Contents 1 Overview 2 Versions history 3 Servants 4 Features 4.1 Objects By Reference 4.2 Data By Value 4.3 Objects By Value (OBV) 4.4 CORBA Component Model (CCM) 4.5 Portable interceptors 4.6 General InterORB Protocol (GIOP) 4.7 VMCID (Vendor Minor Codeset ID) 4.8 Corba Location (CorbaLoc) 5 Benefits 6 Problems and criticism 7 See also 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links

Overview[edit] CORBA enables communication between software written in different languages and running on different computers. Implementation details from specific operating systems, programming languages, and hardware platforms are all removed from the responsibility of developers who use CORBA. CORBA normalizes the method-call semantics between application objects residing either in the same address-space (application) or in remote address-spaces (same host, or remote host on a network). Version 1.0 was released in October 1991. CORBA uses an interface definition language (IDL) to specify the interfaces that objects present to the outer world. CORBA then specifies a mapping from IDL to a specific implementation language like C++ or Java. Standard mappings exist for Ada, C, C++, C++11, COBOL, Java, Lisp, PL/I, Object Pascal, Python, Ruby and Smalltalk. Non-standard mappings exist for C#, Erlang, Perl, Tcl and Visual Basic implemented by object request brokers (ORBs) written for those languages. The CORBA specification dictates there shall be an ORB through which an application would interact with other objects. This is how it is implemented in practice: The application simply initializes the ORB, and accesses an internal Object Adapter, which maintains things like reference counting, object (and reference) instantiation policies, and object lifetime policies. The Object Adapter is used to register instances of the generated code classes. Generated code classes are the result of compiling the user IDL code, which translates the high-level interface definition into an OS- and language-specific class base for use by the user application. This step is necessary in order to enforce CORBA semantics and provide a clean user process for interfacing with the CORBA infrastructure. Some IDL mappings are more difficult to use than others. For example, due to the nature of Java, the IDL-Java mapping is rather straightforward and makes usage of CORBA very simple in a Java application. This is also true of the IDL to Python mapping. The C++ mapping requires the programmer to learn datatypes that predate the C++ Standard Template Library (STL). By contrast, the C++11 mapping is easier to use, but requires heavy use of the STL. Since the C language is not object-oriented, the IDL to C mapping requires a C programmer to manually emulate object-oriented features. In order to build a system that uses or implements a CORBA-based distributed object interface, a developer must either obtain or write the IDL code that defines the object-oriented interface to the logic the system will use or implement. Typically, an ORB implementation includes a tool called an IDL compiler that translates the IDL interface into the target language for use in that part of the system. A traditional compiler then compiles the generated code to create the linkable-object files for use in the application. This diagram illustrates how the generated code is used within the CORBA infrastructure: Illustration of the autogeneration of the infrastructure code from an interface defined using the CORBA IDL This figure illustrates the high-level paradigm for remote interprocess communications using CORBA. The CORBA specification further addresses data typing, exceptions, network protocols, communication timeouts, etc. For example: Normally the server side has the Portable Object Adapter (POA) that redirects calls either to the local servants or (to balance the load) to the other servers. The CORBA specification (and thus this figure) leaves various aspects of distributed system to the application to define including object lifetimes (although reference counting semantics are available to applications), redundancy/fail-over, memory management, dynamic load balancing, and application-oriented models such as the separation between display/data/control semantics (e.g. see Model–view–controller), etc. In addition to providing users with a language and a platform-neutral remote procedure call (RPC) specification, CORBA defines commonly needed services such as transactions and security, events, time, and other domain-specific interface models.

