Contents 1 Schematic paradigm 2 Morphology 3 Distinction in verbs 4 First-person clusivity 4.1 Singular inclusive forms 5 Second-person clusivity 6 Third-person clusivity 7 Distribution of the clusivity distinction 8 References 9 Further reading


Schematic paradigm[edit] Sets of reference: Inclusive form (left) and exclusive form (right) Clusivity paradigms may be summarized as a two-by-two grid: Includes the addressee? Yes No Includes the speaker? Yes Inclusive we Exclusive we No you they


Morphology[edit] In some languages, the three first-person pronouns appear to be unrelated. This is the case for Chechen, which has singular so/со, exclusive txo/тхо, and inclusive vay/вай. In others, all three are related, as in Tok Pisin (an English creole spoken in Papua New Guinea) singular mi, exclusive mi-pela, and inclusive yu-mi (a compound of mi with yu "you") or yu-mi-pela. However, when only one of the plural pronouns is related to the singular, it may be either one. In some dialects of Mandarin Chinese, for example, inclusive or exclusive 我們/我们 wǒmen is the plural form of singular wǒ "I", while inclusive 咱們/咱们 zánmen is a separate root. However, in Hadza it is the inclusive, ’one-be’e, which is the plural of the singular ’ono (’one-) "I", while the exclusive ’oo-be’e is a separate root. It is not uncommon for two separate words for "I" to pluralize into derived forms having a clusivity distinction. For example, in Vietnamese the familiar word for "I" (ta) pluralizes to inclusive we (chúng ta) and the polite word for "I" (tôi) pluralizes into exclusive we (chúng tôi). In Samoan, the singular form of the exclusive pronoun is the regular word for "I", while the singular form of the inclusive pronoun may also occur on its own, in which case it also means "I", but with a connotation of appealing or asking for indulgence. In the Kunama language of Eritrea, the first person inclusive and exclusive distinction is marked on dual and plural forms of verbs, independent pronouns, and possessive pronouns.[5]


Distinction in verbs[edit] Where verbs are inflected for person, as in Australia and much of America, the inclusive-exclusive distinction can be made there as well. For example, in Passamaquoddy "I/we have it" is expressed Singular n-tíhin (first person prefix n-) Exclusive n-tíhin-èn (first person n- + plural suffix -èn) Inclusive k-tíhin-èn (inclusive prefix k- + plural -èn) In Tamil on the other hand, the two different pronouns have the same agreement on the verb.


First-person clusivity[edit] First-person clusivity is a common feature among Dravidian, Kartvelian, Caucasian,[6] Australian and Austronesian, and is also found in languages of eastern, southern, and southwestern Asia, Americas, and in some creole languages. Some African languages also make this distinction, such as the Fula language. No European language outside the Caucasus makes this distinction grammatically, but some constructions may be semantically inclusive or exclusive. Singular inclusive forms[edit] Several Polynesian languages, such as Samoan and Tongan, have clusivity with overt dual and plural suffixes in their pronouns. The lack of a suffix indicates the singular. The exclusive form is used in the singular as the normal word for "I", but the inclusive also occurs in the singular. The distinction is one of discourse: the singular inclusive has been described as the "modesty I" in Tongan, often rendered in English as one, while in Samoan its use has been described as indicating emotional involvement on the part of the speaker.


Second-person clusivity[edit] In theory, clusivity of the second person should be a possible distinction, but its existence is controversial. Some notable linguists, such as Bernard Comrie,[7] have attested that the distinction is extant in spoken natural languages, while others, such as John Henderson,[8] maintain that the human brain does not have the capacity to make a clusivity distinction in the second person. Many other linguists take the more neutral position that it could exist but is nonetheless not currently attested.[3] Clusivity in the second person is conceptually simple but nonetheless if it exists is extremely rare, unlike clusivity in the first. Hypothetical second-person clusivity would be the distinction between "you and you (and you and you ... all present)" and "you and someone else whom I am not addressing currently." These are often referred to in the literature as "2+2" and "2+3", respectively (the numbers referring to second and third person as appropriate). Horst J. Simon provides a deep analysis of second-person clusivity in his 2005 article.[3] He concludes that oft-repeated rumors regarding the existence of second-person clusivity—or indeed, any [+3] pronoun feature beyond simple exclusive we[9] – are ill-founded, and based on erroneous analysis of the data.


