Contents 1 Definitions 2 Relation to transmitter output power 3 Antenna gain and directivity 4 Dipole vs. isotropic radiators 5 Polarization 6 FM example 6.1 United States regulatory usage 7 Microwave band issues 8 Lower-frequency issues 9 Related terms 10 HAAT 11 See also 12 References


Definitions[edit] Effective radiated power and effective isotropic radiated power both measure the amount of power a radio transmitter and antenna (or other source of electromagnetic waves) radiates in a specific direction: in the direction of maximum signal strength (the "main lobe") of its radiation pattern.[1][2][3][4] This maximum radiated power is dependent on two factors: the total power output and the radiation pattern of the antenna – how much of that power is radiated in the desired direction. The latter factor is quantified by the antenna gain, which is the ratio of the signal strength radiated by an antenna to that radiated by a standard antenna. For example, a 1,000-watt transmitter feeding an antenna with a gain of 4 (6 dBi) will have the same signal strength in the direction of its main lobe, and thus the same ERP and EIRP, as a 4,000-watt transmitter feeding an antenna with a gain of 1 (0 dBi). So ERP and EIRP are measures of radiated power that can compare transmitters with different antennas on an equal basis. The difference between ERP and EIRP is that antenna gain has traditionally been measured in two different units, comparing the antenna to two different standard antennas; an isotropic antenna and a half-wave dipole antenna: Isotropic gain is the ratio of the power density I max {\displaystyle I_{\text{max}}} (signal strength in watts per square meter) received at a point far from the antenna (in the far field) in the direction of its maximum radiation (main lobe), to the power I max,isotropic {\displaystyle I_{\text{max,isotropic}}} at the same point radiated by a hypothetical lossless isotropic antenna, which radiates equal power in all directions G i = I max I max,isotropic {\displaystyle \mathrm {G} _{\text{i}}={I_{\text{max}} \over I_{\text{max,isotropic}}}} Gain is often expressed in logarithmic units of decibels (dB). The decibel gain relative to an isotropic antenna (dBi) is given by G (dBi) = 10 log ⁡ I max I max,isotropic {\displaystyle \mathrm {G} {\text{(dBi)}}=10\log {I_{\text{max}} \over I_{\text{max,isotropic}}}} Dipole gain is the ratio of the power density received from the antenna in the direction of its maximum radiation to the power density I max,dipole {\displaystyle I_{\text{max,dipole}}} received from a lossless half-wave dipole antenna in the direction of its maximum radiation G d = I max I max,dipole {\displaystyle \mathrm {G} _{\text{d}}={I_{\text{max}} \over I_{\text{max,dipole}}}} The decibel gain relative to a dipole (dBd) is given by G (dBd) = 10 log ⁡ I max I max,dipole {\displaystyle \mathrm {G} {\text{(dBd)}}=10\log {I_{\text{max}} \over I_{\text{max,dipole}}}} In contrast to an isotropic antenna, the dipole has a "donut-shaped" radiation pattern, its radiated power is maximum in directions perpendicular to the antenna, declining to zero on the antenna axis. Since the radiation of the dipole is concentrated in horizontal directions, the gain of a half-wave dipole is greater than that of an isotropic antenna. The isotropic gain of a half-wave dipole is 1.64, or in decibels 10 log 1.64 = 2.15 dBi, so G i = 1.64 G d {\displaystyle G_{\text{i}}=1.64G_{\text{d}}} In decibels G (dBi) = G (dBd) + 2.15 {\displaystyle G{\text{(dBi)}}=G{\text{(dBd)}}+2.15} The two measures EIRP and ERP are based on the two different standard antennas above:[1][3][2][4] EIRP is defined as the RMS power input in watts required to a lossless isotropic antenna to give the same maximum power density far from the antenna as the actual transmitter. It is equal to the power input to the transmitter's antenna multiplied by the isotropic antenna gain E I R P = G i P in {\displaystyle \mathrm {EIRP} =G_{\text{i}}P_{\text{in}}} The ERP and EIRP are also often expressed in decibels (dB). The input power in decibels is usually calculated with comparison to a reference level of one watt (W): P in ( d B w ) = 10 log ⁡ P in {\displaystyle P_{\text{in}}\mathrm {(dBw)} =10\log P_{\text{in}}} . Since multiplication of two factors is equivalent to addition of their decibel values E I R P ( d B w ) = G (dBi) + P in ( d B w ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {EIRP(dBw)} =G{\text{(dBi)}}+P_{\text{in}}\mathrm {(dBw)} } ERP is defined as the RMS power input in watts required to a lossless half-wave dipole antenna to give the same maximum power density far from the antenna as the actual transmitter. It is equal to the power input to the transmitter's antenna multiplied by the antenna gain relative to a half-wave dipole E R P = G d P in {\displaystyle \mathrm {ERP} =G_{\text{d}}P_{\text{in}}} In decibels E R P ( d B w ) = G (dBd) + P in ( d B w ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {ERP(dBw)} =G{\text{(dBd)}}+P_{\text{in}}\mathrm {(dBw)} } Since the two definitions of gain only differ by a constant factor, so do ERP and EIRP E I R P ( W ) = 1.64 ⋅ E R P ( W ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {EIRP(W)} =1.64\cdot \mathrm {ERP(W)} } In decibels E I R P ( d B w ) = E R P (dBw) + 2.15 {\displaystyle \mathrm {EIRP(dBw)} =\mathrm {ERP} {\text{(dBw)}}+2.15}