Versions history[edit] This table presents the history of CORBA standard versions.[1][2] Version Version Date Highlights 1.0 October 1991 First version, C mapping 1.1 February 1992 Interoperability, C++ mapping 1.2 December 1993 - 2.0 August 1996 First major update of the standard, also dubbed CORBA 2 2.1 August 1997 - 2.2 February 1998 Java mapping 2.3 June 1999 - 2.4 August 2000 - 2.5 September 2001 - 2.6 December 2001 - 3.0 July 2002 Second major update of the standard, also dubbed CORBA 3 CORBA Component Model (CCM) 3.0.1 November 2002 - 3.0.2 December 2002 - 3.0.3 March 2004 - 3.1 January 2008 - 3.1.1 August 2011 Adopted as 2012 edition of ISO/IEC 19500 3.2 November 2011 - 3.3 November 2012 Addition of ZIOP

Servants[edit] A servant is the invocation target containing methods for handling the remote method invocations. In the newer CORBA versions, the remote object (on the server side) is split into the object (that is exposed to remote invocations) and servant (to which the former part forwards the method calls). It can be one servant per remote object, or the same servant can support several (possibly all) objects, associated with the given Portable Object Adapter. The servant for each object can be set or found "once and forever" (servant activation) or dynamically chosen each time the method on that object is invoked (servant location). Both servant locator and servant activator can forward the calls to another server. In total, this system provides a very powerful means to balance the load, distributing requests between several machines. In the object-oriented languages, both remote object and its servant are objects from the viewpoint of the object-oriented programming. Incarnation is the act of associating a servant with a CORBA object so that it may service requests. Incarnation provides a concrete servant form for the virtual CORBA object. Activation and deactivation refer only to CORBA objects, while the terms incarnation and etherealization refer to servants. However, the lifetimes of objects and servants are independent. You always incarnate a servant before calling activate_object(), but the reverse is also possible, create_reference() activates an object without incarnating a servant, and servant incarnation is later done on demand with a Servant Manager. The Portable Object Adapter (POA) is the CORBA object responsible for splitting the server side remote invocation handler into the remote object and its servant. The object is exposed for the remote invocations, while the servant contains the methods that are actually handling the requests. The servant for each object can be chosen either statically (once) or dynamically (for each remote invocation), in both cases allowing the call forwarding to another server. On the server side, the POAs form a tree-like structure, where each POA is responsible for one or more objects being served. The branches of this tree can be independently activated/deactivated, have the different code for the servant location or activation and the different request handling policies.

Features[edit] The following describes some of the most significant ways that CORBA can be used to facilitate communication among distributed objects. Objects By Reference[edit] This reference is either acquired through a stringified Uniform Resource Locator (URL), NameService lookup (similar to Domain Name System (DNS)), or passed-in as a method parameter during a call. Object references are lightweight objects matching the interface of the real object (remote or local). Method calls on the reference result in subsequent calls to the ORB and blocking on the thread while waiting for a reply, success or failure. The parameters, return data (if any), and exception data are marshaled internally by the ORB according to the local language and OS mapping. Data By Value[edit] The CORBA Interface Definition Language provides the language- and OS-neutral inter-object communication definition. CORBA Objects are passed by reference, while data (integers, doubles, structs, enums, etc.) are passed by value. The combination of Objects-by-reference and data-by-value provides the means to enforce strong data typing while compiling clients and servers, yet preserve the flexibility inherent in the CORBA problem-space. Objects By Value (OBV)[edit] Apart from remote objects, the CORBA and RMI-IIOP define the concept of the OBV and Valuetypes. The code inside the methods of Valuetype objects is executed locally by default. If the OBV has been received from the remote side, the needed code must be either a priori known for both sides or dynamically downloaded from the sender. To make this possible, the record, defining OBV, contains the Code Base that is a space-separated list of URLs whence this code should be downloaded. The OBV can also have the remote methods. CORBA Component Model (CCM)[edit] CORBA Component Model (CCM) is an addition to the family of CORBA definitions.[3] It was introduced with CORBA 3 and it describes a standard application framework for CORBA components. Though not dependent on "language dependent Enterprise Java Beans (EJB)", it is a more general form of EJB, providing four component types instead of the two that EJB defines. It provides an abstraction of entities that can provide and accept services through well-defined named interfaces called ports. The CCM has a component container, where software components can be deployed. The container offers a set of services that the components can use. These services include (but are not limited to) notification, authentication, persistence and transaction processing. These are the most-used services any distributed system requires, and, by moving the implementation of these services from the software components to the component container, the complexity of the components is dramatically reduced. Portable interceptors[edit] Portable interceptors are the "hooks", used by CORBA and RMI-IIOP to mediate the most important functions of the CORBA system. The CORBA standard defines the following types of interceptors: IOR interceptors mediate the creation of the new references to the remote objects, presented by the current server. Client interceptors usually mediate the remote method calls on the client (caller) side. If the object Servant exists on the same server where the method is invoked, they also mediate the local calls. Server interceptors mediate the handling of the remote method calls on the server (handler) side. The interceptors can attach the specific information to the messages being sent and IORs being created. This information can be later read by the corresponding interceptor on the remote side. Interceptors can also throw forwarding exceptions, redirecting request