Third-person clusivity[edit] Obviative (abbreviated OBV) third person is a grammatical-person marking that distinguishes a non-salient (obviative) third-person referent from a more salient (proximate) third-person referent in a given discourse context. The obviative is sometimes referred to as the "fourth person".[10]


Distribution of the clusivity distinction[edit] Look up we in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. The inclusive–exclusive distinction occurs nearly universally among the Austronesian languages and the languages of northern Australia, but rarely in the nearby Papuan languages. (Tok Pisin, an English-Melanesian pidgin, generally has the inclusive–exclusive distinction, but this varies with the speaker's language background.) It is widespread in India (among the Dravidian and Munda languages, as well as in the Indo-European languages of Marathi, Rajasthani, Punjabi, Sindhi, and Gujarati, which borrowed it from Dravidian), and in the languages of eastern Siberia, such as Tungusic, from which it was borrowed into northern Mandarin Chinese. In indigenous languages of the Americas it is found in about half the languages, with no clear geographic or genealogical pattern. It is also found in a few languages of the Caucasus and Sub-Saharan Africa, such as Fulani and Khoekhoe.[11][12] It is, of course, possible in any language to express the idea of clusivity semantically, and many languages provide common forms that clarify the ambiguity of their first person pronoun (English "the rest of us", Italian noialtri). A language with a true clusivity distinction, however, does not provide a first person plural with indefinite clusivity: where the clusivity of the pronoun is ambiguous; rather, the speaker is forced to specify - by choice of pronoun or inflection - whether they are including the addressee or not. This rules out most European languages, for example. Clusivity is nonetheless a very common language feature overall. Some languages with more than one plural number make the clusivity distinction only in, for example, the dual, but not in the greater plural. Others make it in all numbers. In the table below, the plural forms are the ones preferentially listed. Examples of the clusivity distinction in specific languages Language Inclusive form Exclusive form Singular related to Notes Language family Ainu a-/an- ci-  ?? Ainu Apma kidi gema Neither Subject prefixes are ta- (incl.) and kaa(ma)- (excl.). Dual forms, derived from the plurals, also exist. Austronesian Aymara jiwasa naya Exclusive The derived form jiwasanaka of the inclusive refers to at least 3 people. Aymaran Bislama yumi mifala Both The inclusive form is derived from the second person pronoun and the first person pronoun. There are also dual and trial forms. English creole Cebuano kita kami  ?? Short forms are ta (incl.) and mi (excl.) Austronesian Chechen vai txo Neither Caucasian Daur baa biede  ?? Mongolic Evenki mit bū  ?? Tungusic Fula en, eɗen min, miɗen Exclusive (?) Examples show short & long form subject pronouns. Niger-Congo Guarani ñande ore Neither Tupi-Guarani Gujarati આપણે /aˑpəɳ(eˑ)/ અમે /əmeˑ/ Exclusive Indo-European Hadza onebee ôbee Inclusive Hadza (isolate) Hawaiian kāua (dual); kākou (plural) māua (dual); mākou (plural) Austronesian Hiligaynon kitá kamí Austronesian Ilocano datayó, sitayó dakamí, sikamí  ?? The dual inclusives datá and sitá are widely used. Austronesian Kapampangan ikatamu ikami  ?? The dual inclusive ikata is widely used. Austronesian Australian Kriol yunmi melabat Exclusive The inclusive form is derived from the second person pronoun and the first person pronoun. The exclusive form is derived from the first person sing. and the third person plural forms. There is significant dialectal and diachronic variation in the exclusive form. English creole Lakota uŋ(k)- uŋ(k)- ... -pi Neither The inclusive form has dual number. By adding the suffix "-pi" it takes the plural number. In the plural form no clusivity distinction is made. Siouan Lojban mi'o mi'a/mi Both There also exists the form ma'a, which means the speaker, listener, and others unspecified. It is of note that the first-person pronoun mi doesn't take number and can refer to any number of individuals in the same group; mi'a and mi'o are usually preferred. Constructed language Malagasy Isika Izahay – Austronesian Manchu muse be Exclusive Tungusic Malay kita kami Neither The exclusive form is hardly used in informal Indonesian in (and spreading from) Jakarta. Instead, kita is almost always used colloquially to indicate both inclusive and exclusive "we". However, in more formal circumstances (both written and spoken), the distinction is clear and well-practiced. Therefore, kami is absolutely exclusive whereas kita may generally mean both inclusive and exclusive "we" depending on the circumstances. This phenomenon is less frequently encountered in Malaysian. Austronesian Malayalam നമ്മൾ (nammaḷ) ഞങ്ങൾ (ñaṅṅaḷ) Exclusive Dravidian Mandarin 咱們 / 咱们 (zánmen) 我們 / 我们 (wǒmen) Exclusive 我们 is used both inclusively and exclusively by most speakers, especially in formal situations. Use of 咱们 is common only in northern dialects, notably Beijing dialect, and may be a Manchu influence.[13] Sino-Tibetan Marathi आपण /aˑpəɳ/ आम्ही /aˑmʱiˑ/ Exclusive Indo-European Marwari /aˑpãˑ/ /mɦẽˑ/ Exclusive Indo-European Southern Min 咱 (lán) 阮 (goán/gún) Exclusive Sino-Tibetan Newar language Jhi: sa:n (झि:सं:) Jim sa:n (जिम् सं:) Both are used as possessive pronouns Sino-Tibetan Pohnpeian kitail (plural), kita (dual) kiht (independent), se (subject) There is an independent (non-verbal) and subject (verbal) pronoun distinction. The exclusive includes both dual and plural while the independent has a dual/plural distinction Austronesian Punjabi ਆਪਾਂ (apan) ਅਸੀਂ (asin) Indo-European Quechuan languages ñuqanchik ñuqayku Both Quechuan Samoan ʻitatou ʻimatou Exclusive The dual forms are ʻitaʻua (incl.) and ʻimaʻua (excl.) Austronesian Shawnee kiilawe niilawe Exclusive The inclusive form is morphologically derived from the second person pronoun kiila. Algic Tagalog táyo kamí Neither Austronesian Tausug kitaniyu kami  ?? The dual inclusive is kita. Austronesian Tamil நாம் (nām) நாங்கள் (nāṅkaḷ) Exclusive Dravidian Telugu మనము (manamu) మేము (memu) Neither Dravidian Tetum ita ami  ?? Austronesian Tok Pisin yumipela mipela Exclusive The inclusive form is derived from the second person pronoun and the first person pronoun. There are also dual and trial forms. English creole Tupi îandé oré Inclusive Tupi-Guarani Tulu namma yenkuḷn Dravidian Vietnamese chúng ta chúng tôi Inclusive The exclusive form is derived from the polite form of I, tôi Austroasiatic