Relation to transmitter output power[edit] The transmitter is usually connected to the antenna through a transmission line. Since the transmission line may have significant losses L {\displaystyle L} , the power applied to the antenna is usually less than the output power of the transmitter P TX {\displaystyle P_{\text{TX}}} . The relation of ERP and EIRP to transmitter output power is E I R P ( d B w ) = P TX ( d B w ) − L ( d B ) + G (dBi) {\displaystyle \mathrm {EIRP(dBw)} =P_{\text{TX}}\mathrm {(dBw)} -L\mathrm {(dB)} +G{\text{(dBi)}}} E R P ( d B w ) = P TX ( d B w ) − L ( d B ) + G (dBi) − 2.15 {\displaystyle \mathrm {ERP(dBw)} =P_{\text{TX}}\mathrm {(dBw)} -L\mathrm {(dB)} +G{\text{(dBi)}}-2.15} Losses in the antenna itself are included in the gain.


Antenna gain and directivity[edit] Antenna gain is closely related to directivity and often incorrectly used interchangeably. However, gain is always less than directivity by a factor called radiation efficiency, η. Whereas directivity is entirely a function of wavelength and the geometry and type of antenna, gain takes into account the losses that always occur in the real world. Specifically, accelerating charge (time varying current) causes electromagnetic radiation per Maxwell's equations. Therefore, antennas use a current distribution on radiating elements to generate electromagnetic energy that propagates away from the antenna. This coupling is never 100% efficient (by Laws of Thermodynamics), and therefore antenna gain will always be less than directivity by this efficiency factor.


Dipole vs. isotropic radiators[edit] Because ERP is calculated as antenna gain (in a given direction) as compared with the maximum directivity of a half-wave dipole antenna, it creates a mathematically virtual effective dipole antenna oriented in the direction of the receiver. In other words, a notional receiver in a given direction from the transmitter would receive the same power if the source were replaced with an ideal dipole oriented with maximum directivity and matched polarization towards the receiver and with an antenna input power equal to the ERP. The receiver would not be able to determine a difference. Maximum directivity of an ideal half-wave dipole is a constant, i.e., 0 dBd = 2.15 dBi. Therefore, ERP is always 2.15 dB less than EIRP. The ideal dipole antenna could be further replaced by an isotropic radiator (a purely mathematical device which cannot exist in the real world), and the receiver cannot know the difference so long as the input power is increased by 2.15 dB. Unfortunately, the distinction between dBd and dBi is often left unstated and the reader is sometimes forced to infer which was used. For example, a Yagi-Uda antenna is constructed from several dipoles arranged at precise intervals to create better energy focusing (directivity) than a simple dipole. Since it is constructed from dipoles, often its antenna gain is expressed in dBd, but listed only as dB. Obviously this ambiguity is undesirable with respect to engineering specifications. A Yagi-Uda antenna's maximum directivity is 8.77 dBd = 10.92 dBi. Its gain necessarily must be less than this by the factor η, which must be negative in units of dB. Neither ERP nor EIRP can be calculated without knowledge of the power accepted by the antenna, i.e., it is not correct to use units of dBd or dBi with ERP and EIRP. Let us assume a 100-watt (20 dBW) transmitter with losses of 6 dB prior to the antenna. ERP < 22.77dBW and EIRP < 24.92dBW, both less than ideal by η in dB. Assuming that the receiver is in the first side-lobe of the transmitting antenna, and each value is further reduced by 7.2 dB, which is the decrease in directivity from the main to side-lobe of a Yagi-Uda. Therefore, anywhere along the side-lobe direction from this transmitter, a blind receiver could not tell the difference if a Yagi-Uda was replaced with either an ideal dipole (oriented towards the receiver) or an isotropic radiator with antenna input power increased by 1.57 dB.[5]