to another target. General InterORB Protocol (GIOP)[edit] Main article: General Inter-ORB Protocol The GIOP is an abstract protocol by which Object request brokers (ORBs) communicate. Standards associated with the protocol are maintained by the Object Management Group (OMG). The GIOP architecture provides several concrete protocols, including: Internet InterORB Protocol (IIOP) – The Internet Inter-Orb Protocol is an implementation of the GIOP for use over the Internet, and provides a mapping between GIOP messages and the TCP/IP layer. SSL InterORB Protocol (SSLIOP) – SSLIOP is IIOP over SSL, providing encryption and authentication. HyperText InterORB Protocol (HTIOP) – HTIOP is IIOP over HTTP, providing transparent proxy bypassing. Zipped IOP (ZIOP) – A zipped version of GIOP that reduces the bandwidth usage. VMCID (Vendor Minor Codeset ID)[edit] Each standard CORBA exception includes a minor code to designate the subcategory of the exception. Minor exception codes are of type unsigned long and consist of a 20-bit “Vendor Minor Codeset ID” (VMCID), which occupies the high order 20 bits, and the minor code proper which occupies the low order 12 bits. Minor codes for the standard exceptions are prefaced by the VMCID assigned to OMG, defined as the unsigned long constant CORBA::OMGVMCID, which has the VMCID allocated to OMG occupying the high order 20 bits. The minor exception codes associated with the standard exceptions that are found in Table 3-13 on page 3-58 are or-ed with OMGVMCID to get the minor code value that is returned in the ex_body structure (see Section 3.17.1, “Standard Exception Definitions,” on page 3-52 and Section 3.17.2, “Standard Minor Exception Codes,” on page 3-58). Within a vendor assigned space, the assignment of values to minor codes is left to the vendor. Vendors may request allocation of VMCIDs by sending email to A list of currently assigned VMCIDs can be found on the OMG website at: The VMCID 0 and 0xfffff are reserved for experimental use. The VMCID OMGVMCID (Section 3.17.1, “Standard Exception Definitions,” on page 3-52) and 1 through 0xf are reserved for OMG use. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification (CORBA 2.3) Corba Location (CorbaLoc)[edit] Corba Location (CorbaLoc) refers to a stringified object reference for a CORBA object that looks similar to a URL. All CORBA products must support two OMG-defined URLs: "corbaloc:" and "corbaname:". The purpose of these is to provide a human readable and editable way to specify a location where an IOR can be obtained. An example of corbaloc is shown below: corbaloc:: A CORBA product may optionally support the "http:", "ftp:" and "file:" formats. The semantics of these is that they provide details of how to download a stringified IOR (or, recursively, download another URL that will eventually provide a stringified IOR). Some ORBs do deliver additional formats which are proprietary for that ORB.

Benefits[edit] CORBA's benefits include language- and OS-independence, freedom from technology-linked implementations, strong data-typing, high level of tunability, and freedom from the details of distributed data transfers. Language independence CORBA was designed to free engineers from limitations of coupling their designs to a particular software language. Currently there are many languages supported by various CORBA providers, the most popular being Java and C++. There are also C++11, C-only, SmallTalk, Perl, Ada, Ruby, and Python implementations, just to mention a few. OS-independence CORBA's design is meant to be OS-independent. CORBA is available in Java (OS-independent), as well as natively for Linux/Unix, Windows, Solaris, OS X, OpenVMS, HPUX, Android, LynxOS, VxWorks, ThreadX, INTEGRITY, and others. Freedom from technologies One of the main implicit benefits is that CORBA provides a neutral playing field for engineers to be able to normalize the interfaces between various new and legacy systems. When integrating C, C++, Object Pascal, Java, Fortran, Python, and any other language or OS into a single cohesive system design model, CORBA provides the means to level the field and allow disparate teams to develop systems and unit tests that can later be joined together into a whole system. This does not rule out the need for basic system engineering decisions, such as threading, timing, object lifetime, etc. These issues are part of any system regardless of technology. CORBA allows system elements to be normalized into a single cohesive system model. For example, the design of a multitier architecture is made simple using Java Servlets in the web server and various CORBA servers containing the business logic and wrapping the database accesses. This allows the implementations of the business logic to change, while the interface changes would need to be handled as in any other technology. For example, a database wrapped by a server can have its database schema change for the sake of improved disk usage or performance (or even whole-scale database vendor change), without affecting the external interfaces. At the same time, C++ legacy code can talk to C/Fortran legacy code and Java database code, and can provide data to a web interface. Data-typing CORBA provides flexible data typing, for example an "ANY" datatype. CORBA also enforces tightly coupled datatyping, reducing human errors. In a situation where Name-Value pairs are passed around, it is conceivable that a server provides a number where a string was expected. CORBA Interface Definition Language provides the mechanism to ensure that user-code conforms to method-names, return-, parameter-types, and exceptions. High tunability Many implementations (e.g. ORBexpress (Ada, C++, and Java implementation)[4] and OmniORB (open source C++ and Python implementation))[5] have options for tuning the threading and connection management features. Not all ORB implementations provide the same features. Freedom from data-transfer details When handling low-level connection and threading, CORBA provides a high level of detail in error conditions. This is defined in the CORBA-defined standard exception set and the implementation-specific extended exception set. Through the exceptions, the application can determine if a call failed for reasons such as "Small problem, so try again", "The server is dead" or "The reference does not make sense." The general rule is: Not receiving an exception means that the method call completed successfully. This is a very powerful design feature. Compression CORBA marshals its data in a binary form and supports compression. IONA, Remedy IT, and Telefónica have worked on an extension to the CORBA standard that delivers compression. This extension is called ZIOP and this is now a formal OMG standard.

