmen and Matsu Islands on the coast of Fukien, and the islands in the South China Sea administered by the Republic of China on Taiwan were not part of the cession. In 1895, subsequent to the Treaty of Shimonoseki, officials in Taiwan declared independence in the hope of returning the island to Qing rule. The Republic of Taiwan (1895) collapsed after 12 days due to political infighting, but local leaders continued resistance in the hope of achieving self-rule. The incoming Japanese crushed the island's independence bid in a five-month campaign. The Qing Dynasty was subsequently overthrown and replaced by the ROC in 1912. Upon the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War, the ROC declared the Treaty of Shimonoseki void in its declaration of war on Japan. The war soon merged with World War II, and Japan was subsequently defeated in 1945 by the Allied Powers, of which the ROC was a part. Potsdam Declaration and surrender of Japan[edit] The United States entered the War in December 1941. All military attacks against Japanese installations and Japanese troops in Taiwan were conducted by United States military forces. At the Cairo Conference, the U.S., United Kingdom, and the ROC agreed that Taiwan was to be restored to the ROC after the war. This agreement was enunciated in the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration, which outlined the terms of Japanese surrender, specified that the terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out. When Japan unconditionally surrendered, it accepted in its Instrument of Surrender the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. Japanese troops in Taiwan were directed to surrender to the representatives of the Supreme Allied Commander in the China Theater, Chiang Kai-shek (i.e. the Republic of China military forces) on behalf of the Allies, according to the directions of General Douglas MacArthur, head of the United States Military Government, in General Order No. 1, which was issued 2 September 1945. Chief Executive Chen Yi of the Republic of China soon proclaimed "Taiwan Retrocession Day" on 25 October 1945. 1945–Today – Post World War II status[edit] 1945 – End of World War II[edit] According to the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Proclamation, and Japanese Instrument of Surrender, the United States and the United Kingdom pledged along with Japan that Taiwan and the outlying Penghu Islands would be restored to the ROC. Therefore, following the victory of the Allies in World War II, the ROC government began considering Taiwan and the nearby islands as part of its sovereign territory, and exercising its administration over Taiwan on 25 October 1945, including by accepting a document of surrender from the Japanese army, declaring the restoration of Taiwan as an integral part of the ROC’s territory, and restoring ROC citizenship to the people of Taiwan and Penghu, in addition to establishing a provincial government and arranging elections to choose representatives of the people. Thus, the ROC government have been considering Taiwan and Penghu as a part of its sovereign territory since 1945. However, because a peace treaty had not been concluded at that time, Allies of World War II and Japan considered that Taiwan and Penghu were still sovereign territories of Japan. They also did not agree with the ROC's self-claimed restoration of ROC citizenship to the people of Taiwan and Penghu, and considered that the people of Taiwan and Penghu still had Japanese citizenship. Allies also stated that the ROC's control over Taiwan and Penghu was just a military occupation assigned by Allies, and made it clear to the ROC that the disposition of Taiwan and Penghu could not be settled until a peace settlement is made with Japan. 1947 – February 28 Incident[edit] When the February 28 Incident erupted in 1947, the U.S. Consulate-General in Taipei prepared a report in early March, calling for an immediate intervention in the name of the U.S. or the United Nations. Based on the argument that the Japanese surrender did not formally transfer sovereignty, Taiwan was still legally part of Japan and occupied by the United States (with administrative authority for the occupation delegated to the Chinese Nationalists), and a direct intervention was appropriate for a territory with such status. This proposed intervention, however, was rejected by the U.S. State Department. In a news report on the aftermath of the February 28 Incident, some Taiwanese residents were reported to be talking of appealing to the United Nations to put the island under an international mandate, since China's possession of Taiwan had not been formalized by any international treaties by that time and the island was therefore still under belligerent occupation.[8] They later made a demand for a treaty role to be represented at the forthcoming peace conference on Japan, in the hope of requesting a plebiscite to determine the island's political future.[9] 1950–1953 – Korean War and US intervention[edit] At the start of 1950, US President Harry S. Truman appeared to accept the idea that the military occupation of Taiwan was an accepted fact when the United States Department of State stated that "In keeping with these [Cairo and Potsdam] declarations, Formosa was surrendered to Generalissimo Chiang-Kai Shek, and for the past 4 years, the United States and Other Allied Powers have accepted the exercise of Chinese authority over the Island."[10] However, after the outbreak of the Korean War, Truman decided to "neutralize" Taiwan claiming that it could otherwise trigger another world war. In June 1950, President Truman, who had given only passive support to Chiang Kai-shek and was prepared to see Taiwan fall into the hands of the Chinese Communists, vowed to stop the spread of communism and sent the U.S. Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait to prevent the PRC from attacking Taiwan, but also to prevent the ROC from attacking mainland China. He then declared that "the determination of the future status of Formosa must await the restoration of security in the Pacific, a peace settlement with Japan, or consideration by the United Nations."[11] President Truman later reaffirmed the position "that all questions affecting Formosa be settled by peaceful means as envisaged in the Charter of the United Nations" in his special message to the Congress in July 1950.[12] The PRC denounced his moves as flagrant interference in the internal affairs of China. On 8 September 1950, President Truman ordered John Foster Dulles, then Foreign Policy Advisor to the U.S. Secretary of State, to carry out his decision on "neutralizing" Taiwan in drafting the Treaty of Peace with Japan (San Francisco Peace Treaty) of 1951. According to George H. Kerr's memoir Formosa Betrayed, Dulles devised a plan whereby Japan would first merely renounce its sovereignty over Taiwan without a recipient country to allow the sovereignty over Taiwan to be determined together by the United States, the United Kingdom, Soviet Union, and Republic of China on behalf of other nations on the peace treaty. The question of Taiwan would be taken into the United Nations (which the ROC was still part), if these four parties could not reach into an agreement within one year. 1951 – Treaty of Peace with Japan (San Francisco)[edit] When Japan regained sovereignty over itself in 1952 with the conclusion of the Treaty of Peace with Japan (San Francisco Peace Treaty) with 48 nations, Japan renounced all claims and title over Taiwan and the Pescadores. Many claim that Japanese sovereignty only terminated at that point.[13] Notably absent at the peace conference was the ROC which was expelled from mainland China in December 1949 as a result of the Chinese Civil War and had retreated to Taiwan. The PRC, which was proclaimed 1 October 1949, was also not invited. The lack of invitation was probably due to the dispute over which government was the legitimate government of China (which both governments claimed to be); however, Cold War considerations might have played a part as well.[citation needed] Some major governments represented in the San Francisco Conference, such as the UK and Soviet Union, had already established relations with the PRC, while others, such as the U.S. and Japan, still held relations with the ROC. The UK at that time stated for the record that the San Francisco Peace Treaty "itself does not determine the future of these islands," and therefore the UK, along with Australia and New Zealand, was happy to sign the peace treaty.[14] One of the major reasons that the delegate from the Soviet Union gave for not signing the treaty was that: "The draft contains only a reference to the renunciation by Japan of its rights to these territories [Taiwan] but intentionally omits any mention of the further fate of these territories."[14] Article 25 of this treaty officially stipulated that only the Allied Powers defined in the treaty could benefit from this treaty. China was not listed as one of the Allied Powers; however, article 21 still provided limited benefits from Articles 10 and 14(a)2 for China. Japan's cession of Taiwan is unusual in that no recipient of Taiwan was stated as part of Dulles's plan of "neutralizing" Taiwan. The ROC protested its lack of invitation to the San Francisco Peace conference, to no avail. 1952 ROC-Japan Peace Treaty[edit] After the end of World War II, the ROC signed the Treaty of Peace between the Republic of China and Japan, also known as the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, in Taipei in 1952. Both the San Francisco Peace Treaty signed in 1951 and the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty signed in 1952 stipulate that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” In the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty signed in 1952, Article 4 stipulates that “all treaties, conventions and agreements concluded before 9 December 1941 between Japan and China have become null and void as a consequence of the war.” While Peace Treaty of Shimonoseki is certainly a treaty nullified by this provision, however, in terms of international law, a territory once ceded by a legal and effective treaty remains a ceded territory even if the treaty is nullified afterwords. Article 3 stipulates that the disposition of property and claims of Japan and its nationals in Taiwan and Penghu shall be the subject of special arrangements between the governments of the ROC and Japan. And Article 10 stipulates that “nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores).” From legal point of view, this provision confirmed that all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) are not nationals of ROC, but merely "deemed as" and to be treated as nationals of ROC for the purpose of the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty. Moreover, Note No. 1 in the Exchange of Notes accompanying the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty stipulates that “the terms of the present Treaty shall, in respect of the Republic of China, be applicable to all the territories which are now, or which may hereafter be, under the control of its Government.” Consequently, at that time Japan agreed that Taiwan is a territory under the control of the ROC. However, although Japan recognized ROC's administration over Taiwan, she refrained from recognizing Taiwan as sovereign territory of ROC due to the legal fact that Japan had renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan in San Francisco Peace Treaty and could not make further disposition of Taiwan sovereignty.[15] The Treaty of Peace was abrogated by the Japanese government on Sept. 29, 1972, while Japan government officially recognized PRC as "the sole government of China".