References[edit] ^ "Grammatical Features - Associativity". www.grammaticalfeatures.net.  ^ https://books.google.pl/books?id=kbg5AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77 ^ a b c Simon, Horst J. Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second person plural, in: Elena Filimonova (ed.): Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2005. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-09. Retrieved 2010-08-02.  ^ Mary Haas. 1969. "Exclusive" and "inclusive": A look at early usage. International Journal of American Linguistics 35:1-6. ^ Thompson, E. D. 1983. "Kunama: phonology and noun phrase" in M. Lionel Bender (ed.): Nilo-Saharan Language Studies, pp. 280–322. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University. ^ https://books.google.pl/books?id=RtyhAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=chechen+noun+classes&source=bl&ots=Qg7yqMUNp7&sig=RIH3yCGfhqeBICWcaEem8sf_ttA&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiBtcvB4YXUAhWM3SwKHSjuCI4Q6AEIMDAB#v=onepage&q=chechen%20noun%20classes&f=false ^ Comrie, Bernard. 1980. "Review of Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Volume 3: Word Structure (1978)". Language 56: p837, as quoted in Simon 2005. Quote: One pair of combinations not discussed is the opposition between 2nd person non-singular inclusive (i.e. including some third person) and exclusive, which is attested in Southeast Ambrym. ^ Henderson, T.S.T. 1985. "Who are we, anyway? A study of personal pronoun systems". Linguistische Berichte 98: p308, as quoted in Simon 2005. Quote: My contention is that any language which provided more than one 2nd person plural pronoun, and required the speaker to make substantial enquiries about the whereabouts and number of those referred to in addition to the one person he was actually addressing, would be quite literally unspeakable. ^ One treated example is the Ghomala' language of Western Cameroon, which has been said to have a [1+2+3] first-person plural pronoun, but a more recent analysis by Wiesemann (2003) indicates that such pronouns may be limited to ceremonial use. ^ Kibort, Anna. "Person." Grammatical Features. 7 January 2008. [1] Retrieved on 2009-10-25. ^ http://wals.info/chapter/39 World Atlas of Language Structures 39: Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction in Independent Pronouns ^ http://wals.info/chapter/40 World Atlas of Language Structures 40: Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction in Verbal Inflection ^ Matthews, 2010. "Language Contact and Chinese". In Hickey, ed., The Handbook of Language Contact, p 760.