Problems and criticism[edit] While CORBA delivered much in the way code was written and software constructed, it has been the subject of criticism.[6] Much of the criticism of CORBA stems from poor implementations of the standard and not deficiencies of the standard itself. Some of the failures of the standard itself were due to the process by which the CORBA specification was created and the compromises inherent in the politics and business of writing a common standard sourced by many competing implementors. Initial implementation incompatibilities The initial specifications of CORBA defined only the IDL, not the on-the-wire format. This meant that source-code compatibility was the best that was available for several years. With CORBA 2 and later this issue was resolved. Location transparency CORBA's notion of location transparency has been criticized; that is, that objects residing in the same address space and accessible with a simple function call are treated the same as objects residing elsewhere (different processes on the same machine, or different machines). This is a fundamental design flaw,[7][not in citation given] as it makes all object access as complex as the most complex case (i.e., remote network call with a wide class of failures that are not possible in local calls). It also hides the inescapable differences between the two classes, making it impossible for applications to select an appropriate use strategy (that is, a call with 1µs latency and guaranteed return will be used very differently from a call with 1s latency with possible transport failure, in which the delivery status is potentially unknown and might take 30s to time out). Design and process deficiencies The creation of the CORBA standard is also often cited for its process of design by committee. There was no process to arbitrate between conflicting proposals or to decide on the hierarchy of problems to tackle. Thus the standard was created by taking a union of the features in all proposals with no regard to their coherence.[8] This made the specification complex, expensive to implement entirely, and often ambiguous. A design committee composed of a mixture of implementation vendors and customers created a diverse set of interests. This diversity made difficult a cohesive standard. Standards and interoperability increased competition and eased customers' movement between alternative implementations. This led to much political fighting within the committee and frequent releases of revisions of the CORBA standard that some ORB implementors ensured were difficult to use without proprietary extensions.[6] Less ethical CORBA vendors encouraged customer lock-in and achieved strong short-term results. Over time the ORB vendors that encourage portability took over market share.[citation needed] Problems with implementations Through its history, CORBA has been plagued by shortcomings in poor ORB implementations. Unfortunately many of the papers criticizing CORBA as a standard are simply criticisms of a particularly bad CORBA ORB implementation. CORBA is a comprehensive standard with many features. Few implementations attempt to implement all of the specifications,[8] and initial implementations were incomplete or inadequate. As there were no requirements to provide a reference implementation, members were free to propose features which were never tested for usefulness or implementability. Implementations were further hindered by the general tendency of the standard to be verbose, and the common practice of compromising by adopting the sum of all submitted proposals, which often created APIs that were incoherent and difficult to use, even if the individual proposals were perfectly reasonable.[citation needed] Robust implementations of CORBA have been very difficult to acquire in the past, but are now much easier to find. The SUN Java SDK comes with CORBA built-in. Some poorly designed implementations have been found to be complex, slow, incompatible and incomplete. Robust commercial versions began to appear but for significant cost. As good quality free implementations became available the bad commercial implementations died quickly. Firewalls CORBA (more precisely, GIOP) is not tied to any particular communications transport. A specialization of GIOP is the Internet Inter-ORB Protocol or IIOP. IIOP uses raw TCP/IP connections in order to transmit data. If the client is behind a very restrictive firewall or transparent proxy server environment that only allows HTTP connections to the outside through port 80, communication may be impossible, unless the proxy server in question allows the HTTP CONNECT method or SOCKS connections as well. At one time, it was difficult even to force implementations to use a single standard port — they tended to pick multiple random ports instead. As of today, current ORBs do have these deficiencies. Due to such difficulties, some users have made increasing use of web services instead of CORBA. These communicate using XML/SOAP via port 80, which is normally left open or filtered through a HTTP proxy inside the organization, for web browsing via HTTP. Recent CORBA implementations, though, support SSL and can be easily configured to work on a single port. Some ORBS, such as TAO, omniORB and JacORB also support bidirectional GIOP, which gives CORBA the advantage of being able to use callback communication rather than the polling approach characteristic of web service implementations. Also, most modern firewalls support GIOP & IIOP and are thus CORBA-friendly firewalls.