Question of sovereignty over Taiwan[edit] Position of the People's Republic of China (PRC)[edit] A Mainland Travel Permit for Taiwan Residents (Taiwan Compatriot Permit). This permit is issued by the PRC as a travel document for most ROC nationals to travel to the mainland of China. The PRC refuses to accept Taiwan passports as a travel document. The position of the PRC is that the ROC ceased to be a legitimate government upon the founding of the former on 1 October 1949 and that the PRC is the successor of the ROC as the sole legitimate government of China, with the right to rule Taiwan under the succession of states theory.[16] The position of PRC is that the ROC and PRC are two different factions in the Chinese Civil War, which never legally ended. Therefore the PRC claims that both factions belong to the same sovereign country—China. Since, as per the PRC, Taiwan's sovereignty belongs to China, the PRC's government and supporters believe that the secession of Taiwan should be agreed upon by the 1.3 billion Chinese citizens instead of just the 23 million ROC citizens who live in Taiwan.[17] Furthermore, the position of PRC is that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, which states "Recognizing that the representatives of the Government of the People's Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations", means that the PRC is recognized as having the sovereignty of all of China, including Taiwan (established by Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Proclamation and Japanese Instrument of Surrender). Therefore, the PRC believes that it is within their legal rights to extend its jurisdiction to Taiwan, by military means if at all necessary. In addition, the position of PRC is that the ROC does not meet the fourth criterion of the Montevideo Convention, as it is recognized by only 19 UN member states and has been denied access to international organizations such as the UN. The PRC points out the fact that the Montevideo Convention was only signed by 19 states at the Seventh International Conference of American States. Thus the authority of the United Nations as well as UN Resolutions should supersede the Montevideo Convention. It is clear that the PRC still maintains that "there is only one China in the world" and "Taiwan is an inalienable part of China", however instead of "the Government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government of China", the PRC now emphasizes that "both Taiwan and the mainland belong to one and the same China"[citation needed]. Although the current position allows for flexibility in terms of defining that "one China", any departure from the One-China policy is deemed unacceptable by the PRC government. The PRC government is unwilling to negotiate with the Republic of China government under any formulation other than One-China policy, although a more flexible definition of "one China" such as found in the 1992 consensus is possible under PRC policy. The PRC government considers the 1992 consensus a temporary measure to set aside sovereignty disputes and to enable talks. The PRC government considers perceived violations of its "One-China policy" or inconsistencies with it such as supplying the ROC with arms a violation of its rights to territorial integrity.[18] International news organizations often report that "China considers Taiwan a renegade province that must be united with the mainland by force if necessary", even though the PRC does not explicitly say that Taiwan is a "renegade province" in any press releases. However, official PRC media outlets and officials often refer to Taiwan as "China's Taiwan Province" or simply "Taiwan, China", and pressure international organizations to use the term. Position of the Republic of China (ROC)[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Cover of a Taiwan passport. The ROC argues that it maintains all the characteristics of a state and that it was not "replaced" or "succeeded" by the PRC because it has continued to exist long after the PRC's founding. According to the Montevideo Convention of 1933, the most cited source for the definition of statehood, a state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The ROC meets all these criteria as it possesses a government exercising effective jurisdiction over well-defined territories with over 23 million permanent residents and a full-fledged foreign ministry. Both the original 1912 constitution and the 1923 'Cao' version failed to list Taiwan as a part of the ROC since the framers at the time considered Taiwan to be Japanese territory. It was only in the mid-1930s when both the CCP and KMT realised the future strategic importance of Taiwan that they altered their party positions to make a claim on Taiwan as a part of China. After losing the Civil War against the Communist Party in 1949, Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Party fled to Taiwan, establishing a new government there, but always maintained that their government represented all of China, i.e. both Taiwan and the mainland. The position of most supporters of Taiwan independence is that the PRC is the government of China, that Taiwan is not part of China, and the 'Republic of China (Taiwan)' is an independent, sovereign state. The Democratic Progressive Party states that Taiwan has never been under the jurisdiction of the PRC, and that the PRC does not exercise any hold over the 23 million Taiwanese on the island. On the other hand, the position of most Chinese reunification supporters is that the Chinese Civil War is still not concluded as no peace agreement has ever been signed. Therefore, the current political separation across the Taiwan strait is only temporary and a reunified China including both mainland China and Taiwan will be the result. The position of the Republic of China had been that it was a de jure sovereign state. "Republic of China," according to the ROC government's definition, extended to both mainland China (Including Hong Kong and Macau) and the island of Taiwan.[19] In 1991, President Lee Teng-hui unofficially claimed that the government would no longer challenge the rule of the Communists in mainland China, the ROC government under Kuomintang (KMT) rule actively maintained that it was the sole legitimate government of China. The Courts in Taiwan have never accepted President Lee's statement, primarily due to the reason that the (now defunct) National Assembly never officially changed the acclaimed national borders. Notably, the People's Republic of China claims that changing the national borders would be "a precursor to Taiwan independence". The task of changing the national borders now requires a constitutional amendment passed by the Legislative Yuan and ratified by a majority of all eligible ROC voters, which the PRC has implied would constitute grounds for military attack. An Exit and Entry Permit. This permit is issued by the ROC for residents of mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau to travel to Taiwan. On the other hand, though the constitution of the Republic of China promulgated in 1946 does not state exactly what territory it includes, the draft of the constitution of 1925 did individually list the provinces of the Republic of China and Taiwan was not among them, since Taiwan was arguably de jure part of Japan as the result of the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895. The constitution also stipulated in Article I.4, that "the territory of the ROC is the original territory governed by it; unless authorized by the National Assembly, it cannot be altered." However, in 1946, Sun Fo, son of Sun Yat-Sen and the minister of the Executive Yuan of the ROC, reported to the National Assembly that "there are two types of territory changes: 1. renouncing territory and 2. annexing new territory. The first example would be the independence of Mongolia, and the second example would be the reclamation of Taiwan. Both would be examples of territory changes." Japan renounced all rights to Taiwan in the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951 and the Treaty of Taipei of 1952 without an explicit recipient. While the ROC continuously ruled Taiwan after the government was directed to Taiwan by the General Order No. 1 (1945) to receive Japanese surrender, there has never been a meeting of the ROC National Assembly in making a territory change according to the ROC constitution. The explanatory memorandum to the constitution explained the omission of individually listing the provinces as opposed to the earlier drafts was an act of deliberate ambiguity: as the ROC government does not recognize the validity of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, based on Chiang Kai-shek's Denunciation of the treaty in the late 1930s, hence (according to this argument) the sovereignty of Taiwan was never disposed by China. A ratification by the ROC National Assembly is therefore unnecessary. The Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China have mentioned "Taiwan Province," and the now defunct National Assembly passed constitutional amendments that give the people of the "Free Area of the Republic of China", comprising the territories under its current jurisdiction, the sole right, until reunification, to exercise the sovereignty of the Republic through elections[19][20] of the President and the entire Legislature as well as through elections to ratify amendments to the ROC constitution. Also, Chapter I, Article 2 of the ROC constitution states that "The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizens." This suggests that the constitution implicitly admits that the sovereignty of the ROC is limited to the areas that it controls even if there is no constitutional amendment that explicitly spells out the ROC's borders. The building of the Provincial Government of the Taiwan Province of the Republic of China at Jhongsing Village The Republic of China Presidential Office Building is located in the Zhongzheng District of Taipei. In 1999, ROC President Lee Teng-hui proposed a two-state theory (兩國論) in which both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China would acknowledge that they are two separate countries with a special diplomatic, cultural and historic relationship.[21][22] This however drew an angry reaction from the PRC who believed that Lee was covertly supporting Taiwan independence.[23] President Chen Shui-bian (2000 – May 2008) fully supported the idea that the "Republic of China is an independent, sovereign country" but held the view that the Republic of China is Taiwan and Taiwan does not belong to the People's Republic of China. This is suggested in his Four-stage Theory of the Republic of China. Due to the necessity of avoiding war with the PRC however, President Chen had refrained from formally declaring Taiwan's independence. Government publications have implied that Taiwan refers to the ROC, and "China" refers to the PRC.[19] After becoming chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party in July 2002, Chen appeared to move further than Lee's special two-state theory and in early August 2002, by putting forward the "one country on each side" concept, he stated that Taiwan may "go on its own Taiwanese road" and that "it is clear that the two sides of the straits are separate countries." These statements essentially eliminate any "special" factors in the relations and were strongly criticized by opposition parties in Taiwan. President Chen has repeatedly refused to endorse the One China Principle or the more "flexible" 1992 Consensus the PRC demands as a precursor to negotiations with the PRC. During Chen's presidency, there had not been any successful attempts to restart negotiations on a semi-official level. In the 2008 ROC elections, the people delivered KMT's Ma Ying-jeou with an election win as well as a sizable majority in the legislature. President Ma, throughout his election campaign, maintained that he would accept the 1992 consensus and promote better relations with the PRC. In respect of Taiwan political status, his policy was 1. he would not negotiate with the PRC on the subject of reunification during his term; 2. he would never declare Taiwan independence; and 3. he would not provoke the PRC into attacking Taiwan. He officially accepted the 1992 Consensus in his inauguration speech which resulted in direct semi-official talks with the PRC, and this later led to the commencement of weekend direct charter flights between mainland China and Taiwan. President Ma also interprets the cross-strait relations as "special", "but not that between two nations".[24] He later stated that mainland China is part of the territory of the Republic of China, and laws relating to international relations are not applicable to the relations between mainland China and Taiwan, as they are parts of a state.[25][26][27] Position of other countries and international organizations[edit] See also: Foreign relations of Taiwan Voting situation in the UN general assembly respect to resolution 2758 (1971). Because of anti-communist sentiment at the start of the Cold War, the Republic of China was recognized as the sole legitimate government of China by the United Nations and most Western nations. On 9 January 1950, the Israeli government extended recognition to the People's Republic of China. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 505, passed on 1 February 1952 considered the Chinese communists to be rebels against the Republic of China. However, the 1970s saw a switch in diplomatic recognitions from the ROC to the PRC. On 25 October 1971, Resolution 2758 was passed by the UN General Assembly, which "decides to restore all its rights to the People's Republic of China and to recognize the representatives of its Government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it." It should be noted that the Resolution 2758 merely dealt with the issue of Chinese representative in UN without any reference to the legal status of Taiwan. Multiple attempts by the Republic of China to rejoin the UN, no longer to represent all of China but just the people of the territories it governs, have not made it past committee, largely due to diplomatic maneuvering by the PRC, which claims Resolution 2758 has settled the matter. (See China and the United Nations.) The PRC refuses to maintain diplomatic relations with any nation that recognizes the ROC,[16] but does not object to nations conducting economic, cultural, and other such exchanges with Taiwan that do not imply diplomatic relation. Therefore, many nations that have diplomatic relations with Beijing maintain quasi-diplomatic offices in Taipei. Similarly, the government in Taiwan maintains quasi-diplomatic offices in most nations under various names, most commonly as the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office. With President Chiang Kai-shek, the U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower waved hands to Taiwanese people during his visit to Taipei, Taiwan in June 1960. The United States of America is one of the main allies of Taiwan and, since the Taiwan Relations Act passed in 1979, the United States has sold arms and provided military training to the Republic of China Armed Forces.[28] This situation continues to be a point of contention for China, which considers US involvement disruptive to the stability of the region. In January 2010, the Obama administration announced its intention to sell $6.4 billion worth of military hardware to Taiwan. As a consequence, China threatened the United States with economic sanctions and warned that their cooperation on international and regional issues could suffer.[29] The official position of the United States is that China is expected to "use no force or threat[en] to use force against Taiwan" and that Taiwan is to "exercise prudence in managing all aspects of Cross-Strait relations." Both are to refrain from performing actions or espousing statements "that would unilaterally alter Taiwan's status."[30] The United States maintains the American Institute in Taiwan. The United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Republic of India, Pakistan and Japan have formally adopted the One China policy, under which the People's Republic of China is theoretically the sole legitimate government of China. However, the United States and Japan acknowledge rather than recognize the PRC position that Taiwan is part of China. In the case of Canada[31] and the UK, bilateral written agreements state that the two respective parties take note of Beijing's position but do not use the word support. The UK government position that "the future of Taiwan be decided peacefully by the peoples of both sides of the Strait" has been stated several times. Despite the PRC claim that the United States opposes Taiwanese independence, the United States takes advantage of the subtle difference between "oppose" and "does not support". In fact, a substantial majority of the statements Washington has made says that it "does not support Taiwan independence" instead of saying that it "opposes" independence. Thus, the US does not take a position on the political outcome, except for one explicit condition that there be a peaceful resolution to the differences between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.[30] The United States bi-partisan position is that it doesn't recognize the PRC's claim over Taiwan, and considers Taiwan's status as unsettled.[32] All of this ambiguity has resulted in the United States constantly walking on a diplomatic tightrope with regard to cross strait relations. President Chen Shui-bian (far left) attended the funeral of Pope John Paul II in 2005. As the Holy See's recognized head of state of China, Chen was seated in the front row (in French alphabetical order) beside the first lady and president of Brazil. The ROC maintains formal diplomatic relations with 19 UN member states, mostly in Central America and Africa. Additionally, the Holy See also recognizes the ROC, a largely non-Christian/Catholic state, due partly to the Catholic Church's traditional opposition to communism, and also to protest what it sees as the PRC's suppression of the Catholic faith in mainland China. However, Vatican diplomats were engaged in talks with PRC politicians at the time of Pope John Paul II's death, with a view towards improving relations between the two countries. When asked, one Vatican diplomat suggested that relations with Taiwan might prove "expendable" should PRC be willing to engage in positive diplomatic relations with the Holy See.[33] Under Pope Benedict XVI the Vatican and PRC have shown greater interest in establishing ties, including the appointment of pro-Vatican bishops and the Pope canceling a planned visit from the Dalai Lama.[34] During the 1990s, there was a diplomatic tug of war in which the PRC and ROC attempted to outbid each other to obtain the diplomatic support of small nations. This struggle seems to have slowed as a result of the PRC's growing economic power and doubts in Taiwan as to whether this aid was actually in the Republic of China's interest. In March 2004, Dominica switched recognition to the PRC in exchange for a large aid package.[35] However, in late 2004, Vanuatu briefly switched recognition from Beijing to Taipei,[36] followed by a return to its recognition of Beijing.[37] On 20 January 2005, Grenada switched its recognition from Taipei to Beijing, in return for millions in aid (US$1,500 for every Grenadian).[38] However, on 14 May 2005, Nauru announced the restoration of formal diplomatic relations with Taipei after a three-year hiatus, during which it briefly recognized the People's Republic of China.[39] On 26 October 2005, Senegal broke off relations with the Republic of China and established diplomatic contacts with Beijing.[40] The following year, on 5 August 2006, Taipei ended relations with Chad when Chad established relations with Beijing.[41] On 26 April 2007, however, Saint Lucia, which had severed ties with the Republic of China following a change of government in December 1996, announced the restoration of formal diplomatic relations with Taipei.[42] On 7 June 2007, Costa Rica broke off diplomatic ties with the Republic of China in favour of the People's Republic of China.[43] In January 2008 Malawi's foreign minister reported Malawi decided to cut diplomatic recognition of the Republic of China and recognize the People's Republic of China.[44] On 4 November 2013, the Government of Gambia announced its break up with Taiwan, but the Foreign Affairs Ministry of China denied any ties with this political movement, adding that they weren't considering on building a relation with this African nation.[45] In December 2016, the African island nation of São Tomé and Príncipe switched recognition from Taiwan to mainland China.[46] The latest country to break off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan was Panama on 13 June 2017, due to unknown reasons. Chinese diplomat Wang Weihua replied that "China pretends to replicate the Panama example in other countries of the region that prefer to maintain relationships with Taiwan" while promising "juicy investments from the Chinese" if those countries switch sides. He also stated that all of Central America should recognize only one China, with that China being the People's Republic of China. China now supports the construction of a 450km long passenger and freight railway in the region, with a possible expansion to the rest of Mesoamerica, as part of China's one belt, one road (or silk road) project. Since establishing ties with China, both countries have negotiated 19 agreements covering multiple topics, including a free trade treaty. One of the agreements aims to increase productivity in the Panamanian agricultural sector with the thought of exports to China.[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] Taiwan in reply expressed deep regret, with Taiwanese president Tsai-ing Wen saying that "Beijing has used methods to manipulate the one China principle," and that "Taiwan is not going to compete in this diplomatic game." A press release from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China said that "Despite over a century of diplomatic ties, the Panamanian government, led by President Varela, ignoring the ties of friendship and solidarity that the people of Taiwan and Panama have maintained for a long time- has surrendered to the authorities of Beijing in sight of its economic benefit, obstinating in giving a turn to its diplomatic commitment."[56] The Panamanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that "the Panamanian government recognizes that there is only one China, that the PRC government is the only legitimate government that represents all of China, and that Taiwan forms part of the Chinese territory."[57][58][59][60][61] Another press release from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China said that "In a extremely disrespectful way, the Panamanian government hid in a malicious way the process to the Republic of China (Taiwan) until the last moment. Thus the Republic of China (Taiwan) government expresses its greatest discontent and indignation and restates that it won't participate in Beijing's checkbook diplomacy."[62][63] In a statement, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it will "cease bilateral cooperation and assistance, and to evacuate the embassy and technical personnel" in Panama.[64] Panama had recognized the ROC since 1912[65][66] and with Panama’s move, Taiwan is left with formal relations with only 20 countries.[67] The Panamanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that China has pledged to receive all Panamanian students who are currently scholarship holders in Taiwan.[68] [69] [70] The countries that maintain formal diplomatic relations with the ROC are:  Belize (1989)  Burkina Faso (1961–1973, 1994)  Dominican Republic (1957)  El Salvador (1961)  Guatemala (1960)  Haiti (1956)  Honduras (1965)  Kiribati (2003)  Marshall Islands (1998)  Nauru (1980–2002, 2005)  Nicaragua (1962–1985, 1990)  Palau (1999)  Paraguay (1957)  Saint Kitts and Nevis (1983)  Saint Lucia (1984–1997, 2007)  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (1981)  Solomon Islands (1983)  Swaziland (1968)  Tuvalu (1979)   Vatican City (The Holy See) (1942) Under continuing pressure from the PRC to bar any representation of the ROC that may imply statehood, international organizations have adopted different policies toward the issue of ROC's participation. In cases where almost all UN members or sovereign states participate, such as the World Health Organization,[71] the ROC has been completely shut out, while in others, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and International Olympic Committee (IOC) the ROC participates under unusual names: "Chinese Taipei" in the case of APEC and the IOC, and the "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kimmen and Matsu" (often shortened as "Chinese Taipei") in the case of the WTO.[citation needed] The issue of ROC's name came under scrutiny during the 2006 World Baseball Classic. The organizers of the 16-team tournament intended to call Taiwan as such, but reverted to "Chinese Taipei" under pressure from PRC. The ROC protested the decision, claiming that the WBC is not an IOC event, but did not prevail.[citation needed] The ISO 3166 directory of names of countries and territories registers Taiwan (TW) separately from and in addition to the People's Republic of China (CN), but lists Taiwan as "Taiwan, Province of China" based on the name used by the UN under PRC pressure. In ISO 3166-2:CN, Taiwan is also coded CN-71 under China, thus making Taiwan part of China in ISO 3166-1 and ISO 3166-2 categories. An effect of non-recognition can be that other countries may extradite people originating for Taiwan to mainland China.[72] Naming issues surrounding Taiwan/ROC continue to be a contentious issue in non-governmental organizations such as the Lions Club, which faced considerable controversy naming its Taiwanese branch.[73]