Further reading[edit] Jim Chen, First Person Plural (analyzing the significance of inclusive and exclusive we in constitutional interpretation) Payne, Thomas E. (1997), Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-58224-5  Filimonova, Elena (eds). (2005). Clusivity: Typological and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 90-272-2974-0. v t e Lexical categories and their features Noun Abstract / Concrete Adjectival Agent Animate / Inanimate Attributive Common / Proper Countable / Mass / Collective Initial-stress-derived Relational Strong / Weak Verbal / Deverbal Verb Forms Finite / Non-finite Attributive Converb Gerund Gerundive Infinitive Participle (adjectival · adverbial) Supine Verbal noun Types Accusative Ambitransitive Andative/Venitive Anticausative Autocausative Auxiliary Captative Catenative Compound Copular Defective Denominal Deponent Ditransitive Dynamic ECM Ergative Frequentative Impersonal Inchoative Intransitive Irregular Lexical Light Modal Monotransitive Negative Performative Phrasal Predicative Preterite-present Reflexive Regular Separable Stative Stretched Strong Transitive Unaccusative Unergative Weak Adjective Collateral Demonstrative Nominalized Possessive Postpositive Adverb Genitive Conjunctive Flat Locative Interrogative Prepositional Pronominal Relative Pronoun Demonstrative Disjunctive Distributive Donkey Dummy Formal/Informal Gender-neutral Gender-specific Inclusive/Exclusive Indefinite Intensive Interrogative Objective Personal Possessive Prepositional Reciprocal Reflexive Relative Resumptive Subjective Weak Preposition/postposition Inflected Casally modulated Stranded Conjunction Determiner Article Demonstrative Interrogative Possessive Quantifier Classifier Measure word Particle Discourse Interrogative Modal Noun Possessive Complementizer Other Yes and no Copula Coverb Expletive Interjection (verbal) Preverb Pro-form Pro-sentence Pro-verb Procedure word Prop-word Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clusivity&oldid=825075069" Categories: Personal pronounsGrammatical conjugationGrammatical categories