See also[edit] Software engineering Component-based software engineering Distributed computing Portable object Service-oriented architecture (SOA) Component-based software technologies D-Bus — current open cross-language cross-platform object model GNOME Bonobo — deprecated GNOME cross-language object model KDE DCOP — deprecated KDE interprocess and software componentry communication system KDE KParts — KDE component framework Component Object Model (COM) — Microsoft Windows-only cross-language object model DCOM (Distributed COM) — extension making COM able to work in networks Common Language Infrastructure — Current .NET cross-language cross-platform object model XPCOM (Cross Platform Component Object Model) — developed by Mozilla for applications based on it (e.g. Mozilla Application Suite, SeaMonkey 1.x) IBM System Object Model SOM and DSOM — component systems from IBM used in OS/2 and AIX Internet Communications Engine (ICE) Java remote method invocation (Java RMI) Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE) JavaBean OpenAIR Remote procedure call (RPC) Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Software Communications Architecture (SCA) — components for embedded systems, cross-language, cross-transport, cross-platform Language bindings Language binding Foreign function interface Calling convention Name mangling Application programming interface - API Application binary interface - ABI Comparison of application virtual machines SWIG opensource automatic interfaces bindings generator from many languages to many languages

References[edit] ^ "History of CORBA". Object Management Group. Retrieved 2017-03-12.  ^ "History of CORBA". Object Management Group. Retrieved 2017-06-04.  ^ "The CORBA Component Model". Dr. Dobb's Journal. 2004-09-01. Retrieved 2017-03-13.  ^ "ORBexpress : Real-time CORBA ORB".  ^ "omniORB : Free CORBA ORB". Retrieved 9 January 2014.  ^ a b Chappel, David (May 1998). "Trouble with CORBA". Archived from the original on 3 Dec 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2010.  ^ Waldo, Jim; Geoff Wyant; Ann Wollrath; Sam Kendall (November 1994). "A Note on Distributed Computing" (PDF). Sun Microsystem Laboratories. Retrieved 4 November 2013.  ^ a b Henning, Michi (30 June 2006). "The Rise and Fall of CORBA". ACM Queue. Association for Computing Machinery. 4 (5). Retrieved 15 March 2010. 

Further reading[edit] "The official CORBA standard from the OMG group".  Orfali, Robert. The Essential Client/Server Survival Guide. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-15325-7.  Orfali, Robert; Harkey, Dan; Edwards, Jeri. The Essential Distributed Objects Survival Guide. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-12993-3.  Orfali, Robert; Harkey, Dan. Client/Server Programming with JAVA and CORBA. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-24578-X.  Slama, Dirk; Garbis, Jason; Russell, Perry. Enterprise CORBA. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-083963-9.  Henning, Michi; Vinoski, Steve. Advanced CORBA Programming with C++. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-37927-9.  Korthaus, Axel; Schader, Martin; Aleksy, Markus. Implementing Distributed Systems with Java and CORBA. Springer. ISBN 3-540-24173-6.  Bolton, Fintan. Pure Corba. Sams Publishing. ISBN 0-672-31812-1.  Siegel, Jon. CORBA 3 - Fundamentals and Programming. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-29518-3.  Zahavi, Ron. Enterprise Application Integration with CORBA: Component and Web-Based Solutions. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-32720-4.  Hartman, Bret; Beznosov, Konstantin; Vinoski, Steve; Flinn, Donald. Enterprise Security with EJB and CORBA. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-40131-5.  Mowbray, Thomas J.; Zahavi, Ron. The Essential Corba: System Integration Using Distributed Objects. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-10611-9.  Rosen, Michael; Curtis, David. Integrating CORBA and COM Applications. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-19827-7.  Brose, Gerald; Vogel, Andreas; Duddy, Keith. Java Programming with CORBA. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-37681-7.  Schettino, John; Hohman, Robin S.; O'Hara, Liz. CORBA For Dummies. Hungry Minds. ISBN 0-7645-0308-1.  Rosenberger, Jeremy L. Teach Yourself CORBA in 14 Days. Sams Publishing. ISBN 0-672-31208-5.  Siegel, Jon. Quick CORBA 3. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-38935-8.  Mowbray, Thomas J.; Malveau, Raphael C. CORBA Design Patterns. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-15882-8.  Orfali, Robert; Harkey, Dan; Edwards, Jeri. Instant CORBA. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-18333-4.  Harmon, Paul; Morrissey, William (1996). The Object Technology Casebook. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-14717-6. 

