Contents 1 Background 2 Jurisdictions 2.1 European Patent Organisation 2.2 Germany 2.3 United States 3 See also 4 References 5 Further reading

Background[edit] Further information: Patent, Prior art, and Internet In most patent laws, an (alleged) invention must be new and inventive (or non-obvious, which is basically synonymous of inventive) to be considered patentable, i.e., to be validly patented. An invention is considered new if it does not form part of the prior art (or state of the art), i.e., if it was not already disclosed in the prior art.[2] An invention is considered inventive if it is not obvious in view of the prior art.[3] The prior art is essentially everything available to the public before the filing date of the patent.[4] In practice, if a device or a method was already known (e.g. described in a scientific paper) before the filing date[5] of the patent covering the device or the method or if the device or method is obvious in view of what was known before the filing date, then, in general, it is not considered new (because known before the filing date) or not considered inventive (because obvious in view of what was known before the filing date of the patent), and then not considered patentable. A patent cannot be obtained for the device or method, or, if obtained (granted), it can generally be "invalidated". The identification of the prior art is therefore of utmost importance to determine whether an invention is patentable, i.e. whether a patent can be granted for an invention (or whether a patent granted for an invention is valid). The purpose of the novelty criterion is to prevent the prior art being patented again.[6] The Internet is a popular source of technical information and is of particular interest for the purposes of establishing the prior art. Its use is however surrounded by concerns as to its reliability.[7]

Jurisdictions[edit] European Patent Organisation[edit] European Patent Office (EPO) headquarters in Munich, Germany. In August 2009, the European Patent Office (EPO) published a "notice concerning internet citations"[8] to "[set] out the practice followed at the EPO when citing documents retrieved from the internet in both the European and the PCT procedure." The notice is not binding on the Boards of Appeal.[9] Regarding the standard of proof, the notice reads: "When an internet document is cited against an application or patent, the same facts are to be established as for any other piece of evidence, including standard paper publications ... This evaluation is made according to the principle of "free evaluation of evidence" ... That means that each piece of evidence is given appropriate weight according to its probative value, which is evaluated in view of the particular circumstances of each case. For assessing these circumstances, the balance of probabilities will be used as the standard of proof, as generally applied by the boards of appeal. According to this standard, it is not sufficient that the alleged fact (e.g. the publication date) is merely probable; the examining division must be convinced that it is correct. It does mean, however, that proof beyond reasonable doubt ("up to the hilt") of the alleged fact is not required."[10] In 2012, Board of Appeal 3.5.04 issued two decisions, namely T 1553/06 and T 2/09, on the issue of Internet disclosures.[11] The two decisions originate from a contrived test case built by the parties, i.e. the patent proprietor and the opponent.[12] In decision T 1553/06 (page 72), the Board proposed a test to decide whether a document stored on the World Wide Web has been made available to the public, whereas, in decision T2/09, the Board dealt with the alleged public availability of an email transmitted over the Internet.[11] The EPO Guidelines cite the Internet Archive as well as Wikipedia as possible and credible sources of prior art.[13] Germany[edit] In 2002, "the Bundespatentgericht in case BPatG 17W (pat) 1/02 (see GRUR 2003 Heft 04, pp 323-325) confirmed in later BPatG 17W (pat) 47/00, ruled that the Internet was not a reliable source for determining the state of the art. This applied also to web archives such as the Internet Archive."[14][needs update] United States[edit] Internet publications can be relied on as printed publications and thus as prior art under United States patent law. The effective date of the publication will be determined by evidence, such a date of posting listed in the publication itself, or a date of archiving in the Internet Archive.[15] In August 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) ordered examiners to stop using Wikipedia as a source of information for determining the patentability of inventions.[16][needs update] However, according to The Patent Librarian's Notebook's blog, examiners continue to cite it, and the number of United States patents issued in 2008 that cited Wikipedia articles nearly doubled to 477, compared to 2007.[17] It increased to 809 citations in 2009.[18]