Legal arguments[edit] This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (May 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Arguments for the Republic of China and People's Republic of China sovereignty claims[edit] Today, the ROC is the de facto government of Taiwan; whereas the PRC is the de facto government over Mainland China. However, each government claims to be the legitimate government of all China de jure. The arguments below are frequently used by proponents and/or opponents of these claims. Arguments common to both the PRC and ROC The ROC and PRC both officially support the One China policy and thus share common arguments. In the arguments below, "Chinese" is an ambiguous term that could mean the PRC and/or ROC as legal government(s) of China. The waging of aggressive war by Japan against China in 1937 and beyond violates the peace that was brokered in the Treaty of Shimonoseki. In 1941, with the declaration of war against Japan, the Chinese government declared this treaty void ab initio (never happened in the first place). Therefore, some argue that, with no valid transfer of sovereignty taking place, the sovereignty of Taiwan naturally belongs to China.[74] The Cairo Declaration of 1 December 1943 was accepted by Japan in its surrender. This document states that Taiwan was to be restored to the Republic of China at the end of World War II. Likewise, the Potsdam Declaration of 26 July 1945, also accepted by Japan, implies that it will no longer have sovereignty over Taiwan by stating that "Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands". The proclamation of Taiwan Retrocession Day on 25 October 1945, by the ROC (when the PRC had not yet been founded) was entirely uncontested. Had another party been sovereign over Taiwan, that party would have had a period of years in which to protest, and its failure to do so represents cession of rights in the manner of prescription. The lack of protest by any non-Chinese government persists to this day, further strengthening this argument.[75] The exclusion of Chinese governments (both ROC and PRC) in the negotiation process of the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT) nullified any legal binding power of the SFPT on China, including any act of renouncing or disposing of sovereignty. In addition, the fact that neither ROC nor PRC government ever ratified SFPT terms, prescribes that the SFPT is irrelevant to any discussion of Chinese sovereignty.[dubious – discuss] Even if the SFPT were determinative, it should be interpreted in a manner consistent with the Potsdam and Cairo Declarations, therefore sovereignty would still have been transferred to China.[76] SFPT's validity has come into question as some of the countries participating in the San Francisco conference, such as the USSR, Poland, Czechoslovakia and North and South Korea refused to sign the treaty.[77] Assuming SFPT is valid in determining the sovereignty over Taiwan, Japan, in the article 2 of the SFPT, renounced all rights, without assigning a recipient, regarding Taiwan. Japan in the same article also renounced, without assigning a recipient, areas which are now internationally recognised as territories of Russia as well as other countries.[dubious – discuss] Given that the sovereignty of these countries over renounced areas are undisputed, the Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan must also be undisputed.[77] Arguments in support of ROC sovereignty claims The ROC fulfills all requirements for a state according to the Convention of Montevideo, which means it has a territory, a people, and a government. The ROC continues to exist since its establishment in 1911, only on a reduced territory after 1949. The creation and continuity of a state is only a factual issue, not a legal question. Declarations and recognition by other states can't have any impact on their existence. According to the declaratory theory of recognition, the recognition of third states are not a requirement for being a state. Most of the cited declarations by American or British politicians are not legal statements but solely political intents. The PRC has never exercised control over Taiwan. The Treaty of Taipei formalized the peace between Japan and the ROC. In it, Japan reaffirmed Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration and voided all treaties conducted between China and Japan (including the Treaty of Shimonoseki). Applying the principle of uti possidetis with regard to the Treaty of Taipei would grant Taiwan's sovereignty to the ROC, as it is undisputed that at the coming into force of the treaty, the ROC controlled Taiwan.[78] Article 4 of the ROC Constitution clearly states that "The territory of the Republic of China" is defined "according to its existing national boundaries..." Taiwan was historically part of China and is therefore naturally included therein. Also, as Treaty of Shimonoseki is void ab initio,[dubious – discuss] China has never legally dispossessed of the sovereignty of the territory. There is, accordingly, no need to have a National Assembly resolution to include the territory. The ROC – USA Mutual Defense Treaty of 1955 states that "the terms "territorial" and "territories" shall mean in respect of the Republic of China, Taiwan and the Pescadores" and thus can be read as implicitly recognizing the ROC sovereignty over Taiwan.[dubious – discuss] However, the treaty was terminated in 1980. Arguments in support of PRC sovereignty claims In the Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China to the end of Treaty of Taipei, the document signifying the commencement of the PRC and Japan's formal relations, Japan in article 3 stated that it fully understands and respects the position of the Government of the People's Republic of China that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China. Japan also firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration which says "the terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out". The Cairo Declaration says "All territories Japan has stolen from China, including Manchuria, Taiwan, and the Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China". The PRC argues that it is a successor state of the ROC and is therefore entitled to all of the ROC's holdings and benefits.[79] Arguments for Taiwanese self sovereignty claims and its legal status[edit] Arguments for Taiwan already being an independent, sovereign nation The peace that was brokered in the Treaty of Shimonoseki was breached by the Boxer Rebellion, which led to the conclusion of the Boxer Protocol of 1901 (Peace Agreement between the Great Powers and China),[80] and China, not by the Second Sino-Japanese War. The Treaty of Shimonoseki was a dispositive treaty, therefore it is not voidable or nullifiable (this doctrine being that treaties specifying particular actions which can be completed, once the action gets completed, cannot be voided or reversed without a new treaty specifically reversing that clause). Hence, the unequal treaty doctrine cannot be applied to this treaty.[citation needed] By way of comparison, as 200,000,000 Kuping taels were not returned to China from Japan, and Korea had not become a Chinese-dependent country again, the cession in the treaty was executed and cannot be nullified. The disposition of Formosa and the Pescadores in this treaty was a legitimate cession by conquest, confirmed by treaty, and thus is not a theft, as described as "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese" in Cairo Declaration. It should also be noted that the Qing court exercised effective sovereignty over primarily the west coast of Taiwan only, and even then did not regard the area as an integral part of national Chinese territory.[citation needed] The "Cairo Declaration" was merely an unsigned press communiqué which does not carry a legal status, while the Potsdam Proclamation and Instrument of Surrender are simply modus vivendi and armistice that function as temporary records and do not bear legally binding power to transfer sovereignty. Good faith of interpretation only takes place at the level of treaties. The "retrocession" proclaimed by ROC in 1945 was legally null and impossible since Taiwan was still de jure part of Japan before the post-war San Francisco Peace Treaty came into effect on 28 April 1952. Consequently, the announcement of the mass-naturalization of native Taiwanese persons as ROC citizens in January 1946 is unjust and void Ab initio. After the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into effect, the sovereignty of Taiwan naturally belonged to the Taiwanese people. While Taiwan independence supporters once used arguments not in favor of Chinese sovereignty to dispute to legitimacy of the Kuomintang-controlled government that ruled over Taiwan, these arguments have been dropped by a majority (except the most extreme) supporters of independence due to the democratization of Taiwan. This has allowed the more moderate supporters of independence to stress the popular sovereignty theory in order to accept the legitimacy of the Republic of China (whose government is currently controlled by the Democratic Progressive Party) in Taiwan. Former President Chen Shui-bian, by his interpretation of the "Republic of China", has repeatedly confirmed that the "Republic of China is Taiwan." Sovereignty transfer to the ROC by prescription does not apply to Taiwan's case since: 1) Prescription is the manner of acquiring property by a long, honest, and uninterrupted possession or use during the time required by law. The possession must have been possessio longa, continua, et pacifica, nec sit ligitima interruptio (long, continued, peaceable, and without lawful interruption). For prescription to apply, the state with title to the territory must acquiesce to the action of the other state. Yet, PRC has never established an occupation on Taiwan and exercised sovereignty, 2) Prescription as a rule for acquiring sovereignty itself is not universally accepted. The International Court of Justice ruled that Belgium retained its sovereignty over territories even by non-assertion of its rights and by acquiescence to acts of sovereign control alleged to have been exercised by the Netherlands over a period of 109 years.,[81] 3) Also by way of comparison, even after 38 years of continuous control, the international community did not recognize sovereignty rights to the Gaza Strip by Israel, and the Israeli cabinet formally declared an end to military rule there as of 12 September 2005, with a removal of all Israeli settlers and military bases from the Strip, 4) A pro-independence group, which formed a Provisional Government of Formosa in 2000, argued that both the February 28 Incident of 1947 and the Provisional Government of Formosa have constituted protests against ROC government's claim of retrocession within a reasonable twenty-five-year (or more) acquiescence period,[82] 5) Taiwanese residents were unable to make a protest after the February 28 Incident due to the authoritarian rule under KMT regime which suppressed all pro-independence opinion, 6) Japan was not able to cast a protest as it was under military occupation at the time; however it did not renounce its sovereignty over Taiwan until 28 April 1952.[83] Arguments by various groups that claim Taiwan should declare itself to be an independent sovereign nation As one of the "territories which detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War" defined in the articles 76b and 77b of the United Nations Charter, which China signed in 1945 and also defined in the protocol of Yalta Conference, Taiwan qualifies for the UN trusteeship program, and after a period of time would later be considered fully independent. The ROC, as a founding member of the United Nations, has a treaty obligation to comply with the UN Charter and to help the people living in Taiwan enjoy the right of self-determination. The San Francisco Peace Treaty is definitive, where Japan ceded Taiwan (like Sakhalin and Kuril Islands etc.) without specifying a clear recipient. China was prohibited[by whom?][citation needed] from acquiring Taiwan sovereignty as a benefit when the treaty was finalized.[original research?] Moreover, the Treaty of Taipei only became effective on 5 August 1952, over three months after the coming into force of the San Francisco Peace Treaty on 28 April 1952. Hence, the Treaty of Taipei cannot be interpreted to have ceded the sovereignty of Taiwan to the ROC or the PRC, but only as a recognition of the territories which ROC had and under its control, as Japan cannot cede what it no longer possessed. Since the peace brokered in the Boxer Protocol of 1901 was breached by the second Sino-Japanese War, the San Francisco Peace Treaty specifies that the date to be used in returning territory to China in Article 10 was 1901, not 1895. The postliminium restoration of China was completed without sovereignty over Taiwan since Taiwan was not part of China when the first Chinese Republic was established in 1911. Moreover, the Treaty of Taipei was abrogated by Japan upon the PRC's request in 1972. Cession of Taiwan without a recipient was neither unusual nor unique, since Cuba, as a precedent, was ceded by Spain without recipient in Treaty of Paris of 1898 as the result of Spanish–American War. Cuba reached independence in May 1902. At the end of WWII, Libya and Somaliland were also relinquished without recipient by Italy in the Treaty of peace with Italy of 1947 and both reached independence later. The Nationality Law of the Republic of China was originally promulgated in February 1929. However, no amendment or change to this law or any other law has ever been made by the Legislative Yuan in the post WWII period to reflect any mass-naturalization of native Taiwanese persons as ROC citizens. This is important because Article 10 of the Treaty of Taipei specifies: "For the purposes of the present Treaty, nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) and their descendants who are of the Chinese nationality in accordance with the laws and regulations which have been or may hereafter be enforced by the Republic of China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) … " Since no relevant laws or regulations have ever been promulgated, there is no legal basis to consider native Taiwanese persons as ROC citizens. Furthermore it is recognized that the ROC government administering Taiwan is not the same ROC that accepted Japanese surrender in 1945, because the ruling authorities were given popular mandate by different pools of constituencies: one is the mainland Chinese electorate, the other local Taiwanese. The popular sovereignty theory, to which the Pan-Green coalition subscribes, emphasizes that Taiwan could make fundamental constitutional changes and choose a new national title by means of a popular referendum. (In contrast, the ROC legal theory, which is supported by the Pan-Blue coalition suggests that any fundamental constitutional changes would require that the amendment procedure of the ROC constitution be followed.) Nevertheless the popular sovereignty theory does not contradict any arguments in favor of self-determination, nor does it affirm arguments in favor of Chinese sovereignty. This means that at present the only obstacle against declaring Taiwan independence is a lack of consensus among the Taiwanese people to do so; however it is clear that the consensus is changing as the Taiwanese people begin preparations for their 15th application for entrance to the United Nations in the fall of 2007. The San Francisco Peace Treaty's omission of China as a participant was not an accident of history, but reflected the status that the ROC had failed to maintain its original position as the de jure[which?] and de facto government of the whole China. By fleeing of the ROC government to Taiwan island in December 1949, and the ROC is then arguably to become a government in exile status.[84][85] Under international law,[which?] there are no actions which a government in exile can take in its current location of residence in order to be recognized as the local legitimate government. Hence, Taiwan's current international situation has arisen from the fact that the ROC is not completely internationally recognized as a legitimate state. (Note: the ROC government has limited recognition as the sole legitimate government of China (including Taiwan), but not as a government of Taiwan island.) Arguments for United States sovereignty claims[edit] Some have argued that the United States holds in trust the sovereignty over Taiwan based on the San Francisco Peace Treaty's cession of Taiwan without a recipient.[86] Article 23 of the San Francisco Peace Treaty designated the United States as "the principal occupying power" with respect to the territories covered by the geographical scope of the treaty, including "Formosa and the Pescadores." The argument also states that the Republic of China troops were acting under the directions of the United States when taking over the administration of Taiwan after the completion of the 25 October 1945, Japanese surrender ceremonies. The principal-agent relationship between the United States and the Republic of China was argued to never have been formally terminated. On 24 October 2006, Dr. Roger C. S. Lin led a group of Taiwanese residents, including members of the Taiwan Nation Party, to file a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. According to their lawyer, Mr. Charles Camp, "[t]he Complaint asks the Court to declare whether the Taiwanese plaintiffs, including members of the Taiwan Nation Party, have certain rights under the United States Constitution and other US laws".[87] Their central argument is that, following Japanese renunciation of all rights and claims to Taiwan, Taiwan came under U.S. jurisdiction based on it being the principal occupying power as designated in the Treaty of Peace with Japan and remains so to this day. Moreover, the plaintiffs claimed that the United States has never recognized the incorporation of Taiwan into Chinese national territory.[88] The defendant in this case was the United States government. The District Court agreed with United States government on 18 March 2008 and ruled that the case presents a political question; as such, the court concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the matter and dismissed the complaint.[89][90] This decision was appealed by plaintiffs.[91] The appeals court unanimously upheld the district court ruling and dismissed the appeal.[92]

Controversies[edit] Many political leaders who have maintained some form of One-China Policy have committed slips of the tongue in referring to Taiwan as a country or as the Republic of China. United States presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush have been known to have referred to Taiwan as a country during their terms of office. Although near the end of his term as U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell said that Taiwan is not a state, he referred to Taiwan as the Republic of China twice during a testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 9 March 2001.[93] In the People's Republic of China Premier Zhu Rongji's farewell speech to the National People's Congress, Zhu accidentally referred to Mainland China and Taiwan as two countries.[94] There are also those from the PRC who informally refer to Taiwan as a country.[95] South Africa delegates once referred to Taiwan as the "Republic of Taiwan" during Lee Teng-hui's term as President of the ROC.[96] In 2002, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City, referred to Taiwan as a country.[97] Most recently, former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stated in a local Chinese newspaper in California in July 2005 that Taiwan is "a sovereign nation". The People's Republic of China discovered the statement about three months after it was made.[citation needed] In a controversial speech on 4 February 2006, Japanese Foreign Minister Tarō Asō called Taiwan a country with very high education levels because of previous Japanese colonial rule over the island.[98] One month later, he told a Japanese parliamentary committee: "[Taiwan's] democracy is considerably matured and liberal economics is deeply ingrained, so it is a law-abiding country. In various ways, it is a country that shares a sense of values with Japan." At the same time, he stated: "I know there will be a problem with calling [Taiwan] a country".[99] In February 2007, the Royal Grenada Police Band played the National Anthem of the Republic of China in an inauguration of the reconstructed St George's Queen's Park Stadium funded by the PRC. Grenada had broken off diplomatic relations with Taiwan just two years prior in favor of the PRC.[100] When the Kuomintang visited Mainland China in 2005, the government-controlled PRC media called this event a "visit," and called the KMT one of "Taiwan's political parties" even though the Kuomintang's full name remains the "Chinese Nationalist Party." Interestingly in Mainland China, there is a legal party called the Revolutionary Committee of the Kuomintang that is officially one of the nine "consultative parties," according to the PRC's Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.

Governing authority[edit] Non-partisan Taiwanese political candidate Wu San-lien (2L) celebrated his landslide victory (65.5%) in the first-time Taipei city mayoral election in January 1951 with his supporters. Taipei has been the capital of the Republic of China since December 1949. Since the ROC lost its United Nations seat as "China" in 1971 and was replaced by the PRC, most sovereign states have switched their diplomatic recognition to the PRC, recognizing the PRC as the sole legitimate representative of China, though many deliberately avoid stating clearly what territories they believe China includes. As of 13 June 2017, the ROC maintains official diplomatic relations with 19 UN member states and the Holy See,[101] although informal relations are maintained with nearly all others. Agencies of foreign governments such as the American Institute in Taiwan operate as de facto embassies of their home countries in Taiwan, and the governing authority on Taiwan operates similar de facto embassies and consulates in most countries under such names as "Taipei Representative Office" (TRO) or "Taipei Economic and Cultural (Representative) Office" (TECO). In certain contexts, Taiwan is also referred to as Chinese Taipei due to pressures from People's Republic of China. The ROC government has in the past actively pursued the claim as the sole legitimate government over mainland China and Taiwan. This position started to be largely adjusted in the early 1990s as democracy was introduced and new Taiwanese leaders were elected, changing to one that does not actively challenge the legitimacy of PRC rule over mainland China. However, with the election of the Kuomintang (KMT, "Chinese Nationalist Party") back into executive power in 2008, the ROC government has changed its position back to that "mainland China is also part of the territory of the ROC."[25] Both the PRC and the ROC carry out Cross-Strait relations through specialized agencies (such as the Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC), rather than through foreign ministries. Different groups have different concepts of what the current formal political situation of Taiwan is. (See also: Chinese reunification, Taiwan independence, and Cross-Strait relations)