External links[edit] Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: CORBA Programming Official OMG CORBA Components page Unofficial CORBA Component Model page Comparing IDL to C++ with IDL to C++11 Corba: Gone But (Hopefully) Not Forgotten OMG XMI Specification v t e ISO standards by standard number List of ISO standards / ISO romanizations / IEC standards 1–9999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 16 31 -0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 128 216 217 226 228 233 259 269 302 306 428 518 519 639 -1 -2 -3 -5 -6 646 690 732 764 843 898 965 1000 1004 1007 1073-1 1413 1538 1745 1989 2014 2015 2022 2047 2108 2145 2146 2240 2281 2709 2711 2788 2848 2852 3029 3103 3166 -1 -2 -3 3297 3307 3602 3864 3901 3977 4031 4157 4217 4909 5218 5428 5775 5776 5800 5964 6166 6344 6346 6385 6425 6429 6438 6523 6709 7001 7002 7098 7185 7200 7498 7736 7810 7811 7812 7813 7816 8000 8178 8217 8571 8583 8601 8632 8652 8691 8807 8820-5 8859 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -8-I -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 8879 9000/9001 9075 9126 9293 9241 9362 9407 9506 9529 9564 9594 9660 9897 9899 9945 9984 9985 9995 10000–19999 10005 10006 10007 10116 10118-3 10160 10161 10165 10179 10206 10218 10303 -11 -21 -22 -28 -238 10383 10487 10585 10589 10646 10664 10746 10861 10957 10962 10967 11073 11170 11179 11404 11544 11783 11784 11785 11801 11898 11940 (-2) 11941 11941 (TR) 11992 12006 12182 12207 12234-2 13211 -1 -2 13216 13250 13399 13406-2 13450 13485 13490 13567 13568 13584 13616 14000 14031 14224 14289 14396 14443 14496 -2 -3 -6 -10 -11 -12 -14 -17 -20 14644 14649 14651 14698 14750 14764 14882 14971 15022 15189 15288 15291 15292 15398 15408 15444 -3 15445 15438 15504 15511 15686 15693 15706 -2 15707 15897 15919 15924 15926 15926 WIP 15930 16023 16262 16612-2 16750 16949 (TS) 17024 17025 17100 17203 17369 17442 17799 18000 18004 18014 18245 18629 18916 19005 19011 19092 (-1 -2) 19114 19115 19125 19136 19439 19500 19501 19502 19503 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19600:2014 19752 19757 19770 19775-1 19794-5 19831 20000+ 20000 20022 20121 20400 21000 21047 21500 21827:2002 22000 23270 23271 23360 24517 24613 24617 24707 25178 25964 26000 26300 26324 27000 series 27000 27001 27002 27006 27729 28000 29110 29148 29199-2 29500 30170 31000 32000 38500 40500 42010 55000 80000 -1 -2 -3 Category Authority control GND: 4403709-0 Retrieved from "" Categories: Common Object Request Broker ArchitectureComponent-based software engineeringGNOMEInter-process communicationISO standardsObject-oriented programmingHidden categories: Articles lacking in-text citations from February 2009All articles lacking in-text citationsUse dmy dates from July 2011All articles with failed verificationArticles with failed verification from November 2017All articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from November 2017Articles with unsourced statements from February 2007Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages العربيةDeutschEspañolEuskaraفارسیFrançaisGaeilgeGalego한국어ItalianoКыргызчаLietuviųMagyarमराठीNederlands日本語NorskPolskiPortuguêsРусскийSlovenščinaSuomiSvenskaTürkçeУкраїнська中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 18 November 2017, at 20:30. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.404","walltime":"0.497","ppvisitednodes":{"value":2004,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":86593,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":2384,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":12,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":5,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":1,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 370.100 1 -total"," 22.57% 83.547 1 Template:Reflist"," 21.41% 79.246 19 Template:Cite_book"," 15.06% 55.751 7 Template:Cite_web"," 13.52% 50.047 1 Template:More_footnotes"," 9.12% 33.753 3 Template:Fix"," 8.46% 31.305 1 Template:Ambox"," 7.62% 28.207 1 Template:Infobox_standardref"," 6.78% 25.104 1 Template:Infobox"," 6.30% 23.328 1 Template:Authority_control"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.203","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":5735204,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1246","timestamp":"20180112010519","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":596,"wgHostname":"mw1246"});});

Common_Object_Request_Broker_Architecture - Photos and All Basic Informations

Common_Object_Request_Broker_Architecture More Links

Wikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:WikiProject Fact And Reference CheckWikipedia:When To CiteHelp:Maintenance Template RemovalObject Management GroupStandardizationObject Management GroupProgramming LanguageDistributed ObjectInterface Definition LanguageC++Java (programming Language)Ada (programming Language)C (programming Language)C++C++11COBOLJava (programming Language)Lisp (programming Language)PL/IObject PascalPython (programming Language)Ruby (programming Language)SmalltalkC Sharp (programming Language)Erlang (programming Language)PerlTclVisual BasicObject Request BrokerStandard Template LibraryEnlargePortable Object AdapterServant (CORBA)Model–view–controllerRemote Procedure CallRemote Method InvocationForwarding (object-oriented Programming)Portable Object AdapterUniform Resource LocatorDomain Name SystemRMI-IIOPA Priori And A PosterioriUniform Resource LocatorEnterprise Java BeansNotification SystemAuthenticationPersistence (computer Science)Transaction ProcessingRMI-IIOPInteroperable Object ReferenceServant (CORBA)General Inter-ORB ProtocolGeneral Inter-ORB ProtocolObject Request BrokerObject Management GroupInternetInternet Protocol SuiteSecure Sockets LayerEncryptionAuthenticationHTTPMultitier ArchitectureJava ServletTelefonicaAddress SpaceFunction CallWikipedia:VerifiabilityΜsDesign By CommitteeWikipedia:Citation NeededWikipedia:Citation NeededGeneral Inter-ORB ProtocolTCP/IPTransparent ProxyHTTPTunneling ProtocolSOCKSWeb ServicesXMLSOAPSecure Sockets LayerTAO (software)Component-based Software EngineeringDistributed ComputingPortable Object (computing)Service-oriented ArchitectureFreedesktop.orgD-BusGNOMEBonobo (GNOME)KDEDCOPKDEKDE PlatformComponent Object ModelDistributed Component Object ModelCommon Language Infrastructure.NET FrameworkXPCOMMozilla Application SuiteSeaMonkeyIBM System Object ModelOS/2AIXInternet Communications EngineJava Remote Method InvocationJava Platform, Enterprise EditionJavaBeanOpenAIRRemote Procedure CallWindows Communication FoundationSoftware Communications ArchitectureLanguage BindingForeign Function InterfaceCalling ConventionName ManglingApplication Programming InterfaceApplication Binary InterfaceComparison Of Application Virtual MachinesSWIGObject Management GroupObject Management GroupDr. Dobb's JournalACM QueueAssociation For Computing MachineryInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-15325-7International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-12993-3International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-24578-XInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-13-083963-9International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-201-37927-9International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/3-540-24173-6International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-672-31812-1International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-29518-3International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-32720-4International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-40131-5International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-10611-9Michael Rosen (enterprise Architect)International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-19827-7International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-37681-7International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-7645-0308-1International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-672-31208-5International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-38935-8International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-15882-8International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-18333-4Paul Harmon (management Author)International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-471-14717-6Template:ISO StandardsTemplate Talk:ISO StandardsInternational Organization For StandardizationList Of International Organization For Standardization StandardsList Of ISO RomanizationsList Of IEC StandardsISO 1ISO 2Preferred NumberISO 4ISO 5ISO 6ISO 7ISO 9A440 (pitch Standard)ISO 31ISO 31-0ISO 31-1ISO 31-2ISO 31-3ISO 31-4ISO 31-5ISO 31-6ISO 31-7ISO 31-8ISO 31-9ISO 31-10ISO 31-11ISO 31-12ISO 31-13ISO 128ISO 216ISO 217ISO 226British Standard Pipe ThreadISO 233ISO 259EnvelopeKappa NumberVicat Softening PointISO 428ISO 518ISO 519ISO 639ISO 639-1ISO 639-2ISO 639-3ISO 639-5ISO 639-6ISO/IEC 646ISO 690ISO 732Antimagnetic WatchISO 843ISO 898ISO 965ISO 1000Magnetic Ink Character Recognition135 FilmOCR-A FontISO 1413ALGOL 60ISO 1745ISO 1989ISO 2014ISO 2015ISO/IEC 2022ISO 2047International Standard Book NumberISO 2145ISO 2146ISO 2240Water Resistant MarkISO 2709ISO 2711ISO 2788ISO 2848ISO 2852126 FilmISO 3103ISO 3166ISO 3166-1ISO 3166-2ISO 3166-3International Standard Serial NumberISO 3307Kunrei-shiki RomanizationISO 