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages BrezhonegDeutschEspañolFrançaisBahasa IndonesiaItalianoҚазақшаLa .lojban.ਪੰਜਾਬੀPolskiPortuguêsРусский中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 11 February 2018, at 09:41. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.184","walltime":"0.247","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1018,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":49832,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":675,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":15,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":0,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 157.803 1 -total"," 36.76% 58.012 1 Template:Reflist"," 27.26% 43.012 2 Template:Cite_web"," 18.42% 29.075 1 Template:Grammatical_categories"," 17.04% 26.883 1 Template:Sidebar"," 14.91% 23.521 1 Template:ISBN"," 8.82% 13.921 1 Template:Lexical_categories"," 8.29% 13.086 2 Template:Navbox"," 6.99% 11.025 1 Template:Wiktionary_pipe"," 6.90% 10.896 1 Template:Catalog_lookup_link"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.047","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":2653546,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1330","timestamp":"20180217152631","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":76,"wgHostname":"mw1271"});});


Clusivity - Photos and All Basic Informations

Clusivity More Links

Grammatical CategoryAffect (linguistics)Agent (grammar)Patient (grammar)Agreement (linguistics)AnimacyArgument (linguistics)Complement (linguistics)Adjunct (grammar)Associated MotionGrammatical AspectBoundedness (linguistics)Branching (linguistics)Grammatical CaseGrammatical ConjugationClassifier (linguistics)Comparison (grammar)Contrast (linguistics)Construct StateCount NounMass NounDative ShiftDeclensionDefinitenessEvidentialityFeature (linguistics)Focus (linguistics)Genitive ConstructionGrammatical GenderNoun ClassHonorifics (linguistics)Incorporation (linguistics)InflectionLexical AspectMarkednessMirativeLinguistic ModalityGrammatical MoodNegation (grammar)Grammatical NumberGrammatical PersonPolypersonal AgreementAffirmative And NegativePossession (linguistics)PluractionalityReciprocal (grammar)Predicate (grammar)Serial Verb ConstructionSingulativeSpecificity (linguistics)Subject (linguistics)Object (linguistics)SuffixaufnahmeGrammatical TenseTense–aspect–moodTelicityTransitivity (grammar)Topic–commentThematic RelationValency (linguistics)Voice (grammar)Volition (linguistics)Template:Grammatical CategoriesTemplate Talk:Grammatical CategoriesLinguisticsGrammatical PersonPronounVerbWeConversationLanguages Of PeruDomingo De Santo TomásEnlargeChechen LanguageTok PisinMandarin ChineseHadza LanguageVietnamese LanguageSamoan LanguageKunama LanguageLanguages Of EritreaDual (grammatical Number)Grammatical PersonMalecite-Passamaquoddy LanguageDravidian LanguagesKartvelian LanguagesNorth Caucasian LanguagesAustralian Aboriginal LanguagesAustronesian LanguagesWest AsiaAmericasCreole LanguageFula LanguageCaucasusSemanticsPolynesian LanguagesSamoan LanguageTongan LanguageDiscourse (linguistics)Bernard ComrieObviativeList Of Glossing AbbreviationsGrammatical PersonSalience (language)WiktionaryAustronesian LanguagesAustralian Aboriginal LanguagesPapuan LanguagesTok PisinPidginDravidian LanguagesMunda LanguagesIndo-European LanguagesMarathi LanguageRajasthani LanguagePunjabi LanguageSindhi LanguageGujarati LanguageSiberiaTungusic LanguagesMandarin ChineseIndigenous Languages Of The AmericasLanguages Of The CaucasusLanguages Of AfricaFula LanguageKhoekhoe LanguageAinu LanguageAinu LanguagesApma LanguageAustronesian LanguagesAymara LanguageAymaranBislamaEnglish CreoleCebuano LanguageAustronesian LanguagesChechen LanguageCaucasian LanguageDaur LanguageMongolic