Polarization[edit] Polarization has not been taken into account so far, but it must be properly clarified. When considering the dipole radiator previously we assumed that it was perfectly aligned with the receiver. Now assume, however, that the receiving antenna is circularly polarized, and there will be a minimum 3 dB polarization loss regardless of antenna orientation. If the receiver is also a dipole, it is possible to align it orthogonally to the transmitter such that theoretically zero energy is received. However, this polarization loss is not accounted for in the calculation of ERP or EIRP. Rather, the receiving system designer must account for this loss as appropriate. For example, a cellular telephone tower has a fixed linear polarization, but the mobile handset must function well at any arbitrary orientation. Therefore, a handset design might provide dual polarization receive on the handset so that captured energy is maximized regardless of orientation, or the designer might use a circularly polarized antenna and account for the extra 3 dB of loss with amplification.


FM example[edit] An antenna tower consisting of a high-gain collinear antenna array. For example, an FM radio station which advertises that it has 100,000 watts of power actually has 100,000 watts ERP, and not an actual 100,000-watt transmitter. The transmitter power output (TPO) of such a station typically may be 10,000 to 20,000 watts, with a gain factor of 5 to 10 (5× to 10×, or 7 to 10 dB). In most antenna designs, gain is realized primarily by concentrating power toward the horizontal plane and suppressing it at upward and downward angles, through the use of phased arrays of antenna elements. The distribution of power versus elevation angle is known as the vertical pattern. When an antenna is also directional horizontally, gain and ERP will vary with azimuth (compass direction). Rather than the average power over all directions, it is the apparent power in the direction of the antenna's main lobe that is quoted as a station's ERP (this statement is just another way of stating the definition of ERP). This is particularly applicable to the huge ERPs reported for shortwave broadcasting stations, which use very narrow beam widths to get their signals across continents and oceans. United States regulatory usage[edit] ERP for FM radio in the United States is always relative to a theoretical reference half-wave dipole antenna. (That is, when calculating ERP, the most direct approach is to work with antenna gain in dBd). To deal with antenna polarization, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lists ERP in both the horizontal and vertical measurements for FM and TV. Horizontal is the standard for both, but if the vertical ERP is larger it will be used instead. The maximum ERP for US FM broadcasting is usually 100,000 watts (FM Zone II) or 50,000 watts (in the generally more densely populated Zones I and I-A), though exact restrictions vary depending on the class of license and the antenna height above average terrain (HAAT).[6] Some stations have been grandfathered in or, very infrequently, been given a waiver, and can exceed normal restrictions.


Microwave band issues[edit] For most microwave systems, a completely non-directional isotropic antenna (one which radiates equally and perfectly well in every direction – a physical impossibility) is used as a reference antenna, and then one speaks of EIRP (effective isotropic radiated power) rather than ERP. This includes satellite transponders, radar, and other systems which use microwave dishes and reflectors rather than dipole-style antennas.


Lower-frequency issues[edit] In the case of medium wave (AM) stations in the United States, power limits are set to the actual transmitter power output, and ERP is not used in normal calculations. Omnidirectional antennas used by a number of stations radiate the signal equally in all directions. Directional arrays are used to protect co- or adjacent channel stations, usually at night, but some run directionally 24 hours. While antenna efficiency and ground conductivity are taken into account when designing such an array, the FCC database shows the station's transmitter power output, not ERP.


Related terms[edit] Effective monopole radiated power (EMRP) may be used in Europe, particularly in relation to mediumwave broadcasting antennas. This is the same as ERP, except that a short vertical antenna (i.e. a short monopole) is used as the reference antenna instead of a half-wave dipole.


HAAT[edit] Main article: Height above average terrain The height above average terrain for VHF and higher frequencies is extremely important when considering ERP, as the signal coverage (broadcast range) produced by a given ERP dramatically increases with antenna height. Because of this, it is possible for a station of only a few hundred watts ERP to cover more area than a station of a few thousand watts ERP, if its signal travels above obstructions on the ground.