Possible military solutions and intervention[edit] Until 1979, both sides intended to resolve the conflict militarily.[citation needed] Intermittent clashes occurred throughout the 1950s and 1960s, with escalations comprising the First and Second Taiwan Strait crises. In 1979, with the U.S. change of diplomatic recognition to the PRC, the ROC lost its ally needed to "recover the mainland." Meanwhile, the PRC's desire to be accepted in the international community led it to promote peaceful unification under what would later be termed "one country, two systems", rather than to "liberate Taiwan" and to make Taiwan a Special Administrative Region. PRC's condition on military intervention[edit] Notwithstanding, the PRC government has issued triggers for an immediate war with Taiwan, most notably via its controversial Anti-Secession Law of 2005. These conditions are: if events occur leading to the "separation" of Taiwan from China in any name, or if a major event occurs which would lead to Taiwan's "separation" from China, or if all possibility of peaceful unification is lost. It has been interpreted that these criteria encompass the scenario of Taiwan developing nuclear weapons (see main article Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction also Timeline of the Republic of China's nuclear program). Much saber rattling by the PRC has been done over this, with Jiang Zemin, after assuming the mantle of the Chairman of the Central Military Commission, becoming a leading voice. The third condition has especially caused a stir in Taiwan as the term "indefinitely" is open to interpretation.[citation needed] It has also been viewed by some as meaning that preserving the ambiguous status quo is not acceptable to the PRC, although the PRC stated on many occasions that there is no explicit timetable for reunification. Concern over a formal declaration of de jure Taiwan independence is a strong impetus for the military buildup between Taiwan and mainland China. The former US Bush administration publicly declared that given the status quo, it would not aid Taiwan if it were to declare independence unilaterally.[102] According to the US Department of Defense report "Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011" conditions that mainland China has warned may cause the use of force have varied. They have included "a formal declaration of Taiwan independence; undefined moves “toward independence”; foreign intervention in Taiwan’s internal affairs; indefinite delays in the resumption of cross-Strait dialogue on unification; Taiwan’s acquisition of nuclear weapons; and, internal unrest on Taiwan. Article 8 of the March 2005 "Anti-Secession Law" states Beijing would resort to "non-peaceful means" if "secessionist forces . . . cause the fact of Taiwan's secession from China," if "major incidents entailing Taiwan's secession" occur, or if "possibilities for peaceful reunification" are exhausted".[103] According to President Chen Shui-bian who was President of the Republic of China between 2000 and 2008, China accelerated the deployment of missiles against Taiwan up to 120 a year (May 2007), bringing the total arsenal to 706 ballistic missiles capable of being fitted with nuclear warheads that are aimed at Taiwan. Some believe that their deployment is a political tool on the part of the PRC to increase political pressure on Taiwan to abandon unilateral moves toward formal independence, at least for the time being, although the PRC government never declares such deployment publicly.[citation needed]. Legislative elections were held in Taiwan on 12 January 2008. The results gave the Kuomintang and the Pan-Blue Coalition a supermajority (86 of the 113 seats) in the legislature, handing a heavy defeat to President Chen Shui-bian's Democratic Progressive Party, which won the remaining 27 seats only. The junior partner in the Pan-Green Coalition, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, won no seats. The election for the 12th-term President and Vice-President of the Republic of China was held in the Republic of China (Taiwan) on Saturday, 22 March 2008. Kuomintang nominee Ma Ying-jeou won, with 58% of the vote, ending eight years of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential power. Along with the 2008 legislative election, Ma's landslide victory brought the Kuomintang back to power in Taiwan. Balance of power[edit] The possibility of war, the close geographical proximity of ROC-controlled Taiwan and PRC-controlled mainland China, and the resulting flare-ups that occur every few years, conspire to make this one of the most watched focal points in the Pacific. Both sides have chosen to have a strong naval presence. However, naval strategies between both powers greatly shifted in the 1980s and 1990s, while the ROC assumed a more defensive attitude by building and buying frigates and missile destroyers, and the PRC a more aggressive posture by developing long-range cruise missiles and supersonic surface-to-surface missiles. Although the People's Liberation Army Air Force is considered large, most of its fleet consists of older generation J-7 fighters (localized MiG-21s and Mig-21BIs), raising doubts over the PLAAF's ability to control Taiwan's airspace in the event of a conflict. Since mid-1990s PRC has been purchasing, and later localizing, SU-27 based fighters. There are over 170 of these Russian fighters and Chinese J11A variants. They have increased the effectiveness of PLAAF's Beyond Visual Range (BVR) capabilities. The introduction of 60 new-generation J10A fighters is anticipated to increase the PLAAF's firepower. PRC's acquisition of Russian Su30MKKs further enhanced the PLAAF's air-to-ground support ability. The ROC's air force, on the other hand, relies on Taiwan's fourth generation fighters, consisting of 150 US-built F-16 Fighting Falcons, approximately 60 French-built Mirage 2000-5s, and approximately 130 locally developed IDFs (Indigenous Defense Fighters). All of these ROC fighter jets are able to conduct BVR combat missions with BVR missiles, but the level of technology in mainland Chinese fighters is catching up. Also the United States Defense Intelligence Agency has reported that few of Taiwan's 400 total fighters are operationally capable.[104][105] In 2003, the ROC purchased four missile destroyers—the former USS Kidd class, and expressed a strong interest in the Arleigh Burke class. But with the growth of the PRC navy and air force, some doubt that the ROC could withstand a determined invasion attempt from mainland China in the future. These concerns have led to a view in certain quarters that Taiwanese independence, if it is to be implemented, should be attempted as early as possible, while the ROC still has the capacity to defend itself in an all-out military conflict. Over the past three decades, estimates of how long the ROC can withstand a full-scale invasion from across the Strait without any outside help have decreased from three months to only six days.[106] Given such estimates, the US Navy has continued practicing "surging" its carrier groups, giving it the experience necessary to respond quickly to an attack on Taiwan.[107] The US also collects data on the PRC's military deployments, through the use of spy satellites, for example.[citation needed] For early surveillance may effectively identify PRC's massive military movement, which may imply PRC's preparation for a military assault against Taiwan. However, numerous reports issued by the PRC, ROC and US militaries make mutually wild contradictory statements about the possible defense of Taiwan.[citation needed] Naturally, war contingencies are not being planned in a vacuum. In 1979, the United States Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act, a law generally interpreted as mandating U.S. defense of Taiwan in the event of an attack from the Chinese Mainland (the Act is applied to Taiwan and Penghu, but not to Kinmen or Matsu). The United States maintains the world's largest permanent fleet in the Pacific Region near Taiwan. The Seventh Fleet, operating primarily out of various bases in Japan, is a powerful naval contingent built upon the world's only permanently forward-deployed aircraft carrier USS George Washington. Although the stated purpose of the fleet is not Taiwanese defense, it can be safely assumed from past actions, that is one of the reasons why the fleet is stationed in those waters.[citation needed] Starting in 2000, Japan renewed its defense obligations with the US and embarked on a rearmament program, partly in response to fears that Taiwan might be invaded. Some analysts believed that the PRC could launch preemptive strikes on military bases in Japan to deter US and Japanese forces from coming to the ROC's aid. Japanese strategic planners also see an independent Taiwan as vital, not only because the ROC controls valuable shipping routes, but also because its capture by PRC would make Japan more vulnerable. During World War II, the Allied forces were invaded the Philippines, but another viable target to enable direct attacks on Japan would have been Taiwan (then known as Formosa). However, critics of the preemptive strike theory assert that the PRC would be loath to give Japan and the US such an excuse to intervene.[citation needed] The United States Department of Defense in a 2011 report stated that the primary mission of the PRC military is a possible military conflict with Taiwan, including also possible US military assistance. Although the risk of a crisis in the short-term is low, in the absence of new political developments, Taiwan will likely dominate future military modernization and planning. However, also other priorities are becoming increasingly prominent and possible due to increasing military resources. Many of mainland China's most advanced military systems are stationed in areas opposite Taiwan. The rapid military modernization is continually changing the military balance of power towards mainland China.[108] A 2008 report by the RAND Corporation analyzing a theoretical 2020 attack by mainland China on Taiwan suggested that the US would likely not be able to defend Taiwan. Cruise missile developments may enable China to partially or completely destroy or make inoperative US aircraft carriers and bases in the Western Pacific. New Chinese radars will likely be able to detect US stealth aircraft and China is acquiring stealthy and more effective aircraft. RAND Corporation argued that the reliability of US beyond-visual-range missiles as a mean to achieve air superiority is questionable and largely unproven.[109] Third Taiwan Strait Crisis[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) ROCS Kang Ding-class frigate with S-70C helicopter In 1996, the PRC began conducting military exercises near Taiwan, and launched several ballistic missiles over the island. The saber-rattling was done in response to the possible re-election of then President Lee Teng-hui.[citation needed] The United States, under President Clinton, sent two aircraft carrier battle groups to the region, reportedly sailing them into the Taiwan Strait.[110] The PRC, unable to track the ships' movements, and probably unwilling to escalate the conflict, quickly backed down. The event had little impact on the outcome of the election, since none of Lee's contestants were strong enough to defeat him, but it is widely believed that the PRC's aggressive acts, far from intimidating the Taiwanese population, gave Lee a boost that pushed his share of votes over 50 percent.[citation needed] The possibility of war in the Taiwan Straits, even though quite low in the short-term, requires the PRC, ROC, and U.S. to remain wary and vigilant. The goal of the three parties at the moment seems to be, for the most part, to maintain the status quo.

Developments since 2004 and future prospects[edit] Judicial[edit] On 24 October 2006, Dr. Roger C. S. Lin led a group of Taiwanese residents, including members of the Taiwan Nation Party, to file a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. According to their lawyer, Mr. Charles Camp, "the Complaint asks the Court to declare whether the Taiwanese plaintiffs, including members of the Taiwan Nation Party, have certain rights under the United States Constitution and other US laws".[111] Their central argument is that, following Japanese renunciation of all rights and claims to Taiwan, Taiwan came under U.S. jurisdiction based on it being the principal occupying power as designated in the Treaty of Peace with Japan and remains so to this day. This case was opposed by the United States government. The District Court agreed with United States government on 18 March 2008 and ruled that the case presents a political question; as such, the court concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the matter and dismissed the complaint.[112] This decision has been appealed by plaintiffs[113] and the appeals court unanimously upheld the district court ruling.[114] The PRC and Taiwan have agreed to increase cooperation in the area of law enforcement. Mainland police will begin staffing a liaison office in Taipei in 2010.[115] Political[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Although the situation is confusing, most observers believe that it is stable with enough understandings and gentlemen's agreements to keep things from breaking out into open warfare. The current controversy is over the term one China which ironically was coined by ROC to keep PRC out of the UN until UN Resolution 2758 switch recognition to PRC resulted in ROC exiting the UN. Today, the PRC insists that the ROC must recognise this term and historical fact to begin negotiations. Although the Democratic Progressive Party has moderated its support for Taiwan independence, there is still insufficient support within that party for former President Chen Shui-bian to agree to one China. By contrast, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) appear willing to agree to some variation of one China, and observers believed the position of the PRC was designed to sideline Chen until the 2004 presidential election where it was hoped that someone who was more supportive of Chinese reunification would come to power. Partly to counter this, Chen Shui-bian announced in July 2002 that if the PRC does not respond to Taiwan's goodwill, Taiwan may "go on its own ... road".[citation needed] With Chen's re-election in 2004, Beijing's prospects for a speedier resolution were dampened, though they seemed strengthened again following the Pan-Blue majority in the 2004 legislative elections. However, public opinion in Taiwan reacted unfavorably towards the anti-secession law passed by the PRC in March 2005. Following two high-profile visits by KMT and PFP party leaders to the PRC, the balance of public opinion appears to be ambiguous, with the Pan-Green Coalition gaining a majority in the 2005 National Assembly elections, but the Pan-Blue Coalition scoring a landslide victory in the 2005 municipal elections. Legislative elections were held in Taiwan on 12 January 2008. The results gave the Kuomintang and the Pan-Blue Coalition an absolute majority (86 of the 113 seats) in the legislature, handing a heavy defeat to President Chen Shui-bian's Democratic Progressive Party, which won the remaining 27 seats. The junior partner in the Pan-Green Coalition, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, won no seats. The election for the 12th President of ROC was held on 22 March 2008. Kuomintang candidate Ma Ying-jeou won, with 58% of the vote, ending eight years of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leadership. Along with the 2008 legislative election, Ma's landslide victory brought the Kuomintang back to power in Taiwan. This new political situation has led to a decrease of tension between both sides of the Taiwan Strait and the increase of cross-strait relations, making a declaration of independence, or war, something unlikely. Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and its Chinese counterpart the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) signed four agreements in Taipei on 4 November 2008. Both SEF and ARATS have agreed to address direct sea links, daily charter flights, direct postal service and food safety.[116] After President Tsai Ing-wen took office, PRC press statement appear to suggest the all discussion between SEF and ARATS has been halted, pending Tsai's response regarding as again the "one china" question which she has not address since the election. Public opinion[edit] Public opinion in Taiwan regarding relations with the PRC is notoriously difficult to gauge, as poll results tend to be extremely sensitive to how the questions are phrased and what options are given, and there is a tendency by all political parties to spin the results to support their point of view.[citation needed][dubious – discuss] According to a November 2005 poll from the Mainland Affairs Council, 37.7% of people living in the ROC favor maintaining the status quo until a decision can be made in the future, 18.4% favors maintaining the status quo indefinitely, 14% favors maintaining the status quo until eventual independence, 12% favors maintaining the status quo until eventual reunification, 10.3% favors independence as soon as possible, and 2.1% favors reunification as soon as possible. According to the same poll, 78.3% are opposed to the "one country, two systems" model, which was used for Hong Kong and Macau, while 10.4% is in favor.[117] According to a June 2008 poll from a Taiwanese mainstream media TVBS, 58% of people living in Taiwan favor maintaining the status quo, 19% favors independence, and 8% favors unification. According to the same poll, if status quo is not an option and the ones who were surveyed must choose between "Independence" or "Unification", 65% are in favor of independence while 19% would opt for unification. The same poll also reveals that, in terms of self-identity, when the respondents are not told that a Taiwanese can also be a Chinese, 68% of the respondents identify themselves as "Taiwanese" while 18% would call themselves "Chinese". However, when the respondents are told that duo identity is an option, 45% of the respondents identify themselves as "Taiwanese only", 4% of the respondents call themselves "Chinese only" while 45% of the respondents call themselves "both Taiwanese as well as Chinese". Furthermore, when it comes to preference in which national identity to be used in international organizations, 54% of people in the survey indicated that they prefer "Taiwan" and only 25% of the people voted for "Chinese Taipei".[118] According to an October 2008 poll from the Mainland Affairs Council, on the question of Taiwan's status, 36.17% of respondents favor maintaining the status quo until a decision can be made in the future, 25.53% favors maintaining the status quo indefinitely, 12.49% favors maintaining the status quo until eventual independence, 4.44% favors maintaining the status quo until eventual reunification, 14.80% favors independence as soon as possible, and 1.76% favors reunification as soon as possible. In the same poll, on the question of the PRC government's attitude towards the ROC government, 64.85% of the respondents consider the PRC government hostile or very hostile, 24.89 consider the PRC government friendly or very friendly, while 10.27% did not express an opinion. On the question of the PRC government's attitude towards the people in Taiwan, 45.98% of the respondents consider the PRC government hostile or very hostile, 39.6% consider the PRC government friendly or very friendly, while 14.43% did not express an opinion.[119] May 2009 Taiwan's (Republic of China) Department of the Interior published a survey examining whether people in Taiwan see themselves as Taiwanese, Chinese or both. 64.6% see themselves as Taiwanese, 11.5% as Chinese, 18.1% as both and 5.8% were unsure.[120] According to a December 2009 poll from a Taiwanese mainstream media TVBS, if status quo is not an option and the ones who were surveyed must choose between "Independence" or "Unification", 68% are in favor of independence while 13% would opt for unification.[121] As of March 2012, a poll by the Global Views Monthly indicated that support for Taiwanese independence has risen. According to the survey 28.2 percent of respondents indicated that they support a formal declaration for Taiwan independence, a rise of 3.7 percent compared to a similar poll conducted earlier in 2012. Asked whether Taiwan would eventually declare itself a new and independent nation, 49.1 percent replied yes while 38 percent responded negatively, the Global Views Monthly said. Only 22.9 percent agreed that Taiwan should eventually unify with China, while 63.5 percent disagreed. A June 2013 poll conducted by DPP showed an overwhelming 77.6% consider themselves as Taiwanese.[122] A) On the independence-unification issue, the survey found that 25.9 percent said they support unification, 59 percent support independence and 10.3 percent prefer the "status quo." B) When asked whether Taiwan and China are parts of one country, the party said the survey found 78.4 percent disagree, while 15 percent agreed. C) As for whether Taiwan and China are two districts in one country, 70.6 percent disagree, while 22.8 percent agree, the survey showed. D)When asked which among four descriptions – "one country on each side", "a special state-to-state relationship", "one country, two areas", and "two sides are of one country" – they find the most acceptable, 54.9 percent said "one country on each side", 25.3 percent chose "a special state-to-state relationship", 9.8 percent said "one country, two areas" and 2.5 percent favor "two sides are of one country", the survey showed. Changing Taiwan's status to abide the ROC constitution[edit] From the perspective of the ROC constitution, which the mainstream political parties such as the Kuomintang (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is enforced to recognise, changing the ROC's governing status or completely clarifying Taiwan's political status would at best require amending the ROC constitution and defy People's Republic of China constitution. In other words, if reunification supporters wanted to reunify Taiwan with mainland China in such a way that would effectively abolish the ROC or affect the ROC's sovereignty, or if independence supporters who hold the view that Taiwan is under the ROC's sovereignty wanted to abolish the ROC and establish a Republic of Taiwan, they would also need to amend or abolish the ROC constitution and redraft a new constitution. Passing an amendment requires an unusually broad political consensus, which includes approval from three-quarters of a quorum of members of the Legislative Yuan. This quorum requires at least three-quarters of all members of the Legislature. After passing the legislature, the amendments need ratification from at least fifty percent of all eligible voters of the ROC, irrespective of voter turnout. Given these harsh constitutional requirements, neither the pan-greens nor pan-blues can unilaterally change Taiwan's political and legal status with respect to the ROC's constitution. However, extreme Taiwan independence supporters view the ROC's constitution as illegal and therefore believe that amendments to the ROC constitution are an invalid way to change Taiwan's political status.

Note on terminology[edit] Political status vs. Taiwan issue or Mainland issue[edit] Some scholarly sources as well as political entities like the PRC refer to the controversial status of the island of Taiwan as the "Taiwan question", "Taiwan issue", or "Taiwan problem". The ROC government does not like these terminologies, emphasizing that it should be called the "Mainland issue" or "Mainland question", because from the ROC's point of view, it does not recognise itself as just "the local government of Taiwan", doing so is indirectly suggesting it is inferior to PRC. Others use the term "Taiwan Strait Issue" because it implies nothing about sovereignty and because "Cross-Strait relations" is a term used by both the ROC and the PRC to describe their interactions. However, this term is also objectionable to some ROC supporters because it still implies that there is an unwillingness to clearly express ROC's sovereignty claim. De facto vs. de jure and whether ROC ceased to exist[edit] The use of the terms de facto and de jure to describe Taiwan's as well as the Republic of China's status as a state is itself a contentious issue. This partially stems from the lack of precedents regarding derecognized, but still constitutionally functioning states. For instance, it is regularly argued that Taiwan satisfies the requirements of statehood at international law as stated in the Montevideo Convention. At the same time, there is continued debate on whether UN membership or recognition as a state by the UN is a decisive feature of statehood (since it represents broad recognition by the international community); the debate arises because non-state entities can often satisfy the Montevideo Convention factors, while the list of states recognised by the UN, for the most part, correlate well with entities recognised as states by customary international law. If the latter argument is accepted, then the Republic of China may have ceased to be a state post-1971 as a matter of international law (de jure), yet continued to otherwise function as the state that it had been recognised as (de facto). From the 1990s onwards, media wire services sometimes describe Taiwan as having de facto independence, whereas the Republic of China has always considered itself as a continuously functioning de jure state.