LanguagesEvenki LanguageTungusic LanguagesFula LanguageSubject PronounNiger-Congo LanguageGuarani LanguageTupi-Guarani LanguageGujarati LanguageIndo-European LanguagesHadza LanguageHadza LanguageHawaiian LanguageAustronesian LanguagesHiligaynon LanguageAustronesian LanguagesIlocano LanguageAustronesian LanguagesKapampangan LanguageAustronesian LanguagesAustralian Kriol LanguageEnglish CreoleLakota LanguageSiouanLojbanConstructed LanguageMalagasy LanguageAustronesian LanguagesManchu LanguageTungusic LanguagesMalay LanguageAustronesian LanguagesMalayalamDravidian LanguagesStandard ChineseManchu LanguageSino-Tibetan LanguagesMarathi LanguageIndo-European LanguagesMarwari LanguageIndo-European LanguagesSouthern MinSino-Tibetan LanguagesNewar LanguageSino-Tibetan LanguagesPohnpeian LanguageAustronesian LanguagesPunjabi LanguageIndo-European LanguagesQuechuan LanguagesQuechuan LanguagesSamoan LanguageAustronesian LanguagesShawnee LanguageAlgicTagalog LanguageAustronesian LanguagesTausug LanguageAustronesian LanguagesTamil LanguageDravidian LanguagesTelugu LanguageDravidian LanguagesTetum LanguageAustronesian LanguagesTok PisinEnglish CreoleTupi LanguageTupi-Guarani LanguageTulu LanguageDravidian LanguagesVietnamese LanguageAustroasiaticMary HaasLionel Bender (linguist)World Atlas Of Language StructuresWorld Atlas Of Language StructuresJudicial InterpretationInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-521-58224-5International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/90-272-2974-0Template:Lexical CategoriesTemplate Talk:Lexical CategoriesPart Of SpeechNounNounAdjectival Noun (disambiguation)Agent NounAnimacyNoun AdjunctCommon NounProper NounCount NounMass NounCollective NounInitial-stress-derived NounRelational NounStrong NounWeak NounVerbal NounDeverbal NounVerbFinite VerbNon-finite VerbAttributive VerbConverbGerundGerundiveInfinitiveParticipleAdjectival ParticipleAdverbial ParticipleSupineVerbal NounAccusative VerbAmbitransitive VerbAndative And VenitiveAnticausative VerbAutocausative VerbAuxiliary VerbCaptative VerbCatenative VerbCompound VerbCopula (linguistics)Defective VerbDenominal VerbDeponent VerbDitransitive VerbDynamic VerbExceptional Case-markingErgative VerbFrequentativeImpersonal VerbInchoative VerbIntransitive VerbIrregular VerbLexical VerbLight VerbModal VerbMonotransitive VerbNegative VerbPerformative VerbPhrasal VerbPredicative VerbGermanic VerbReflexive VerbRegular VerbSeparable VerbStative VerbStretched VerbGermanic Strong VerbTransitive VerbUnaccusative VerbUnergative VerbGermanic Weak VerbAdjectiveCollateral AdjectiveDemonstrativeNominalized AdjectivePossessivePostpositive AdjectiveAdverbAdverbial GenitiveConjunctive AdverbFlat AdverbLocative AdverbInterrogative WordPrepositional AdverbPronominal AdverbRelative AdverbPronounDemonstrativeDisjunctive PronounDistributive PronounDonkey PronounDummy PronounT–V DistinctionGender-neutral PronounGender-specific PronounIndefinite PronounIntensive PronounInterrogative WordObject PronounPersonal PronounPossessivePrepositional PronounReciprocal PronounReflexive PronounRelative PronounResumptive PronounSubject PronounWeak PronounPreposition And PostpositionInflected PrepositionCasally Modulated PrepositionPreposition StrandingConjunction (grammar)DeterminerArticle (grammar)DemonstrativeInterrogative WordPossessiveQuantifier (linguistics)Classifier (linguistics)Measure WordGrammatical ParticleDiscourse ParticleInterrogative WordModal ParticleNoun ParticlePossessiveComplementizerYes And NoCopula (linguistics)CoverbSyntactic ExpletiveInterjectionOnomatopoeiaPreverbPro-formPro-sentencePro-verbProcedure WordProp-wordHelp:CategoryCategory:Personal PronounsCategory:Grammatical ConjugationCategory:Grammatical CategoriesDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link