3864International Standard Recording CodeISO 3977ISO 4031ISO 4157ISO 4217ISO/IEC 4909ISO/IEC 5218ISO 5428ISO 5775ISO 5776ISO 5800ISO 5964ISO 6166ISO 6344ISO 6346ISO 6385Water Resistant MarkANSI Escape CodeISO 6438ISO 6523ISO 6709ISO 7001ISO 7002PinyinPascal (programming Language)ISO 7200OSI ModelISO 7736ISO/IEC 7810ISO/IEC 7811ISO/IEC 7812ISO/IEC 7813ISO/IEC 7816ISO 8000ISO 8178Fuel OilFTAMISO 8583ISO 8601Computer Graphics MetafileISO/IEC 8652ISO 8691Language Of Temporal Ordering SpecificationISO/IEC 8820-5ISO/IEC 8859ISO/IEC 8859-1ISO/IEC 8859-2ISO/IEC 8859-3ISO/IEC 8859-4ISO/IEC 8859-5ISO/IEC 8859-6ISO/IEC 8859-7ISO/IEC 8859-8ISO-8859-8-IISO/IEC 8859-9ISO/IEC 8859-10ISO/IEC 8859-11ISO/IEC 8859-12ISO/IEC 8859-13ISO/IEC 8859-14ISO/IEC 8859-15ISO/IEC 8859-16Standard Generalized Markup LanguageISO 9000SQLISO/IEC 9126File Allocation TableISO 9241ISO 9362Shoe SizeManufacturing Message SpecificationISO 9529ISO 9564X.500ISO 9660ISO 9897C (programming Language)POSIXISO 9984ISO 9985ISO/IEC 9995ISO 10005ISO 10006ISO 10007ISO/IEC 10116Whirlpool (cryptography)ISO 10160ISO 10161Guidelines For The Definition Of Managed ObjectsDocument Style Semantics And Specification LanguageISO 10206ISO 10218ISO 10303EXPRESS (data Modeling Language)ISO 10303-21ISO 10303-22ISO 10303-28STEP-NCISO 10383ISO 10487ArmSCIIIS-ISUniversal Coded Character SetTorxRM-ODPMultibusInternational Standard Music NumberISO 10962ISO/IEC 10967ISO/IEEE 11073ISO 11170ISO/IEC 11179ISO/IEC 11404JBIGISO 11783ISO 11784 & 11785ISO 11784 & 11785ISO/IEC 11801ISO 11898ISO 11940ISO 11940-2ISO/TR 11941ISO/TR 11941ISO 11992ISO 12006ISO/IEC TR 12182ISO/IEC 12207Tag Image File Format / Electronic PhotographyPrologPrologPrologIsofixTopic MapsISO 13399ISO 13406-2110 FilmISO 13485ISO 13490ISO 13567Z NotationISO 13584International Bank Account NumberISO 14000ISO 14031ISO 14224PDF/UAHorsepowerISO/IEC 14443MPEG-4MPEG-4 Part 2MPEG-4 Part 3Delivery Multimedia Integration FrameworkH.264/MPEG-4 AVCMPEG-4 Part 11MPEG-4 Part 12MPEG-4 Part 14MPEG-4 Part 14MPEG-4 Part 14ISO 14644STEP-NCISO 14651ISO 14698ISO 14750Software MaintenanceC++ISO 14971ISO 15022ISO 15189ISO/IEC 15288Ada Semantic Interface SpecificationISO 15292ISO 15398Common CriteriaJPEG 2000Motion JPEG 2000HTMLPDF417ISO/IEC 15504International Standard Identifier For Libraries And Related OrganizationsISO 15686ISO/IEC 15693International Standard Audiovisual NumberISO 15706-2International Standard Musical Work CodeISO 15897ISO 15919ISO 15924ISO 15926ISO 15926 WIPPDF/XMaxiCodeECMAScriptPDF/VTISO 16750ISO/TS 16949ISO/IEC 17024ISO/IEC 17025ISO 17100:2015Open Virtualization FormatSDMXLegal Entity IdentifierISO/IEC 27002ISO/IEC 18000QR CodeISO/IEC 18014ISO 18245Process Specification LanguagePhotographic Activity TestPDF/AISO 19011ISO 19092-1ISO 19092-2ISO 19114ISO 19115Simple Feature AccessISO 19136ISO 19439Unified Modeling LanguageMeta-Object FacilityXML Metadata InterchangeUnified Modeling LanguageKnowledge Discovery MetamodelObject Constraint LanguageMeta-Object FacilityXML Metadata InterchangeBusiness Process Model And NotationISO 19600:2014ISO/IEC 19752RELAX NGISO/IEC 19770X3DISO/IEC 19794-5Cloud Infrastructure Management InterfaceISO/IEC 20000ISO 20022ISO 20121ISO 20400MPEG-21International Standard Text CodeISO 21500ISO/IEC 21827ISO 22000C Sharp (programming Language)Common Language InfrastructureLinux Standard BasePDF/ELexical Markup FrameworkISO-TimeMLCommon LogicISO 25178ISO 25964ISO 26000OpenDocumentDigital Object IdentifierISO/IEC 27000-seriesISO/IEC 27000ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27002ISO/IEC 27006International Standard Name IdentifierISO 28000ISO 29110Requirements EngineeringJPEG XROffice Open XMLRuby (programming Language)ISO 31000Portable Document FormatISO/IEC 38500Web Content Accessibility GuidelinesISO/IEC 42010ISO 55000ISO/IEC 80000ISO 80000-1ISO 80000-2ISO 80000-3Category:ISO StandardsHelp:Authority ControlIntegrated Authority FileHelp:CategoryCategory:Common Object Request Broker ArchitectureCategory:Component-based Software EngineeringCategory:GNOMECategory:Inter-process CommunicationCategory:ISO StandardsCategory:Object-oriented ProgrammingCategory:Articles Lacking In-text Citations From February 2009Category:All Articles Lacking In-text CitationsCategory:Use Dmy Dates From July 2011Category:All Articles With Failed VerificationCategory:Articles With Failed Verification From November 2017Category:All Articles With Unsourced StatementsCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From November 2017Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From February 2007Category:Wikipedia Articles With GND IdentifiersDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link