See also[edit] Taiwan portal Wikinews has related news: Pentagon report reflects concerns over China's increased military Chinese General threatens U.S. with nuclear weapons over possible Taiwan Strait conflict, Beijing downplays comment History of Taiwan History of Taiwan under Japanese rule History of Republic of China Chinese Civil War February 28 Incident, for historical context of ROC-Taiwanese conflict Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan Four-stage Theory of the Republic of China Republic of China on Taiwan Taiwan Province Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China Taiwan independence Cross-Strait Unification Cross-Strait relations Anti-Secession Law of the People's Republic of China Military Power of the People's Republic of China Republic of China and weapons of mass destruction People's Republic of China and weapons of mass destruction Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC Taiwan Affairs Office of the PRC Foreign relations of Taiwan Taiwan in United Nations Taiwan Relations Act Three Communiqués 51st state#Taiwan

References[edit] ^ HC Deb 04 February 1955 vol 536 c159W. "In September, 1945, the administration of Formosa was taken over from the Japanese by Chinese forces at the direction of the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers; but this was not a cession, nor did it in itself involve any change of sovereignty. The arrangements made with Chiang Kai-shek put him there on a basis of military occupation pending further arrangements, and did not of themselves constitute the territory Chinese." ^ Zhao, Suisheng (2013-10-23). Across the Taiwan Strait: Mainland China, Taiwan and the 1995-1996 Crisis. Routledge. p. 91. ISBN 9781136685293.  ^ Joint Chiefs of Staff (17 August 1945).  General Order No. 1. Wikisource. "f. The above indicated commanders are the only representatives of the Allied Powers empowered to accept surrenders and all surrenders of Japanese Forces shall be made only to them or to their representatives."  ^ "The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue". Taiwan Affairs Office and the Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. 21 February 2000. Retrieved 2 August 2008.  ^ a b "State Department Legal Advisor: The Legal Status of Taiwan". Foreign relations of the United States. 13 July 1971. Retrieved 25 March 2015.  ^ Starr, Robert I. (13 July 1971), Legal Status of Taiwan, US State Dept., retrieved 26 December 2009 ; reprinted as Appendix C of Tkacik, John J. (ed.). Rethinking One China. Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation. ISBN 9780891952701.  ^ Lowther, William (30 March 2012). "Taiwan 'agrees' it's part of China: ex-US diplomat". The Taipei Times. Retrieved 17 December 2014.  ^ Durdin, Tillman (30 March 1947). "FORMOSANS' PLEA FOR RED AID SEEN; Harsh Repression of Revolt Is Expected to Increase Efforts to Escape Rule by China". New York Times. Retrieved 6 October 2007.  ^ "Formosans Ask Treaty Role". New York Times. 5 October 1947. Retrieved 6 October 2007.  ^ "United States Policy Toward Formosa". Statement by President Truman (Report). Department of State Bulletin. 22. 16 January 1950.  ^ Statement by the President on the Situation in Korea, Truman library, 27 June 1950, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ Special Message to the Congress Reporting on the Situation in Korea, 19 July 1950, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ Eisenhower, Dwight D. (1963). Mandate for Change 1953–1956. Doubleday & Co., New York. p. 461. OCLC 2551357. Retrieved 7 July 2011. The Japanese peace treaty of 1951 ended Japanese sovereignty over the islands but did not formally cede them to "China," either Communist or Nationalist.  ^ a b John Tkacik (30 September 2007), John Tkacik on Taiwan: Taiwan's status remains 'unsettled', Taipei Times, p. 8  ^ "衆議院会議録情報 第046回国会 予算委員会 第17号". Retrieved 2016-05-17.  ^ a b "The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue". PRC Taiwan Affairs Office and the Information Office of the State Council. 2005. Retrieved 6 March 2006.  ^ "Four-point guidelines on cross-Straits relations set forth by President Hu". PRC Taiwan Affairs Office and the Information Office of the State Council. Retrieved 16 September 2008.  ^ "China expresses strong indignation for "US-Taiwan defense conference": FM spokesman". People's Daily. 10 October 2004.  ^ a b c "The Official Position of the Republic of China (Taiwan) on China's Passing of the Anti-secession (Anti-Separation) Law" (Press release). Mainland Affairs Council, ROC Executive Yuan. 29 March 2005.  ^ "Taiwan assembly passes changes". BBC. 7 June 2005.  ^ Bunnag, Sanya (20 July 1999). "Understanding Taiwan's tactics". BBC.  ^ Willem van Kemenade (2000). "Taiwan, Voting for Trouble?". The Washington Quarterly. 23.2: 135–151.  ^ "Beijing media ups the ante". BBC. 20 July 1999.  ^ "Taiwan and China in 'special relations': Ma". China Post. 4 September 2008.  ^ a b Ko, Shu-Ling (8 October 2008). "Ma refers to China as ROC territory in magazine interview". Taipei Times.  ^ "馬總統:兩岸關係是現實關係" [President Ma: Cross-strait relations are relations based on current reality] (in Chinese). Central News Agency of the Republic of China. 8 October 2008.  ^ 王寓中 (8 October 2008). "馬:大陸是中華民國領土" [Ma: the mainland is the territory of the Republic of China] (in Chinese). Liberty Times.  ^ Stephen J. Yates (16 April 1999). "The Taiwan Relations Act After 20 Years: Keys to Past and Future Success". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 19 July 2009.  ^ "China: US spat over Taiwan could hit co-operation". Agence France Presse. 2 February 2010.  ^ a b "Overview of US Policy Towards Taiwan" (Press release). US Department of State. 21 April 2004. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009.  ^ "Fact Sheet". Canadian Trade Office in Taipei. Retrieved 6 October 2014.  ^ Shirley A. Kan; Wayne M. Morrison (4 January 2013). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4.  ^ Spencer, Richard (16 May 2005). "Vatican ready to sacrifice Taiwan for China". London: Daily Telegraph.  ^ "The Vatican's Cold Shoulder". Wall Street Journal. 20 December 2007. Retrieved 14 January 2008.  ^ Painter, James (30 March 2004). "Taiwan's 'Caribbean headache'". BBC.  ^ Vurobaravu, Fred (24 November 2004). "Parliament debates Vanuatu-Taiwan deal". Vanuatu Daily Post.  ^ "Vanuatu gov. reshuffled after Taiwan controversy". China Radio International. 11 December 2004.  ^ "Grenada picks China over Taiwan". BBC. 21 January 2005.  ^ Su, Joy (15 May 2005). "Nauru Switches its Allegiance Back to Taiwan from China". Taipei Times.  ^ "Senegal picks China over Taiwan". BBC. 26 October 2005.  ^ "Taiwan Breaks Off Relations With Chad". Voice of America. 5 August 2006.  ^ "Taiwan re-establishes diplomatic relations with St. Lucia". International Herald Tribune. 30 August 2007.  ^ "Taiwan loses Costa Rica's support". BBC News. 7 June 2007. Retrieved 7 June 2007.  ^ Wu, Debby (14 January 2008). "Malawi Drops Ties With Taiwan for China". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 7 April 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2008.  ^ "Gambia breaks relations with surprised Taiwan; China says it wasn't in contact with government". Washington Post. 14 November 2013.  ^ "A Small African Nation Severs Ties with Taiwan, and Beijing Applauds".  ^ "After ditching Taiwan, China says Panama will get the help it needs". Reuters. 17 November 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Gandásegui, Panama and China's Silk Road (1)". The Panama News. 2017-11-25. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "TLC con China se negociará desde 2018". La Prensa (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Los 19 acuerdos que firmaron China y Panamá". La Estrella de Panamá (in Spanish). 2017-11-17. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Negociación de TLC de Panamá y China podría comenzar en un año". La Estrella de Panamá (in Spanish). 2017-09-18. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "China apoya proyecto de tren entre Panamá y Chiriquí". La Estrella de Panamá (in Spanish). 2017-11-21. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Centroamérica debe reconocer que hay una sola China, afirma el diplomático chino Wang Weihua". La Estrella de Panamá (in Spanish). 2017-08-06. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Panama Establishes Ties With China, Further Isolating Taiwan".  ^ ^ "Taiwán, indignada por la decisión de Panamá de establecer relaciones con China". La Prensa (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Calamur, Krishnadev. "Panama's Decision to Cut Ties With Taiwan". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Panama cuts ties with Taiwan for China". BBC News. 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Haas, Benjamin (2017-06-13). "Panama cuts formal ties with Taiwan in favour of China". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Crespo, Aymara. "COMUNICADO CONJUNTO ENTRE LA REPÚBLICA DE PANAMÁ Y LA REPÚBLICA POPULAR CHINA SOBRE EL ESTABLECIMIENTO DE RELACIONES DIPLOMÁTICAS". (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Panamá rompe con Taiwán y establece relaciones diplomáticas con China". CNN (in Spanish). 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Taiwán rompe relaciones con Panamá y denuncia 'diplomacia de chequera' de China". La Estrella de Panamá (in Spanish). 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Redacción (2017-06-13). "Por qué Panamá rompió su vínculo histórico con Taiwán y estableció relaciones diplomáticas con China". BBC Mundo. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ hermesauto (2017-06-13). "Taiwan loses Central American ally after Panama establishes formal diplomatic ties with China". The Straits Times. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "Panama rupture frees up Taiwan - Taipei Times". Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ (Taiwan), Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (2016-01-07). "PANAMA Y LA REPUBLICA DE CHINA: FORJANDO JUNTOS UN FUTURO MEJOR, Taiwan Hoy". Taiwan Hoy (in sp). Retrieved 2017-12-21. CS1 maint: Unrecognized language (link) ^ Diplomat, Timothy S. Rich and Vasabjit Banerjee, The. "Panama Switch Marks China's Return to Checkbook Diplomacy". The Diplomat. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "China to replace Taiwan scholarships". La Prensa (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ "China to replace Taiwan scholarships - Newsroom Panama". Newsroom Panama. 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Crespo, Aymara. "Comunicado de la Cancillería sobre estudiantes becados en Taiwán". (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-12-21.  ^ Klapper, Bradley (23 May 2006). "Taiwan fails in 10th bid for WHO observer status". Associated Press.  ^ "Taiwanese 'forced on to plane to China' by police in Kenya". BBC News. 12 April 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2016.  ^ Yeh, Lindy (12 July 2002). "Taiwan's Lions Club gets another temporary name". Taipei Times. p. 3.  ^ "The True Legal Status of Taiwan". Taiwan Civil Government.  ^ Phillips, Claude (1957), "The International Legal Status of Formosa", Political Research Quarterly, Sage Publications, 10 (2): 276–289, doi:10.1177/106591295701000203  ^ Charney, Jonathan; J. R. V. Prescott (July 2000), "Resolving Cross-strait relations between China and Taiwan", The American Journal of International Law, American Society of International Law, 94 (3): 453–477, doi:10.2307/2555319, archived from the original on 22 June 2004, retrieved 1 February 2011  ^ a b 兩岸關係與台灣主權 (Cross-strait relations and Taiwan's sovereignty) (in Chinese), The Strait Journal, October 2008  ^ Hung, Joe (22 November 2004), Is sovereignty over Taiwan undecided?, National Policy Foundation, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ 有关台湾光复的国际法文件 [Documents regarding the retrocession of Taiwan] (in Chinese), Xinhua News Agency, 8 May 2008  ^ Boxer Protocol, Peking 7. September 1901; Peace Agreement between the Great Powers, China um 1900; in Den Ugen Der Zeit, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER CERTAIN FRONTIER LAND, International Court of Justice, 20 June 1959, retrieved 14 April 2009  ^ 中國國務院台辦新聞發佈會實錄 (in Chinese),, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ Sovereignty, Taiwan Documents Project, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ "Tsai blasted for R.O.C. legitimacy remark". China Post. 27 May 2010. Retrieved 12 June 2010.  ^ Ko, Shu-ling (29 April 2009). "Treaty confirmed sovereignty: Ma". Taipei Times. Retrieved 14 June 2010.  ^ Roger Lin (31 December 2006), Taiwan is US Territory, Taipei Times, p. 8, retrieved 6 October 2007  ^ Law Offices of Charles H_ Camp News, retrieved 28 January 2007  ^ "Taiwan is not Chinese Territory",, retrieved 7 January 2010  ^ Civil Action No. 2006-1825 LIN et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, retrieved 16 April 2008  ^ USCA Court Documents, retrieved 9 December 2008  ^ USCA Court Documents, retrieved 3 January 2009  ^ Roger Lin v. United States of America (PDF), retrieved 7 April 2009  ^ "US scrambles as Powell learns the art of 'diplospeak'". Agence France-Presse. 15 March 2001.  ^ "China and Taiwan 'two countries': Zhu". Taipei Times. 6 March 2003. p. 3.  ^ Gluck, Caroline (17 August 2005). "Taiwan struggles with Chinese dissidents". BBC.  ^ Su Tseng-chang (3 June 1994). "大聲說出「台灣属於我們中國」". DPP. Archived from the original on 23 February 2006. Retrieved 16 July 2006.  ^ "NY mayor stands up for Taiwan". Taipei Times. 2 May 2002.  ^ "Good schools due to Japan: Aso". Taipei Times. 6 February 2006. p. 2.  ^ "Japan's Aso calls Taiwan a 'country'". Taipei Times. 10 March 2006. p. 1.  ^ "Grenada investigates anthem gaffe". BBC News. 4 February 2007.  ^ "Taiwan breaks ties with Malawi". The Hindu. 14 January 2008. Retrieved 2 February 2008.  ^ "Bush Opposes Taiwan Independence". Fox News. 9 December 2003. p. 1.  ^ Office of the Secretary of Defense (6 May 2011). Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China, 2011 (PDF). Annual Report to Congress (Report). Retrieved 16 February 2012.  ^ Minnick, Wendell (22 February 2010). "U.S. Intel Report on Taiwan Air Power Released". Retrieved 6 December 2011.  ^ Hebert, Adam J. "Behind the Taiwan Arms Sales". Retrieved 6 December 2011.  ^ Chang, Rich (1 May 2006). "War simulations reveal communication problem". Taipei Times. p. 3.  ^ Dunnigan, James (7 July 2004). "US Navy Sticks it to China". Dirty Little Secrets. Retrieved 11 June 2006.  ^ ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS, Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China, 2011, Office of the Secretary of Defense ^ MINNICK RAND, WENDELL (2008). "Rand Study Suggests U.S. Loses War With China".  ^ Lin, Jennifer (21 March 1996). "U.s. Considers Risking China's Wrath On Taiwan The Nimitz Could Sail Through The Taiwan Strait. China Is Calling That ``brazen.". Philadelphia Daily News. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 28 March 2015.  Chi Su (11 September 2008). Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs. Routledge. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-134-04043-8.  ^ "Law Offices of Charles H_ Camp News". Retrieved 28 January 2007.  ^ "Civil Action No. 2006-1825 LIN et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". Retrieved 16 April 2008.  ^ "USCA Court case Statement of Facts". Retrieved 1 January 2009.  ^ "Roger Lin v. United States of America" (PDF). Retrieved 5 April 2014.  ^ "兩岸簽共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議 將重打經濟犯罪". 中國台灣網. 26 April 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.  ^ "Taiwan reached deals with China at the expense of sovereignty and democracy". EFTA. 6 November 2008.  ^ "民意調查:「民眾對當前兩岸關係之看法」結果摘要". 行政院大陸委員會. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 18 October 2006.  ^ "民意調查:兩會復談前國族認同民調" (PDF). TVBS. Retrieved 20 June 2008.  ^ 「大陸政策與兩岸協商」民意調查(民國97年10月10日~10月12日)問卷及百分比分布 (PDF) (in Chinese). Mainland Affairs Council of the Republic of China. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 October 2008. Retrieved 16 October 2008.  ^ 「民眾的政治態度及族群觀點」民意調查 加權百分比摘要表 (PDF) (in Chinese). Taiwan's (Republic of China) Department of the Interior. Retrieved 11 June 2009.  ^ "Taiwanese text" (PDF). TVBS. Retrieved 23 December 2009.  ^ Lee, Hsin-fang. "DPP poll finds 77.6% identify as Taiwanese". Retrieved 7 July 2013. 