See also[edit] Public participation in patent examination Search report

References[edit] ^ T 1134/06, Reasons 3.2: "It is thus at the present state of affairs often very difficult to establish with a high degree of reliability what exactly appeared on a web site and when."(emphasis added) ^ See for instance, in the European Patent Convention (EPC), Article 54(1) EPC. ^ See for instance, in the EPC, Article 56 EPC. ^ The definition of the prior art, i.e. what is part of the prior art and what is not part of the prior art, however depends on the legislation considered, since patent laws are essentially territorial in nature. ^ or priority date. ^ Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (Fifth edition 2006), pages 46-47. (pdf 4.1 MB). ^ T 1134/06, Reasons 3.6. ^ EPO, Notice from the European Patent Office concerning internet citations, Official Journal EPO, 8-9/2009, 456. See also EPO practice on internet citations, Patent Information News issue 3/2009, p. 2. ^ Article 23(3) EPC ^ Notice from the European Patent Office concerning internet citations, section 3.2. ^ a b Laurent Teyssedre (18 April 2012). "T1553/06 : accessibilité de documents sur internet" [T1553/06 : accessibility of documents on the Internet]. Le blog du droit européen des brevets (in French). Retrieved 21 April 2012.  ^ Laurent Teyssedre (17 April 2012). "T2/09 et T1553/06 : une opposition "test-case" est recevable" [T2/09 and T1553/06 : a "test-case" opposition is admissible]. Le blog du droit européen des brevets (in French). Retrieved 21 April 2012.  ^ Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, section g-iv, 7.5.4 : "Disclosures which have no date or an unreliable date" ^ T 1134/06, Reasons 3.3.1. ^ MPEP § 2128 "Printed Publications" as Prior Art ^ Woellert, Lorraine (2006-09-04). "Kicking Wiki Out Of The Patent Office". Business Week. Retrieved 2009-02-28.  ^ White, Michael (2009-02-15). "Wikipedia References Increase". Retrieved 2009-02-28.  ^ White, Michael (2010-01-07). "Wikipedia Citations in Patents Up 59 Percent". Retrieved 2010-02-03. 

Further reading[edit] (in German) Bundespatentgericht Beschluss vom 17.10.2002 17 W (pat) 1/02 Verfahren zum Vorabspeichern von Computernetzwerk-Information JurPC Web-Dok. 121/2003 Decision T 1134/06 of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, January 16, 2007. Klicznik, Alexander (2007). Neuartige Offenbarungsmittel des Standes der Technik im Patenrecht (in German). Heymanns. ISBN 978-3-452-26714-6.  Decision T 286/10 (Sécurisation d'un accès à une ressource numérique/BOUYGES), points 2-5 (Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.06 of the European Patent Office 21 May 2014). Retrieved from "" Categories: Computer lawPatent lawHidden categories: CS1 French-language sources (fr)Wikipedia articles in need of updating from September 2014Articles with German-language external linksCS1 German-language sources (de)

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 6 March 2018, at 22:17. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.188","walltime":"0.247","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1270,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":20084,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":2280,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":27,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":2,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":0,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":11417,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 221.353 1 -total"," 38.53% 85.293 2 Template:Old"," 34.93% 77.313 1 Template:Reflist"," 30.86% 68.316 2 Template:Fix-span"," 25.36% 56.132 5 Template:Category_handler"," 23.45% 51.903 5 Template:Cite_web"," 12.57% 27.828 1 Template:Further"," 11.21% 24.803 2 Template:Fix/category"," 9.70% 21.480 2 Template:DMCA"," 8.57% 18.976 2 Template:Dated_maintenance_category"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.072","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":3264486,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1271","timestamp":"20180316005215","ttl":3600,"transientcontent":true}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":72,"wgHostname":"mw1246"});});

Internet_as_a_source_of_prior_art - Photos and All Basic Informations

Internet_as_a_source_of_prior_art More Links

EnlargeWorld Wide WebHyperlinkPatent LawNovelty (patent)Inventive Step And Non-obviousnessPatentabilityPatentPrior ArtInternetNovelty (patent)Inventive StepNon-obviousPrior ArtFiling DateEnlargeMunichGermanyEuropean Patent OfficeBalance Of ProbabilitiesProof Beyond Reasonable DoubtTest Case (law)EPO GuidelinesBundespatentgerichtGewerblicher Rechtsschutz Und UrheberrechtWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Dates And NumbersPublicationUnited States Patent LawUnited States Patent And Trademark OfficePatent ExaminerPatentabilityWikipedia:Manual Of Style/Dates And NumbersPublic Participation In Patent ExaminationSearch ReportEuropean Patent ConventionEuropean Patent ConventionEuropean Patent ConventionPriority RightOfficial Journal EPOPatent Information NewsEuropean Patent ConventionGuidelines For Examination In The European Patent OfficeBusiness WeekBoards Of Appeal Of The European Patent OfficeInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/978-3-452-26714-6Help:CategoryCategory:Computer LawCategory:Patent LawCategory:CS1 French-language Sources (fr)Category:Wikipedia Articles In Need Of Updating From September 2014Category:Articles With German-language External LinksCategory:CS1 German-language Sources (de)Discussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link