See also[edit] Nominal power List of broadcast station classes


References[edit] ^ a b Jones, Graham A.; Layer, David H.; Osenkowsky, Thomas G. (2007). National Association of Broadcasters Engineering Handbook, 10th Ed. Elsevier. p. 1632. ISBN 1136034102.  ^ a b Huang, Yi; Boyle, Kevin (2008). Antennas: From Theory to Practice. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 117–118. ISBN 0470772921.  ^ a b Seybold, John S. (2005). Introduction to RF Propagation. John Wiley and Sons. p. 292. ISBN 0471743682.  ^ a b Weik, Martin H. (2012). Communications Standard Dictionary. Springer Science and Business Media. p. 327. ISBN 146156672X.  ^ Cheng, David K. (1992). Field and Wave Electromagnetics, 2nd Ed. Addison-Wesley. pp. 648–650.  ^ 47 CFR 73.211 v t e Radio spectrum (ITU) ELF 3 Hz/100 Mm 30 Hz/10 Mm SLF 30 Hz/10 Mm 300 Hz/1 Mm ULF 300 Hz/1 Mm 3 kHz/100 km VLF 3 kHz/100 km 30 kHz/10 km LF 30 kHz/10 km 300 kHz/1 km MF 300 kHz/1 km 3 MHz/100 m HF 3 MHz/100 m 30 MHz/10 m VHF 30 MHz/10 m 300 MHz/1 m UHF 300 MHz/1 m 3 GHz/100 mm SHF 3 GHz/100 mm 30 GHz/10 mm EHF 30 GHz/10 mm 300 GHz/1 mm THF 300 GHz/1 mm 3 THz/0.1 mm Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Effective_radiated_power&oldid=824664664" Categories: ITU Radio RegulationsAntennas (radio)Power (physics)Broadcast engineeringLogarithmic scales of measurement


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages CatalàČeštinaDeutschEestiEspañolFrançaisHrvatskiItalianoעבריתNederlands日本語PolskiSlovenčinaSvenskaTürkçe Edit links This page was last edited on 8 February 2018, at 19:02. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.188","walltime":"0.282","ppvisitednodes":{"value":934,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":27619,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":2430,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":8,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":0,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 148.990 1 -total"," 61.28% 91.301 1 Template:Reflist"," 45.63% 67.990 5 Template:Cite_book"," 20.80% 30.986 1 Template:Main_article"," 17.74% 26.437 1 Template:Radio_spectrum"," 16.20% 24.131 1 Template:Navbox_with_columns"," 8.36% 12.457 1 Template:Navbox"," 1.59% 2.365 1 Template:Main_other"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.057","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":2485855,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1254","timestamp":"20180217145819","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":392,"wgHostname":"mw1254"});});


Effective_radiated_power - Photos and All Basic Informations

Effective_radiated_power More Links

Institute Of Electrical And Electronics EngineersRadio FrequencyRadio TransmitterPower (physics)Watt (unit)Dipole AntennaMain LobeAntenna GainTelecommunicationBroadcastingBroadcasting StationIsotropic AntennaDecibelMain LobeRadiation PatternAntenna GainIsotropic AntennaHalf-wave DipoleFar FieldIsotropic AntennaDecibelHalf-wave DipoleIsotropic AntennaDecibelWatt (unit)Half-wave DipoleTransmission LineMaxwell's EquationsLaws Of ThermodynamicsDipole AntennaPolarization (waves)Yagi-Uda AntennaEnlargeCollinear Antenna ArrayFrequency ModulationRadio StationAdvertiseWattTransmitter Power OutputDecibelHorizontal PlanePhased ArrayElevation AngleAzimuthCompassAverageShortwaveBeam WidthContinentOceanDipole AntennaFederal Communications CommissionMeasurementHeight Above Average TerrainGrandfather ClauseWaiverMicrowaveIsotropic AntennaRadiationEIRPSatelliteTransponderMedium WaveUnited StatesMediumwaveMonopole AntennaDipoleHeight Above Average TerrainBroadcast RangeNominal PowerList Of Broadcast Station ClassesInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/1136034102International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0470772921International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0471743682International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/146156672XCode Of Federal RegulationsTemplate:Radio SpectrumTemplate Talk:Radio SpectrumRadio SpectrumExtremely Low FrequencySuper Low FrequencyUltra Low FrequencyVery Low FrequencyLow FrequencyMedium FrequencyHigh FrequencyVery High FrequencyUltra High FrequencySuper High FrequencyExtremely High FrequencyTremendously High FrequencyHelp:CategoryCategory:ITU Radio RegulationsCategory:Antennas (radio)Category:Power (physics)Category:Broadcast EngineeringCategory:Logarithmic Scales Of MeasurementDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link