Further reading[edit] Bush, R. & O'Hanlon, M. (2007). A War Like No Other: The Truth About China's Challenge to America. Wiley. ISBN 9780471986775 Bush, R. (2006). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 9780815712909 Carpenter, T. (2006). America's Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781403968418 Cole, B. (2006). Taiwan's Security: History and Prospects. Routledge. ISBN 9780415365819 Copper, J. (2006). Playing with Fire: The Looming War with China over Taiwan. Praeger Security. ISBN 9780275988883 Federation of American Scientists et al. (2006). Chinese Nuclear Forces and U.S. Nuclear War Planning Gill, B. (2007). Rising Star: China's New Security Diplomacy. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 9780815731467 Shirk, S. (2007). China: Fragile Superpower: How China's Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195306095 Tsang, S. (2006). If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics and Economics. Routledge. ISBN 9780415407854 Tucker, N.B. (2005). Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231135641

External links[edit] Wikisource has original text related to this article: US-PRC Joint Communique Foreign Ministry of the People's Republic of China Government Information Office – Republic of China Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council – White Papers on Taiwan Issue by the PRC China Taiwan Information Center (PRC perspective) Kenneth Lieberthal (March–April 2005), Preventing a War Over Taiwan, Council on Foreign Relations, retrieved 6 October 2007  Taiwan Documents Project A complete collection of Taiwan-related documents, based in Los Angeles, USA (favors Taiwan Independence) Taiwan and the World Trade Organization (by Steve Charnovitz) Who Owns Taiwan: A Dissection of International Title America and Taiwan, 1943–2004 The Menacing Missiles of Taiwan Australian White Paper on Taiwan relations Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan collection of documents and articles. Resolving the Political Status of Taiwan through the US Court system Republic of China Mainland Affairs Council Sovereignty, Wealth, Culture, and Technology: Mainland China and Taiwan Grapple with the Parameters of the "Nation-State" in the 21st Century v t e Empire of Japan Overview Agriculture Censorship Demographics Economy Economic history Education Eugenics Foreign commerce and shipping Industrial production Militarism Nationalism Statism Internal politics State Shinto Kazoku Emperors Meiji (Mutsuhito) Taishō (Yoshihito) Shōwa (Hirohito) Symbols Flag of Japan Rising Sun Flag Imperial Seal of Japan Government Seal of Japan State Seal of Japan Privy Seal of Japan Kimigayo Policies Constitution Charter Oath Foreign relations Imperial Rescript on Education Kokutai National Spiritual Mobilization Movement Peace Preservation Law Political parties Supreme Court of Judicature Taisei Yokusankai Tokkō Tonarigumi Greater East Asia Conference Government Administration (Ministries) Imperial Household Home Ministry War Army Navy Treasury Foreign Affairs Agriculture and Commerce Commerce and Industry Munitions Colonial Affairs Greater East Asia East Asia Development Board (Kōain) Legislative & Deliberative Bodies Daijō-kan Privy Council Gozen Kaigi Imperial Diet Peers Representatives Military Armed Forces Imperial General Headquarters Imperial Rescript to Soldiers and Sailors Senjinkun military code Nuclear weapons program Kamikaze War crimes Supreme War Council Imperial Japanese Army General Staff Air Service Railways and Shipping Imperial Guard Imperial Way Faction (Kōdōha) Japanese holdout Tōseiha Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff Air Service Land Forces Fleet Faction Treaty Faction History Meiji period Meiji Restoration Boshin War Satsuma Rebellion First Sino-Japanese War Triple Intervention Boxer Rebellion Anglo-Japanese Alliance Russo-Japanese War Taishō period World War I Siberian Intervention General Election Law Washington Naval Treaty Shōwa period Shōwa financial crisis Pacification of Manchukuo Anti-Comintern Pact Second Sino-Japanese War Tripartite Pact Soviet–Japanese Border War (1939) Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact Pacific War Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Soviet–Japanese War (1945) Surrender (Potsdam Declaration, Gyokuon-hōsō) Occupation Territories Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere Karafuto Korea Kwantung Manchukuo South Pacific Taiwan Occupied territories Borneo Burma Hong Kong Dutch East Indies Malaya Philippines Singapore Thailand Vietnam Other topics Sonnō jōi Fukoku kyōhei Hakkō ichiu Internment camps German pre–World War II industrial co-operation Racial Equality Proposal Shinmin no Michi Shōwa Modan Socialist thought Yasukuni Shrine International Military Tribunal for the Far East Japanese dissidence during the Shōwa period v t e Cold War USA USSR ANZUS NATO Non-Aligned Movement SEATO Warsaw Pact Cold War II 1940s Morgenthau Plan Hukbalahap Rebellion Dekemvriana Percentages Agreement Yalta Conference Guerrilla war in the Baltic states Forest Brothers Operation Priboi Operation Jungle Occupation of the Baltic states Cursed soldiers Operation Unthinkable Operation Downfall Potsdam Conference Gouzenko Affair Division of Korea Operation Masterdom Operation Beleaguer Operation Blacklist Forty Iran crisis of 1946 Greek Civil War Baruch Plan Corfu Channel incident Turkish Straits crisis Restatement of Policy on Germany First Indochina War Truman Doctrine Asian Relations Conference May 1947 Crises Marshall Plan Comecon 1948 Czechoslovak coup d'état Tito–Stalin Split Berlin Blockade Western betrayal Iron Curtain Eastern Bloc Western Bloc Chinese Civil War (Second round) Malayan Emergency Albanian Subversion 1950s Papua conflict Bamboo Curtain Korean War McCarthyism Egyptian Revolution of 1952 1953 Iranian coup d'état Uprising of 1953 in East Germany Dirty War (Mexico) Bricker Amendment 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état Partition of Vietnam Vietnam War First Taiwan Strait Crisis Geneva Summit (1955) Bandung Conference Poznań 1956 protests Hungarian Revolution of 1956 Suez Crisis "We will bury you" Operation Gladio Arab Cold War Syrian Crisis of 1957 1958 Lebanon crisis Iraqi 14 July Revolution Sputnik crisis Second Taiwan Strait Crisis 1959 Tibetan uprising Cuban Revolution Kitchen Debate Sino-Soviet split 1960s Congo Crisis 1960 U-2 incident Bay of Pigs Invasion 1960 Turkish coup d'état Soviet–Albanian split Berlin Crisis of 1961 Berlin Wall Portuguese Colonial War Angolan War of Independence Guinea-Bissau War of Independence Mozambican War of Independence Cuban Missile Crisis Sino-Indian War Communist insurgency in Sarawak Iraqi Ramadan Revolution Eritrean War of Independence Sand War North Yemen Civil War Aden Emergency 1963 Syrian coup d'état Vietnam War Shifta War Guatemalan Civil War Colombian conflict Nicaraguan Revolution 1964 Brazilian coup d'état Dominican Civil War South African Border War Transition to the New Order Domino theory ASEAN Declaration Laotian Civil War 1966 Syrian coup d'état Argentine Revolution Korean DMZ conflict Greek military junta of 1967–74 Years of Lead (Italy) USS Pueblo incident Six-Day War War of Attrition Dhofar Rebellion Al-Wadiah War Protests of 1968 French May Tlatelolco massacre Cultural Revolution Portuguese colonial war Prague Spring 1968 Polish political crisis Communist insurgency in Malaysia Invasion of Czechoslovakia Iraqi Ba'athist Revolution Goulash Communism Sino-Soviet border conflict CPP–NPA–NDF rebellion Corrective Move 1970s Détente Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Black September in Jordan Corrective Movement (Syria) Cambodian Civil War Koza riot Realpolitik Ping-pong diplomacy Ugandan-Tanzanian War 1971 Turkish military memorandum Corrective Revolution (Egypt) Four Power Agreement on Berlin Bangladesh Liberation War 1972 Nixon visit to China North Yemen-South Yemen Border conflict of 1972 Yemenite War of 1972 NDF Rebellion Eritrean Civil Wars 1973 Chilean coup d'état Yom Kippur War 1973 oil crisis Carnation Revolution Spanish transition Metapolitefsi Strategic Arms Limitation Talks Rhodesian Bush War Angolan Civil War Mozambican Civil War Oromo conflict Ogaden War Ethiopian Civil War Lebanese Civil War Sino-Albanian split Cambodian–Vietnamese War Sino-Vietnamese War Operation Condor Dirty War (Argentina) 1976 Argentine coup d'état Korean Air Lines Flight 902 Yemenite War of 1979 Grand Mosque seizure Iranian Revolution Saur Revolution New Jewel Movement 1979 Herat uprising Seven Days to the River Rhine Struggle against political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union 1980s Soviet–Afghan War 1980 and 1984 Summer Olympics boycotts 1980 Turkish coup d'état Peruvian conflict Casamance conflict Ugandan Bush War Lord's Resistance Army insurgency Eritrean Civil Wars 1982 Ethiopian–Somali Border War Ndogboyosoi War United States invasion of Grenada Able Archer 83 Star Wars Iran–Iraq War Somali Rebellion 1986 Black Sea incident 1988 Black Sea bumping incident South Yemen Civil War Bougainville Civil War 8888 Uprising Solidarity Soviet reaction Contras Central American crisis RYAN Korean Air Lines Flight 007 People Power Revolution Glasnost Perestroika Nagorno-Karabakh War Afghan Civil War United States invasion of Panama 1988 Polish strikes Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 Revolutions of 1989 Fall of the Berlin Wall Velvet Revolution Romanian Revolution Die Wende 1990s Mongolian Revolution of 1990 German reunification Yemeni unification Fall of communism in Albania Breakup of Yugoslavia Dissolution of the Soviet Union Dissolution of Czechoslovakia Frozen conflicts Abkhazia China-Taiwan Korea Nagorno-Karabakh South Ossetia Transnistria Sino-Indian border dispute North Borneo dispute Foreign policy Truman Doctrine Containment Eisenhower Doctrine Domino theory Hallstein Doctrine Kennedy Doctrine Peaceful coexistence Ostpolitik Johnson Doctrine Brezhnev Doctrine Nixon Doctrine Ulbricht Doctrine Carter Doctrine Reagan Doctrine Rollback Sovereignty of Puerto Rico during the Cold War Ideologies Capitalism Chicago school Keynesianism Monetarism Neoclassical economics Reaganomics Supply-side economics Thatcherism Communism Marxism–Leninism Castroism Eurocommunism Guevarism Hoxhaism Juche Maoism Trotskyism Naxalism Stalinism Titoism Other Fascism Islamism Liberal democracy Social democracy Third-Worldism White supremacy Organizations ASEAN CIA Comecon EEC KGB MI6 Non-Aligned Movement SAARC Safari Club Stasi Propaganda Active measures Crusade for Freedom Izvestia Pravda Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Red Scare TASS Voice of America Voice of Russia Races Arms race Nuclear arms race Space Race See also Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War Soviet espionage in the United States Soviet Union–United States relations USSR–USA summits Russian espionage in the United States American espionage in the Soviet Union and Russian Federation Russia–NATO relations Brinkmanship CIA and the Cultural Cold War Cold War II Category Commons Portal Timeline List of conflicts v t e Chinese Civil War Principal belligerents and campaigns Nationalist Party /  Republic of China ( National Revolutionary Army → Republic of China Armed Forces) Communist Party /  People's Republic of China ( Red Army → 8th Route Army, N4A, etc. → People's Liberation Army) Pre-1945 Post-1945 Current issues 1924 First United Front 1927 Shanghai massacre Nanchang uprising Autumn Harvest Uprising Guangzhou Uprising 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict 1930–1934 Encirclement Campaigns 1931–1934 Chinese Soviet Republic 1933–1934 Fujian People's Government 1934–1936 Long March 1936 Xi'an Incident 1937–1946 Second United Front 1945 Chongqing Negotiations 1945 Double Tenth Agreement 1946 Jiaochangkou Incident 1945–1949 Operation Beleaguer 1946–1949 Revolution 1948 SS Kiangya Incident 1948 Liaoshen Campaign 1948–1949 Huaihai Campaign 1948–1949 Pingjin Campaign 1949 Taiping Steamer Incident 1949 Yangtze River Crossing Campaign 1950–1958 Kuomintang Islamic insurgency 1950 Hainan Island Campaign 1950 Wanshan Archipelago Campaign 1950 Battle of Chamdo 1951 Incorporation of Tibet 1955 First Taiwan Strait Crisis 1958 Second Taiwan Strait Crisis (Jinmen Crisis) 1960–1961 China–Burma border 1996 Third Taiwan Strait Crisis 2005–present Pan-Blue visits Political status of Taiwan Tibetan Government-in-Exile Chinese unification Hong Kong independence movement Inner Mongolian independence movement Manchurian independence movement Taiwan independence movement Tibetan independence movement East Turkestan independence movement Cross-Strait relations v t e Cross-Strait relations  People's Republic of China  Republic of China Organizations Taiwan Affairs Office Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Communist Party of China Kuomintang Revolutionary Committee Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League Paramount leaders Xi Jinping Hu Jintao Jiang Zemin Deng Xiaoping People Chen Deming Chen Yunlin Zhang Zhijun Wang Yi Wang Daohan Organizations Mainland Affairs Council Straits Exchange Foundation Kuomintang Democratic Progressive Party National Unification Council Presidents Tsai Ing-wen Ma Ying-jeou Chen Shui-bian Lee Teng-hui People Lin Join-sane Wang Yu-chi Chiang Pin-kung Lai Shin-yuan Koo Chen-fu Mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu Events Treaty of Shimonoseki (1895) Retrocession of Taiwan (1945) February 28 Incident (1947) Chinese Civil War (1946–1950) First Taiwan Strait Crisis (1954–1955) Second Taiwan Strait Crisis (1958) PRC entry to the United Nations (1971) Lieyu Massacre (1987) Third Taiwan Strait Crisis (1995–1996) Anti-Secession Law (2005) Pan–Blue visits to mainland China (2005) Cross-Strait charter (2005–2008) Sunflower Movement (2014) 2014 Wang–Zhang meetings 2015 Xi–Chu meeting 2015 Ma–Xi meeting Negotiations Kinmen Agreement (1990) Wang–Koo summit (1993) Cross-Strait high-level talks (2008–current) Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (2010) Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Culture Forum (2006–current) Straits Forum (2009–current) Shanghai-Taipei City Forum (2010–current) Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement (2013) Cross-Strait Peace Forum (2013–current) Concepts China and the United Nations Political status of Taiwan Chinese unification One country, two systems One China, Better system Taiwan independence movement 1992 Consensus one China, respective interpretations no unification, no independence and no use of force Three Links One-China policy Two Chinas One Country on Each Side Three Noes Six Assurances Special state-to-state relations Four Noes and One Without Zhonghua minzu Special non-state-to-state relations Cross-Strait Economic Zone Free area of the Republic of China Chinese Taipei v t e Foreign relations of Taiwan Africa Burkina Faso Chad Gambia Malawi São Tomé and Príncipe South Africa Americas Belize Brazil Canada Chile Dominican Republic Mexico Paraguay United States Venezuela Asia Bangladesh PR China Hong Kong India Indonesia Japan Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Saudi Arabia South Korea Vietnam Europe Czech Republic Denmark Holy See Italy Latvia Poland Russia Ukraine United Kingdom Oceania Australia Pacific countries Other United Nations Political status Arab World Caribbean Third World Related topics Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office Taiwan Relations Act (Taiwan Travel Act) Diplomatic missions of/in Taiwan Passport Visa policy/requirements Timeline of diplomatic relations Retrieved from "" Categories: Cross-Strait relationsHistory of TaiwanPolitics of TaiwanTaiwanese lawSovereigntyHidden categories: CS1 Chinese-language sources (zh)CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)CS1 maint: Unrecognized languageCS1 uses Chinese-language script (zh)Use dmy dates from February 2015Articles needing additional references from November 2013All articles needing additional referencesArticles containing Chinese-language textAll articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from August 2010Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011Articles needing additional references from November 2007Articles with unsourced statements from August 2016Articles with unsourced statements from January 2012Articles that may contain original research from May 2009All articles that may contain original researchAll accuracy disputesArticles with disputed statements from September 2009Articles with unsourced statements from October 2008Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2010Articles with unsourced statements from October 2010Articles that may contain original research from October 2010All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrasesArticles with unsourced statements from February 2007Articles with unsourced statements from March 2009Articles with unsourced statements from May 2007Articles with unsourced statements from January 2010Articles with unsourced statements from September 2009Articles needing additional references from November 2011Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008Articles with disputed statements from April 2008

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages Bân-lâm-gúDeutschEspañolفارسیFrançais한국어Bahasa IndonesiaItalianoעבריתBahasa Melayu日本語PortuguêsSimple EnglishSvenskaTürkçeTiếng Việt文言吴语粵語中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 18 March 2018, at 09:42. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"1.844","walltime":"2.135","ppvisitednodes":{"value":16787,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":573182,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":52415,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":15,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":21,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":0,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":130702,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 1667.245 1 -total"," 41.54% 692.634 1 Template:Reflist"," 25.09% 418.364 5 Template:Infobox"," 14.55% 242.596 64 Template:Cite_news"," 14.54% 242.345 1 Template:Chinese"," 12.86% 214.417 28 Template:Fix"," 10.95% 182.511 1 Template:Infobox_Chinese/Chinese"," 10.28% 171.429 19 Template:Citation_needed"," 9.20% 153.467 2 Template:Lang"," 7.78% 129.699 27 Template:Cite_web"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.939","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":23226116,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1331","timestamp":"20180320174947","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":2255,"wgHostname":"mw1331"});});

Political_status_of_Taiwan - Photos and All Basic Informations

Political_status_of_Taiwan More Links

Cross-Strait RelationsHistory Of Taiwan Since 1945Wikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalTraditional Chinese CharactersSimplified Chinese CharactersStandard ChineseHanyu PinyinSouthern MinHokkienPe̍h-ōe-jīTaiwanTaiwanPenghuMainland ChinaChinaTaiwan Independence MovementStatus QuoSupreme Commander For The Allied PowersTreaty Of San FranciscoTheory Of The Undetermined Status Of TaiwanPolicy Of Deliberate AmbiguityBrinkmanshipHistory Of TaiwanTaiwan (island)Austronesian PeopleKingdom Of TungningHan ChineseQing DynastyTaiwan PrefectureChinese ProvinceFirst Sino-Japanese WarWorld War IIAllied Powers (World War II)History Of Taiwan1943 Cairo DeclarationPotsdam DeclarationJapanese Instrument Of SurrenderChinese Civil WarSouth China SeaSuccession Of States TheoryQuemoyMatsu IslandsWuqiu, KinmenFujianTaiping IslandPratas IslandsEnlargeTreaty Of ShimonosekiUnequal TreatiesQing DynastyPenghuFirst Sino-Japanese WarTreaty Of ShimonosekiCairo Conference (1943)Instrument Of Surrender Of JapanWang Yingfan1943 Cairo DeclarationPotsdam DeclarationInternational LawTreaty Of TaipeiTaiwan IndependenceDe JureCairo Conference (1943)ArmisticeModus VivendiPeace TreatyTreaty Of San FranciscoTreaty Of TaipeiSan Francisco Peace TreatyPopular SovereigntyMandate (politics)Chen Shui-bianPan-Green CoalitionPan-Blue CoalitionMa Ying-jeouOne-China PolicyTaipei TimesPenghuBattle Of PenghuTreaty Of ShimonosekiSurrender Of JapanMing DynastyKingdom Of TungningTaiwan Under Qing RuleChinaTaiwan Under Japanese RuleJapanTaiwan After World War IITaiwanTaiwanSiege Of Fort ZeelandiaBattle Of PenghuTreaty Of ShimonosekiSurrender Of JapanDutch FormosaSpanish FormosaNetherlandsSpainKingdom Of TungningTaiwan Under Qing RuleChinaTaiwan Under Japanese RuleJapanTaiwan After World War IITaiwanEnlargeFirst Sino-Japanese WarQing DynastyPescadoresImperial JapanTreaty Of ShimonosekiUnequal TreatyKinmenMatsu IslandsFujianSouth China Sea IslandsRepublic Of ChinaRepublic Of Taiwan (1895)Second Sino-Japanese WarWorld War IIAllies Of World War IICairo Conference (1943)1943 Cairo DeclarationPotsdam DeclarationJapanese Instrument Of SurrenderChiang Kai-shekDouglas MacArthurGeneral Order No. 1Chen Yi (Kuomintang)Retrocession DayMilitary OccupationFebruary 28 IncidentTaipeiU.S. State DepartmentPlebisciteHarry S. TrumanUnited States Department Of StateKorean WarChinese CommunistsU.S. Seventh FleetTaiwan StraitUnited Nations CharterJohn Foster DullesU.S. Secretary Of StateTreaty Of Peace With JapanGeorge H. KerrFormosa Betrayed (1965 Book)Soviet UnionChina And The United NationsTreaty Of Peace With JapanMainland ChinaChinese Civil WarCold WarWikipedia:Citation NeededNew ZealandAllies Of World War IIDeem (law)EnlargeMainland Travel Permit For Taiwan ResidentsTaiwan PassportSuccession Of States TheoryChinese Civil WarUN General Assembly Resolution 2758Anti-Secession LawInternational Recognition Of The Republic Of ChinaMontevideo ConventionWikipedia:Citation NeededOne-China PolicyRepublic Of China1992 ConsensusTerritorial IntegrityTaiwan Province, People's Republic Of ChinaTaiwanWikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalEnlargeTaiwan PassportTaiwan IndependenceCross-Strait UnificationChinese Civil WarRepublic Of ChinaDe JureMainland ChinaHong Kong Special Administrative RegionMacauPresident Of The Republic Of ChinaLee Teng-huiCommunist Party Of ChinaKuomintangNational Assembly Of The Republic Of ChinaLegislative YuanEnlargeExit & Entry Permit (Republic Of China)Constitution Of The Republic Of ChinaTaiwan ProvinceTreaty Of ShimonosekiNational Assembly Of The Republic Of ChinaSun FoSun Yat-SenExecutive YuanMongoliaTaiwan (island)Treaty Of San FranciscoTreaty Of TaipeiGeneral Order No. 1DenunciationFree Area Of The Republic Of ChinaEnlargeEnlargeTaipeiLee Teng-huiSpecial State-to-state RelationsTaiwan IndependenceChen Shui-bianRepublic Of ChinaFour-stage Theory Of The Republic Of ChinaDemocratic Progressive PartyOne Country On Each SideOne China Policy1992 ConsensusMa Ying-jeouSpecial Non-state-to-state RelationsForeign Relations Of TaiwanEnlargeCold WarUnited Nations General Assembly Resolution 505United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758UN General AssemblyChina And The United NationsTaipei Economic And Cultural OfficeEnlargeDwight D. EisenhowerTaipeiTaiwanTaiwan–United States RelationsTaiwan Relations ActRepublic Of China Armed ForcesCross-Strait RelationsAmerican Institute In TaiwanIndiaPakistanOne ChinaTaiwan StraitEnlargeChen Shui-bianFuneral Of Pope John Paul IIInternational Recognition Of The Republic Of ChinaHoly SeeCatholicChinese Patriotic Catholic AssociationVatican CityJohn Paul IIPope Benedict XVIDalai LamaDominicaVanuatuGrenadaNauruSenegalChadSaint LuciaCosta RicaGambiaBelizeBurkina FasoDominican RepublicEl SalvadorGuatemalaHaitiHondurasKiribatiMarshall IslandsNauruNicaraguaPalauParaguaySaint Kitts And NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent And The GrenadinesSolomon IslandsSwazilandTuvaluVatican CityHoly SeeWorld Health OrganizationWorld Trade OrganizationInternational Olympic CommitteeChinese TaipeiAPECWikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:Citation NeededISO 3166ISO 3166-2:CNISO 3166-1ISO 3166-2ExtraditeLions ClubWikipedia:No Original ResearchWikipedia:VerifiabilityWikipedia:Citing SourcesHelp:Maintenance Template RemovalOne China PolicyTreaty Of Shimonoseki1943 Cairo DeclarationPotsdam DeclarationRetrocession DayCustom (law)Treaty Of San FranciscoWikipedia:Accuracy DisputeTalk:Political Status Of TaiwanWikipedia:Accuracy DisputeTalk:Political Status Of TaiwanConvention Of MontevideoTreaty Of TaipeiPotsdam DeclarationUti PossidetisTreaty Of ShimonosekiWikipedia:Accuracy DisputeTalk:Political Status Of TaiwanSino-American Mutual Defense TreatyWikipedia:Accuracy DisputeTalk:Political Status Of TaiwanJoint Communique Of The Government Of Japan And The Government Of The People's Republic Of ChinaPotsdam DeclarationTreaty Of ShimonosekiBoxer RebellionHistorical PowersSecond Sino-Japanese WarUnequal Treaty DoctrineWikipedia:Citation NeededTaelKoreaWikipedia:Citation NeededPotsdam DeclarationJapanese Instrument Of SurrenderModus VivendiArmisticeSan Francisco Peace TreatyAb InitioSan Francisco Peace TreatyKuomintangPopular SovereigntyDemocratic Progressive PartyChen Shui-bianCustom (law)International Court Of JusticeGaza StripIsraelFebruary 28 IncidentFebruary 28 IncidentMilitary OccupationUnited Nations CharterYalta ConferenceSelf-determinationSan Francisco Peace TreatySakhalinKuril IslandsWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Words To WatchWikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:No Original ResearchTreaty Of TaipeiSan Francisco Peace TreatyTreaty Of TaipeiSan Francisco Peace TreatyPostliminiumTreaty Of TaipeiCubaTreaty Of Paris (1898)Spanish–American WarLibyaSomalilandTreaty Of Peace With Italy (1947)Treaty Of TaipeiPan-Green CoalitionPan-Blue CoalitionSelf-determinationSan Francisco Peace TreatyWikipedia:Avoid Weasel WordsGovernment In ExileWikipedia:Avoid Weasel WordsGovernment In ExileLegitimacy (political)Taiwan Nation PartyUnited States District Court For The District Of ColumbiaTreaty Of Peace With JapanPolitical QuestionUnited States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia CircuitTaiwanRepublic Of ChinaRonald ReaganGeorge W. BushColin PowellTaiwanTaiwanThe Republic Of ChinaU.S. SenateZhu RongjiNational People's CongressMainland ChinaTaiwanLee Teng-huiMichael BloombergUnited States Secretary Of DefenseDonald RumsfeldWikipedia:Citation NeededMinister For Foreign Affairs (Japan)Tarō AsōTaiwanTaiwan Under Japanese RuleLiberal Theory Of EconomicsGrenadaNational Anthem Of The Republic Of ChinaSt George's, GrenadaKuomintangMainland ChinaRevolutionary Committee Of The KuomintangChinese People's Political Consultative ConferenceEnlargeTaipei CityTaipeiRepublic Of ChinaChina And The United NationsUN General Assembly Resolution 2758International Recognition Of The Republic Of ChinaHoly SeeAmerican Institute In TaiwanChinese TaipeiPeople's Republic Of ChinaKuomintangCross-Strait RelationsMainland Affairs CouncilCross-Strait UnificationTaiwan IndependenceCross-Strait RelationsWikipedia:Citation NeededChinese Civil WarFirst Taiwan Strait CrisisSecond Taiwan Strait CrisisOne Country, Two SystemsSpecial Administrative Region Of The People's Republic Of ChinaAnti-Secession Law Of The People's Republic Of ChinaTaiwan And Weapons Of Mass DestructionTimeline Of The Republic Of China's Nuclear ProgramSaber RattlingJiang ZeminWikipedia:Citation NeededTaiwan IndependenceNuclear WeaponChen Shui-bianPresident Of The Republic Of ChinaWikipedia:Citation NeededRepublic Of ChinaRepublic Of China Legislative Election, 2008KuomintangPan-Blue CoalitionLegislative YuanChen Shui-bianDemocratic Progressive PartyPan-Green CoalitionTaiwan Solidarity UnionRepublic Of China Presidential Election, 2008KuomintangMa Ying-jeouRepublic Of ChinaPeople's Republic Of ChinaFrigateDestroyerCruise MissileSurface-to-surface MissilePeople's Liberation Army Air ForceChengdu J-7MiG-21SU-27Shenyang J-11Beyond Visual Range MissileChengdu J-10Sukhoi Su-30Air-to-groundRepublic Of China Air ForceF-16 Fighting FalconDassault-Breguet Mirage 2000AIDC Ching-kuoBVRUSS Kidd (DDG-993)Arleigh Burke Class DestroyerPeople's Liberation Army NavyPLAAFSpy SatelliteWikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:Citation NeededCongress Of The United StatesTaiwan Relations ActSeventh FleetAircraft CarrierUSS George Washington (CVN-73)Wikipedia:Citation NeededPreemptive StrikeWorld War IIPhilippinesWikipedia:Citation NeededUnited States Department Of DefenseRAND CorporationCruise MissileAircraft CarrierStealth AircraftBeyond-visual-range MissileWikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalEnlargeRepublic Of China NavyKang Ding Class FrigateSikorsky SH-60 SeahawkThird Taiwan Strait CrisisBallistic MissileLee Teng-huiWikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:Citation NeededTaiwan Nation PartyUnited States District Court For The District Of ColumbiaTreaty Of Peace With JapanPolitical QuestionUnited States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia CircuitWikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalGentlemen's AgreementDemocratic Progressive PartyTaiwan IndependenceKuomintangPeople First Party (Republic Of China)ROC Presidential Election, 2004Cross-Strait UnificationWikipedia:Citation NeededROC Legislative Election, 2004Anti-Secession Law Of The People's Republic Of ChinaROC National Assembly Election, 2005Republic Of ChinaRepublic Of China Legislative Election, 2008KuomintangPan-Blue CoalitionLegislative YuanChen Shui-bianDemocratic Progressive PartyPan-Green CoalitionTaiwan Solidarity UnionRepublic Of China Presidential Election, 2008KuomintangMa Ying-jeouTaiwan StraitCross-strait RelationsStraits Exchange FoundationAssociation For Relations Across The Taiwan StraitSpin (politics)Wikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:Accuracy DisputeTalk:Political Status Of TaiwanMainland Affairs CouncilOne Country, Two SystemsMacauTVBSMainland Affairs CouncilTVBSConstitution Of The Republic Of ChinaKuomintangDemocratic Progressive PartyIsland Of TaiwanCross-Strait RelationsDe JureMontevideo ConventionCustomary International LawPortal:TaiwanHistory Of TaiwanTaiwan Under Japanese RuleHistory Of Republic Of ChinaChinese Civil WarFebruary 28 IncidentTheory Of The Undetermined Status Of TaiwanFour-stage Theory Of The Republic Of ChinaRepublic Of China On TaiwanTaiwan ProvinceTaiwan Province, People's Republic Of ChinaTaiwan IndependenceCross-Strait UnificationCross-Strait RelationsAnti-Secession Law Of The People's Republic Of ChinaMilitary Power Of The People's Republic Of ChinaRepublic Of China And Weapons Of Mass DestructionPeople's Republic Of China And Weapons Of Mass DestructionMainland Affairs CouncilTaiwan Affairs OfficeForeign Relations Of TaiwanTaiwan In United NationsTaiwan Relations ActThree Communiqués51st StateHansardInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9781136685293Joint Chiefs Of StaffWikisource:General Order No. 1WikisourceForeign Relations Of The United StatesInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780891952701OCLCPeople's DailyStephen J. YatesCanadian Trade Office In TaipeiChina Radio InternationalTaipei TimesVoice Of AmericaInternational Standard Serial NumberCategory:CS1 Maint: Unrecognized LanguageTaipei TimesDigital Object IdentifierJonathan I. CharneyDigital Object IdentifierAgence France-PresseTaipei TimesSu Tseng-changDemocratic Progressive PartyTaipei TimesTaipei TimesTaipei TimesFox NewsTaipei TimesInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/978-1-134-04043-8European Federation Of Taiwanese AssociationsInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780471986775International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780815712909International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9781403968418International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780415365819International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780275988883International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780815731467International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780195306095International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780415407854International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780231135641WikisourceTemplate:Empire Of JapanTemplate Talk:Empire Of JapanEmpire Of JapanAgriculture In The Empire Of JapanCensorship In The Empire Of JapanDemographics Of Imperial JapanEconomy Of The Empire Of JapanEconomic History Of JapanEducation In The Empire Of JapanEugenics In JapanForeign Commerce And Shipping Of Empire Of JapanIndustrial Production In Shōwa JapanJapanese MilitarismJapanese NationalismStatism In Shōwa JapanEmpire Of Japan (internal Politics 1914–1944)State ShintoKazokuEmperor MeijiEmperor TaishōHirohitoFlag Of JapanRising Sun FlagImperial Seal Of JapanGovernment Seal Of JapanState Seal Of JapanPrivy Seal Of JapanKimigayoMeiji ConstitutionCharter OathForeign Relations Of Meiji JapanImperial Rescript On EducationKokutaiNational Spiritual Mobilization MovementPeace Preservation LawPolitical Parties Of The Empire Of JapanSupreme Court Of Judicature Of JapanTaisei YokusankaiTokubetsu Kōtō KeisatsuTonarigumiGreater East Asia ConferenceAdministrative Structure Of The Imperial Japanese GovernmentMinistry Of The Imperial HouseholdHome Ministry (Japan)Ministry Of War (pre-modern Japan)Ministry Of The ArmyMinistry Of The Navy (Japan)Ministry Of The TreasuryMinistry Of Foreign Affairs (Japan)Ministry Of Agriculture And CommerceMinistry Of Commerce And Industry (Japan)Ministry Of Munitions (Japan)Ministry Of Colonial AffairsMinistry Of Greater East AsiaEast Asia Development BoardAdministrative Structure Of The Imperial Japanese GovernmentDaijō-kanPrivy Council (Japan)Gozen KaigiNational DietHouse Of Peers (Japan)House Of Representatives (Japan)Armed Forces Of The Empire Of JapanImperial General HeadquartersImperial Rescript To Soldiers And SailorsSenjinkun Military CodeJapanese Nuclear Weapon ProgramKamikazeJapanese War CrimesSupreme War Council (Japan)Imperial Japanese ArmyImperial Japanese Army General Staff OfficeImperial Japanese Army Air ServiceImperial Japanese Army Railways And Shipping SectionImperial Guard (Japan)Imperial Way FactionJapanese HoldoutTōseihaImperial Japanese NavyImperial Japanese Navy General StaffImperial Japanese Navy Air ServiceImperial Japanese Navy Land ForcesFleet FactionTreaty FactionMeiji PeriodMeiji RestorationBoshin WarSatsuma RebellionFirst Sino-Japanese WarTriple InterventionBoxer RebellionAnglo-Japanese AllianceRusso-Japanese WarTaishō PeriodJapan During World War IJapan During The Siberian InterventionGeneral Election LawWashington Naval TreatyShōwa PeriodShōwa Financial CrisisPacification Of ManchukuoAnti-Comintern PactSecond Sino-Japanese WarTripartite PactSoviet–Japanese Border War (1939)Soviet–Japanese Neutrality PactPacific WarAtomic Bombings Of Hiroshima And NagasakiSoviet–Japanese War (1945)Surrender Of JapanPotsdam DeclarationGyokuon-hōsōOccupation Of JapanGreater East Asia Co-Prosperity SphereKarafuto PrefectureKorea Under Japanese RuleKwantung Leased TerritoryManchukuoSouth Pacific MandateTaiwan Under Japanese RuleList Of Territories Occupied By Imperial JapanJapanese Occupation Of British BorneoJapanese Occupation Of BurmaJapanese Occupation Of Hong KongJapanese Occupation Of The Dutch East IndiesJapanese Occupation Of MalayaJapanese Occupation Of The PhilippinesJapanese Occupation Of SingaporeThailand In World War IIVietnam In World War IISonnō JōiFukoku KyōheiHakkō IchiuList Of Japanese-run Internment Camps During World War IIGermany–Japan Industrial Co-operation Before World War IIRacial Equality ProposalShinmin No MichiShōwa ModanSocialist Thought In Imperial JapanYasukuni ShrineInternational Military Tribunal For The Far EastJapanese Dissidence During The Shōwa PeriodTemplate:Cold WarTemplate Talk:Cold WarCold WarUnited StatesSoviet UnionANZUSNATONon-Aligned MovementSoutheast Asia Treaty OrganizationWarsaw PactCold War IIMorgenthau PlanHukbalahap RebellionDekemvrianaPercentages AgreementYalta ConferenceGuerrilla War In The Baltic StatesForest BrothersOperation PriboiOperation JungleOccupation Of The Baltic StatesCursed SoldiersOperation UnthinkableOperation DownfallPotsdam ConferenceIgor GouzenkoDivision Of KoreaWar In Vietnam (1945–46)Operation BeleaguerOperation Blacklist FortyIran Crisis Of 1946Greek Civil WarBaruch PlanCorfu Channel IncidentTurkish Straits CrisisRestatement Of Policy On GermanyFirst Indochina WarTruman DoctrineAsian Relations ConferenceMay 1947 CrisesMarshall PlanComecon1948 Czechoslovak Coup D'étatTito–Stalin SplitBerlin BlockadeWestern BetrayalIron CurtainEastern BlocWestern BlocChinese Civil WarMalayan EmergencyAlbanian SubversionPapua ConflictBamboo CurtainKorean WarMcCarthyismEgyptian Revolution Of 19521953 Iranian Coup D'étatUprising Of 1953 In East GermanyDirty War (Mexico)Bricker Amendment1954 Guatemalan Coup D'étatGeneva Conference (1954)Vietnam WarFirst Taiwan Strait CrisisGeneva Summit (1955)Bandung ConferencePoznań 1956 ProtestsHungarian Revolution Of 1956Suez CrisisWe Will Bury YouOperation GladioArab Cold WarSyrian Crisis Of 19571958 Lebanon Crisis14 July RevolutionSputnik CrisisSecond Taiwan Strait Crisis1959 Tibetan UprisingCuban RevolutionKitchen DebateSino-Soviet SplitCongo Crisis1960 U-2 IncidentBay Of Pigs Invasion1960 Turkish Coup D'étatSoviet–Albanian SplitBerlin Crisis Of 1961Berlin WallPortuguese Colonial WarAngolan War Of IndependenceGuinea-Bissau War Of IndependenceMozambican War Of IndependenceCuban Missile CrisisSino-Indian WarCommunist Insurgency In SarawakRamadan RevolutionEritrean War Of IndependenceSand WarNorth Yemen Civil WarAden Emergency1963 Syrian Coup D'étatVietnam WarShifta WarGuatemalan Civil WarColombian ConflictNicaraguan Revolution1964 Brazilian Coup D'étatDominican Civil WarSouth African Border WarTransition To The New OrderDomino TheoryASEAN DeclarationLaotian Civil War1966 Syrian Coup D'étatArgentine RevolutionKorean DMZ Conflict (1966–1969)Greek Military Junta Of 1967–74Years Of Lead (Italy)USS Pueblo (AGER-2)Six-Day WarWar Of AttritionOmani Civil War (1963-76)Al-Wadiah WarProtests Of 1968May 1968 Events In FranceTlatelolco MassacreCultural RevolutionPortuguese Colonial WarPrague Spring1968 Polish Political CrisisCommunist Insurgency In Malaysia (1968–89)Warsaw Pact Invasion Of Czechoslovakia17 July RevolutionGoulash CommunismSino-Soviet Border ConflictCPP–NPA–NDF RebellionCorrective MoveDétenteTreaty On The Non-Proliferation Of Nuclear WeaponsBlack SeptemberCorrective Movement (Syria)Cambodian Civil WarKoza RiotRealpolitikPing-pong DiplomacyUgandan-Tanzanian War1971 Turkish Military MemorandumCorrective Revolution (Egypt)Four Power Agreement On BerlinBangladesh Liberation War1972 Nixon Visit To ChinaSouth YemenModern History Of YemenNDF RebellionEritrean Civil Wars1973 Chilean Coup D'étatYom Kippur War1973 Oil CrisisCarnation RevolutionSpanish Transition To DemocracyMetapolitefsiStrategic Arms Limitation TalksRhodesian Bush WarAngolan Civil WarMozambican Civil WarOromo ConflictOgaden WarEthiopian Civil WarLebanese Civil WarSino-Albanian SplitCambodian–Vietnamese WarSino-Vietnamese WarOperation CondorDirty War1976 Argentine Coup D'étatKorean Air Lines Flight 902Yemenite War Of 1979Grand Mosque SeizureIranian RevolutionSaur RevolutionNew Jewel Movement1979 Herat UprisingSeven Days To The River RhineStruggle Against Political Abuse Of Psychiatry In The Soviet UnionSoviet–Afghan War1980 Summer Olympics Boycott1984 Summer Olympics Boycott1980 Turkish Coup D'étatInternal Conflict In PeruCasamance ConflictUgandan Bush WarLord's Resistance Army InsurgencyEritrean Civil Wars1982 Ethiopian–Somali Border WarNdogboyosoi WarUS Invasion Of GrenadaAble Archer 83Strategic Defense InitiativeIran–Iraq WarSomali Rebellion1986 Black Sea Incident1988 Black Sea Bumping IncidentSouth Yemen Civil WarBougainville Civil War8888 UprisingHistory Of SolidaritySoviet Reaction To The Polish Crisis Of 1980–81ContrasCentral American CrisisRYANKorean Air Lines Flight 007People Power RevolutionGlasnostPerestroikaNagorno-Karabakh WarAfghan Civil War (1989–92)United States Invasion Of Panama1988 Polish StrikesTiananmen Square Protests Of 1989Revolutions Of 1989Berlin WallVelvet RevolutionRomanian RevolutionDie WendeMongolian Revolution Of 1990German ReunificationYemeni UnificationFall Of Communism In AlbaniaBreakup Of YugoslaviaDissolution Of The Soviet UnionDissolution Of CzechoslovakiaFrozen ConflictAbkhaz–Georgian ConflictDivision Of KoreaPolitical Status Of Nagorno-KarabakhGeorgian–Ossetian ConflictTransnistria WarSino-Indian Border DisputeNorth Borneo DisputeTruman DoctrineContainmentEisenhower DoctrineDomino TheoryHallstein DoctrineKennedy DoctrinePeaceful CoexistenceOstpolitikJohnson DoctrineBrezhnev DoctrineNixon DoctrineUlbricht DoctrineCarter DoctrineReagan DoctrineRollbackSovereignty Of Puerto Rico During The Cold WarCapitalismChicago School Of EconomicsKeynesian EconomicsMonetarismNeoclassical EconomicsReaganomicsSupply-side EconomicsThatcherismCommunismMarxism–LeninismPolitics Of Fidel CastroEurocommunismGuevarismHoxhaismJucheMaoismTrotskyismNaxaliteStalinismTitoismFascismIslamismLiberal DemocracySocial DemocracyThird-WorldismWhite SupremacyAssociation Of Southeast Asian NationsCentral Intelligence AgencyComeconEuropean Economic CommunityKGBSecret Intelligence ServiceNon-Aligned MovementSouth Asian Association For Regional CooperationSafari ClubStasiActive MeasuresCrusade For FreedomIzvestiaPravdaRadio Free Europe/Radio LibertyRed ScareTelegraph Agency Of The Soviet UnionVoice Of AmericaVoice Of RussiaArms RaceNuclear Arms RaceSpace RaceAllied Intervention In The Russian Civil WarSoviet Espionage In The United StatesSoviet Union–United States RelationsList Of Soviet Union–United States SummitsRussian Espionage In The United StatesAmerican Espionage In The Soviet Union And Russian FederationRussia–NATO RelationsBrinkmanship (Cold War)CIA And The Cultural Cold WarCold War IICategory:Cold WarPortal:Cold WarTimeline Of Events In The Cold WarList Of Conflicts Related To The Cold WarTemplate:Chinese Civil WarTemplate Talk:Chinese Civil WarChinese Civil WarTemplate:Campaignbox Chinese Civil WarKuomintangTaiwanNational Revolutionary ArmyRepublic Of China Armed ForcesCommunist Party Of ChinaChinaChinese Red ArmyEighth Route ArmyNew Fourth ArmyCommunist-controlled China (1927–49)People's Liberation ArmyCold WarFirst United FrontShanghai MassacreNanchang UprisingAutumn Harvest UprisingGuangzhou UprisingSino-Soviet Conflict (1929)Encirclement CampaignsChinese Soviet RepublicFujian People's GovernmentLong MarchXi'an IncidentSecond United FrontChongqing NegotiationsDouble Tenth AgreementJiaochangkou IncidentOperation BeleaguerChinese Communist RevolutionSS KiangyaLiaoshen CampaignHuaihai CampaignPingjin CampaignTaiping (steamer)Yangtze River Crossing CampaignKuomintang Islamic InsurgencyLanding Operation On Hainan IslandWanshan Archipelago CampaignBattle Of ChamdoIncorporation Of Tibet Into The People's Republic Of ChinaFirst Taiwan Strait CrisisSecond Taiwan Strait CrisisCampaign At The China–Burma Border (1960–61)Third Taiwan Strait Crisis2005 Pan–Blue Visits To Mainland ChinaTibetan Government-in-ExileChinese UnificationHong Kong IndependenceInner Mongolian Independence MovementManchurian NationalismTaiwan Independence MovementTibetan Independence MovementEast Turkestan Independence MovementCross-Strait RelationsTemplate:Cross-Strait RelationsTemplate Talk:Cross-Strait RelationsCross-Strait RelationsChinaTaiwanTaiwan Affairs OfficeAssociation For Relations Across The Taiwan StraitsCommunist Party Of ChinaRevolutionary Committee Of The Chinese KuomintangTaiwan Democratic Self-Government LeagueParamount LeaderXi JinpingHu JintaoJiang ZeminDeng XiaopingChen DemingChen YunlinZhang ZhijunWang Yi (politician)Wang DaohanMainland Affairs CouncilStraits Exchange FoundationKuomintangDemocratic Progressive PartyNational Unification CouncilPresident Of The Republic Of ChinaTsai Ing-wenMa Ying-jeouChen Shui-bianLee Teng-huiLin Join-saneWang Yu-chiChiang Pin-kungLai Shin-yuanKoo Chen-fuMainland ChinaHong KongMacauTaiwanPenghuKinmenMatsu IslandsList Of Chinese FlagsTreaty Of ShimonosekiRetrocession DayFebruary 28 IncidentChinese Civil WarFirst Taiwan Strait CrisisSecond Taiwan Strait CrisisUnited Nations General Assembly Resolution 27581987 Lieyu MassacreThird Taiwan Strait CrisisAnti-Secession Law2005 Pan–Blue Visits To Mainland ChinaCross-Strait CharterSunflower Student Movement2014 Wang–Zhang Meetings2015 Xi–Chu MeetingMa–Xi MeetingKinmen AgreementWang–Koo SummitCross-Strait High-level TalksEconomic Cooperation Framework AgreementCross-Strait Economic, Trade And Culture ForumStraits ForumShanghai-Taipei City ForumCross-Strait Service Trade AgreementCross-Strait Peace ForumChina And The United NationsChinese UnificationOne Country, Two SystemsTaiwan Independence Movement1992 ConsensusThree NoesThree LinksOne-China PolicyTwo ChinasOne Country On Each SideThree NoesSix AssurancesOne Country On Each SideFour Noes And One WithoutZhonghua MinzuSpecial Non-state-to-state RelationsCross-Strait Economic ZoneFree Area Of The Republic Of ChinaChinese TaipeiTemplate:Foreign Relations Of TaiwanTemplate Talk:Foreign Relations Of TaiwanTaiwanForeign Relations Of TaiwanAfrica–China RelationsBurkina Faso–Taiwan RelationsChad–Taiwan RelationsThe Gambia–Taiwan RelationsMalawi–Taiwan RelationsSão Tomé And Príncipe–Taiwan RelationsSouth Africa–Taiwan RelationsNational Emblem Of The Republic Of ChinaBelize–Taiwan RelationsBrazil–Taiwan RelationsCanada–Taiwan RelationsChile–Taiwan RelationsDominican Republic–Taiwan RelationsMexico–Taiwan RelationsParaguay–Taiwan RelationsTaiwan–United States RelationsTaiwan–Venezuela RelationsBangladesh–Taiwan RelationsCross-Strait RelationsHong Kong–Taiwan RelationsIndia–Taiwan RelationsIndonesia–Taiwan RelationsJapan–Taiwan RelationsMalaysia–Taiwan RelationsMongolia–Taiwan RelationsMyanmar–Taiwan RelationsPhilippines–Taiwan RelationsSingapore–Taiwan RelationsTaiwan–Saudi Arabia RelationsSouth Korea–Taiwan RelationsTaiwan–Vietnam RelationsCzech Republic–Taiwan RelationsDenmark–Taiwan RelationsHoly See–Taiwan RelationsItaly–Taiwan RelationsLatvia–Taiwan RelationsPoland–Taiwan RelationsRussia–Taiwan RelationsTaiwan–Ukraine RelationsTaiwan–United Kingdom RelationsAustralia–Taiwan RelationsSino-Pacific RelationsChina And The United NationsSino-Arab RelationsCaribbean–China RelationsSino-Third World RelationsMinistry Of Foreign Affairs (Republic Of China)Taipei Economic And Cultural Representative OfficeTaiwan Relations ActTaiwan Travel ActList Of Diplomatic Missions Of TaiwanList Of Diplomatic Missions In TaiwanTaiwan PassportVisa Policy Of TaiwanVisa Requirements For Taiwanese CitizensTimeline Of Diplomatic Relations Of TaiwanHelp:CategoryCategory:Cross-Strait RelationsCategory:History Of TaiwanCategory:Politics Of TaiwanCategory:Taiwanese LawCategory:SovereigntyCategory:CS1 Chinese-language Sources (zh)Category:CS1 Spanish-language Sources (es)Category:CS1 Maint: Unrecognized LanguageCategory:CS1 Uses Chinese-language Script (zh)Category:Use Dmy Dates From February 2015Category:Articles Needing Additional References From November 2013Category:All Articles Needing Additional ReferencesCategory:Articles Containing Chinese-language TextCategory:All Articles With Unsourced StatementsCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From August 2010Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From October 2011Category:Articles Needing Additional References From November 2007Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From August 2016Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From January 2012Category:Articles That May Contain Original Research From May 2009Category:All Articles That May Contain Original ResearchCategory:All Accuracy DisputesCategory:Articles With Disputed Statements From September 2009Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From October 2008Category:Articles With Specifically Marked Weasel-worded Phrases From October 2010Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From October 2010Category:Articles That May Contain Original Research From October 2010Category:All Articles With Specifically Marked Weasel-worded PhrasesCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From February 2007Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From March 2009Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From May 2007Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From January 2010Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From September 2009Category:Articles Needing Additional References From November 2011Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From January 2008Category:Articles With Disputed Statements From April 2008Discussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link